User talk:Redmarkviolinist/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
The Simpsons WikiProject membership update
The Simpsons WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.
Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #~~~~, in order to renew or cancel your membership.
If you do not comply with any of the choices, at the end of 1 month after this message was posted, your membership will be canceled and your name removed from the list. If you wish to regain your membership, just sign in again!
The The Simpsons WikiProject team – 01:23, 26 April 2024 UTC [refresh]
Official thanks, slightly delayed due to post-RfA crash (who knew?)
 |
...for helping me navigate the waters of my surprisingly peaceful RFA, which closed successfully with 85 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutral.
I would particularly like to thank Acalamari and Alison, my nominators, and everyone who watched the page and ran the tally.
If there is anything I can do to be of service in the future, please feel free to contact me.
If you hate RfA thankspam, please forgive me. I promise I won't block you in retaliation for deleting it ;-)
And forgive me if I need a Wikibreak now and then (like now. I'm exhausted!). You wouldn’t want to see me climbing the Reichstag, now would you?
Off to flail around with my new mop! (what?!)
Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫
This RfA thanks inspired by Neranei's, which was inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.
Re:Vandalism
ur a rasict
ur goin to jail for hate crimes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.87.151.98 (talk) 16:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. In the future, please don't put personal attacks on my talk page. Thanks, Redmarkviolinist (talk) 17:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Hey
thanks, sorry the WIPP page was written in first person so i just couldn't help but quickly correct at least some of it >_<
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXI (November 2007)
The November 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
RickK
Hello! I think the increased automation of Wikipedia will make fighting trolls and vandals easier. It gets annoying to revert vandals, but I find that it is usually easy to do so.
I wonder which exchanges made RickK leave... WhisperToMe 21:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thank you
Thank you for the welcome. V i s n a v a 18:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Your sig
your sig ---Redmarkviolinist (talk)
links not to your user page but to the non-article Redmarkviolinist
you may want to change it to ---Redmarkviolinist (talk)
- -Sirex98 23:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:54, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank You
For the welcome Earththeir (talk) 17:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- No Problem. Redmarkviolinist (talk) 17:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:56, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Battle of Marion
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Battle of Marion, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.bencaudill.com/documents_msc/battle_of_marion.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Battle of Marion and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Battle of Marion with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Battle of Marion.
It is also important that the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and that it follows Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at Talk:Battle of Marion/Temp. Leave a note at Talk:Battle of Marion saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! David D. (Talk) 10:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Sorry but that got deleted a lot faster than I expected. I have restored your last version without the templates (see Talk:Battle of Marion/Temp ), so you can continue working on it. When you have finished move it back to the Battle of Marion page and I will delete the temporary Talk:Battle of Marion/Temp page. Let me know if you want help or advice on cleaning it up. David D. (Talk) 19:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
WTF
I am not a sockpuppeteer. I have welcomed many users (see my contribs). Your evidence is very weak. Please request a CU if you don't believe me (I can't request one) Alexfusco5 17:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- More counter-evidence. If I had a sockpuppet and was nominated for adminship by the sockpuppet, why would I want to decline the RFA Alexfusco5 17:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Typo redirect Ancient Egyptian engineering
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ancient Egyptian engineering, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ancient Egyptian engineering is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ancient Egyptian engineering, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Fenis Castle1.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Fenis Castle.JPG. The copy called Image:Fenis Castle.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 05:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Reply
Is there a possibility that Fenis Castle|300px can be made larger? If so, would you be willing to help out with it. Its a nice pic. Redmarkviolinist (talk) 05:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for nominating the image - it is pretty - I hoped I didn't come across to harshly in my vote. Unfortunately, generally speaking, there is no way to expand images and maintain their detail. Once an image is shrunk, that data is lost. Do you have the original image, or the raw format from the digital camera? That's the best possibility. de Bivort 06:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Hiya - sorry, but you appear to have removed the "tl" from {{tl|helpme}} on the above user's page. I'm not sure why, but have reinserted it, as the enquiry (which was from a month ago) has been answered, and the reactivation is causing some confusion. If I've overstepped the mark, or there was a purpose to your removal, feel free to let me know. Thanks! Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 14:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
battle of marion
I just noticed that you did a cut and paste for a move rather than using the move option at the top of the page. Don't you want to preserve the history of the article? Or are you not bothered? If you want I can restore the previous edits to preserve the history. If that is what you'd like don't make any more edits to the article. David D. (Talk) 17:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Are you still looking for a coach?
I saw your name over at admin coaching. Have you found a coach yet, and if not, are you still looking for one?
The Transhumanist 00:53, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
- I put my name up to volunteer to coach, not to be coached. Just a notice, Redmarkviolinist Drop me a line 20:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC).
- No problemo. By the way, your name is listed here: Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests for Coaching#Current requests. The Transhumanist 22:38, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
uh yeah...
