Jump to content

Abortion in Taiwan: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
m Dating maintenance tags: {{Use dmy dates}}
Reference edited with ProveIt #proveit
Line 5: Line 5:
The [[Siraya people]] were observed to practice mandatory abortion by Dutch colonizers, which modern scholars have found to be part of a taboo that a women's pregnancy would adversely impact her husbands performance in war as part of a broader pattern of gendered separation until the man became recognized as an elder at the age of forty, after which it was societally permissible for his wife, often younger by a number of years, to carry a pregnancy to term. Continued influence from Dutch missionaries led to the Siraya ending this practice and allowing newlyweds to live with each other.{{sfn|Adelaar|2011|pp=12-13}}
The [[Siraya people]] were observed to practice mandatory abortion by Dutch colonizers, which modern scholars have found to be part of a taboo that a women's pregnancy would adversely impact her husbands performance in war as part of a broader pattern of gendered separation until the man became recognized as an elder at the age of forty, after which it was societally permissible for his wife, often younger by a number of years, to carry a pregnancy to term. Continued influence from Dutch missionaries led to the Siraya ending this practice and allowing newlyweds to live with each other.{{sfn|Adelaar|2011|pp=12-13}}


Abortion was made illegal in Taiwan with the start of Japanese colonization in 1895, which placed Taiwan under Japanese criminal law. Abortion continued to be outlawed in the early Republic of China period.{{sfnm|Wu|2009|1p=28|Rei|2023|2p=305}} Under the penal code of Taiwan, abortion was illegal, including in response to rape.{{sfn|Lin|2009|p=213}} However, abortion was relatively common and easy to obtain in Taiwan during this period, with a 1969 study finding that 10-20% of respondents had the procedure.{{sfn|Moskowitz|2001|p=20}} The "[[Feminism in Taiwan#The 1970s|new feminism]]" movement headed by [[Annette Lu]] saw the criminalization of abortion as a core mechanism, along with [[patronymy]], of patriarchal control over women's reproductive rights. To avoid persecution under the [[Martial law in Taiwan|martial law era]], activists argued that legalizing abortion would serve the government's population control policies.{{sfn|Chen|2016|pp=183-184}} While the Genetic Health Act was drafted in 1971, its passage was stalled for thirteen years due to "ethics concerns" until 1984, when the [[Chiang Ching-kuo]] government passed the law amid stronger feminist advocacy in the 1980s and an increased emphasis on family planning and [[eugenics|eugenicist]] measures in response to increasing fears of overpopulation.{{sfnm|Lin|2009|1pp=213-214|Chen|2016|pp=185-186}} Feminists have criticized the law's focus on eugenics, seen by the direct translation of the Chinese name being the "Eugenic Health Law", as discriminatory and lacking commitment to women's reproductive rights, as abortion is not completely decriminalized by the law and there are restrictions placed on married women and minors, who require spousal and parental consent in most cases.{{sfn|Yang|2023|p=134}} Nevertheless, abortion is available under six conditions:{{sfn|Yang|2023|pp=133-134}}
Abortion was common in premodern Taiwan (as well as China) before being made illegal when the Qing dynasty adopted a Western legal code in its later period. Abortion continued to be outlawed during the Japanese colonization, which placed Taiwan under Japanese criminal law, and the early Republic of China period.{{sfnm|Lin|2016|1p=156|Rei|2023|2p=305}} Under the penal code of Taiwan, abortion was illegal, including in response to rape.{{sfn|Lin|2009|p=213}} However, abortion was relatively common and easy to obtain in Taiwan during this period, with a 1969 study finding that 10-20% of respondents had the procedure.{{sfn|Moskowitz|2001|p=20}} The "[[Feminism in Taiwan#The 1970s|new feminism]]" movement headed by [[Annette Lu]] saw the criminalization of abortion as a core mechanism, along with [[patronymy]], of patriarchal control over women's reproductive rights. To avoid persecution under the [[Martial law in Taiwan|martial law era]], activists argued that legalizing abortion would serve the government's population control policies, at times brushing off ethical quandaries about the government's support for [[eugenics]] and portraying lower class women as "ignorant" in their reproductive decisions.{{sfn|Chen|2016|pp=183-184}} While the Genetic Health Act was drafted in 1971, its passage was stalled for thirteen years due to "ethics concerns" until 1984, when the [[Chiang Ching-kuo]] government prioritized family planning and eugenicist measures in response to increasing fears of overpopulation.{{sfn|Lin|2009|pp=213-214}} Additionally, activists had changed their campaigning the the 1980s to reflect positions of abortion as an issue of reproductive health and privacy, shifting political discourse around abortion to cover it as an issue of women's rights, and in 1984 petitioned the [[Legislative Yuan]] and the public twice with more conservative arguments to legalize abortion, which were the first feminist lobbying sessions in Taiwan.{{sfn|Chen|2016|pp=185-186}} The law's focus on eugenics, seen by the direct translation of the Chinese name being the "Eugenic Health Law", has continued to be criticized by feminists as discriminatory and lacking commitment to women's reproductive rights, as abortion is not completely decriminalized by the law and there are restrictions placed on married women and minors, who require spousal and parental consent in most cases.{{sfn|Yang|2023|p=134}}

