User talk:SriMesh/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, SriMesh. You have new messages at L'Aquatique's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
  • Please add comments to the bottom of the Current talk page.
  • This particular page is Archive 5...there are other archival pages for its history as it was getting too long.
Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

View User Page Please add comments to the bottom of this Current talk page.

DO NOT ADD COMMENTS ON THIS ARCHIVE PAGE PLEASE

Thanks

Gifting you a Ganesha for good luck.

For Barnstar and GA review. I would like have your comments about Matrikas. I am currently expanding the article. I am also GA reviewing an article for the first time. I will contact you if i need help in the review.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:55, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You need not peek in now. I will leave a note on your talk after the expansion of Matrikas.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Sri, I appreciate the work you have been doing, but there is still a lot of concern (not just from me) about the British Columbia page. The main concern is that most of the quotes on the page seem to have nothing to do with British Columbia, or to not be particularly about British Columbia. Are you under the impression that any notable quote by a notable British Columbian belongs on this page? If so, that's not the way things work at Wikiquote. I understand that you have a portal that you would like to maintain, and are trying to put the quotations in Wikiquote, which is fine and good, but the way to do it would be to set up separate pages from separate topics, and then cross-reference them from your portal. For instance, you could certainly have a page on Emily Carr, who is notable and whose quotes are notable. You could probably have a page about British Columbia too, but you would need to keep to topic on it (that is, only notable quotes clearly about British Columbia.

Going through the quotes on the page, here are my comments:

  • Cedars are terribly sensitive...
    • Appears to be about cedars, which grow everywhere
  • Come to the edge of the barn...
    • Not apparently about BC.
  • Downstream ever further...
    • If I had to guess, I'd say this is about salmon. I can see where it might be about BC, but I'd need some context.
  • It is wonderful to feel the grandness of Canada...
    • Seems to be about Canada. Yes, I know she lived in BC, but if she meant BC why did she say Canada? Much of what she says is true about other parts of Canada.
  • Life's an awfully lonesome affair.
    • This is about life. I don't see the connection to BC
  • Most of the Games..
    • First, this is about the games, not about BC (even though the games will be there). Second, it's not a very interesting quote from a quotability standpoint -- it's just marketing propaganda.
  • owls in the beardusky woods
    • About owls? We have them too.
  • Stand with Baillie-Grohman in 1882...
    • I don't know where most of those places are, but I'm prepared to believe this one is about BC.
  • The flavour is its own reward...
    • Have no idea why this is about BC.
  • There is something bigger than fact...
    • Again, if she's talking about BC we need some context.
  • You always feel when you look it straight...
    • Isn't this about art?
  • The coast of British Columbia was one of the three chief centers of aboriginal America.
    • About BC, but of no interest as a quote. It's just a fact.

If some of these (other than the one i mention) are really about BC, you need to explain why. The standard wikiquote format, which you haven't used, would be useful here. Here's an example:

  • The hush of the forest in the still of the mountains.
    • explaining what he finds unique about British Columbia
    • John Doe, My Life, Erehwon Publishers, 2007

But the source had better bear out the fact that the person really is talking about some experience or quality unique to BC, not just an impression he happened to have just because he happened to be in BC or because he was born there. Do you understand what I mean? --ubiquity (talk) 15:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Your copyedit request

On April 12, 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on Geography of Saskatchewan. Due to a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we aplogize. Since your request, this article has been subject to significant editing, and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. SlackerMom (talk) 17:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Your copyedit request

On 11 August 2007, you made a request to the League of Copyeditors for a copyedit on Agriculture in Canada. Because of a heavy backlog and a shortage of copyeditors, we have been unable to act on your request in a timely manner, for which we aplogize. Since your request, this article has been subject to significant editing and may no longer be a good candidate for copyediting by the League. If you still wish the League to copyedit this article, please review this article against our new criteria and follow the instructions on the Requests page. This will include your request in our new system, where it should receive more prompt attention. Finetooth (talk) 18:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

In Ayyavazhi article

Thanks for the good works. And the citations, 108 and 109 were moved to another URL and now I've placed the current URL to the article. And the page cited in 'citation 75' was missing and I don't find it through search engines. So I removed it from the article. Please refer to the article and it's talk page. Once again thanks very much for your good suggestions and works. - PAUL RAJ 20:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