I don't remember writing that...Do what you want mate--n1yaNt 18:09, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
- yeah I remember now. haha sorry, trying to be funny. clearly not my strong suit. n1yaNt 02:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Reply
I am not vandalizing Wikipedia and have proven it, just users keep reverting my good edits. 172.164.16.207 (talk) 03:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Let's get started
See your coaching page. You may find the other coachees' coaching pages interesting too. Use the backlinks on your coaching page to visit the VC. Good luck. Have fun. The Transhumanist 06:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
League of Copyeditors roll call
|
Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there. The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors. |
Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Other Users
Other users are deleting everything and calling it nonsense! I'm sad and you should help me out! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumagirl7 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for assisting this editor. If there's anything I can do to help you, let me know. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:32, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Insulted
I have to admit, I'm kinda insulted. Of all the edits logged under my IP address only one could be considered outright vandalism is the blanking of KMTDCfan89 user page (and that one wasn't me...it was my brother having a fight with the guy spilling over from some other message board).
All of my other edits are NOT vandalism, nor did any of them delete any real information! In fact the ONLY deletion is the removal of a picture of a swallowed Simba button from the Simba article.
Sidney Leslie Goodwin (4 August 2007): Removed the bolding from a phrase that shouldn't have been bolded.
Western North Carolina (3 September 2007): Actually reverted some vandalism.
North Carolina (10 September 2007): Fixed the location of the State.
Talk:United States (25 September 2007):Answered someone's question about voting in the US.
United States Declaration of Independence (26 October 2007):Fixed what I thought was a capitalizing error in the article.
Grand Theft Auto IV (2 December 2007): Fixed what I thought was a spelling error. When It was reverted back I asked in the talk page and discovered that I was wrong and didn't attempt to change it back. (aeroplanes VS airplanes)
Talk:Harry Potter (27 December 2007): The page was covered in all these big red error messages, becase I didn't know what they were I asked in the talk page. Soon after they were gone.
As you can see the ONLY vandalism under this IP was back in late October. And I'm insulted that today you posted a message in my IP talk page more or less accusing me of being a vandal with my edits and that "instead of vandalizing this information, instead think of expanding and making it better." 71.75.103.239 (talk) 17:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please respond. I'd really like to know what recent edit I did that sparked the vandalism accusation. Because as I've stated I haven't preformed any. 71.75.103.239 (talk) 04:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Editing
Yes, I am sure that I'm willing to edit. I'm very smart and creative for my age and I thing they should know that I could be teaching my teachers(once I did in a class that didn't give the right information, but I got kicked out. Apperently, they must have thought wrong was right.)
--Pumagirl7 (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Special Effects
I saw your page and I want mine to look like that. How do I do it?
--Pumagirl7 (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Auto-Wiki Browser
Congratulations!! You have been approved to use Auto-Wiki Browser. Just download it from here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=158332
And continue editing! —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Placebo Effect (talk • contribs) 22:33, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Redmarkviolinist! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 03:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
WHAT?
Tell me how reverting an IP vandal's message ("yeah, but this is a load of rubbish!!!") constitutes vandalism?!
Irritatedly yours, Two One Six Five Five (talk) 21:20, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiDragons, Males/Females, pet lover, etc.
How do you have those things that say "This user is a WikiDragon", "This user loves cats and snakes", "This user is female", etc, etc.? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumagirl7 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
About your editor review.
Hi there! Well, it's been a month since your editor review, and I was wondering if you'd consider archiving it. Of course, this is purely optional; there is no requirement at all. I'm just asking because the list is getting a bit crowded. Again, if you'd like to stay on longer to see if you get more reviews then by all means feel free to do so. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺) 04:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks and Happy New Year
Firstly, let me wish you a very happy New Year and thank you for your help in the Milhist Tag & Assess 2007 drive.
Secondly, although the Tag & Assess 2007 drive is now officially closed, you are very welcome to continue tagging and assessing until 31 January 2008. Any articles you tag and assess during this time will be credited fully to your tagging tally for further award purposes.
Thirdly, if you can find the time, it would be great to have your feedback/comments and participation in the recently-set-up Tag & Assess workshop The idea is to see what lessons we can learn from the 2007 drive to make the 2008 one more efficient and enjoyable.
Thanks again for your help, --ROGER DAVIES talk 10:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXII (December 2007)
The December 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Question
I saw that you were approved for vandalproof and was wondering if you have been able to actually use the program, as it is not working for me. Sirkadtalk 19:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Ah, okay. Sirkadtalk 17:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- I figured it out, i didnt have it in the right directory lol. Sirkadtalk 03:33, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Hans T. Blokland
I've declined the speedy tag you placed on Hans T. Blokland. The reason is:
- other page copied from Wikipedia, not the other way around
For your information, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate your concerns! I think we should keep it. El Buscón was one of the first picaresque novels by the very well-known poet and playwright Francisco de Quevedo. I do need some time to expand it so that it matches or at least comes close to matching the length of the Spanish Wikipedia article on the same subject: which is at: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Busc%C3%B3n --Polylerus (talk) 17:56, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield , Deletion Really?
