User talk:Interlingua

Welcome!

Leave a message | Send an email

Empty Articles

Hi, Thomas Hübener. Stefan Kießling etc, are from football teams. I am currently updating some of the football teams where some players do not have a profile. I will add a sentence or two. Thanks. Squadoosh

NPOV and OR

Hi there. Your edit to Koyaanisqatsi doesn't seem to present a Neutral point of view. And your edit to Powaqqatsi would seem to be either POV or original research. So I've removed them for now. Feel free to add them back if you can present them in a more neutral way or find somewhere else that someone brought up the same issue that you did on Powaqqatsi so you can cite it on the page. Qutezuce 08:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Mike Keith

Do not change the links to Mike Keith until you have created the new disambiguation page.--Zpb52 14:11, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Tikaram

I have responded to your comment. It changes nothing so long as the article doesn't include verifiable information. 23skidoo 01:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Your sig

is broken. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 00:09, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Debate Discussions

• I've replied to your comments/votes on the various AfD's for state debate organisations... I said something different at each one, so you may want to take a look at all of them. - pm_shef 03:41, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the thoughtful comments. Interlingua ^talk 03:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Destriarch

Sorry, I'm still feeling my way around the way Wiki handles "chat" so I hope this message actually works. You noted me regarding my possibly writing further articles about Zoroastrianism, Ancient Persia and Iran etc. Really, my subject is more demonology, mythology and the ilk but I might be able to provide a little information on specific subjects from time to time.

Ash

Thanks for the shout out

I got your comment just as I was editing the last station for TransMilenio. Thanks for the encouragement. A fellow Iowa City-raise wikipedian, I see. Little Hawk, I presume? Hwonder talk 23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually, raised 1 hour outside of Iowa City in a tiny town. But I lived there two summers for college classes while I was in high school. Interlingua ^talk

Your question about lists and AfDs

You asked why list of Los Angeles television stations has received less hostility than other lists. Besides that it does not obviously violate any policies, I think this is because:

1. it is manageable. Lists that could potentially get too large, like a list of cemeteries, list of schools in China or list of websites are not manageable because they would simply get too large. Categories are better suited
2. the criteria for inclusion is clear, and it is easy for others to check it's accuracy
3. bias. It is considered useful. The more people think a list is useful, or if the subject of the list is of interest to many people, it will probably be kept

--Ezeu 01:03, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

I also saw your question and as a generally anti-list user felt that it deserved ansnwer. Ezeu's points one and two are the main reasons. Lists with a small (<100) size and a more or less defined membership have some use, especially if the idividual entries don't or shouldn't have articles of their own. Lists with large sizes and amorphous membership are more likely to generate hostility. Eluchil404 00:46, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Limonese Authentic Party

Do you have any data on the Limonese Authentic Party? I can barely verify it exists. RJFJR 02:01, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Not much.

"Suspenden inscripción del Partido Auténtico Limonense"
2-11-1986.
Partido Auténtico Limonense - Deudas. Wright, Marvin. Walker, Alfredo.
http://www.metabase.net/docs/bn-cr-p/003161.html

Auténtico Limonense  	¢ 483.873.82 (monto asignado)  	¢ 483.873.82 (monto liquado)
This was an amount 1/100 that of the 2nd place party in 1982. In 86, 90 and 94, it's funds ranged from 1/100 to 1/200 of the 2nd richest party. There's no data for 98 for this party
http://www.tse.go.cr/contribestado.htm

Listed on http://www.broadleft.org/cr.htm as one of (many) leftist parties in Costa Rica

http://cariari.ucr.ac.cr/~oscarf/diagno.html Figs on public financing of the party.

In 98, it got 2,000 out of 2,000,000+ votes. 0.1% of total vote. It was a tiny party

Do you have more than this? Interlingua ^talk 02:29, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Saryn Hooks

You participated in the Finola Hackett AfD. Please also join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saryn Hooks (second nomination). Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:26, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Language envy

I am glad we voted alike on the AfD's and that I gave you something to think about. Even though I am against using all those user boxes WP has for us, I am impressed by your set -- the language array that you know is another reason to redouble our efforts to learn more (I am trying to learn Greek, Russian, and Armenian -- simultaneously, I am afraid). I may even add the user boxes based on their usefulness demonstrated by you.

