Jump to content

Talk:Hearst Tower (Manhattan)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleHearst Tower (Manhattan) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 1, 2021Good article nomineeListed
April 24, 2024Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
May 24, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 9, 2024Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 26, 2005, and January 25, 2021.
The text of the entries was:
  • August 26, 2005: Did you know ...that the uncommon triangulated frame of Hearst Tower, currently under construction in New York City, requires about 20 percent less steel than a conventional perimeter frame?
  • January 25, 2021: Did you know ... that the Hearst Tower (pictured) was built nearly eight decades after its base was completed?
Current status: Featured article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hearst Tower (Manhattan). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk04:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hearst Tower
Hearst Tower
  • ... that the Hearst Tower (pictured) was built nearly eight decades after its base was completed? Source: White, Norval; Willensky, Elliot & Leadon, Fran (2010). AIA Guide to New York City (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 308.
    • ALT1:... that the Hearst Magazine Building was constructed as the base of a tower that was not built for nearly eight decades? Source: White, Norval; Willensky, Elliot & Leadon, Fran (2010). AIA Guide to New York City (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. p. 308.
    • ALT2:... that a window cleaning system for the Hearst Tower (pictured) took three years and cost $3 million to plan? Source: New Yorker 2013
    • ALT3:... that the Hearst Magazine Building is the only survivor of an unbuilt entertainment complex envisioned around New York City's Columbus Circle in the early 20th century? Source: Nash, Eric (2005). "Hearst Magazine Building (originally International Magazine Building)". Manhattan skyscrapers. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. p. 45.
    • ALT4:... that work on New York City's Hearst Tower (pictured) proceeded after the September 11 attacks because the Hearst Corporation's board believed "If we don't do anything, [the terrorists] have won"? Source: NY Daily News

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • General eligibility:

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: Yes
  • Interesting: Yes
  • Other problems: Yes
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Recently expanded, interesting hooks, and I see no problems preventing this from becoming a DYK. Good job! @Epicgenius: Just ping me when you get done with the QPQ Jon698 (talk) 20:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jon698: Thanks for the review. I've done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 19:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interior

[edit]

The lead sentence for the Interiors paragraph does not make sense / confusing > Office space ceiling height vs. atrium??. One did not replace the other: "The Hearst Magazine Building initially contained office space with 11-foot (3.4 m) ceilings, which was replaced with a 95-foot-tall (29 m) atrium when the tower was built" Dogears (talk) 13:58, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dogears, thanks for bringing this up. It is indeed the case that the atrium replaced the office space, and that the office space had 11-foot ceilings. The atrium did not replace the ceilings; it replaced the office space. Perhaps this can be worded better, so I'll rephrase that shortly. Epicgenius (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]