Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Spanish military history task force/Archive 1

Welcome

Welcome welcome to a new task force! I've been noticing the absence of a Spanish task force for some time now. Question: does Portugal, being part of "Iberia before the establishment of the modern Spanish state" fall under this umbrella? Obviously, in terms of who's working on this project, and what your specialties are, it might not make that much of a difference in terms of whether or not you'll actually be working on Portuguese topics, but just in terms of project banner tagging... LordAmeth 14:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

A lot of stuff is likely to overlap, I suppose (particularly when there was a joint monarchy); but I would say that post-Reconquista Portugal should probably be considered separate, at least in theory. I was really intending for the wording to cover primarily pre-Reconquista material; perhaps the scope should be reworded somehow? Kirill Lokshin 18:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Should probably be different post-1640, given that Portuguese politics began to diverge from Spanish politics - and this became especially true in the early 19th century. JonCatalan 23:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

A lot of pre-1640 stuff will be quite different too; the colonial involvements will be markedly distinct, for one thing. A hypothetical Portuguese task force would be dealing a lot with Africa, India, the Middle East, Southeast Asia, etc., while the Spanish one would cover primarily the Americas.

As a practical point, I think that Portuguese material coming after the 12th century could be presumed separate unless there's some sort of Spanish interaction involved. Kirill Lokshin 00:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

You're probably right - if there is a Portugal task-force created then I guess any article in which the history of Spain and Portugal are closely related they can be put under both task forces. JonCatalan 04:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Military History of Spain

Anybody interested in what I proposed on the talk-page for Military History of Spain? JonCatalan 01:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Request for article on "Wilhelm Zeisser"

If the request is for a piece on Gómez, an article already exists as Wilhelm Zaisser, which seems to be the customary spelling. Roger 18:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Siege of Cádiz

Just starting the above article, any help would be appreciated I'm finding it hard to find good sources. Thanks SGGH ^speak! 15:09, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Agustín Muñoz Grandes

I'm planning on expanding his article soon, lots of key points missing. I also noticed the Spanish and English Wikipedia articles on him are radically different in what they contain. I wouldn't mind getting a little help - articles relating to Spain in WW2 are incredibly stub-like and I'm hoping to get some momentum in fixing them up. ColombianConservative 20:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Spanish military history

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

submarines General Sanjuro and General Mola

Archimede class submarine and Spanish submarine C-3 contradict each other, the first says that Archimede was renamed General Sanjuro and Torricelli was renamed General Mola, whilst the latter says that Archimede was renamed General Mola and Torricelli was renamed General Sanjuro. This contradiction requires attention. 76.66.195.190 (talk) 11:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:42, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Changes to popular pages lists

There are a few important changes to the popular pages system. A quick summary:

• The "importance" ranking (for projects that use it) will be included in the lists along with assessment.
• The default list size has been lowered to 500 entries (from 1000)
• I've set up a project on the Toolserver for the popular pages - tools:~alexz/pop/.
  • This includes a page to view the results for projects, including the in-progress results from the current month. Currently this can only show the results from a single project in one month. Features to see multiple projects or multiple months may be added later.
  • This includes a new interface for making requests to add a new project to the list.
  • There is also a form to request a change to the configuration for a project. Currently the configurable options are the size of the on-wiki list and the project subpage used for the list.
• The on-wiki list should be generated and posted in a more timely and consistent manner than before.
• The data is now retained indefinitely.
• The script used to generate the pages has changed. The output should be the same. Please report any apparent inconsistencies (see below).
• Bugs and feature requests should be reported using the Toolserver's bug tracker for "alexz's tools" - [1]

-- Mr.Z-man 00:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!

Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Just a reminder but, with about 18 hours to go until nominations close, you'll need to get your skates on if you're thinking of standing as a coordinator. The election is based on self-nominations, so please don't be shy in putting your name forward. The last elections will give you an idea of what to expect.

Otherwise, voting starts tonight at 00:01 (UTC). Any member of the project may support as many of the candidates as they wish. You should cast your votes here.

 Roger Davies ^talk 06:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! Abraham, B.S. (talk) 13:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Military history of Spain

Just to say that I've taken a stab at fleshing out the Military history of Spain article, in line with the Talk page comments there. Welcome any further edits/corrections, especially in the earlier sections (I'm more of a 17th century man myself!). Hchc2009 (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Timelines

I am trying to improve some incomplete articles on spanish military history but I´m finding problems on the fact that wikipedia considers each period of spain as a "difrent country":

Kingdom of Spain

Spanish Republic

National Faction

National Spain

Spain

The point where I want to go: Example: Spanish aviation history:

1. Pioneer period, & first use: Kingdom of Spain

2. Civil war: Two difrent airforces?: Spanish Republic National Faction

3. Franco´s period, WWII, American aid, .... National Spain

4. 1978?- present: Modern era:Spain

Who am I? to consider the above staments correct, I nead desperate HELP on how to focus this point, on how to organize the timelines; the research I´v done is stoped becuase I dont know how to traslate the information in to an article, because off this silly but important fact. --Elloza (talk) 12:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Peer review for Battle of Cartagena de Indias now open

The peer review for Battle of Cartagena de Indias is now open; all editors are invited to participate, and any input there would be appreciated! Thanks! -MBK₀₀₄ 00:35, 17 August 2010 (UTC)