Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 April 26
April 26
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Unused, looping template. SuperMarioMan 22:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
Unused and arguably little potential for any use. I'm not sure that there are many articles about murders of TV characters out there. SuperMarioMan 22:54, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete; broken, obviously unused, useless. — This, that and the other (talk) 01:32, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Single-use template with no unique functionality; redundant to Template:Infobox games. SuperMarioMan 22:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This map is pretty unsuitable for a location map, since it isn't blank. I seriously doubt it'll ever be used as a location map. Michael! (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - unlikely to be used as a location map. Mikenorton (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template"
and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
Alternatives of better quality are Template:Location map Italy North, Template:Location map Italy with the "relief=1" parameter, or Template:Location map Alps. Michael! (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Location map Italy North does not have a relief version - the only reason that the template isn't being used is that links to it have recently been replaced with less useful maps. Mikenorton (talk) 13:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- If Italy North doesn't have a relief map yet, then Template:Location map Northern Italy relief should be kept temporarily. Michael! (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Transcluded from User talk:Michael!#Location map Italy North relief by Michael! (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC):
- By the way, isn't Template:Location map Alps a good alternative? Michael! (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yes that's even better than the original, well spotted - I'll update the articles accordingly - thanks. Mikenorton (talk) 19:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- By the way, isn't Template:Location map Alps a good alternative? Michael! (talk) 19:12, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Transcluded from User talk:Michael!#Location map Italy North relief by Michael! (talk) 21:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC):
- If Italy North doesn't have a relief map yet, then Template:Location map Northern Italy relief should be kept temporarily. Michael! (talk) 16:09, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template"
and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This location map template was created to demonstrate how the protected Template:Location map Italy should be updated. That is done, but this obsolete sandbox wasn't deleted, as should have happened. This template (Template:Location map Italy/sandbox) is identical to Template:Location map Italy, it is used nowhere, and it is highly unlikely it'll ever be used again. Michael! (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant. Mikenorton (talk) 17:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- This is a template sandbox. I don't see the point in deletion. --BDD (talk) 04:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:08, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template"
and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This location map template is obsolete, since there is already a much better location available: Template:Location map Italy. Besides, this template doesn't seem to be used any more. Michael! (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - unlikely to be used. Mikenorton (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:11, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template"
and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This location map template is obsolete, since there is already a much better location available: Template:Location map Italy. Besides, this template doesn't seem to be used any more. Michael! (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant. Mikenorton (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This template for a location map doesn't seem to be used any more, nor is it suitable for a location map. Michael! (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Mikenorton (talk) 18:53, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:15, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template"
and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This relief location map template is obsolete, since it is already available in Template:Location map Italy using the "relief=1" parameter. Michael! (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - redundant. Mikenorton (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- Template:TCDSB-Elem (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
A list of WP:REDLINKS to completely unnotable primary schools that we do not need articles on per WP:OUTCOMES. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- delete - WP:OUTCOMES#Schools, most are not notable and even not worth noting beyond the name. --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete, no objections Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
very weak frontend to the standard rail line template, and can be easily replaced by simple substitution (like this). Frietjes (talk) 17:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete per author approval. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:02, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
There's only one article on a work by this writer, so no need for a navbox. INeverCry 16:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- delete Frietjes (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- As creator I'm fine with that; never got round to creating other articles. Nikthestunned 18:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 04:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Reason to delete this template: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template"
and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used"
This relief location map template is obsolete, since it is already available in Template:Location map Italy South Tyrol using the "relief=1" parameter. Michael! (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- delete after replacement. Frietjes (talk) 17:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- It is replaced. This map is no longer being used. Michael! (talk) 21:17, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- delete - redundant. Mikenorton (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.