Thanks, Carlos Carlossuarez46 00:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Aleem Pahalwan

Aleem pahalwan was one of the earlier opponents of the former Pakistani wrestling champion Bholu Pahalwan during his early career in the 1930's. There is nothing mentioned about Aleem being a champion except that he was the nephew of famous Buta Pahalwan of Baroda who was a former Rustam-i-Hind. The name and brief profile of Aleem pahalwan has been mentioned in the following old manuscript of Bholu Pahalwan which can be observed by visiting the following site: http://geocities.com/worlddweb/bholu_page1/, http://geocities.com/worlddweb/bholu_page2/,

Thanks, Farid. Faridzenger, 21 June 2006.

new america

I suggest you merge New America Founcation into New America Foundation sharpish. -- RHaworth 07:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. Last night I couldn't believe they didn't have an article on this Founcation and checked multiple times with and without The, or using America/American. Of course, if I'd just spelled foundation properly. BTW, where is the proper place for me to respond to this note you've sent me: here on my Talk page or on your Talk page, or somewhere else entirely? I'm never sure if simply putting a : at the start of my reply will send a Message notice to the person to whom I'm responding. Interlingua ^talk 15:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

My view is that the reply should be on the same page as the question to keep the thread together. I do try to watch all user_talk pages I have left notes at but I do sometimes miss. (I have to use "my contributions" - my watchlist became unmanageably large long time ago!). Sometimes when a newbie has left a comment on my talk page, I transfer it to their talk page and reply there. Putting a colon in front does nothing except the (very useful) function of clarifying who is saying what. -- RHaworth 21:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

LGBT Indians

Thank you. I was looking for some more names. I will take your suggestion. Maybe we can make an entire list of South Asian lGBT's, as I know of plenty of famous Pakistani and Bangladeshi gays too. Or should we keep them separate? I'll do more work tommorow, though, as I must finish dinner and go to bed. Afghan Historian 04:50, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for the Redirect

Not at all! If you want to move a page, you should click on the 'move' at the top of the site. You can read more about it here. Regards, Jacek Kendysz 14:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

xequere

hi,Interlingua About plastic balls, i get it from Afoxé article on brazilian wikipedia. And yes i am always contribuing to the brazilian music, and afro brazilian articles when i can. As im doing right now on Afro-Brazilian.

See you later.

Mateus Zica 14:26, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

i just made the Afoxé article

Brazil

Wow you lived in all this places? how old are you^?

where have you benn here in brasil?

LGBT

Sounds good. Your idea was somewhat like what I had in mind and better too. We'll go along with it. I did add one diasporic South Asian, Freddie Mercury. I dont know if you've heard of him but he was the lead singer of a famous British rock group called Queen. He was a Parsi (Indian Zoroastrian) who was born in Zanziber east africa but grew up in Mumbai before emigrating to England. He kept his ethnic background a secret, though, for fear of discrmination. I will also add yours plus the baron Waheed Ali, a Pakistani-Brit politician and lord of gay background. However, I can only do work for you today, as I have to be gone for 7 weeks tommorow for a debate camp ( i'm an RA, actually, who monitors the dorm rooms, keeps the campers in check and judges at camp tournament, I was a debater in high school and that's why they called me back). I get paid for it too. Post me help messages on my inbox user for when i'm gone User: Darth Pakhta. I'll respond when I get back August 12 and will resume work then. Thank you very much. Afghan Historian 18:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I redirected the list to List of LGBT South Asians. See if that works. Also, I added some of the names you gave. I'll add the others when I get more time tonight. Afghan Historian 21:04, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Lists

Hello, Interlingua. I saw your question about creating lists that won't be deleted and I have some suggestions. First, people dislike lists that don't have a reasonable chance of being completed and/or would be huge if completed. They also don't like lists that need to be continuously updated, although very notable lists, like members of congress, can get away with this. In both of these situations, a category is usually preferred. Another big complaint is a list of things that many people find trivial, like a list of songs that have the word "black" in them (some song lists have been very similar to this).

The last big problem that I can think of is lists that encourage the creation of articles on non-notable topics. For example, there might be a list of all of the people who appeared in a TV show. Some of the actors probably already have articles and some of the others may be notable enough for articles when they are created. However, there is likely to be some non-notable people who only appeared briefly in the show and have never had significant roles in anything else, either. Linking the names of all of the actors may encourage people to create articles on the non-notable ones. In fact, they can be attractive because they are shorter to write. Some solutions would be to only link notable people or people that already have an article, leaving the rest unlinked, or to limit the list to major characters, those who already have an article or those probably notable enough for an article. Another possibility is to make a category, like "this actor appeared in (name of the show)". Since only actors with articles would appear in the category, there is no danger of encourage the creation of bad articles. Categories about non-notable topics may also be deleted, but they tend to get more leeway and less attention than lists. However, if there is a glut of trivial categories on a topic, they may get purged on Categories for Deletion in a mass or combined nomination.