Under the law, abortion is available under six conditions:{{sfn|Yang|2023|pp=133-134}}
* Acquisition of a "genetic, infectious or psychiatric disease detrimental to reproductive health" by the parents
* Acquisition of a "genetic, infectious or psychiatric disease detrimental to reproductive health" by the parents
* Acquisition of a genetic disease within four degrees of relational separation from either parent
* Acquisition of a genetic disease within four degrees of relational separation from either parent
Line 13: Line 15:
* Likely effect on mental health or family life
* Likely effect on mental health or family life


The law in general has been seen as an indirect legalization of abortion on request due to the vague nature of its prose.{{sfn|Lin|2016|pp=156-157}} The last condition has become the most common way to seek an abortion in Taiwan due to its ease of invocation,{{sfn|Yang|2023|p=133}} with some anti-abortion activists citing it as an obstacle to tightening restrictions on the procedure.{{sfn|Lin|2009|p=216}}
The last condition has become the most common way to seek an abortion in Taiwan due to its ease of invocation,{{sfn|Yang|2023|p=133}} and some anti-abortion activists have targeted it as an overly broad and vague.{{sfn|Lin|2009|p=216}} The legislation was amended in 2009, with a provision that would have introduced mandatory counseling and a six-day waiting period being rejected amid pushback from women's rights activists.{{sfn|Lin|2009|pp=216-217}} Religious groups attempted to reintroduce the stipulation in 2019 but failed to get enough support to put the issue on the ballot.{{sfn|Rei|2023|p=306}} In 2023, after continuing efforts from feminist organizations, an amendment abolishing the spousal consent requirement and modifying the minor consent process in line with the [[Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women]] and renaming the legislation to the "Fertility Health Law" ({{lang-zh|生育保健法}}) was drafted, but is yet to be finalized by the [[Executive Yuan]].<ref>{{cite web|first1=Stephanie|last1=Chiang|access-date=2023-08-07|title=Taiwan amendment would give married women autonomy on abortion decision|url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4334711|date=4 November 2021|website=Taiwan News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|access-date=2023-08-07|title=優生保健法修法延宕!女性生育自主權有得等 團體籲新內閣速提政院版|url=https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%84%AA%E7%94%9F%E4%BF%9D%E5%81%A5%E6%B3%95%E4%BF%AE%E6%B3%95%E5%BB%B6%E5%AE%95-%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB%E6%AC%8A%E6%9C%89%E5%BE%97%E7%AD%89-%E5%9C%98%E9%AB%94%E7%B1%B2%E6%96%B0%E5%85%A7%E9%96%A3%E9%80%9F%E6%8F%90%E6%94%BF%E9%99%A2%E7%89%88-160000618.html|date=30 January 2023|website=Yahoo News}}</ref>


