Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 283

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 280Archive 281Archive 282Archive 283Archive 284Archive 285→Archive 290

Undelete / request for information: crmnext

Firstly this page was not created by me but i have been tracking this companies progress Company website: https://www.crmnext.com/ CRMNEXT is a legitimate organization that was represented in Wikipedia. It was recently cited in leading financial paper in india http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/money/pe-giants-locked-in-a-race-to-invest-in-saas-startup-crmnext/articleshow/60402050.cms

There might have been content that may be incorrect but deleting the entire page does not make sense Link to wikidata of the page https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24807616 —NiK (talk) 09:19, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRMNEXT (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user RoySmith (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

unocoin

Unocoin Technologies Pvt Ltd has been one of the leading Bitcoin trading & merchant service provider in India for the general public. There is every right for Unocoin to own a Wikipedia page with details on the company & services offered. However, with some recent edits on the page suggested by users, we have seen that the page was deleted without any prior warnings or elaborated reasons making the visibility and authenticity of news related to the company difficult. We would request you to un-delete the page (and provide any insights on how to rectify unintentional violations of page rules). —kittusiva (talk) 12:40, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

@Kittusiva: Not done and will not be done
First, who exactly is this "we" you refer to?
Fair warning was given to the creator of the article at User talk:Baleepgain, as is customary when nominating an article for speedy deletion.
No company has "every right" to have an article on Wikipedia. Just the opposite. Companies that attempt to use Wikipedia for publicity purposes have zero right to have an article here.
The article was deleted, multiple times, in accordance with WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion). Wikipedia is not a promotion or publicity medium. Attempts to use Wikipedia in that manner will lead to article create protection (which has happened), blocking user accounts, and blacklisting the company's domain name so that it can never be used on Wikipedia.
I suggest you start over from scratch at Draft:Unocoin and submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. That is the only way an editor with a conflict of interest (like you apparently have) can publish an article here. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:GPR DRAFT

I, J.xoe, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. J.xoe (talk) 10:07, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Thomas Hayes (scientist)

Remains a person of significant public interest as a central government figure in highly public and controversial court cases. He was also chief scientist for UK government during the trial of, still to this day, the largest terrorist attack on UK soil.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.185.160.132 (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

The fact that it was deleted as both WP:G11 and WP:PROD is unusual, and should have a response from DGG (talk · contribs). Note that the requester is using an IP address that belongs to the BBC, which strangely has a bit of history of disruptive edits. Possibly the article should be restored to draft space for improvement? ~Anachronist (talk) 00:31, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
It had previously been listed for prod as " WP:1E. WP:COATRACK for Pan Am Flight 103 bombing investigation and Pan Am Flight 103 conspiracy theories ", which is the basis of the G11 (in tis case it's advocacy, not promotion) He has no notability except as a forensic scientist who was a witness at the trial. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
In that case, it's probably best to start over from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Panayiotis Kalorkoti

Wikipedia Deletion policy states that ‘If in doubt as to whether there is consensus to delete a page, administrators normally will not delete it’. I do not believe there is consensus to delete. The reason for deletion of the Panayiotis Kalorkoti page is given as: ‘On the surface, the list of external links might suggest that this subject meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines. However, many of the links are just to catalogue entries. There appears to be a lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources here. There is a small amount of local news coverage, but I haven't been able to find much else. Cordless Larry (talk) 20:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC)’ And: ‘Weak delete. On the one hand, the three exhibition reviews in local newspapers meet WP:ARTIST standard 3. On the other hand, the article is plainly WP:PROMOTION driven by an SPA. I don't think Mr Kalorkoti is encyclopedic quite yet. Matt's talk 02:03, 15 August 2017 (UTC)’.