User:SriMesh, Thanks very much, beyond words for all your kind helps and works. - PAUL RAJ 20:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

have you or haven't you passed the article as WP:GAC says it is still on hold.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 05:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I have removed the article from GAC list.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Sask Quotes

Hi SriMesh, how are you? It was nice to hear from you. I checked out the Saskatchewan page. Looks good. I have started a discussion on its Talk page. Talk to you soon! Moisejp (talk) 02:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi SriMesh, how are you doing? All is well here. I just wanted to make sure I got the Sask stuff I sent you a few weeks or so ago. That was my first time to e-mail anything through Wikipedia, so just wanted to make sure. Have a good day! Moisejp (talk) 08:02, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi SriMesh. How's it going? I'm well. Wow, you sure added lots to Saskatchewan! I have the DVD for The Muppet Movie, so I will find the exact quote Kermit uses in "Movin' Right Along" about Saskatchewan. Also, when I was doing research for the old SIPC page, I came across this webpage: http://www.saskatoonlibrary.ca/html/LHistorysong.html but it was right before the SIPC article was going to be deleted so I didn't have a chance to check out many of the quotes. I will try to check a few of them out in the next few days. Bye for now! Moisejp (talk) 01:56, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Added the Muppets quote, fixed up some punctuation, and left a note on the discussion page. Check it out! Moisejp (talk) 23:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Ayyavazhi article to FAC

Hai User:SriMesh, I am thinking of nominating Ayyavazhi for the Featured article. What is your opinion? Do you think that the article was fit in all ways to be so? If not i need you kind suggestions and helps. Thanks - PAUL RAJ 13:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I am trying to move forward; Thanks very much for your valuable suggestions. - PAUL RAJ 08:57, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
User:SriMesh, Thanks very much for voting in the Ayyavazhi article FAC. - PAUL RAJ 16:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
User:Amarrg has made some comments in the FA nomination page of Ayyavazhi. Can you please try solving the issue? I'll also. - PAUL RAJ 05:32, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Friend, With high respect for your suggestion, I request you that can you please explain with other words; I mean with examples from the articles itself? Sorry for the inconvenience. - PAUL RAJ 17:28, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
I've made corrections with the article as per your suggestions. Please take a look. Thanks for you kind helps. - PAUL RAJ 14:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Transportation in Saskatchewan

Updated DYK query On 24 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Transportation in Saskatchewan, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Roads invitation

The invite says it's for the roads project, but when I click on the link it takes me to the Saskatchewan project. Might wanna fix that, eh? (*grin*) Bearcat (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Portal Alberta

Thanks for the kind words about the photos. I will offer some more to the Alberta Portal as I get additional ones of comparable quality.Cszmurlo (talk) 04:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Ayyavazhi GAC Reassessed

User:SriMesh, User:Ncmvocalist had reassesed the Ayyavazhi article and had still clamed that the article lacks Good prose, MOS guidelines, Fair Use rationales, the article is not in focus, ect. He had also made suggestions. Can you please help in maintaining it.

Leave the reference section, i will prove its relaiability and hence the article's NPOV. But I need help in the above issues. Thanks - PAUL RAJ 09:02, 5 February 2008 (UTC)


Thanks very much for you help. I kindly request you that keep an eye on the MOS of the article, since I can't do anything better than you, Thanks. - PAUL RAJ 07:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Ayyavazhi

I'm sure there are other articles that have managed to find a way of 'getting around' issues like the one that you have mentioned. However, if it is indeed impossible to make the prose both well written, and clear throughout the article (even with respect to these names), then the article is destined to staying at a B grade as it does not come up to the required standard of other articles that are at a higher grade.

