HealthCare.gov

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Healthcare.gov)
Jump to: navigation, search
HealthCare.gov
Healthcare.gov logo.png
Web address www.healthcare.gov
Type of site health insurance marketplace
Owner U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Launched October 1, 2013; 10 months ago (2013-10-01)
Alexa rank Increase 2,350 (November 2013)
Current status Active

HealthCare.gov is a health insurance exchange website operated under the United States federal government under the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, often known as 'Obamacare'), designed to serve the residents of the thirty-six U.S. states that opted not to create their own state exchanges.[1][better source needed] The exchange facilitates the sale of private health insurance plans to residents of the United States[2] and offers subsidies to those who earn less than four times the federal poverty line. The website also assists those persons who are eligible to sign up for Medicaid, and has a separate marketplace for small businesses.

The October 1, 2013 roll-out of HealthCare.gov went through as planned, despite the concurrent partial government shutdown. However, the launch was marred by serious technological problems, making it difficult for the public to sign up for health insurance.[3] The deadline to sign up for coverage that would begin January 2014 was December 23, 2013, by which time the problems had largely been fixed. The current enrollment period deadline is the last day of March.[4] State exchanges also have had the same deadlines; their performance has been varied.[5][6][7]

The website design was overseen by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and built by a number of federal contractors, most prominently CGI Group, which received a contract valued at $292 million through 2013. Estimates that the overall cost for building the website had reached over $500 million by October 2013.[1][8][9][10][11] On July 30, 2014, the Government Accountability Office released a non-partisan study that concluded the administration did not provide "effective planning or oversight practices" in developing the HealthCare.gov website.[12]

Background and functionality[edit]

Medicaid expansion through the PPACA by state:
  Expanding Medicaid
  Not expanding Medicaid
  Still debating Medicaid expansion

The site functions as a clearing house to allow Americans to compare prices on health insurance plans in their states, to begin enrollment in a chosen plan, and to simultaneously find out if they qualify for government healthcare subsidies.[3] Visitors sign up and create their own specific user account first, listing some personal information, before receiving detailed information about what is available in their area. Designed to assist the millions of uninsured Americans, the comparison shopping features involve a visual format somewhat analogous to websites such as Amazon.com and Etsy.[2][10]

HealthCare.gov also details Medicaid options for individuals. This relates to an expansion of the long-running program undertaken as a joint effort under the PPACA.[13] The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected that the exchange would be used by an estimated seven million Americans to obtain coverage during the first year after its launch;[3] current estimates suggest that the combined figure is slightly above eight million.[14]

Development and history[edit]

President Barack Obama signed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) into law on March 23, 2010 in the East Room before a select audience of nearly 300. He stated that the health reform effort, designed after a long and acrimonious debate facing fierce opposition in the U.S. Congress to expand health insurance coverage, was based on "the core principle that everybody should have some basic security when it comes to their health care".[15] The Sunlight Foundation has stated that at least forty-seven private company contractors have been involved with the PPACA in some capacity as of fall 2013, with the measure causing a wide variety of policy changes.[2] Journalists writing for The New York Times have called the PPACA "the most expansive social legislation enacted in decades".[15]

A report by Reuters described HealthCare.gov itself as the "key" to the reform measure.[8] Development of the website's interface as well as its supporting back-end services, to make sure that the website could work to help people compare between health insurance plans, were both outsourced to private companies. The front-end of the website was developed by the startup Development Seed.[2] The back-end work was contracted out to CGI Federal Inc., a subsidiary of the Canadian IT multinational CGI Group, which subcontracted the work to other companies as is common on large government contracts.[10] CGI was also responsible for building some of the state-level healthcare exchanges, with varying levels of success (some did not open on schedule).[8]

Kathleen Sebelius and Todd Park, chief technology officer of the Department of Health.

