Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 November 2

< November 1	November 3 >

November 2[edit]

Template:Branding timeline[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Branding timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It can fully replaced by {{Multiple image}}. Rezonansowy (talk • contribs) 22:20, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete after replacement with multiple image or gallery. Frietjes (talk) 22:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox same sex union recognition[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfy until the author has time to deploy it. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:44, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox same sex union recognition (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, partly redundant to Template:Infobox LGBT rights. eh bien mon prince (talk) 11:30, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Another appropriate template already exists. LT910001 (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep + Comment I created the template because of the proliferation of articles on same-sex union recognition by jurisdiction, usually separate from articles on general LGBT rights. I think summing up the recognition-specific points in each article is necessary for readers, as these articles can grow very big by themselves due to the usual sections growing with each development. --RayneVanDunem (talk) 21:27, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a distinct, but related topic per RayneVanDunem. Imzadi 1979 → 23:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This infobox was created over a year and half ago, but it's still not being used anywhere. Why would you want to keep it?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

move to userspace until someone has time to actually deploy it. no need to keep templates that may be used, but with no foreseeable plan to be used, in template space. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.