The legislation was amended in 2009, with a provision that would have introduced mandatory counseling and a six-day waiting period being rejected amid pushback from women's rights activists.{{sfn|Lin|2009|pp=216-217}} Religious groups attempted to reintroduce the stipulation in 2019 but failed to get enough support to put the issue on the ballot.{{sfn|Rei|2023|p=306}} In 2023, after continuing efforts from feminist organizations, an amendment abolishing the spousal consent requirement and modifying the minor consent process in line with the [[Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women]] and renaming the legislation to the "Fertility Health Law" ({{lang-zh|生育保健法}}) was drafted, but is yet to be finalized by the [[Executive Yuan]].<ref>{{cite web|first1=Stephanie|last1=Chiang|access-date=2023-08-07|title=Taiwan amendment would give married women autonomy on abortion decision|url=https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4334711|date=4 November 2021|website=Taiwan News}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|access-date=2023-08-07|title=優生保健法修法延宕!女性生育自主權有得等 團體籲新內閣速提政院版|url=https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%84%AA%E7%94%9F%E4%BF%9D%E5%81%A5%E6%B3%95%E4%BF%AE%E6%B3%95%E5%BB%B6%E5%AE%95-%E5%A5%B3%E6%80%A7%E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2%E8%87%AA%E4%B8%BB%E6%AC%8A%E6%9C%89%E5%BE%97%E7%AD%89-%E5%9C%98%E9%AB%94%E7%B1%B2%E6%96%B0%E5%85%A7%E9%96%A3%E9%80%9F%E6%8F%90%E6%94%BF%E9%99%A2%E7%89%88-160000618.html|date=30 January 2023|website=Yahoo News}}</ref>
Unlike other countries, there is not a major debate over abortion in Taiwan. However, stigma over underage pregnancy and issues with accessing abortion for minors has stimulated a belief in "[[Mizuko kuyō#Similar practices|fetus ghosts]]", with some teenagers participating in the relatively new practice of post-abortion rituals in Buddhism and Taoism to bless the fetus after the abortion to reduce the parent's guilt and karma, which had led to numerous responses from the religious establishment for the practice.{{sfn|Lee|Chou|Chen|Weng|2014|p=2, 6}}<ref>{{cite web|last=Lin|first=Grace Cheng-Ying|access-date=2023-08-07|title=The Evolving Personhood of the Fetus: Abortion Ritual in Taiwan within the Transnational Flow|url=https://taiwaninsight.org/2019/09/12/the-evolving-personhood-of-the-fetus-abortion-ritual-in-taiwan-within-the-transnational-flow/|work=Taiwan Insight|publisher=[[University of Nottingham]]|date=12 September 2019}}</ref>

Unlike other countries, there is not a major debate over abortion in Taiwan; anti-abortion movements were largely "nonexistent" before 2002 and rose in the mid-2000s to support the proposal of mandatory counseling and waiting.{{sfn|Ho|2014|p=99}} However, stigma over underage pregnancy and issues with accessing abortion for minors has stimulated a belief in "fetus ghosts", considered a version of the Japanese concept of [[mizuko kuyō]] that gained popularity in Taiwan as a reaction the broadened availability of abortion, with some teenagers conducting Buddhist and Taoist post-abortion rituals to bless the fetus after the abortion to reduce the parent's guilt and karma, which had led to numerous responses from the religious establishment for the practice.{{sfnm|Lee et al.|2014|1p=2, 6|Lin|2016|2p=158}}