Specifically, aspects of HealthCare.gov relating to digital identity authentication were assigned to Experian. Quality Software Services, Inc. (QSSI) also played a role. The total number of companies enlisted in the website's creation, and their names, has not been disclosed by the Department of Health and Human Services.[10] The whole effort was officially co-ordinated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), an agency that commentators such as journalists David Perera and Sean Gallagher have speculated was ill-suited to that task. Social activist and technologist Clay Johnson later said that the federal government had issues come up given that it "leans towards a write-down-all-the-requirements-then-build-to-those-requirements type of methodology" not well suited to current IT[16] especially when government contractors are focused on maximizing profits.[17]

"The firms that typically get contracts are the firms that are good at getting contracts, not typically good at executing on them," Alex Howard, a fellow at the Harvard Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation, remarked to The Verge as he evaluated the back-end of the project. In contrast, the web-magazine's journalist Adrianne Jeffries praised the successful use of an "innovative" startup business for the front-end. However, she found the overall rollout "bone-headed".[10]

The Obama administration repeatedly modified regulations and policies until summer 2013, meaning contractors had to deal with changing requirements. However, changing requirements are by no means unusual in a large, expensive custom software project; they are a well-known factor in historical project failures, and methodologies such as agile software development have been developed to cope with them. Unfortunately, regulations pertaining to large government contracts in many countries, including the United States, are not a good match for agile software development.[2]

Analysis by the Reuters news agency in mid-October stated that the total contract-based cost of building HealthCare.gov swelled threefold from its initial estimate of $93.7 million to about $292 million.[8] As pointed out later by commentators such as Mark Steyn, the CGI company has already been embroiled in a mid-2000s controversy before over contract payments. While devising the Canadian Firearms Registry, estimated costs of $2 million ballooned to about $2 billion.[18]

Launch and technical problems[edit]

Health insurance exchange functionality by state:[19]
  Creating state-operated exchanges
  Establishing state-federal partnership exchanges
  Defaulting to federal exchange

The HealthCare.gov website was launched on the scheduled date of October 1, 2013. Although the government shutdown began on the same day, HealthCare.gov was one of the federal government websites that remained open through the events. Although it appeared to be up and running normally, visitors quickly encountered numerous types of technical problems,[10][20] and, by some estimates, only 1% of interested people were able to enroll to the site in the first week of its operations.[2] Even for those that did manage to enroll, insurance providers later reported some instances of applications submitted through the site with required information missing.[21]

In Bloomberg Businessweek journalist Paul Ford summed up the issue by remarking, "Regardless of your opinions on the health-care law, this is the wrong way to make software." He also wrote, "In the meantime, it’s clear that tens of millions of dollars have been spent to launch something broken."[2] A ConsumerReports.org article re-iterated previous advice, with the group recommending for people to stay "away from HealthCare.gov for at least another month". The group stated as well, "Hopefully that will be long enough for its software vendors to clean up the mess they've made."[21]

In its third week of operations, technical problems continued. A CNN.com article highlighted the "maddeningly long wait times" as an issue.[8] A variety of other problems included broken pull-down menus that have only worked intermittently, for example.[13]

Todd Park, the U.S. chief technology officer, initially said on October 6 that the glitches were caused by unexpected high volume when the site drew 250,000 simultaneous users instead of the 50,000-60,000 expected. He claimed that the site would have worked with fewer simultaneous users. More than 8.1 million people visited the site from October 1 to 4.[13] White House officials subsequently conceded that it was not just an issue of volume, but involved software and systems design issues.[3] For example, consumers are required to create an account before being able to compare plans, and the registration process may have created a bottleneck that led to the long wait times.[22] Also, stress tests done by contractors 1 day before the launch date revealed that the site became too slow with only 1,100 simultaneous users, nowhere near even the 50,000-60,000 expected.[23]

Despite later comments, concerns about the readiness of the exchanges had been raised in March 2013, by Henry Chao, the deputy chief information officer at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), who had said that "let's just make sure it's not a third-world experience". A colleague of his, Gary Cohen, had also remarked, "Everyone recognizes that day one will not be perfect." Even by 2011, when the CMS awarded its private sector contracts, most of the PPACA regulations and implementation measures were still in flux.[8]

