User talk:Poltair/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Wimbleball lake
Hi, I only came across the lake because I've been doing Category:Rivers of Somerset for Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset - you are welcome to join us. I got the photo from Geograph which are licensed under creative commons so we can reuse them on wikipedia (crediting source etc as appropriate).— Rod talk 20:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Jade Goody
I see you have spent a bit of time on Jade Goody's page. Have you nothing better to do - why concern yourself with what that inbred idiot is doing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.182.47 (talk) 23:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
My contributions to Jade Goody are predominately reverts of vandalism, and removing comments similar to yours above. Why don't you register and make some constructive edits to wikipedia? Poltair (talk) 19:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Poltair, on the quotefarm tag, I think that it's actually good practice to put in extended quotes from some judgments: I agree that usually that's not right, but with legal cases it's good practice: like you would find in a cases and materials book that law students would use. :) Wikidea 21:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
This is a fully sourced article about an institution that has received a lot of media interest and is thus clearly notable. What is the exact (detailed) problem here? Put another way, if this is not in full conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, what changes can be made to make it so. I think this is an important and notable topic and needs to be made in a format that it acceptable to all and of encyclopaedic value [SCIS Info] —Preceding unsigned comment added by SCISInfo (talk • contribs) 23:05, 29 May 2008
- and a full fledged WP:Coatrack. Toddst1 (talk) 00:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Sussex Centre for the Individual and Society (SCIS)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Sussex Centre for the Individual and Society (SCIS). Since you nominated this article for deletion, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Toddst1 (talk) 14:01, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Peace process: pseudoscience
See my message on FT2's talk page and suggesting of mediation process. I think there are some important lessons to be learned from recent incidents, and would value your input. Let me know on my talk page. See also the points I discussed with Guy. Peter Damian (talk) 06:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
NLP: Trying again
Articles for deletion: NLP Modeling
Identifying reliable sources
I've left a note on the NLP talk page describing the problem of identifying reliable sources for possible pseudoscience. Any help appreciated. Peter Damian (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
- PS I liked the list of NLP pages you have in your talk space. Very useful, and shows the extent of the problem. Peter Damian (talk) 18:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm working on it in my own little way;) Poltair (talk) 18:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Not at all. Charles Faulkner was my favourite, but with stiff competition. Peter Damian (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yes Faulkner. The last sentence caught my interest -
- Not at all. Charles Faulkner was my favourite, but with stiff competition. Peter Damian (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
The session was entitled Metapatterns: The Biological Basis for How NLP Works.[40] He raised questions, such as: “How does NLP work?” “Is there scientific evidence for its effectiveness?” and then revealed a biological basis for all NLP models[40]
Chill
Dude, pick your battles - through out your life... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.24.24.150 (talk) 21:37, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Nomination for next deletion
Worldview and working model of neuro-linguistic programming
Duplicates almost everything in the original article and what it doesn't duplicate is just hot air and blather. I'm staying away from AfD nominations for the moment in case of further blocks but will support anything you suggest. This one is a real stinker. Best Peter Damian (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Clean Language
I de-prodded Clean Language. See my explanation on the talk page.
Richard II
Thank you for your kind words. It seems likely to go through any time soon now; I'm glad it's being appreciated! Lampman (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
hi
thank you for it and also ı would like to add a photo of uffculme but ı dont know how can ı do ı need an account for it..thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.120.213.213 (talk) 21:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
No problem. In the toolbox on the left there is a link to Upload file. You should find everything you need to know. The photo will probably have to be one you have taken yourself, and are willing to give free use of. I'm not sure if you need an account, but if you want to do more editing here it is probably a good idea. Poltair (talk) 21:38, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thanks
thank u ı will have an account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.120.213.213 (talk) 21:43, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
brett salisbury
brett salisbury was an all american football player and his book has been published, i bought it. modeling claims are legit, i live in sweden, ive heard the name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.13.166.11 (talk) 15:52, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Who cares? Poltair (talk) 19:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Thomas Beelen
I declined speedy deletion, but you should feel free to prod or nominate it. There were some statements of notability, and although they are somewhat weak, I try to be more cautious with speedy deletion. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 23:54, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Ed Thigpen passed away January 13th 2010 in Copenhagen
Hi Poltair,
I can confirm that my father passed away peacefully yesterday at 12:15 PM (13-01-2010) He was briefly in the Hospital and his suffering there was very short, and he passed away peacefully in the company of his family.