So, instead of making a separate sentence for explaining that the name has changed, incorporate it into the previous sentence in which the name was used. So in effect, you should be tightening the expression of the article so that every sentence is focused on the heading under which you've written it, rather than having indirectly relevent sentences floating around. Eg; Instead of having "Ayyavazhi began to be noticed initially by the large number of people gathering to worship Vaikundar (birth name 'Mudisoodum Perumal' )[28] (1809 C.E – 1851 C.E)[29] at Poovandanthoppe. Poovandanthoppe is the name of a village now called Swamithoppe. The Thuvayal thavasu..." -> try "Ayyavazhi began to be noticed initially by the large number of people gathering at the village, Poovandanthoppe to worship Vaikundar...." So a reader can click on Poovandanthoppe and after being redirected to the Swamithoppe article, the first sentence states that Swamithoppe was previously known as Poovandanthoppe. Similarly, the fact that there is no article on Vaikundar is another major concern. Anyway, good luck! Ncmvocalist (talk) 04:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Saskatchewan, etc.

Hi SriMesh. How are you doing? Sorry I haven't been too helpful lately. I have been quite busy and haven't put in a lot of Wikipedia time in recently. Actually, I have another project (i.e. article) or two that I hope to work on before I would be able to find time to get back to the Saskatchewan quotes stuff. Did you end up finding the file you saved from the old SiPC article? If you are eager to do more work on the Sask quotes and want me to send you what I saved from the old SiPC article I could. But I don't want it to seem like I'm dumping extra work on you when I said that I was going to help you. I know you would probably appreciate someone else to jump in there and help you along. But I will try to get back to the quotes thing sooner or later. Bye for now, and take care! Moisejp (talk) 02:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Saskatchewan Spotlight Award

Many thanks for the Saskatchewan Spotlight Award... nice to know my contributions are appreciated. Here's to continued success of WikiProject Saskatchewan! Drm310 (talk) 18:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

importance vs class

You recently assessed a series of articles, but they have importance mixed up with class (so they show up as un-assessed and unknown importance). Could you please fix the remaining ones at Category:Unknown-importance Canada-related articles. Thank you. --Qyd (talk) 21:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Proposal Of A New Section Of The Newsletter

Long time no chat. I got an idea after seeing it on another newsletter I get. A section of articles for deletion. Current, kept, and deleted would be the sections and each month we could update the list. Mr. C.C. (talk) 00:53, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

I try to do stuff on Wikipedia as I can. I saw the idea on the WikiProject Professional Wrestling newsletter. Mr. C.C. (talk) 04:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Don't link to the actual article. Link to the deletion discussion. Mr. C.C. (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Assesment Banner For WikiProject: Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods

I gave a textual assesment for the Kinoosao, Saskatchewan article and the issue of an assesment banner of for WP:SKCN is something I keep thinking about. I know that the current WP:SKCN banner is working on being changed. I am wondering if we can put our heads together and get it done. Mr. C.C. (talk) 19:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Spotlight Award Question

Does the Spotlight Award cover the WP:SKCN and WP:SKRD? I am just wondering. Mr. C.C. (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Award

Thank you for the award! Reggie Perrin (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the award!

Hi, SriMesh. Thank you very much for the Saskatchewan Spotlight award, AND the I Love Saskatchewan award! Shanemcd (talk) 04:05, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank you too for the award!

Hi, SriMesh. Thank you very much for the I Love Saskatchewan award! It motivetes me to continue contribuiting. Gypaetus (talk) 20:17, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Hidden Page

User:Destructo 087/Userboxes/Fooled2




Referencing The Prince Albert, Saskatchewan Article

I left some discussion on this on WP:SKCN talk page. It needs a lot of work as far as references go. I have added some, but it needs a lot more to be considered for good article status in the least. I know you will do what you can. Mr. C.C. (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

St. Lina Aerodrome

Well it appears that St. Lina is in Alberta, so it looks like an error. However, I'm at home right now and don't have access to the manual. I'll double check it later when I get to work. By the way the next one I created right after that was Estevan (Blue Sky) Aerodrome so St. Lina is probably not near Estevan. THanks for seeing it. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 08:44, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Yep it was Alberta. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 14:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation to Saskatchewan Project

I'm flattered. I'm not a Canadian, but I do have relatives in Grimshaw, Alberta, so I have an idea of prairie culture. The only person from Saskatchewan that I actually know is Michael Rieder, the pediatrician that got baby walkers banned in Canada. I'd be happy to act as a neutral referee from south of the border (54-40). Pustelnik (talk) 22:31, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Your note