==References==
==References==
Line 23: Line 27:
* {{Cite book |last=Adelaar |first=Alexander |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5CDUYQ3S-V0C&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PA12&dq=siraya+abortion&hl=en |title=Siraya: Retrieving the Phonology, Grammar and Lexicon of a Dormant Formosan Language |date=2011-12-23 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-025296-5 |language=en}}
* {{Cite book |last=Adelaar |first=Alexander |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5CDUYQ3S-V0C&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PA12&dq=siraya+abortion&hl=en |title=Siraya: Retrieving the Phonology, Grammar and Lexicon of a Dormant Formosan Language |date=2011-12-23 |publisher=Walter de Gruyter |isbn=978-3-11-025296-5 |language=en}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chen |first=Chao-ju |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_12 |chapter=Compulsory Motherhood Challenged and Remade in the Name of Choice: Framing the Right to Choose Under Old and New Maternalism |title=Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order |date=2016 |publisher=Springer Singapore |isbn=978-981-10-1994-4 |editor-last=Lo |editor-first=Chang-fa |location=Singapore |pages=177–197 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_12 |editor-last2=Li |editor-first2=Nigel N.T. |editor-last3=Lin |editor-first3=Tsai-yu}}
* {{Cite book |last=Chen |first=Chao-ju |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_12 |chapter=Compulsory Motherhood Challenged and Remade in the Name of Choice: Framing the Right to Choose Under Old and New Maternalism |title=Legal Thoughts between the East and the West in the Multilevel Legal Order |date=2016 |publisher=Springer Singapore |isbn=978-981-10-1994-4 |editor-last=Lo |editor-first=Chang-fa |location=Singapore |pages=177–197 |language=en |doi=10.1007/978-981-10-1995-1_12 |editor-last2=Li |editor-first2=Nigel N.T. |editor-last3=Lin |editor-first3=Tsai-yu}}
* {{Cite book |last=Ho |first=Ming-sho |chapter=The resurgence of social movements under the Ma Ying-jeou government: A political opportunity structure perspective |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=SnUKBAAAQBAJ&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PT131&dq=abortion+taiwan&hl=en |title=Political Changes in Taiwan Under Ma Ying-jeou: Partisan Conflict, Policy Choices, External Constraints and Security Challenges |editor-last=Cabestan |editor-first=Jean-Pierre |editor-last2=deLisle |editor-first2=Jacques |date=2014-07-17 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-317-75508-1 |language=en}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lee |first=Tsorng-Yeh |last2=Chou |first2=Cheng-Chen |last3=Chen |first3=Chin-Mi |last4=Weng |first4=Min-Hsueh |last5=Liu |first5=Yin-Chun |date=2014-07-01 |title=The Lived Experience of Teen Girls’ Abortion in Taiwan |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014543788 |journal=SAGE Open |language=en |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=215824401454378 |doi=10.1177/2158244014543788 |issn=2158-2440}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lee |first=Tsorng-Yeh |last2=Chou |first2=Cheng-Chen |last3=Chen |first3=Chin-Mi |last4=Weng |first4=Min-Hsueh |last5=Liu |first5=Yin-Chun |date=2014-07-01 |title=The Lived Experience of Teen Girls’ Abortion in Taiwan |url=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014543788 |journal=SAGE Open |language=en |volume=4 |issue=3 |pages=215824401454378 |doi=10.1177/2158244014543788 |issn=2158-2440 | ref = {{harvid|Lee et al.|2014}}}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lin |first=Chih-Chieh |date=2009-01-01 |title=Regulating Pregnancy in Taiwan: An Analysis from an Asian Legal Feminist Using Feminist Legal Theories |url=https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol39/iss2/6 |journal=University of Baltimore Law Forum |volume=39 |issue=2}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Lin |first=Chih-Chieh |date=2009-01-01 |title=Regulating Pregnancy in Taiwan: An Analysis from an Asian Legal Feminist Using Feminist Legal Theories |url=https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/lf/vol39/iss2/6 |journal=University of Baltimore Law Forum |volume=39 |issue=2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lin |first=Grace Cheng-Ying |url=http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137525284_10 |chapter=A Regime Where the Woman’s Voice Is Heard: ''Guanluoyin'' as a Form of Abortion Ritual in Contemporary Taiwan |title= Rethinking Representations of Asian Women |date=2016 |publisher=Palgrave Macmillan US |isbn=978-1-349-57133-8 |editor-last=Ijichi |editor-first=Noriko |location=New York |pages=155–171 |language=en |doi=10.1057/9781137525284_10 |editor-last2=Kato |editor-first2=Atsufumi |editor-last3=Sakurada |editor-first3=Ryoko}}
* {{Cite book |last=Moskowitz |first=Marc L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L-79mhr0O6gC&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PA29&dq=abortion+taiwan&hl=en |title=The Haunting Fetus: Abortion, Sexuality, and the Spirit World in Taiwan |date=2001-05-01 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-2428-0 |language=en}}
* {{Cite book |last=Moskowitz |first=Marc L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L-79mhr0O6gC&newbks=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=PA29&dq=abortion+taiwan&hl=en |title=The Haunting Fetus: Abortion, Sexuality, and the Spirit World in Taiwan |date=2001-05-01 |publisher=University of Hawaii Press |isbn=978-0-8248-2428-0 |language=en}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Rei |first=Wenmay |date=2023-06-02 |title=One Culture, Two Legal Regimes: Abortion in China and Taiwan |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/zfme/69/2/article-p301_12.xml |journal=Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik |volume=69 |issue=2 |pages=301–307 |doi=10.30965/29498570-20230025 |issn=2949-8570}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Rei |first=Wenmay |date=2023-06-02 |title=One Culture, Two Legal Regimes: Abortion in China and Taiwan |url=https://brill.com/view/journals/zfme/69/2/article-p301_12.xml |journal=Zeitschrift für medizinische Ethik |volume=69 |issue=2 |pages=301–307 |doi=10.30965/29498570-20230025 |issn=2949-8570}}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Wu |first=Yan-Chiou 吳燕秋 |title=「拿掉」與「毋生」(m-sinn)-戰後台灣婦女墮胎史(1945-1984) |date=December 2009 |degree=PhD |publisher=[[National Tsing Hua University]] Institute of History |url=http://140.113.39.130/cgi-bin/gs32/hugsweb.cgi?o=dnthucdr&s=%22GH000908403%22.id.&#XXXX |lang=zh-tw}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yang |first=Chia-Ling |date=2023 |editor-last=Selberg |editor-first=Rebecca |editor2-last=Kolankiewicz |editor2-first=Marta |editor3-last=Mulinari |editor3-first=Diana |chapter=Competition and Change in the Discourse on Abortion in Taiwan |title=Struggles for Reproductive Justice in the Era of Anti-Genderism and Religious Fundamentalism |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31260-1_6 |language=en |location=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |pages=133–154 |doi=10.1007/978-3-031-31260-1_6 |isbn=978-3-031-31260-1}}
* {{Cite book |last=Yang |first=Chia-Ling |date=2023 |editor-last=Selberg |editor-first=Rebecca |editor2-last=Kolankiewicz |editor2-first=Marta |editor3-last=Mulinari |editor3-first=Diana |chapter=Competition and Change in the Discourse on Abortion in Taiwan |title=Struggles for Reproductive Justice in the Era of Anti-Genderism and Religious Fundamentalism |url=https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31260-1_6 |language=en |location=Cham |publisher=Springer International Publishing |pages=133–154 |doi=10.1007/978-3-031-31260-1_6 |isbn=978-3-031-31260-1}}