- Michel Thigpen
hello@michelthigpen.com
TheThigpens (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi Poltair,
It is only good that you question something that is not confirmed. And I thank you for that. I also thank you for your kind words. Live well and happy
Sincerely
Michel Thigpen —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheThigpens (talk • contribs) 00:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Point problems, please!
So, please point me the problems that the article has so I can fix it. I hope your answer.*FranklinG* (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Doubt and Thanks
I have a recurring question for a long time and I think you can help me. I wanted to do an article on a singer is not as well known, but do not know if I can. Is it allowed to do that on Wikipedia? I hope your answer.
PS: I'm seeing the errors that the article has Mallu Magalhães and soon begin to edit it. Thanks for the suggestions for revision. Bye *FranklinG* (talk) 20:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much!*FranklinG* (talk) 22:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Another question
Hi Poltair, I start to re-edit the article Mallu Magalhães, but I have a doubt about the references: if I have two or more parts of an article that talk and / or not of the same subject, I put the reference in those shares or another way of putting the same reference in different places? I hope your answer. Bye.*FranklinG* (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Mallu is a girl.*FranklinG* (talk) 17:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Eternity of the world
Notes
1. ^ Physics I, 7 2. ^ Tiziano Dorandi, Chapter 2: Chronology, in Algra et al. (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy, page 50. Cambridge. 3. ^ Lang, Helen, "Introduction", p.2 in Proclus (2001). On the Eternity of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 0520225546. 4. ^ Simplicius, in Arist. de Caelo, 6, b, etc., 72; in Phys. Ausc. 257, 262, etc., 312, etc., 320.
External links
St Austell
Hi Poltair, re your edit of St Austell, the fact that the new St Austell civil parish is urban in character is not my "opinion" but is a fact that can be ascertained by looking at a map. 'Urban', 'rural' and 'coastal' are not subjective geographic terms (unlike, say, 'picturesque' or 'beautiful'). In this case I omitted a source (though I've added it now) but even so it would have been more constructive to add a {{citation needed|date= XXX}} tag and dropped me a line on my talk page rather than simply deleting the sentence. Best wishes, Andy F (talk) 10:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- PS After posting the note above, I noticed that the map on the article page shows the CP boundary closely following the outline of the urban area. That map is drawn from up-to-date mapping by Cornwall Council - see http://mapping.cornwall.gov.uk/website/ccmap/ using the 'Government' overlay. Best wishes Andy F (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Cebr1979 (talk) 18:28, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK
I guess you need to do a QPQ for your DYK on Sheila Florance for it to be accepted. --BabbaQ (talk) 11:48, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for helping me
Hi! I have edited my new page for "Hamed Shakernejad" and have added some sources. But I will try to make it better. Thank you for your support! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahdiaboo (talk • contribs) 13:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
Biography of Shakernejad
Hi!No problem. I have added his biography From a Famous iranian website and its translation near his videos and sounds,and I hope this sources will be fine for you. Thank you for your attention to me, and best wishes for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahdiaboo (talk • contribs) 14:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
The World Before the Flood
Thanks for doing that one so promptly. Regarding the "old master tradition", there doesn't seem to be an obvious way to reword it although it's not entirely necessary. Once I get around to giving William Etty the WP:TNT treatment, the articles on the individual works won't need such an extensive background section, but at the moment the bio is so bad (my removing the actual lies from it has left it a gutted shell) that I don't want to be directing readers there for background detail. – iridescent 22:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- My pleasure. Ah, now I understand why William Etty is so short. I was surprised as there seemed to be plenty of material out there. There wasn't any real problem with the "old master tradition", it was just that I spent hours checking the sources that I had to find something; otherwise it might look like a rubber stamp job, which it wasn't! Best Poltair (talk) 22:46, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Sheila Florance
 | On 26 June 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sheila Florance, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sheila Florance broke her knee wielding an antique shotgun while filming Mad Max? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
— Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Sarah Lancashire
Thanks for the review. I have glanced over your comments and intend to get back to the article within seven days. Eshlare (talk) 12:28, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've thinked I've addressed everything. Let me know if there are any further issues raised by the restructuring.