I was looking at the newpages and noticed you had marked Holy Trinity Church Cuckfield with a speedy deletion tag. I thought to remove it and note the article that it needs to be wikified instead of deleted. Your reason for the deletion was 'no context' when the article was quite lengthy, yet not encyclopedic. I've asked for it to be wikified. Perhaps you would like to add the article to your watch list and see if it's been wikified within a week. After that you can add a DELETION tag instead of a speedy deletion tag. If you would like to respond please leave a message on my talk page. Monkeytheboy (talk) 18:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
The young lady in question has left me a note on my talk page suggesting that I should recreate her Night puma article. That's not going to happen. Since you felt I dealt with her harshly in the past, and you've adopted her as your protege, perhaps you would care to explain to her the reasons for speedy deletion of nonsense articles. I've kept the title on my watchlist and will be keeping an eye out for its possible recreation. If you have any questions, or if there's some aspect of Wikipedia policy that you'd prefer I explain, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
speedy deletion of IFES Ireland
Hi i don't understand why this article was deleted. IFES Ireland is part of the worldwide IFES movement of which there is an article, and a sister movement of UCCF which also has an entry. It is an umbrella charity for christian student groups in Ireland that have been in existence for over 90 years Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soapboxrants (talk • contribs) 17:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Ancient Greek water technology
I noticed that you have cited my work on Urban water engineering and management in ancient Greece. Thanks very much.
I wish to let you know that there are some newer papers which you may find related to the subject of the Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Greek_technology
See:
http://www.itia.ntua.gr/e/docinfo/750/
http://www.itia.ntua.gr/e/docinfo/631/
and
http://www.itia.ntua.gr/?title=ancient&stn=search_results&lang=2
Kind regards,
Demetris Koutsoyiannis
(dk@itia.ntua.gr) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.102.131.52 (talk) 08:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Userpage format
You may want to conform one style to all your user pages/subpages. In my opinion, it looks nicer that way. A tip if you're willing to follow my advice: For the talk page, one shouldn't put |} at the bottom of the table, or else all new talk entries would be underneath the table.
Also, the correct plural of userbox is userboxen.
(for the record, that last comment is a joke) Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 21:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for following my advice. It looks nicer to me now... I hope you don't mind, but I added the header to the top. Also, what's with the {{featured article}} on your user page? Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 17:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- I also conformed your other subpages to the style of your user page (moved header to top). Feel free to revert me if you like. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 17:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your time and effort. Redmarkviolinist Drop me a line 00:10, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello. You may have seen that some Wikipedia articles lack sources to given dates, timelines and chronologies.
If you feel that you could like to help in making all articles more reliable and well sourced in this regard, we would like to encourage you to use, as part of your daily editing and when {{fact}} is not enough for requesting clearly and specifically a citation or source for dates, timeline or chronology, the following inline tag:
- {{Timefact}} displays {chronology source needed} for requesting timelines, dates and chronology sources. Click here for more information
At WP Timeline Tracer, we thank you for using these tools and for helping to make Wikipedia articles more accurate and reliable.
Daoken 10:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I was very surprised to receive your message re: this article, since I was still writing it in another field! I looked at a preview but never "saved" it, although Wikipedia obviously did. This has happened to me several times before. Can you explain why? Thank you. P.S. I removed the "speedy delete" notation because I'm still writing the article. MovieMadness (talk) 14:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
You've got messages
on your coaching page.
The Transhumanist 07:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Enghistory
A tag has been placed on Template:Enghistory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.
Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)
The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
User:Dust Rider
Why did you send a message to my Dust Rider account even though i've placed a template asking user's to reforward messages to this user. Terra Terra's talkpage 18:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
==What kind of a clown tags a user page for speedy deletion???== ♦ King of Baldness ♦ $1,000,000? 16:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- That was a total mistake. I accidentally clicked on the userpage instead of the new page. Redmarkviolinist Drop me a line 16:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Well you shouldn't be tagging anything for speedy anyway see verification at [[AN/I discussion. We had afull converstation the other day at the admin noticeboard stating that infboxes and details will be added over the coming weeks ♦ King of Baldness ♦ $1,000,000? 16:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Look, we all make mistakes, and you simply made one here. It probably would be a good idea to not tag too many articles for speedy deletion in any event though, particularly not newer ones. This isn't saying that you couldn't {{prod}} some you have questions about, but nominating for speedy deletion is probably not the best idea if you have much any doubt whatsoever. John Carter (talk) 16:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Jeremy Flint
Google is not the judge of a bridge player. Flint's entry in the American Contract Bridge League Encyclopedia fully establishes his credibility as a top player; and his reputation as a writer was also high. If you jump on a stub the second it's put up, little would be left standing! More Flint will follow... Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)