The New York Times and The Washington Post reported in November 2013 that the Obama administration brought in consulting firm McKinsey & Company to assess the website. Their report, delivered in March 2013, warned that the effort to build the HealthCare.gov site was falling behind and was at risk of failure unless immediate steps were taken to correct the problems.[24][25]

On October 20, 2013, President Barack Obama addressed the technical problems and other issues in a thirty-minute press conference at the White House Rose Garden, saying that there was "no excuse" for them. He remarked, "There's no sugar coating: the website has been too slow, people have been getting stuck during the application process and I think it's fair to say that nobody's more frustrated by that than I am." He also stated that a "tech surge" was underway to fix the problems.[3] The President additionally pointed out that people could instead apply through a call center or in person.[21]

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said more time was needed to get the website working properly. Carney also hinted that if the problems remained unresolved for such a long time that it prevented people from meeting their legal obligation to obtain insurance in time for the February deadline, the legal penalty for not obtaining insurance would not be applicable because the Obamacare law states that if affordable care is not available, the penalty will not be payable.[21]

So, shortly after HealthCare.gov's launch, the problems still did not affect the legal requirement for Americans to have health insurance by December 15, which remained on the books as stated.[10] However, on October 23, the effective legal deadline for applying for health insurance via HealthCare.gov without getting a penalty via the individual mandate was extended to March 31, 2014, possibly because of the problems with HealthCare.gov and some of the state healthcare exchanges (but without a de jure explanation as such given). Under current law, open enrollment for individuals ends on March 31, 2014. Those that missed the deadline will have to wait until 2015 to get assistance.[26]

The Obama administration appointed a contractor, Quality Software Services, Inc (QSSI), to coordinate the work of the fixing of the website problems. The company had already worked on the website's back-end before the website went live. As stated before, prior to the launch, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) had been playing the role of coordinator, but critics charged that it was ill-suited for such a systems integration role. The administration appointed Jeffrey Zients to act as their adviser in the matter.[27]

On October 25, Zients promised, in a conference call to the media, that the site would be working well "for the vast majority of users" by the end of November. He also claimed that 90% of visitors are now able to complete the account-creation process and actually used HealthCare.gov to compare plans. Perhaps the largest issue he faces, as he acknowledged in the call, are the error-riddled reports given to insurers, often messing up basic details such as an individual's gender.[27]

As stated before, HealthCare.gov problems have persisted even weeks after the launch. For example, a networking failure error at the related data services hub killed the website's functionality again October 28. This occurred the exact day after Health and Human Services head Kathleen Sebelius had highlighted the design of that data hub as a government success. However, state-based exchanges have mostly worked well in registering individuals during this time period, with CNN.com describing them as "largely error free".[5]

A large number of technical fixes took place through October and November, with an NPR.org report later remarking that the website seemed to be "working more smoothly." Yet, on November 13, the Obama administration revealed that fewer than 27,000 people had signed up to private health insurance through the site.[28] By November 30, more than 137,000 people had obtained health insurance through the federal website. That figure represented a strong increase, but enrollment figures are still vastly below past U.S. government forecasts.[4]

Accenture was chosen to replace CGI Group as the lead contractor for the website in January 2014.[29]

A large issue with future enrollments is dealing with the accuracy of HealthCare.gov information sent to insurance companies. As stated in an NPR.org article citing "continuing problems" with HealthCare.gov, about one in ten enrollment notices have contained a significant error. This presents a challenge for the Obama administration's target of signing up 7 million customers by the end of March, which is when the enrollment period ends.[4]

Fake websites[edit]

Before HealthCare.gov went online, there was concern about misleading or fake websites at the state or local level.[30] It was subsequently reported that over 700 fake or misleading websites have been set up.[31] In early December 2013, a third fake health insurance site was shut down in Kentucky.[32] In California, there have been demands to take down a fake or misleading healthcare website.[33]

Reception and possible ramifications[edit]

Kathleen Sebelius formally accepts her nomination as Secretary with President Obama by her side.