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! GreenJoe 02:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Friends of Fiddlers Green

See reply on my page. Pustelnik (talk) 21:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Thank you for your help, I always thought they were notable. Pustelnik (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability

Just so you know, I've removed some from that list which either have had sufficient references added, have already been redirected or should never have been listed in the first place (registered political parties, numbered provincial highways, etc.) Bearcat (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I completely agree in the case of Holy Trinity — although the idea that high schools are encyclopedically notable still personally makes me itch, the article does contain independent references and the education project does generally regard high schools as notable. Bearcat (talk) 22:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Spotlight Award

Here is the Spotlight Award nominated by yours truly.

Saskatchewan Spotlight Award

Mr. C.C. (talk) 05:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Template:PartofWPSASKATCHEWAN

I created the following template: Template:PartofWPSASKATCHEWAN after seeing one for the Canada WikiProject. This template overrides the Canada one and there has to be a way to use both. Mr. C.C. (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm just surprised that lots of Beyonce related articles are being posted on Portal:R&B and Soul Music/Selected article, especially Irreplaceable on Portal:R&B and Soul Music/Selected article/8. Thanks for choosing them, but my concern is there is no template or proper acknowledgment posted in every article's respective discussion pages that these articles got featured in the portal. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 05:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

replied at Efe's talk page.
Hello Srimesh. Good Morning (in Philippine time). Thanks for the prompt reply. For the non-free images, I was really thinking yesterday that the idea of posting them in the portal is against the policy. Most portals and even the main page do not post non-free images. When a song-related article is featured, they do not use the single's cover; instead, they use available free image used in the article—of course, nice images. I'm really interesting to be part of the project Wikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, and I believe the portal is part of it. However, the project is dying, almost. You can count on me for further improvements. --Efe (talk) 00:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I've replied to most of your queries and good work for the template. --Efe (talk) 00:45, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
I've removed some also. Is there a newsletter for the project? --Efe (talk) 00:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. Just wondering why my talk page is categorized to GA-Class R&B and Soul Music articles. --Efe (talk) 01:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Its fine. Thanks for fixing. --Efe (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

{{helpme}} The thing most frustrating with the portal is that the images which are fair use for the articles, are not remaining on the portal which refers to the articles. Would like to know how to proceed...not use fair use images for a portal, do a fair use explanation for each image used on the portal or what have you. Kind Regards. SriMesh | talk 17:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes, not using questionable fair use images would be the best, see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fair_use, however opinions differ. Mion (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Nice portal btw. Mion (talk) 18:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I deleted this as you seemed to accidentially create it in the article space, and there is already one at Template:R&B and Soul Music Selected article, meaning moving it would be pointless. J Milburn (talk) 22:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want a page you've accidentially created to be deleted, you can tag it with {{db-author}}. J Milburn (talk) 22:19, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Quebec Hip Hop Rap

Hi, I have a few questions for you on my talk page after your edit. Fgenolini (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: SK 16/SK 58

No problem. Just the thing is, GAs don't usually pass w/o pictures. And that 16 has the best chance of passing compared to the other two. Mitch32contribs 22:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

I gave it a lookover, as did several others. I'm on the edge of failing it because its screwed up with MoS. If you want some opinions, the #wikipedia-en-roads IRC channel is where I am as well. SK 16 is a big mess, no history should be in the route description, etc. Please, if you want help, ask in the IRC channel.Mitch32contribs 23:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
The article still has problems. 1) MoS and puncutation issues throughout, 2) infobox needs to be expaned, 3) no need for the RM box, 4) split apart the images (they're too bunched up), 5) Jct list should only be kilometres. This is from others. Mitch32contribs 22:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
How about the words "Look now" - -I just fixed half your problems. :) Mitch32contribs 22:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Being a little nitpicky but: 6) Use either SK or Hwy throughout the article, 7) What is twinning? 8) Section 2.6 needs cleanup, 9) Ghost town section needs a notability mention, or it should be removed, 10) Section 2.5 - How can a highway be "graveled"? - These need fixing.Mitch32contribs 23:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I am trying to tweak this article to make it a GA it is on hold. I have placename sizes via the latests census, but always re-stating that the date of the population was 2006 and the cite source is making a hard to read prosy article is there a better way of citing the facts to not get a fact tag, but still say the size of the village or hamlet? Thank you.SriMesh | talk 19:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't quite understand. Could you rephrase your question? Thanks. Microchip 08 20:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
You can use <cite name="foo"/> if the item named 'foo' was already used before your use of it. So you can do something like <cite name="foo"> blah</cite> and later on in the article do <cite name="foo"/> and basically reuse the prior citation.. PS I'm going to remove the helpme tag, re-add it when and if you need clarification. —— nixeagle 20:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey! ok, that is basic wikimarkup... I'm not sure if there is a way round that. However you do have a few options here. First you can continue as you are doing now, putting that tag after each number. Or you can place the tag after each paragraph, and simply place a {{citationneeded}} tag after those that you don't have a citation for. —— nixeagle 21:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Saskatchewan highway shields

