Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 19

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 18 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 20 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 19

[edit]

00:12:42, 19 February 2020 review of submission by M.nelson

[edit]

Hi, I'd like some advice on how to improve the page Draft:Benevity. It was moved to the draftspace for the reasons 'undersourced and promotional'. I'd like to know what steps I can take to get it article-worthy. Thank you. -M.Nelson (talk) 00:12, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

01:58:08, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Lynnglassford

[edit]


I have removed several paragraphs as well as additional references. How do I resubmit this article for publication.

I have removed several paragraphs as well as additional references. How do I resubmit this article for publication.

I submitted an article but it was rejected because the review said it was more advocacy. It is not it is history. Someone suggested I add more references and so I did. How do I ensure it is reviewed again?--Lynnglassford (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lynnglassford (talk) 02:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Read the autobiography policy and the conflict of interest policy. Do not use Wikipedia to publicize yourself. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

04:38:07, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Kebajikan111

[edit]


Kebajikan111 (talk) 04:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


all sources have been entered. not this problem the food is known or not. this is wikipedia bro, all information can be accepted to convey

04:40:07, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Kebajikan111

[edit]


Kebajikan111 (talk) 04:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


all the food that I included in the draft included part of the "Indonesian cuisine list."

@Kebajikan111: You need some additional reliable sources in both of your drafts to show that these dishes are notable. shoy (reactions) 14:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

05:34:16, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Cpjalufka

[edit]

Added more references but to no avail. His name comes up in other Wiki pages (Mastodon (band), Avenged Sevenfold (band), and Unearth (band) ) and thought this artist may have a chance at notability. The Youtube videos are him with members of Metallica and Mastodon on his artwork, but read that videos aren't viewed as reliable sources. Any thoughts? Would including the artwork in the page help, or matter? Cpjalufka (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The person may (mayyy) be notable, however you need to read the provided links about our policies on WP:RS and WP:GNG these will be a good jumping off point for improving your article. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:39:28, 19 February 2020 review of draft by Kr1shnamur

[edit]

Hi guys, Draft:The Humanitarian Society is my first draft, but was declined. I'm not sure how I can adjust the page. Please, consider it's a direct translation of https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societ%C3%A0_Umanitaria. Can you please give me a few suggestions? Thank you!

Kr1shnamur (talk) 08:39, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:58:21, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Alczix

[edit]


Hi,

Could you please give me a few tips on what specifically should I change on this page to be accepted? I was following this example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riskified to keep the information plain and basic, not commercial or corporate.

I'm willing to make any changes you suggest, but I need a little help here. Alczix (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alczix. Riskified is not a great example to imitate. That article was narrowly kept after a discussion in which four participants weighed in for delete and three recommended keep. For that topic there are multiple articles in The Wall Street Journal and The Jerusalem Post, plus ones in Globes, Mother Jones, and from Reuters. Draft:Nethone doesn't cite a single source of similar quality or weight, and the reviewer's analysis is that no such sources exist. No amount of editing can fix that problem and make the draft acceptable. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:30:49, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Brigittevandam

[edit]

Hi guys! I am not sure why my submission hasn't been accepted. I changed it a bit, to make it more from a natural view point. = Do you think it's good like this or should I make another change in order for it to get approved?

THANKS!


Brigittevandam (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The reason your article wasn't accepted is clearly outlined in the decline message on the draft page. In particular, we cannot accept biographies about livnig people without the minimum standard of inline citations. Please read the links in the decline message on the draft page. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

16:40:08, 19 February 2020 review of draft by 24.164.139.222

[edit]


Hello, this is Haruka from Gramercy Global Media. I am trying to create an official Wikipedia website, however, it has been declined for approval. I was wondering if you could give us advice on what to add and where to fix. Unfortunately, we do not have many secondary sources and links, therefore, it would be helpful if you can help us for anything on the content that we are able to edit. Thank you and have a great day!