Certain list topics have enough die hard fans that it is difficult to get a consensus for deletion about them. These include schools, highways, anything railroad related and lists related to a popular series, like Star Wars. It's probably best to nominate only the worst examples of such lists. If there are a bunch of similar lists and it is unclear if they will be kept or deleted on AfD, try nominating one or two instead of all of them at once. I hope this is helpful. Talk to you later, Kjkolb 09:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your suggestions to improve Ganeshbot. I will implement the changes later tonight and start it again. - Ganeshk (talk) 17:03, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

confirmation

Would you be able to find evidence for Supreme Court of Justice hostage crisis? I only get a few google hits. I'd like to see one from a major newspaper to confirm this actually happened. Thank you. RJFJR 15:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

D'oh

I just listened to the "d'oh" sound again. The vowel is definitely the long "o" (English "o" with macron), with glottal stop and in high, constricted tone. Thus, it doesn't resemble the Vietnamese vowel other than in its use of the letter "o." Badagnani 22:38, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

of interest

Thought you mind find this MfD of interest. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 22:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Dissappointed

Hello, I'm a bit dissappointed that you stated on the Raul Castro talk page that I had "violated Wikipedia's policies" in my discussion with another user. The user I was addressing was user:Demfourlife who is using ranging IP addresses to bypass policy and any blocks - This user was -

• Banned under a different IP address for violating the 3rr rule. The same user broke the rule again yesterday on the Fidel Castro page - but as a ranging IP there is nothing that can be done. This page is now blocked to IP addresses.
• Had repeatedly inserted dubious personal claims on a biography article that he was sourcing to an internet blog. These can be removed on site as per policy without discussion. That I entered the debate at all was out of courtesy.
• Led to the Raul Castro page being protected by the VOA bot
• Had been engaging in personal attacks on that and other pages against many users. Many of these have been removed by admins and other editors.(still occuring)
• Had been making claims about other editors in edit summaries (still occuring).
• Calls good faith female users "Castro loving bitches" and intimidates others off the pages.
• Repeatedly attacks a longstanding Cuban editor (user:BruceHallman)
• Has vandalised my talk page with false claims.

Meanwhile I've put forward almost 2000 edits on Cuban articles for a long time - created many detailed pages etc concerning Cuban history and mediated some of the worst disputes surrounding this issue attempting good faith and civility at all times. There can be no further discussion with users who insist repeatedly that an internet blog is a reliable source and are utilising ranging IP's to enforce these rumours on the page. To read that I had been violating policy is not encouraging. Thank you. --Zleitzen 14:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

International Solidarity Fast for Darfur

I noted your comment on the suggested deletion page for this article which I have since completely re-written. If it is not too much trouble, please could you take a look at the reviewed version. I would welcome any suggestions as to how to further improve this article so that you would be happy to give it a Keep. LukeSurl 22:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Did I Make a Mistake on My Redirect Page

See Talk:Roe_v._Wade_for_Men for my discussion of how and why I made a redirect. My issue here is that the History page didn't redirect along with the main article. Did I do something wrong? Should I have done something different? Thanks. Interlingua ^{talk email} 18:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

What are you looking for help with? --pgk 18:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't put the help me tag in the right place. I'm looking for help with the item above, my question about whether I messed up when I made the Redirect Roe vs. Wade for Men to Roe v. Wade for Men.

Well the redirect itself is fine, you left the content of the original article in place which is not particularly normal, but doesn't stop the redirect working. I'm not sure what you mean by the history page didn't redirect, the history page is quite separate to the article. --pgk 18:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I am glad that you fixed the naming of the page, but, yes, it would be nice if the history of the original page could be copied over as I spent some time on creating that page, and I would sorta like the credit for making it in the history. It looks like from WP:MOVE, that you probably should have done a "rename" to preserve the history. Now that the new page is already created with the new title, it is apparently more difficult to do a rename and we would (I think) need an administrator to do so. I honestly don't have much time at the moment to deal with this, although maybe I will some time soon, but if you might be able fix it, it would be very much appreciated.