These statements may appear reasonable but are not correct. The Wikipedia page has not been updated and does not have accurate record of sources. There are reliable and independent sources. Some example:

British Council http://collection.britishcouncil.org/search/keywords:panayiotis-kalorkoti

Imperial War Museum http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/search?query=Panayiotis+Kalorkoti&items_per_page=10

World Who’s Who http://www.worldwhoswho.com/views/browse.html?id=kal-0057

Northern Print http://www.northernprint.org.uk/whats-on/2014/03/01/panayiotis-kalorkoti-meet-the-artist.html

The Journal http://www.thejournal.co.uk/culture/theatre/the-female-form-4624776

Western Mail https://www.questia.com/article/1G1-81818041/an-artist-who-paints-in-poetry-exhibition-kalorkoti

Coventry Evening Telegraph https://www.questia.com/article/1G1-60434423/art-exhibitions-shedding-light-on-the-face-of-art

Linkedin https://uk.linkedin.com/in/panayiotis-kalorkoti-20853096

Gallery K http://www.gallerykcyprus.com/panayiotis-kalorkoti/

Saatchi Art https://www.saatchiart.com/PanKal

Artist Website www.kalorkoti.com


The ‘catalogue entries’ are supported by:

British Library http://explore.bl.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?dscnt=0&vl(174399379UI0)=any&frbg=&scp.scps=scope%3A%28BLCONTENT%29&tab=local_tab&dstmp=1330443506053&srt=rank&ct=search&mode=Basic&dum=true&tb=t&indx=1&vl(freeText0)=Panayiotis+Kalorkoti&vid=BLVU1&fn=search

National Art Library http://catalogue.nal.vam.ac.uk/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=12I08G74940A7.42113&profile=nal&uri=link=3100006~!399385~!3100001~!3100002&aspect=subtab114&menu=search&ri=2&source=~!horizon&term=Kalorkoti%2C+Panayiotis%2C+1957-+--+Exhibitions&index=NAME#focus

Baltic Library & Archive http://balticplus.uk/?search=Panayiotis+Kalorkoti

Smithsoniam Institute Library http://collections.si.edu/search/results.htm?q=Kalorkoti+Panayiotis

Rijsmuseum Library https://library.rijksmuseum.nl/cgi-bin/koha/opac-search.pl?q=Panayiotis+Kalorkoti

New York Public Library https://browse.nypl.org/iii/encore/search/C__SPanayiotis%20Kalorkoti__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=def

Yale University Research Library http://orbexpress.library.yale.edu/vwebv/search?searchArg=Panayiotis+Kalorkoti&searchCode=GKEY%5E*&limitTo=none&recCount=50&searchType=1&page.search.search.button=Search

National Library of Australia http://trove.nla.gov.au/book/result?q=subject%3A%22Kalorkoti%2C+Panayiotis%2C+1957-%22

Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/397513104580360977/

Heidelberg University Library http://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/search.cgi?sprache=ENG&query=Panayiotis%20Kalorkoti&fsubmit=ok&quelle=homepage

I ask that the page is restored and updated to some or all of the links listed.

Many thanks.

Panayiotis Kalorkoti —2.25.61.64 (talk) 13:35, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

no Declined for the time being. To put it bluntly, that is a vanity article, which existed solely for publicity purposes, primarily edited by you or your associates. Just because something qualifies for restoration due to the manner of its deletion, doesn't mean it should be restored in its current state. I could restore it to draft space for rewrite, under the condition that it be submitted for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation and passes review, which should have been done in the first place due to the conflict of interest problems in the article. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


Undeletion request for the page.

The article was not primarily edited by me or my associates. I wish to make it clear that I do not know anyone who edited the article.

As admitted the article qualifies for restoration and I ask you to restore it so it can be edited and improved.

Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.61.64 (talk) 10:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

We aren't stupid. The majority of edits in that article were by addresses in your IP address range as well as by a single-purpose-account "Pan67" who edited solely in behalf of the subject of that article. That's the majority of edits to the article. So what else should we conclude? I suggest greater transparency on your part. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:54, 16 September 2017 (UTC)


Undeletion request for the page.

I have been transparent and have made a reasonable request. I do not think you are stupid but you have made assumptions which are not correct. I repeat again that the article was not primarily edited by me or my associates. I do not know anyone who edited the article.