The technical problems were heavily criticized, and Republican representatives sent President Obama a list of questions, demanding explanations for what went wrong. Some Republicans have called for the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, to be fired, because she oversaw the planning for the site launch.[22] Former White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs described the technical problems as "excruciatingly embarrassing", and he said that some people should be fired. Scott Amey of the Project on Government Oversight pointed to the development cost ceiling being raised from $93.7 million to $292 million, and he asked: "Where was the contract oversight?"[8]

American conservative commentators such as National Review writers Jonah Goldberg and Mark Steyn have argued that the website's launch was a disaster that presages larger problems throughout the entire law, with Goldberg asserting that "the Republicans who insisted that this monstrosity had to be delayed are looking just a little bit more reasonable with every passing tick."[18][34] In a statement, the Republican National Committee (RNC) responded to President Obama's comments that the "tech surge" was code for a "spending surge" and will waste millions of dollars. Said statement also read, "The federal bureaucracy has proven itself too slow, too bloated, too incompetent, and too outdated to manage America’s health care."[35]

Speaker of the House John Boehner, a Republican Representative from Ohio, told reporters that throughout November "more Americans are going to lose their health care than are going to sign up."[36] Ohio Governor John Kasich stated on NBC's Meet the Press program on October 27 that the roll-out has "got everybody just shaking their heads". He also added that it seemed highly likely that most Ohioans would pay more on the HealthCare.gov plans. Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear counter-argued that while the website didn't work well yet that it soon would since HealthCare.gov represents "the future of health care", and he commented as well, "You know, the advice I would give the news media and the critics up here is take a deep breath."[37]

The Daily Show host Jon Stewart notably lampooned the HealthCare.gov controversy during an interview with Sebelius. He jokingly challenged her to an online race: "I'm going to try and download every movie ever made, and you're going to try to sign up for Obamacare, and we'll see which happens first." She also faced grilling over the Obama administration's opposition to an extended individual mandate delay.[38]

Sebelius later said in response to criticism, "The majority of people calling for me to resign I would say are people who I don't work for and who do not want this program to work in the first place". She also said, "I have had frequent conversations with the President and I have committed to him that my role is to get the program up and running, and we will do just that." Her popularity in her native Kansas where she previously served as governor, according to University of Kansas political science professor Burdett Loomis, has spurred her on to stay on.[38]

U.S. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a Democratic Representative from California, commented about the controversy that she feels optimistic about things being fixed, saying "I have faith in technology" as well as "while there are glitches, there are solutions, as well." Democrats in Congress have accused Republican critics of HealthCare.gov of acting in bad faith. "We want the process to improve, but we're not interested in torpedoing the process," said Representative Xavier Becerra, another Democrat from California and chairman of the House Democratic Caucus.[36]

Republican Senator Marco Rubio has drafted legislation as a result of the controversy to delay the individual mandate. He has gotten some scattered Democratic support.[34] Professor and author Victor Lombardi commented to Bloomberg Businessweek that the website's issues "don’t sound catastrophic", and he added that history "may judge this project as the catalyst that revolutionized the United States health-care system" such that "no one will remember a few hiccups at launch."[2]

Although the law that decreed the creation of HealthCare.gov has been divisive and political speculation has taken place, polling done by the Gallup organization around the time of the difficult roll-out still have found that a majority of Americans support keeping at least some aspects of Obamacare. Specifically, just 29% of the public favoured a complete repeal.[3] However, a joint The Washington Post and ABC News survey stated that 56% of respondents consider the website's problems a harbinger of other problems with the health care measure.[21]