24.164.139.222 (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't have secondary sources then your company isn't notable enough to warrant an article. Wikipedia is not a business directory or a place to promote your business. Sulfurboy (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

18:22:13, 19 February 2020 review of draft by Postmahomie

[edit]


I don't understand why this page got denied. I am making a wiki page for a rising star and have only provided facts, but it is being called a "hoax" and has been claimed to be "threatening" the subject. This is not my intention. Please let me know what changes need to be made for this page to be allowed to be published. Postmahomie (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop wasting our time. —  HELLKNOWZ   ▎TALK 18:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

21:31:20, 19 February 2020 review of submission by Akickincrowd

[edit]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Tony_%22UNK%5E6%22_Reynolds Draft:Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds

}} I believe this satisfies the rule of notability under two sections according to Wikipedia's guidelines. Please explain if those standards were overlooked or have changed? Thanks!

CREATIVE PROFESSIONAL: 1) Article includes multiple third party sources: The Atlantic, Time, Vanity Fair, MSNBC, Mother Jones. All of these sources are on Wikipedia's Reliable Sources List. (there were multiple other sources that were not on the list I chose not to include.)

2) Those articles are SPECIFICALLY about Tony Reynolds creation of the Reagan Hologram. 3) The event directly impacted the Republican National Convention, which was/is a major event. 4) From the 2012 creation by Tony Reynolds, until The Reagan Hologram was unveiled in 2018, which is verified by Wikipedia's list of reliable sources, this was not a short term happening.

ALSO OF NOTE MUSICIAN: Tony Reynolds released multiple albums on SONY. 1) Tony Reynolds charted on a verifiable national chart in the Top 5 position. 2) Charting was verified by an independent third party source. (Sirius Satellite) 3) Reynolds has released multiple albums with a major record label, SONY, which again was/is independently verifiable.

WIKIPEDIA Criteria for musicians and ensembles 2) Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart. 5) Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).

If those published Wikipedia standards were overlooked, or those standards have changed, please explain when, or what further do I need to do to provide detail for you?

Akickincrowd (talk) 21:31, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if I have rejected this in error but a Google search comes up with zero results for "Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds" and it looks to me like a hoax. If you could trim it down to only the simple sourced details, it might help. Courtesy link Draft:Tony "UNK^6" Reynolds. Theroadislong (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:33:02, 19 February 2020 review of draft by 2metiger

[edit]


I am not understanding the reason for the issue with this article. There is a Wikipedia page for Dr. Richard E. Mounce that is not as extensive as this, yet he has a page published. Please advise. The sources of the articles that have been co-written by Dr. Adatrow have been cited. They are in Pub-Med and in other journals.

Thanks for your help!


2metiger (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2metiger: The article Richard Mounce should not exist, either. I have nominated that page for deletion. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:43:31, 19 February 2020 review of submission by 84.23.209.134

[edit]


Concerning my draft submission of Jef Rens, trade union leader and deputy-director general of the ILO. You are such snobs to reject this submission. The list of references is taken from accepted submissions by others in French and Dutch. Why are they not verifiable? 84.23.209.134 (talk) 22:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered that maybe you don't know what you're doing and properly asking for help instead of insulting people you've never met, who have had nothing to do with your draft? For instance, you might ask how to provide in-line citations, and consider that maybe you should list page numbers instead of giving us barely enough info to find sources and then expecting us to read the entire thing. Gosh, that's not rude laziness on your part at all!
You do realize that this is a volunteer-run project where no member of the site has a total picture, right? Ian.thomson (talk) 23:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

23:33:21, 19 February 2020 review of draft by Gabbya2020

[edit]


I recently created a page that got declined due to it reading too much like an advertisement. What are some ways that I could fix this? Gabbya2020 (talk) 23:33, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The best way to fix it is to do some reading. In particular, review the links provided in the decline message. This is the greatest resource on figuring out how to re-word an article. We are happy to help if you have specific questions about your page or the policy, but generically asking us "how to fix this" is the equivalent of asking us to do your work. WP:BUILDERSulfurboy (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Gabbya2020: Annoyingly, this question has also been asked - and answered- at the Teahouse. In future, ask one question in just one place, as it really annoys volunteers who then simply waste their time answering already answered questions"! Nick Moyes (talk) 00:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_February_19&oldid=985274450"