I ask you to restore it so it can be edited and improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.61.64 (talk) 09:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

So... The majority of edits are from your IP address range and a username that resembles your actual name, all editing in your behalf. The conclusion from that evidence is obvious.
In any case, I have seen no agreement to the conditions I offered in my first reply in this section. Do you agree to work on the article solely in draft space, and submit it for review, and refrain from making any substantive changes to the article once it is published in main space? ~Anachronist (talk) 15:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)


Undeletion request for the page.

I have repeatedly stated that the article was not primarily edited by me or my associates and that I do not know anyone who edited the article or anything about any usernames. Your assumptions are not correct since I know nothing about other IP addresses. Also there has been no consensus to delete. The administrator Cordless Larry, who originally deleted the page, states on his page ‘The discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panayiotis Kalorkoti resulted in a delete outcome, but there wasn't much discussion, so you could put in a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, as stated at the top of the discussion page. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:46, 13 September 2017 (UTC)’

I ask you again to restore the page so it can be edited and improved by you or anyone else. Finally I wish to say that I have no intention of ‘making any substantive changes to the article once it is published in main space’. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.61.64 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Please note that I am not an administrator and did not delete the article. I am a regular editor and nominated it for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. The article has been restored to Draft:Panayiotis Kalorkoti because it is unlikely to survive long in main space due to the prior deletion discussions. I have restored it to draft space subject to these conditions:
  • You or anyone associated with you may make substantial changes to the article in draft space only. Please add any prose and additional sources you mentioned above. This is an article about you, not a CV, so please refrain from including references or links to your own works. There should be references to significant coverage of you by reliable secondary sources that are independent of you.
  • The article must be submitted for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation, and pass review, before moving it to main article space. A convenient submission box has been provided at the top of the draft article, to submit the article for review when you judge it ready.
  • You or anyone associated with you must refrain from making further substantial changes to the article after it is published in main article space. When published in main space, it is still acceptable for editors with a conflict of interest to make minor corrections to spelling, grammar, and numerical figures, as well as reverting obvious vandalism and adding more citations to reliable secondary sources.
Have at it. Please also note that draft articles are deleted after six months if there has been no editing activity. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Jaydeep Sarangi image.jpg

OTRS permission received, ticket:2017091110019457. ——Guanaco 12:39, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Guanaco: For that OTRS permission to be valid, we need permission from the photographer, not the subject. That doesn't look like a self-portrait to me. Please clarify. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:55, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: Always hard to tell without seeing the image for myself. Your assessment's good enough; no need to undelete unless the uploader resolves that. —Guanaco 18:06, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
@Anachronist: We've received a new, different permission statement. I can't see the file, but the statement itself seems fine. —Guanaco 20:42, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
@Guanaco:  Done, image restored and tagged. ~Anachronist (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
@Guanaco: and it's been moved to Commons at File:Jaydeep Sarangi.jpg. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:53, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. —Guanaco 19:43, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Tres Dedos

I, Tres Dedos, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tres Dedos 16:16, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

I finished text for that page. Please, bring it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tres Dedos (talk • contribs)

@Tres Dedos: no Declined for now. This is the English Wikipedia, and that draft article isn't in English. Also go to WP:CHU/Simple to change your username first. Wikipedia doesn't allow organizations (such as bands) to have user accounts. Your username must represent only you as an individual. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:George Francis Donohue

I would like to fix the reference errors on the page and resubmit —Rattazzimedia (talk) 19:33, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. @Rattazzimedia: Go to WP:CHU/Simple to change your usernamet - Wikipedia prohibits companies to have accounts here. Your username must represent only you as an individual. After you do that, see WP:PAID for instructions on disclosing your paid editing status — a legal obligation to which you agreed when you created your account. The draft article Draft:George Francis Donohue already exists, there is nothing to undelete. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Italian Cultural Centre

The RM at Talk:Italian Cultural Centre Vancouver#Requested move 4 September 2017 was closed with consensus for the article not to be moved. I am thus requesting undeletion to avoid confusion or ambiguity. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 22:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