On October 29, 2013, Rep. Lee Terry (R, NE-2) introduced the Exchange Information Disclosure Act (H.R. 3362; 113th Congress).[39] The bill would require the United States Department of Health and Human Services to submit weekly reports to Congress about the how many people are using HealthCare.gov and signing up for health insurance.[40] These reports would be due every Monday until March 31, 2015 and would be available to the public.[41] The bill would "require weekly updates on the number of unique website visitors, new accounts, and new enrollments in a qualified health plan, as well as the level of coverage," separating the data by state.[40] The bill would also require reports on efforts to fix the broken portions of the website.[40] The House was scheduled to vote on it on January 10, 2014.[42]

Kathleen Sebelius resigned as Secretary of Health and Human Services on April 10, 2014. She was replaced by Sylvia Mathews Burwell on June 9.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b David Perera (16 October 2013). "HealthCare.gov problems spark federal IT recriminations". Fierce Government IT. Retrieved 17 October 2013. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h Paul Ford (16 October 2013). "The Obamacare Website Didn't Have to Fail. How to Do Better Next Time". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved 17 October 2013. 
  3. ^ a b c d e f "Obama addresses healthcare website glitches". BBC News. 21 October 2013. Retrieved 21 October 2013. 
  4. ^ a b c Horsley, Scott (December 11, 2013). "Enrollment Jumps At HealthCare.gov, Though Totals Still Lag". NPR.org. Retrieved December 12, 2013. 
  5. ^ a b Kevin Bohn; Gregory Wallace (October 28, 2013). "Obamacare malfunction shuts down application tool". CNN.com. Retrieved October 28, 2013. 
  6. ^ http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/03/massachusetts_to_fire_technolo.html
  7. ^ http://www.oregonlive.com/health/index.ssf/2014/03/cover_oregon_feds_blast_state.html
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Begley, Sharon (17 October 2013). "As Obamacare tech woes mounted, contractor payments soared". Reuters. Retrieved 17 October 2013. 
  9. ^ We paid over $500 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404 by Andrew Couts, Digital Trends, October 8, 2013
  10. ^ a b c d e f g Adrianne Jeffries (8 October 2013). "Why Obama's HealthCare.gov launch was doomed to fail". The Verge. Retrieved 17 October 2013. 
  11. ^ "HealthCare.gov's head tech guy is out". The Washington Post. 6 November 2013. Retrieved 7 November 2013. 
  12. ^ Alonso-Zaldivar, Ricardo (July 31, 2014). "Probe exposes flaws behind HealthCare.gov rollout". AP News. Retrieved July 31, 2014. 
  13. ^ a b c Tim Mullaney (6 October 2013). "Obama adviser: Demand overwhelmed HealthCare.gov". USA Today. Retrieved 17 October 2013. 
  14. ^ http://kff.org/health-reform/state-indicator/state-marketplace-statistics/
  15. ^ a b Robert Pear; Sheryl Gay Stolberg (March 24, 2010). "Obama Signs Health Care Overhaul Into Law". The New York Times. Retrieved October 27, 2013. 
  16. ^ How HealthCare.gov Went Wrong
  17. ^ Luke Chung (7 December 2013). "Too Big to Fire: How Government Contractors on Healthcare.gov Maximize Profits". Retrieved 7 December 2013. 
  18. ^ a b Mark Steyn (October 25, 2013). "Obamacare’s Magical Thinkers". National Review. Retrieved October 26, 2013. 
  19. ^ "State Decisions For Creating Health Insurance Exchanges, as of May 28, 2013 - Table". Kaiser Family Foundation. May 28, 2013. 