==External links==
==External links==
Official online copy of the Genetic Health Act:
* Official online copy of the Genetic Health Act: [https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070001 English translation], [https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070001 Chinese original]
* {{cite web|last=Lin|first=Grace Cheng-Ying|access-date=2023-08-07|title=The Evolving Personhood of the Fetus: Abortion Ritual in Taiwan within the Transnational Flow|url=https://taiwaninsight.org/2019/09/12/the-evolving-personhood-of-the-fetus-abortion-ritual-in-taiwan-within-the-transnational-flow/|work=Taiwan Insight|publisher=[[University of Nottingham]]|date=12 September 2019}}
* [https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070001 English translation]
* {{Cite thesis |last=Wu |first=Yan-Chiou 吳燕秋 |title=「拿掉」與「毋生」(m-sinn)-戰後台灣婦女墮胎史(1945-1984) |date=December 2009 |degree=PhD |publisher=[[National Tsing Hua University]] Institute of History |url=http://140.113.39.130/cgi-bin/gs32/hugsweb.cgi?o=dnthucdr&s=%22GH000908403%22.id.&#XXXX |lang=zh-tw}}
* [https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=L0070001 Chinese original]


{{Abortion in Asia}}
{{Abortion in Asia}}

Revision as of 01:38, 14 August 2023

Abortion in Taiwan is generally accessible through the 24th week of pregnancy under various circumstances and legally available afterwards when deemed medically necessary. It was legalized by the Genetic Health Act (Chinese: 優生保健法), enacted in 1985 and last amended in 2009, which makes abortion accessible for unmarried adult women as well as married women whose husbands are legally considered incapable or have genetic conditions in their family, while married women with a legally competent spouse and minors/adult women placed under a custodianship need to obtain consent from their spouse and guardian respectively.

History

The Siraya people were observed to practice mandatory abortion by Dutch colonizers, which modern scholars have found to be part of a taboo that a women's pregnancy would adversely impact her husbands performance in war as part of a broader pattern of gendered separation until the man became recognized as an elder at the age of forty, after which it was societally permissible for his wife, often younger by a number of years, to carry a pregnancy to term. Continued influence from Dutch missionaries led to the Siraya ending this practice and allowing newlyweds to live with each other.[1]