@GeoffreyT2000: It was deleted via WP:PROD, so I have restored it, but the article doesn't demonstrate notability. It may not survive long in main space. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Ehrenborg

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Margaret Readdy (talk) 01:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Arya Bina

I, Hmensday, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hmensday (talk) 01:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Michigan Image Reconstruction Toolbox

I, Jfessler, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jfessler (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not realize there was a time limit for working on the draft page. Now that I know that I will pursue it faster and edit it actively. I really hope that I don't lose all the work I put into it already! Jfessler (talk) 15:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Anthony Eterovich

EterovichEstate (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Death of a Bathhouse

I, Stewart Borden, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stewart Borden (talk) 19:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Los Poetas

I, OneMind604, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PhantomRaviolis (talk) 00:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:58, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

John_McCaskill.jpg

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Nhpackard (talk) 23:17, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your great work.

The file Joh_McCaskill.jpg has been deleted, with a message "Lack of licensing information". I believe I enclosed the appropriate copyright tags (from template instructions), and I had the copyright holder send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (included below; it was copied pretty much verbatim from your templates).

I request that the file be restored, and I would appreciate very much any clues regarding how to resolve the problem. (Is it my formatting of the copyright notice? Is it the form of the letter? Is it a lack of communications between permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and the managers of the file?)

Thanks in advance for any help,

Norman Packard

(Redacted)

I have redacted your email address (for your safety) and the email you had forwarded to the WMF (for the sender's safety and to limit copyright issues). This page cannot do anything until there's been a reply to it, at which point a member of WP:OTRS will request undeletion of the image here citing a ticket for it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Also note that if the file was on Wikimedia Commons, then we can do jack squat about it; Commons and Wikipedia are completely separate projects with their own admins and procedures. Everything I said above still applies, as far as I know. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:33, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
 Done, image restored and tagged. Fortunately it wasn't on Commons. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:40, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Claremont Rug Company

When updating the Bakshaish, Caucasian, Sultanabad pages I added in information for Claremont Rug Company's Rug Type Guide pages which provides scholarly information on the origin, colors, design, and rich history of these Persian Rugs. My intention was not to advertise or promote Claremont Rug Company but to give reference to where the information came from. Our page has now been deleted and I request that it please be restored and in the future, I will not add written content to corresponding pages from our website. My intention was to provide more educational information about these types of rugs to enhance the user experience when searching through Wikipedia for these rug types and then reference the source not to promote our website. Thank you. —Rug Connoisseur (talk) 01:07, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

 Not done. Almost every sentence in that article included instances of unsubstantiated puffery. It was definitely not written in a neutral manner as required by WP:NPOV. Furthermore, your use of "we" and "our website" indicates that you have an association with this company, in which case you shouldn't be creating articles in main space directly (see WP:COI). Instead, you should use your sandbox or draft space (such as Draft:Claremont Rug Company) and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation (AFC). AFC is really the only realistic venue for an editor with a conflict of interest to create an article here. Because there is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring a promotional article, it will not be restored and should be rewritten from scratch. Please start over in draft space and use AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:50, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Adam9007/How (not) to destroy me in an argument

Time for this to come back I reckon. —Adam9007 (talk) 02:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done, restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:David F. Golightly

I, Carackus, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Carackus (talk) 00:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:54, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Ratan Pratap

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Journochronicles (talk) 07:38, 21 September 2017 (UTC) Ratan Pratap is a public figure in India. An article on him was written with less sources. However, I have created a new draft with enough citations. I would request you to kindly undelete this page so I can put references and move it to mainspace again. As he is a Bollywood personality I would request admin to help me with recreation of title- Ratan Pratap.