Hey. I fixed the Saskatchewan shield template in {{Infobox road}} to use a variation of Pomte's shield template on all articles. You can see it in action on Saskatchewan Highway 58. I'm also in the process of developing a Saskatchewan junction template (that, with some tricky code, could probably be expanded for any Canadian province) that will simplify the amount of code required to generate a junction table. Regards, TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 15:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Naming of Government Departments MoS

((help me)) Don't know how to name the Department of Highways and Transportation (Saskatchewan) / Ministry of Highway and Infrastructure (Saskatchewan) / Highways and Infrastructure (Saskatchewan) / Saskatchewan Highways and Infrastructure / Saskatchewan Department of Highways and Transportation / Saskatchewan Ministry of Highway and Infrastructure OR... Highways and Transportation (Saskatchewan) wikipedia article. Naming conventions discussion started here. Thank you. SriMesh | talk 02:12, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem; I'll get to it in the morning. An en-dash is the first dash next to "Insert:" at the bottom of the editing page. It refers to a dash that has the width of a standard "n". Another way to insert an en-dash is to write out &ndashplus-a-semicolon. —Rob (talk) 04:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

SK newsletter

Give me a day, I can think about it. Thanks!Mitch32contribs 00:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for supporting my nomination (Interstate 70 in Utah) at FAC. Dave (talk) 03:05, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

In case you are no longer following the discussion, this is one last response to your comment:
The external link I found is here:[1]. Although, this is not complete, missing the truck speed limits (40MPH) placed on the hilly areas. I'll keep looking, and if I can't find a better one, use this as an external link. The page is actually very good, but with a URL of members.aol.com would certainly be challenged as a self published source.Dave (talk) 02:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I've replied to your comments. Thanks for taking the time to review. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 12:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

re:May Newsletter

The notice looks good as it is. I'll start working on some next week when I'm done writing exams too. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 02:35, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 23 April, 2008, a fact from the article Carlyle Clare Agar, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Bobet 12:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

DYK

Updated DYK query On 23 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ministry of Highways and Infrastructure (Saskatchewan), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, Bobet 12:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 5 - May 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:20, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

You said that the article Twillingate, Newfoundland and Labrador needed improvements before being passed for the good article nominations, though I can't find in the talk page the improvements you requested. I'm one of the main contributors to the article and I'd appreciate if you provided the information as to what you would like to see improved. Thank you. NeonFire (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

I've responded and fixed most of the things you mentioned during the review, though there were a few things I found unclear. Could you provide an update as to what else (more specifically) should be improved before pass/fail? Thanks! NeonFire (talk) 11:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I've responded again. NeonFire (talk) 19:30, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Ignore those comments. I didn't notice you responded above the section you split. This is my new response: "Sorry, I didn't see the comments above before. I added to the lead, added captions to the images attributing the authors of those images and added some of the notable people back into the bottom of the history section as well as the new Government and politics section. Being a town of only 2400 people, there isn't much to say about government." NeonFire (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I've responded again. NeonFire (talk) 22:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Indian Head and Qu'Appelle photos

How wonderful that you were able to add photos to these articles. Did you happen to get any current streetscapes as well? Masalai (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Oh, terrific! Do put them up -- and please let me know when you do. I'm sure I can figure out what the buildings are.Masalai (talk) 06:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

You passed this article yesterday. Unfortunately, I have found several issues with the GA criteria that need to be addressed, so I think your passing it was a little premature. The article will be delisted from WP:GA in one week unless the issues are resolved.