Eshlare (talk) 14:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thanks for your efforts at User talk:Jgrantduff NeilN talk to me 14:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC) |
FYI: User_talk:NeilN#frivolous_RFPP_stuff and [2]. I don't know what more we can do after your very good note to this editor. --NeilN talk to me 13:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Poltair. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Dave Arch
Hi and thanks for getting in touch. I am a bit confused as I have only added a paragraph to the beginning on Dave's entry and this wasn't copied from anywhere. The content on the page does seem to have come from his website but has been there some time and it wasn't me that added it. I do know Dave (not closely) and offered to add an updated paragraph to his page. How should I go about resolving any issues? Elaine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by El41neC (talk • contribs) 22:46, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Your de-prod
Hello. I am unclear on what basis you deprodded this article, finding the subject notable. Thank you. --2604:2000:E016:A700:E80C:C0E0:D0EF:8ADF (talk) 22:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
okay. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by AWG97 (talk • contribs) 16:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank-you Note
Thank You very much for the appreciation. AWG97 (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Editing article on Adam Cohen (journalist)
HI, I'm a brand new editor to Wikipedia and chose for my first editing foray to augment the article on Adam Cohen, journalist and author. I noticed that you made some edits yesterday (April 11), including making certain listed dates more understandable to people around the world (e.g.,April 2017 instead of 2017-04). But I am curious what triggered your interest in this article. I also saw that you changed a cite, noting that the source was in the appendix of a cited report. All good. I'm just curious how and why you came to this article. And thanks, by the way, for your edits!
Hersei1960 (talk) 18:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks!
Hi Poltair, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh666 21:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Poltair. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Poltair. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Reference errors
Hi in this[3] edit your change introduced several errors - for example using the "author" property for lists of authors, when it should name just a single author. Not sure if you're using software for this but if so, it seems buggy! Alexbrn (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
- Are you sure? I changed author to vauthors to correct CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list errors and I added |display-authors=etal where there were CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. errors. I also corrected a CS1 maint: Archived copy as title error. These were all done manually and I didn't see any errors following my edit. Poltair (talk) 14:14, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
Harold Cole
I am an Australian and a member of my family was one of Coles victims, he is mentioned in much of the "Cole " literature and archival material. I wonder if you would share with me your interest in Cole and whether you have more material than appears in the wikipedia report. I am putting together a biography of my relative -rather more slowly than I would wish. I am not sure of the protocol of making contact with you but would be willing to share my email address with you for direct contact if you agree. Ministersson (talk) 07:52, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @Ministersson:. I am both sorry and fascinated to hear that one of your family was a victim of Cole. His victims were extraordinarily brave individuals. My interest is in the WWII escape lines and Cole was part of that story. My sources are probably fewer than what you already have; I have the Airey Neave books and Brendan Murphy's book on Cole, Turncoat. Poltair (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
|
Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RfA.Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:44, 29 August 2019 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Reviewing new (draft) article
hello Poltair,
Could I please ask you to review and comment on this draft article? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hanoch_Senderowitz
Many thanks, Uw0v5033 (talk) 16:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Uw0v5033: I'm sorry but I am not an Articles for Creation reviewer, but you might want to check that your references are complete, and improve the layout of the Scientific interests and publications sections. Poltair (talk) 19:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Mz7 (talk) 04:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Medcalf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Williams. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Congrats on being in the top 5 most active pending changes reviewers this month. Great job. –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC) |