 Not done. The article wasn't deleted for lack of sources, it was deleted for being promotional. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project to restore unambiguously promotional articles. Your draft at Draft:Ratan Pratap is almost a word-for-word verbatim copy of the deleted version, using much of the same promotional jargon. I'm willing to restore it if you submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation and it passes review. In its current state, it wouldn't, because it is not written from a neutral point of view. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan_Desbiens

Hi, it appears that the page was deleted for lack of references, but I recently updated the page 2 days ago with all references needed, I believe the person who deleted didn't check back on the updates which made it clear that the article was of notability. —205.237.66.179 (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Desbiens, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:31, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Phasmos/Christian Stavrakis

I, 96.236.136.201, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.236.136.201 (talk) 17:12, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

User:Phasmos/Mortal Remains (2013 film)

I, 96.236.136.201, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.236.136.201 (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Finn Holden

The original page was deleted because it contained images that weren't proven to not be copyrighted, but I now have pictures that I know are definitely safe to use, and I would like to redo my page. —JackIsSatan (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This page wasn't deleted because of any copyright problems with the images, although there was an image used on the page which may have been deleted for that reason. To get the article published you'll need to show that the subject meets the notability guidelines, and I sincerely doubt that'll be possible for an under 13 table tennis player. Hut 8.5 06:40, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Aaron Greene (Producer)

So I can finish and publish the page —Midgeymay (talk) 04:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Request to restore page -- Seán F. Quinn

The page for John Francis Quinn was deleted a few years ago. He was a significant figure in the Irish was of Independence. The Bureau of (Irish) Military History website has many witness statements that relay stories relates to John Francis Quinn leadership and deeds. For example: http://www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS0492.pdf#page=91 http://www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS0492.pdf#page=109 http://www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS0492.pdf#page=117 www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS0890.pdf‎ www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS0640.pdf‎ www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS1148.pdf‎ www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS1152.pdf ‎www.bureauofmilitaryhistory.ie/reels/bmh/BMH.WS0853.pdf‎

There was also a parade in his honor held in Dundalk, Ireland in the early 90s… cannot find a valid references, but looking. —74.102.212.22 (talk) 15:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seán F. Quinn, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Dennis Brown (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 18:37, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Podguide

I have no idea why this article was deleted. there were no references to companies or something. It was just an explanation of the concept of a PodGuide. Multiple other pages even reference the word PodGuide. Yes, there are companies that have podguide in the name, but the article preceded those companies and has no relation to them. WSJ has written about it https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB111957511677868386 and the very first O'Reilly book on podcasting featured the concept as well. —Neatlittlemacapps (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Hocoma

Expired PROD; completing the request on behalf of an IP editor (see Special:Diff/801861001). (I cannot see the page, so I am not sure of its chances at AfD.) —TigraanClick here to contact me 11:52, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Jedidiah Breeze

I, 70.114.145.166, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.114.145.166 (talk) 15:53, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

The Hungerford Family Foundation, Inc.

I, Cochituate, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Charlie (talk) 20:10, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done. Draft:The Hungerford Family Foundation, Inc. contained copyright violations and plagiarism from various pages at the foundation website, such as from here and here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Debris documentar

Please restore my article. I was out of home so I did not have time to contest your deletion and only saw it now. To reiterate: I translated it from the German equivalent Wiki, so, obviously, they did not have a problem vis-a-vis notability/importance over there (and I added references to reliable sources), plus, my article was approved here by another editor via the articles for creation apparatus. As for content: no, it was not vandalism. I realize the film's content is, to put it mildly, not everyone's cup of tea, yet, everything described in the text actually happened in the film. I have worked hard on this entry: Please reply ASAP. —79.183.203.120 (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