Abortion was common in premodern Taiwan (as well as China) before being made illegal when the Qing dynasty adopted a Western legal code in its later period. Abortion continued to be outlawed during the Japanese colonization, which placed Taiwan under Japanese criminal law, and the early Republic of China period.[2] Under the penal code of Taiwan, abortion was illegal, including in response to rape.[3] However, abortion was relatively common and easy to obtain in Taiwan during this period, with a 1969 study finding that 10-20% of respondents had the procedure.[4] The "new feminism" movement headed by Annette Lu saw the criminalization of abortion as a core mechanism, along with patronymy, of patriarchal control over women's reproductive rights. To avoid persecution under the martial law era, activists argued that legalizing abortion would serve the government's population control policies, at times brushing off ethical quandaries about the government's support for eugenics and portraying lower class women as "ignorant" in their reproductive decisions.[5] While the Genetic Health Act was drafted in 1971, its passage was stalled for thirteen years due to "ethics concerns" until 1984, when the Chiang Ching-kuo government prioritized family planning and eugenicist measures in response to increasing fears of overpopulation.[6] Additionally, activists had changed their campaigning the the 1980s to reflect positions of abortion as an issue of reproductive health and privacy, shifting political discourse around abortion to cover it as an issue of women's rights, and in 1984 petitioned the Legislative Yuan and the public twice with more conservative arguments to legalize abortion, which were the first feminist lobbying sessions in Taiwan.[7] The law's focus on eugenics, seen by the direct translation of the Chinese name being the "Eugenic Health Law", has continued to be criticized by feminists as discriminatory and lacking commitment to women's reproductive rights, as abortion is not completely decriminalized by the law and there are restrictions placed on married women and minors, who require spousal and parental consent in most cases.[8]

Under the law, abortion is available under six conditions:[9]

  • Acquisition of a "genetic, infectious or psychiatric disease detrimental to reproductive health" by the parents
  • Acquisition of a genetic disease within four degrees of relational separation from either parent
  • The pregnancy threatens the bearer's life or adversely impacts their mental/psychical health
  • Potential medical risk for teratogenesis (development of congenital abnormalities)
  • For pregnancies that resulted from rape, sexual intercourse of false premises, or with a person who cannot legally be married to the bearer
  • Likely effect on mental health or family life

The law in general has been seen as an indirect legalization of abortion on request due to the vague nature of its prose.[10] The last condition has become the most common way to seek an abortion in Taiwan due to its ease of invocation,[11] with some anti-abortion activists citing it as an obstacle to tightening restrictions on the procedure.[12]

The legislation was amended in 2009, with a provision that would have introduced mandatory counseling and a six-day waiting period being rejected amid pushback from women's rights activists.[13] Religious groups attempted to reintroduce the stipulation in 2019 but failed to get enough support to put the issue on the ballot.[14] In 2023, after continuing efforts from feminist organizations, an amendment abolishing the spousal consent requirement and modifying the minor consent process in line with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and renaming the legislation to the "Fertility Health Law" (Chinese: 生育保健法) was drafted, but is yet to be finalized by the Executive Yuan.[15][16]

Unlike other countries, there is not a major debate over abortion in Taiwan; anti-abortion movements were largely "nonexistent" before 2002 and rose in the mid-2000s to support the proposal of mandatory counseling and waiting.[17] However, stigma over underage pregnancy and issues with accessing abortion for minors has stimulated a belief in "fetus ghosts", considered a version of the Japanese concept of mizuko kuyō that gained popularity in Taiwan as a reaction the broadened availability of abortion, with some teenagers conducting Buddhist and Taoist post-abortion rituals to bless the fetus after the abortion to reduce the parent's guilt and karma, which had led to numerous responses from the religious establishment for the practice.[18]

References

  1. ^ Adelaar 2011, pp. 12–13.
  2. ^ Lin 2016, p. 156; Rei 2023, p. 305.
  3. ^ Lin 2009, p. 213.
  4. ^ Moskowitz 2001, p. 20.
  5. ^ Chen 2016, pp. 183–184.
  6. ^ Lin 2009, pp. 213–214.
  7. ^ Chen 2016, pp. 185–186.
  8. ^ Yang 2023, p. 134.
  9. ^ Yang 2023, pp. 133–134.
  10. ^ Lin 2016, pp. 156–157.
  11. ^ Yang 2023, p. 133.
  12. ^ Lin 2009, p. 216.
  13. ^ Lin 2009, pp. 216–217.
  14. ^ Rei 2023, p. 306.
  15. ^ Chiang, Stephanie (4 November 2021). "Taiwan amendment would give married women autonomy on abortion decision". Taiwan News. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  16. ^ "優生保健法修法延宕!女性生育自主權有得等 團體籲新內閣速提政院版". Yahoo News. 30 January 2023. Retrieved 7 August 2023.
  17. ^ Ho 2014, p. 99.
  18. ^ Lee et al. 2014, p. 2, 6; Lin 2016, p. 158.

Bibliography