Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 October 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 17

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, only links two articles. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CoH (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Almost completely filled with red links. Although CoH is supposed to be 1 musician, it states two names. One of the author of the template, one to a totally different person. Fails reliability and WP:NENAN The Banner talk 20:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. WP:ILIKE - The Banner did not cite any policy why this should be deleted. If there is a policy containing a "reliability" criterion for keeping templates, please show. ChemTerm (talk) 04:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, appears to be a misunderstanding. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Country data Romania (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This page us useless: flagicon and flag are not working (image doesn't show up) Loginnigol (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, as redundant to Template:Jimi HendrixPlastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Electric Ladyland (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Typically, these types of templates are best suited for albums which have articles for every song on the album. This doesn't. However, all songs that do have articles from the album, Electric Ladyland, are already included in and linkable from the {{Jimi Hendrix}} template, making this one redundant for navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 04:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I made this with the intention of producing articles for all of the tracks on the album, which I am in the process of doing now. The links will then be removed from the main Jimi Hendrix template. I understand if it's deleted until the articles are created, but that seems redundant when the articles will be done within the next week or two. Andre666 (talk) 11:22, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The articles are usually created first then a navbox is created to aid in navigation. Please be sure that each of the song articles you are creating meet the notability requirements of WP:N and WP:NSONGS. Thanks. --StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah... delete this! :P Andre666 (talk) 14:46, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.