    "State Decisions For Creating Health Insurance Exchanges, as of May 28, 2013 - Map". Kaiser Family Foundation. May 28, 2013. 
  20. ^ Luke Chung (1 October 2013). "HealthCare.gov is a Technological Disaster". Retrieved 1 October 2013. 
  21. ^ a b c d e Cohen, Tom (21 October 2013). "Obama: No 'sugarcoating' problems with health website". CNN. Retrieved 21 October 2013. 
  22. ^ a b Parsons, Christi; Levey, Noam (21 October 2013). "Obama on healthcare sign-up glitches: 'It's going to get fixed'". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 21 October 2013. 
  23. ^ Frank Thorp (6 November 2013). "'Stress tests' show Healthcare.gov was overloaded". NBC News. Retrieved 18 November 2013. 
  24. ^ Sharon LaFraniere; Eric Lipton (November 18, 2013). "Officials Were Warned About Health Site Woes". The New York Times. Retrieved January 4, 2014. 
  25. ^ Juliet Eilperin; Sandhya Somashekhar (November 18, 2013). "Private consultants warned of risks before HealthCare.gov’s Oct. 1 launch". The Washington Post. Retrieved January 4, 2014. 
  26. ^ Kliff, Sarah (23 October 2013). "Here’s how the White House just tweaked Obamacare". The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 October 2013. 
  27. ^ a b Somashekhar, Sandhya (25 October 2013). "HealthCare.gov fixes won’t be done until end of November". The Washington Post. Retrieved 25 October 2013. 
  28. ^ Kellman, Laurie (November 13, 2013). "Fewer than 27,000 health care sign-ups through federal website; 79,000 more in state sites". Newser.com. Retrieved December 12, 2013. 
  29. ^ "Accenture chosen as lead contractor of Obamacare website". Yahoo!. Retrieved 28 February 2014. 
  30. ^ Kelsey, Miller (13 September 2013). "Officials Worry Fake Health Exchange Websites Could Defraud, Confuse Consumers". Huffington Post. Retrieved 4 December 2013. 
  31. ^ Sandy, Fitzgerald (24 October 2013). "'Cyber-Squatters' Set Up Fake Obamacare Websites". Newsmax. Retrieved 4 December 2013. 
  32. ^ Lisa, Bernard-Kuhn (3 December 2013). "Ky. shuts down 3rd fake Obamacare website". Cincinnati.com. Retrieved 4 December 2013. 
  33. ^ Melanie, Mason (4 December 2013). "Rep. Janice Hahn calls on state GOP to take down 'fake' Obamacare site http://www.latimes.com/local/political/la-me-pc-gop-healthcare-site-20131204,0,722113.story#ixzz2mYOuRhCq". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 4 December 2013. 
  34. ^ a b Jonah Goldberg (October 25, 2013). "Obamacare’s Ticking Clock". National Review. Retrieved October 26, 2013. 
  35. ^ "RNC Statement on ObamaCare’s Continuing Failures". Gop.com. October 21, 2013. Retrieved October 26, 2013. 
  36. ^ a b Condon, Stephanie (October 23, 2013). "Amid HealthCare.gov problems, Democrats stay upbeat". CBS News. Retrieved October 26, 2013. 
  37. ^ "Oct. 27: John Kasich, Steve Beshear, Patrick J. Geraghty, Andrea Mitchell, Peter King, Rick Santorum, Jennifer Granholm, Neera Tanden, Alex Castellanos, Brian Williams". NBC News - Meet The Press. October 27, 2013. Retrieved October 27, 2013. 
  38. ^ a b Naylor, Brian (October 26, 2013). "'Loyal Soldier' Sebelius Vows To Stay Put, Fix HealthCare.gov". NPR.org. Retrieved October 26, 2013. 
  39. ^ "H.R. 3362 - All Actions". United States Congress. Retrieved 7 January 2014. 
  40. ^ a b c Kasperowicz, Pete (4 January 2014). "House GOP to demand O-Care updates". The Hill. Retrieved 7 January 2014. 
  41. ^ "Text of H.R. 3362". Govtrack.us. Retrieved 7 January 2014. 
  42. ^ "Leader's Weekly Schedule Week of January 6, 2014". House Majority Leader's Office. Retrieved 7 January 2014. 

External links[edit]