no Declined for the time being, now that it's at DRV. Re-request here depending on the outcome there. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:32, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Everyone over there says my article should be restored. Should I repost it here?--79.183.203.120 (talk) 09:05, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleter replied now and still seems very hostile for some reason: "Consider yourself lucky that I am talking to an IP address. So why did you not link to the German version? And yes they do have a problem - have you read the hat note to it? So which of the cited sources even mentions this movie? Try again via AfC if you must." Here is what I wrote back: "German version from which I translated is here. Here is the main source I cited which discusses the film at length. Four editors have by now replied over at deletion review and all said the original reasoning for deletion was spurious." You can see the original tagger's comments here.--79.183.203.120 (talk) 13:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Google, by the way, managed to cache the article before it was deleted, in case someone wants to read it.--79.183.203.120 (talk) 17:14, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
What happens if the original deleter refuses to restore the entry?--79.183.203.120 (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
That's what DRV is for. The deletion is either overturned or not. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:22, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
The original deleter replied over at deletion review. They keep ignoring the fact that I cited two sources in my article, one of whom is a book discussing the film at length. They seem to argue in bad faith, and, anyway, it's eight to one.--79.183.203.120 (talk) 12:03, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
You can stop posting here, the page isn't going to be restored through a discussion here, only deletion review. Hut 8.5 12:31, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Alishan Meerza

I, Alishanmeerza, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alishanmeerza (talk) 07:26, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

  • Not done This wasn't an articles for creation submission, it was an A7 deletion, and since the only content of the page was "Syed Alishan Meerza" there's no point restoring it anyway. Hut 8.5 12:32, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Communism (Canadian band)

I, LouisVautour, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LouisVautour (talk) 13:50, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Communism - Originally rejected because of lack of notability, not enough references. Here are several other references. 1- Article in national newspaper Globe and Mail https://www.theglobeandmail.com/arts/music/its-time-to-face-communism-the-band/article31893708/in_queue/?arc404=true 2- Another music news article detailing his notability through "his extensive association with other artists including Ron Sexsmith, Rheostatics, Feist, Tanya Tagaq, and Gord Downie" http://www.fyimusicnews.ca/articles/2016/09/13/five-questions-don-kerr-communism 3- A review from their Fuji Rock Festival performance in Japan http://fujirockexpress.net/17e/p_241 4- Don Kerr's own wikipedia page detailing his notability including his work as producer and performer with several mainstream acts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Kerr 5- Communism performed at the Artwells Fesitival in British Columbia http://www.artswells.com/aw_artist/communism —LouisVautour (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

@LouisVautour: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Hey Louis. Just some notes, outside of the canned template above. Because of the uncontroversial, un-discussed basis for the deletion, you don't need to substantiate why it should be undeleted, though it's great you're aware that good sourcing is the key to ultimate acceptance. Please be aware, though, that to demonstrate notability, it's independent, secondary sources discussing the band in some detail and not mere mentions that register. The Globe and mail and fyimusicnews have an intro, followed by an interview, the intro is secondary source material, but those parts that are Don Kerr statements are primary source material. As to the article on Don Kerr, just be aware that notability is not "inherited". This means, for example, that a company may be notable but a product of theirs may not be,. So too, here, just because Kerr is notable is not very meaningful for the band's notability—it must be demonstrated independently. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:37, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Cliff Taylor, American Actor

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —abdulfez 17:24, 23 September 2017 (UTC) Source: Spitting Image Productions /ITV Network, Central Television for Channel 4 in the United Kingdom. "Bumbledown: The Life and Times of Ronald Reagan. Airdate November 1988. Cliff Taylor credited as main voice actor.

We don't cite credits or images; see WP:Identifying reliable sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:29, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Antonov An-70/GA1

I took up the review of this GAN, but unfortunately I got busy in outreach activities and was unable to complete the review. As I am bit free now, I would like to review that. Going to WP:GAN and retaking the review will confuse the count of reviews by me in the sense it'll consider a new review by me again. To avoid that, please revert the deletion, and I'll work on. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC) —Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 03:30, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Warcon Enterprises

Contesting PROD. This label released music by a number of noteworthy acts, among them Helmet and My American Heart; I'd like to see what I can do to improve the previous version. —Chubbles (talk) 00:09, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

CHAIR OF COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS

The CHAIR OF COMPUTATIONAL MATHEMATICS article shouldn't be deleted from wikipedia because it is an alma mater for the development of ground-breaking research in the areas of Partial Differential Equations, Control Theory, Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing; key tools for technological transfer and for the interaction of Mathematics with other scientific disciplines such as Biology, Engineering, Earth and Climate Sciences. —Hector.olmedo (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:24, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

SegaSonic Cosmo Fighter

—37.217.11.42 (talk) 03:27, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Waku Waku Sonic Patrol Car

—37.217.11.42 (talk) 03:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

VisualBash

I am continuing to develop and teach about VisualBash.

