Talk:INS Vikrant (1961)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleINS Vikrant (1961) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 22, 2017.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 30, 2016Good article nomineeListed
February 10, 2017WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
April 12, 2017Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 2, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that INS Vikrant (pictured) was India's first aircraft carrier?
Current status: Featured article

Auto peer review[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 40 mm, use 40 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 40 mm.[?]
  • This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
  • Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), armor (A) (British: armour), armour (B) (American: armor), harbor (A) (British: harbour), ization (A) (British: isation).
  • This article needs footnotes, preferably in the cite.php format recommended by WP:WIAFA. Simply, enclose inline citations, with WP:CITE or WP:CITE/ES information, with <ref>THE FOOTNOTE</ref>. At the bottom of the article, in a section named “References�? or “Footnotes�?, add <div class="references-small"><references/></div>.[?]
  • The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.[?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Mal 09:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation[edit]

This article is similar word by word to http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/r-vikrant.htm Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

World War II Carrier Comment[edit]

List of British WW-II carriers is here.

Among the Majestic class aircraft carriers, Vikrant is the only one to still be in her original shape (The Majestic is said to have been taken apart and her deck is being used to train Chinese pilots).

SO.... This statement is accurate as per the data on Wikipedia.

Well, Viraat was laid down on 21 June 1944 and although she certainly did not serve during WWII, the design was largely that of a WWII carrier. I would put it in much the same category as HMAS Melbourne which also was modified during the completion of construction after the war and did not enter service until 1955. She was always regarded nevertheless as a WWII era carrier and I think it is at least arguable that Viraat is one too, unless one takes a very narrow view of what a "WWII era" carrier is. Also, remember that Vikrant herself was incomplete at the end of the war and was also modified during completion and not commissioned until 1961. In fact if we are to consider Vikrant to be a WWII era ship then surely must we consider Viraat to be one also. Of course if India breaks Viraat up after she ends her long service life, then the claim stands, but until then I think not. However, she is the only WWII era British carrier to be preserved as a museum, since Viraat is still in service, so I have modified the article to reflect that. - Nick Thorne talk 10:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vikrant-Bonaventure conspiracy and Naval Officers Association of Canada[edit]

The Naval Officers Association of Canada official website claims here http://www.noac-national.ca/article/varner/rumoursofasianaircraftcarriers_byjoevarner.html that the well maintained and recently refitted Bonaventure was quietly swapped for the worn out Indian carrier Vikrant in 1971 which was the ship actually scrapped, it quotes Halifax Herald reporter Mike Bembridge and Senator Forrestall who attempted to track down Bonaventure in Japan after it disappeared for two weeks only to reappear already partly disassembled where it was supposed to be scrapped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.65.209 (talk) 09:53, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See HMCS Bonaventure (CVL 22). Wikiain (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This has just been deleted from this article. I would support keeping it – the current wording doesn't imply that they were swapped, merely that this very specific rumour exists. It is encyclopedic to record that and mention it in both articles. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:19, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's a fringe theory, and the sources aren't reliable. Leave it out of WP altogether. - BilCat (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We cover fringe theories and ghost stories. We describe them as just that. Now I wouldn't rule out text changes to clarify this, but as I read the contested section, it claims no more than that. The source is entirely adequate to verify that the story is in circulation. We're not looking to verify that they were swapped (although such content would be welcome).
I'm assuming that much of this story arose because someone took a photo showing that the davits on Vikrant II were the wrong shape but matched Bonaventure or somesuch. It would be nice to get a copy of that, or whatever it is. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the source used does not meet the qualification of a reliable source. It just rehashes a rumor, and the origianl site doesn't apprear to even exist anymore. It should stay out until it can be sourced to one that does meet WP:RS. Searching for photos to show why we think the story exists is basically original research. What is needed is a reliable source that has done the research already. - BilCat (talk) 18:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gender change[edit]

Hercules and Vikrant both are masculine/manly names and not feminine. request you to change the pronoun from "She" to " It " from wikipedia pages.

Regards

Vikrant Uprit — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.199.104.130 (talk) 07:51, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In English ships are usually referred as feminine, regardless of their name. Hence the use of "she". Regards, DPdH (talk) 10:45, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Museum ship or scrapped?[edit]

The article contradicts itself; in the introductory paragraph says that it is preserved as a museum ship, however in the relevant section says it has been put for auction and was sold for scrapping. Can anyone please confirm which is the fate of this ship, and amend the article accordingly? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 10:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A-class assesment[edit]

@Sturmvogel 66: I am not aware of WP Belfast, but WP:INDIA considers "A-class". Back in time, the project used to assign A-class by an internal peer view, similar to MILHIS's A-class review. Though the internal review is now inactive, the class is still considered to be valid in the project. See List of India A-class articles. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:32, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I didn't think that they had an A-class system at all.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sturmvogel 66: Shall I update the class now? Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sure.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unconventional Ship[edit]

[...] propeller revolutions to 120 RPM at the bow [...]

The ship had propellers at the bow? I seriously doubt that. -- 217.248.24.182 (talk) 11:21, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@217.248.24.182: Thanks for pointing out, corrected. --Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:49, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on INS Vikrant (R11). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Specifications after modernization programs?[edit]

INS Vikrant (R11) was modified quite extensively several times, including, as noted in the article, even before it was commissioned into Indian Navy service. As far as I'm aware, the specifications shown are based on the original wartime design. I am curious how the specifications were affected by the various modernization programs: I would imagine that the displacement remained at 16,000t standard even after the addition of the angled flight deck, for example. The modernization programs in 1979 and 1987 probably changed a lot of things (I seem to remember Indian navy people opposing the ship's retirement because of all the costly changes made in late 1980s). More details on what these programs involved would be very helpful! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.93.91.225 (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:INS_Vikrant_(1961)&oldid=1207719136"