Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 1

< July 31	August 2 >

August 1

Template:Infobox United States railfanning location

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:08, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox United States railfanning location (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Some instances redundant to {{Infobox railway depot}} or {{Infobox bridge}}; suggestions for what to do with the others welcome. Only 13 transclusions. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - These locations are notable for something else. If anything, this should be a category. It is unbelievable that anyone would choose to use this trivia infobox for bridges, tunnels and major railroad facilities. Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's fair to say that the particular details of why a particular area is a good place to settle down with one's notebook and weak lemon drink is not something that a general-purpose encyclopedia requires a template for. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, I hadn't run across that one. Further to Chris' observation, this infobox doesn't even provide any railfanning details. I'm not sure what those would even be--perhaps the relative diligence of local railroad security and the property owner's photograph policies? Assuming we need a replacement at all, the missing piece might be {{Infobox railway junction}}, but I'm unconvinced. Mackensen (talk) 03:54, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kyle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:08, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kyle (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:ANEW, Not everything needs an navbox. The album does not even have an article, it is a redirect. STATic message me! 10:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This literally navigate nothing. There is only the one album, and it is a redirect back to the main article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per Whpq. Lazy Bastard Guy 20:56, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Whpq....William 14:53, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete speedily only 1 link. Banhtrung1 (talk) 03:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gypsy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisting on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 17. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gypsy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Gypsy Rose Lee (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009 Summer Deaflympics 2009 Calendar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:10, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2009 Summer Deaflympics 2009 Calendar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It doesn't have any links. Also this is a minor multi-sport event for the deaf only so this calendar template is unnecessary. Banhtrung1 (talk) 02:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It is being used in 2009 Summer Deaflympics. Using basic templates has nothing to do with the level of major or minor events. Sawol (talk) 11:57, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only used in one article. Subst it and delete it. -- 16:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Delete - no reason this template can't be rebuilt as a standard table on the one article it's used for. I don't think this is how templates are to be used. Lazy Bastard Guy 20:58, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and did it myself. Content of template has been saved. Lazy Bastard Guy 20:36, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FC Pärnu Linnameeskond squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:09, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Pärnu Linnameeskond squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unupdated. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, apparently only two of its subjects have links and do not require a navbox to aid in navigation. This is not what navboxes are for. Lazy Bastard Guy 21:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete speedily per nominator. This is an Esiliiga B team - non professional league. It is not notable. This navbox has only 1 link. Banhtrung1 (talk) 09:23, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough links to provide useful navigation. Mentoz86 (talk) 19:25, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.