Thanks, HalfDome 16:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Here's an idea, HalfDome. You could do two edits to the page: first, copy all the info, then delete it, then save. Next, edit, copy back all the deleted info, then save. This might be a little odd, but since you're (so far, I think) the sole author, this isn't vandalilsm. Interlingua ^{talk email} 00:33, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

I contacted an administrator who fixed it. Woo-hoo. Cheers, HalfDome 16:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion on kastoori Nivasa

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thanks to your suggestion on Kastoori Nivasa movie's Wiki page. I'll use it to edit this and any new pages I create.

The Onion Cellar

Good work. I've removed the {{notability}} warning from the article. -- Longhair\^talk 04:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Spanish Black Belt

I have just set up an AfD process. Ncanales was operating against policy in deleting the prod with no explanation. I found it on the type of inappropriate category that you mention when I was looking up Ecuadorian languages. Kevin McE 20:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Caroline Kaufer

I just added categories. It was VBD that took off the tag!  :) Postcard Cathy 20:13, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Aspiration

Hi, I saw your comment in the Malayalam language talk page. I've always wondered about aspirated stops - could you explain to me in simple terms, what exactly they are? :) Thanks! --vi5in^[talk] 07:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Re: Aspirated Stops

Thanks for the explanation! :) --vi5in^[talk] 16:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Help with "Expression error" message

{{helpme}} There are a number of pages with Expression error: Unexpected div operator or other such errors on them. I've tried to locate the problem of this message but have failed. Two examples: Guam and Nuclear_power_in_Taiwan

Both fixed, after some effort from me and others. Are there any places you're still seeing problems? Algebraist 15:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes. I did a Google search and found some more: Aalen, Template:Include_timeline/horizontal_template, a page on Italian Wikipedia, Template:Location_map, Divehi Wikipedia, Template:Year_in_other_calendars, another from Divehi. Sinhalese page, Uzbek Wikipedia Interlingua 16:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Dickipedia

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dickipedia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dickipedia was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dickipedia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Court cases

• In court cases, the "v." should not be in italics.[1]

I'm trying to find a source for this, but most seem to say that the entire case name is italicized.[2][3][4][5][6] And WP's on manuial of style calls for that formatting. WP:ITALICS. Is there an authoritative source that says only the names of parties should be in italics? ·:· Will Beback ·:· 17:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Language Freedom Movement

Supposedly they did that to accuse them of being West Brits. I've seen footage from some years back of Irish language activists protesting outside Radio Telefís Éireann wielding a modified Union flag - I can't remember what words were on the flags - possibly just "RTE". Autarch (talk) 13:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:'Dialogo' by Ferrari.jpg

Image:'Dialogo' by Ferrari.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Dialogo by Ferrari.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Dialogo by Ferrari.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:34, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Joy

 Marlith (Talk)  has given you a kitten! Gifts of kittens promote Wikilove and holiday spirt. Hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and raise the holiday spirit! Send kittens to others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

 Marlith (Talk)  04:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

re: 1556 Shaanxi earthquake

The date in the article intro was originally 23 Jan but an anonymous user changed it to 14 Feb (without any supporting refs) sometime last year, so I assume it was vandalism as i've not found any other refs pointing to that date. The date in the infobox has always remained as Jan 23 and the refs already on the page point to the 23 Jan, but I could add a citation just for that section if you want. Thanks. RapidR (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deepak Ananthapadmanabha

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Deepak Ananthapadmanabha, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non-notable local journalist; no referencesfor notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DGG (talk) 20:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Finnish verb conjugation

Hi, thanks for your message. Sorry for the late reply, but I haven't had so much time (or inclination, for that matter) to edit Wikipedia lately.

Anyways, it seems Finnish native speaker Vuo has already done most of the work for us. I just added the present indefinite, which he accidentally left out.

Best regards, --the Wild Falcon (talk | log) 12:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and to better understand Vuo's comments on your misuse of the indefinite, please check out the appropriate section of the Finnish grammar article. --the Wild Falcon (talk | log) 13:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

birth and death-date and age

Hello, Interlingua. You have new messages at J JMesserly's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Actually, the template is fine. I corrected the error on death date you introduced and used the new template to do it for reasons that will be obvious in my response. -J JMesserly (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Interlingua. You have new messages at Radiant chains's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Radiant chains (talk) 18:13, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Pronunciatiation of Night Shyamalan in Tamil

I recently added Tamil Pronunciation od Night Shyamalan in Tamil based on the reference provided that his mother is Tamil, some one with the IP address 59.92.152.43 keep removing it.Moulee (talk) 04:56, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

: I would appriciate if you involve in the discussion [7], thx:) Moulee (talk) 16:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Interlingua! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 963 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Faisal Devji - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Miguel Barnet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:44, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Please help to translate this pali-language sentence into English