Visual Bash was presented at the following conferences this year:

Visual Bash 2917-05-18 Pycon Educational Summit 2017-06-21 vmWorkshop Presentation 2017-06-11 SELF Presentation 2017-08-11 SHARE Presentation

Enter your reasoning here I am continuing to develop and teach about VisualBash. and then click the "Save page" button below —Flintiii (talk) 12:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

@Flintiii: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.—Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:33, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:LyricFind

I would like to edit this page. Could we have it userfied? Newyeager (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Viola Katherine Clemmons

I, Ainestar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ainestar (talk) 19:40, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Italian Cultural Centre

I have requested the article Italian Cultural Centre to be restored. Now, I'm requesting the talk page to be restored as well. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:12, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Gurvinder Singh gill

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Gurvinder Singh gill (talk) 02:22, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Raleigh Ringers

I, Chiapetsrcool, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chiapetsrcool (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

List of No Such Thing as a Fish episodes

This isn't just a page to link to the podcast website. The list of facts featured in each episode was very interesting and amusing to look back on. Please reinstate as it's a great shame that Wiki is removing a list of interesting facts from it's website —155.145.195.135 (talk) 10:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of No Such Thing as a Fish episodes, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Roofr : I thought I was saving a draft but it actually posted.

I didn't realize it would post my draft, I was just trying to save it so that I could go back to it the day after. Can you at least restore it to me so that I can change it and make it less ad-like. I really think that the tech behind this company is really noteable and current, they are an amazing company with a vision and I think having a page like this will help people understand the history behind it. If you can't undelete it I would love the chance to at least edit it, or even just get the words I wrote back, as I put a lot of work and research into it. When I saved it I thought I was saving a draft, and since it posted, I didn't get a chance to save it for myself. Thanks for your time. —Maziebishop (talk) 17:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

restore the deleted article

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bilalsarfrazaca (talk) 19:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:The Bristol Cable

I, Stackstackstacks, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stackstackstacks (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Voyagin

Page was deleted for notability issues, however the company in mention does fit the notability criteria - it is a venture backed start-up that saw a large acquisition by Japan's e-commerce giant Rakuten Inc. in 2015. Relevant citation sources have been added. —Jparkers (talk) 08:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Muryar Arewa

This page was proposed for deletion by a user and immediately been deleted up Wikipedia. I believed and understand the person who proposed for the deletion did that ford a personal reason as most contributions and edits by me as being followed by the user who I believed is doing that based on a personal reason. So many pages which are similar to this are existing on Wikipedia such as Naij and others. —Zubairu Dalhatu 23:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (CactusWriter (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:21, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
User contacted me by email. A (pinged) explanation of the deletion and an offer to create a draft copy have been made on my talk page. — CactusWriter (talk) 00:20, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Tetyana Ramus

I plan to cleanup the article to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view —Perohanych (talk) 08:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Or, alternatively, please e-mail me the article's code to perohanych@gmail.com --Perohanych (talk) 08:36, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Charles Doyle

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —90.253.70.99 (talk) 15:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

 Not done, nothing to do. It isn't clear what you want. Charles Doyle is a disambiguation page. There are three deleted articles with variations of the name "Charles Doyle", but none of them are eligible for restoration by request on this page. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:RoveSpier.com

I, Simonioannides, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Simonioannides (talk) 17:10, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:14, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Dinesh Sudarshan Soi

Dinesh Sudarshan Soi Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —146.196.39.214 (talk) 19:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)


person notable please keep this article.

This page is not yet deleted. Please place your argument for retention at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Sudarshan Soi. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_283&oldid=1138664440"