Hello, Interlingua. Sorry for interrupting you! I am a Chinese-wiki editor, today I uploaded a file on wiki-common: [8], which is an important Pili-language sentence that results in the early divide of Buddhism (Theravada and mahasamghika). One of my friend insisted that this words shouldn't be said into Mahaparinibbana Sutta; however, I found this word from Pali's maha-parinibbana-suttanta. Since both of us don't know pali-language, I may need your help on translate this sentence. ( I consider it is: "Do not lay down that which has not been laid down; Do not eliminate that which has been laid down." ) Thanks for any response! I really appreciate your help!--Walter Grassroot |talk~talk~talk~ 06:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

My reading knowledge of Pali is weak, but this is what I found from http://www.tipitaka.org for that verse. "I have heard, Lord, that the Vajjis neither enact new decrees nor abolish existing ones, but proceed in accordance with their ancient constitutions" 3. Mahāparinibbānasuttaṃ, Part One: In Magadha, 134. I hope this helps. Interlingua 17:44, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Angela Correa

A tag has been placed on Angela Correa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 14:00, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, would you be so kind as to give us support!

Hello, I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and you seemed a very learned person interested in languages to me so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm part of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Capsot (talk) 16:23, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunil Gupta

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Sunil Gupta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Sunil Gupta and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. 98.213.48.73 (talk) 16:59, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Research survey invitation

Greetings Interlingua-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 04:04, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Interlingua (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account has been blocked by Procseebot because, the message says, it is associated with IP address 202.168.253.162, an address believed to be an open proxy. This confuses me. To the best of my knowledge, I have never made any edits to Wikipedia while using proxy-based software. And any edits that I might have made from any site have not been vandalous or inappropriate. How can I get this block removed so that I am able, again, to contribute to Wikipedia? Due to the government blocking of YouTube in Bangladesh since mid-September, it is often necessary for people here to use software like UlstraSurf when they want to access YouTube, and I certainly have used it, but I do know think that I've made any edits to Wikipedia while this software is being run. I have been an editor at Wikipedia for seven years with perhaps 2,000-3,000 edits.

Accept reason:

Anthony Bradbury has granted you an IP block exemption, which allows you to edit from hard-blocked IPs, including this one. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Please note 2 things:

1. Your account isn't blocked; only the IP address is. You are still able to edit from any non-blocked IP address.
2. Even well-established users aren't allowed to edit using open proxies.

Please note that I have forwarded your request to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests, where they will heck if the IP address is still a proxy. If it isn't, theyt'll probably unblock it; if it is, you're still welcome to edit from other IPs. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:00, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

The IP has a massive history of spamming (by email). If Interlingua really has no other way of editing, xe should ask for WP:IPBE. Tijfo098 (talk) 10:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the prompt reply. Although I wrote "my account has been blocked" I actually meant "this IP has been blocked". Thanks for clarifying that. I am not now running an open proxy but still find that the IP address I'm using is being blocked. I'm not sure why this has only happened recently. I'm getting access to the Internet via a connection here at the University. Although I'm the only person in my flat with access to the Internet cable, perhaps the IP address is shared by me and the entire student computer lab. If so, that could explain the problem. I have a USB-modem that I sometimes use for Internet access, and I'll try that to see if it works. Interlingua 12:32, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

You should now be able to edit, provided only that you log in. If not, please let me know. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:21, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

If you know who administers that IP, you could point them to http://www.projecthoneypot.org/ip_202.168.253.162 Tijfo098 (talk) 14:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Masala (Boston)

The article Masala (Boston) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Fails WP:ORG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 22:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

And as you can see, I removed the PROD tag and added two WP:RS, which were rather easy to find. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Saleem Kidwai (Muslim Council of Wales)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saleem Kidwai (Muslim Council of Wales), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justice007 (talk) 22:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ed Salvato for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Salvato is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Salvato until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 03:40, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Interlingua. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeffrey Pelehac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Pelehac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Pelehac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AniMate 13:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Interlingua. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Interlingua. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Ruth Vanita for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruth Vanita is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Vanita until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Harshil169 (talk) 06:21, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Horaisan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horaisan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horaisan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

User:力 (powera, π, ν) 01:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deepak Ananthapadmanabha

The article Deepak Ananthapadmanabha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability, no sources to promote notability, poor sourcing used for BLP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 19:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gerhana Skacinta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerhana Skacinta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gerhana Skacinta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Primefac (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)