Also, when passing GAs, please do not start a new main section for 'successful good article nomination'. Please keep the article pass in the same main section as the review. This will make things much easier when reviews are archived at a later point. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

As an additional note, one thing that might help out, especially in the area of 'completeness/broadness' with city articles is to become somewhat familiar with the city article guidelines at WP:USCITY and WP:UKCITIES. If the article is missing a several main sections from those guidelines, it fails the completeness criterion. Also, keep an eye out for sections with very little content (2-4 sentences), which indicates some completeness issues. Even a major section like history should have more than two paragraphs. The history section should tell the story of the development of the city, from ancient times (if the city's that old) to modern day. One thing I am seeing with a lot of recent articles is that they do a good job with history, but really skimp on recent history, cutting off largely around world war II, which leaves off about sixty years or so. Dr. Cash (talk) 01:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

There are also issues with this article, and it will be delisted from WP:GA within one week if they are not addressed. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

St. Bernard School, Saskatoon marked with a general notability guideline Please see User:Eusebeus/School Notability. There are other sources which regard schools as generally notable as wellSriMesh | talk 20:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

It wasn't me who added the template, it was User:Epbr123. Jake the Editor Man (talk) 20:13, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mount Royal, Saskatoon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Mount Royal, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Saskatoon John G. Diefenbaker International Airport

Thanks. I added an image to the box and put some in a gallery. I also went to Transport Canada and using the first box (Mark) I was able to identify some of the aircraft and updated the Commons pictures. Just use the last four letters off the aircraft and it will tell you what they are and the owner. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 07:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Just some of your images:
  • Saskatoon 084 is a 1966 Piper PA-28-160 Cherokee
  • Saskatoon 085 is a 1976 Piper PA-28R-200 Cherokee Arrow
  • Saskatoon 086, 087, 088, 089 and 092 are all Fokker F-28-1000s of Canadian Regional Airlines.
  • Saskatoon 090 is a 1976 Piper PA-28-151 Cherokee
  • Saskatonn 091 is a Cessna of some kind.MilborneOne (talk) 17:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
I can't actually recognise a lot of aircraft as we tend to get the same ones all the time so I had to use the call signs to ID them. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:41, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Central Business District, Saskatoon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Central Business District, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Pleasant Hill, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Sasaktoon neighbourhoods

I have responded to most of the comments you entered. Hopefully they will be useful to those interested in the neighbourhood articles. Drm310 (talk) 19:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

I award you with...

The R&B and Soul Music Award
I, Eduemonitalk, award the R&B and Soul Music Award to SriMesh for for your comprehensive work on the Soul and R&B WikiPortal, wikipedia is really improved by users like you, regards!!!

Forestry Farm Park and Zoo

Thanks for the photos of the airport, it adds to the page. Would you have any in your collection that would be a good fit for the Forestry Farm Park and Zoo. (M@sk (talk) 03:48, 21 May 2008 (UTC))

Thanks for the photos, I will try to integrate more of them as I expand the article. --M@sk (talk) 03:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Sports facilities

Hi, SriMesh. I am attempting to revive WP:WikiProject Sports facilities and noticed that you were the creator of {{WikiProject Sports facilities}}. I want to invite you stop back by the project and participate in getting things going, again. Best wishes. --Gwguffey (talk) 04:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

PEI project

Thanks for the invitation. My knowledge is limited and in any event I would have to pass as my time to contribute may shortly become limited. Jonathan Logan (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Commons project

Hi. Thanks for the invitation and I wish you the best but I'm going to decline to participate, at least for a while. I feel a great deal of annoyance with the administration of the Commons project and deal as little as possible with it. Cheers! DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:29, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 6 - June 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 11:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Commons wikiproject got moved

The page at the Commons got moved which means that all the links to it no longer work. The correct link is now Commons:Commons:WikiProject Canada. I fixed the link at Meta and added it at Wikipedia talk:Canadian Wikipedians' notice board#Commons wikiprojects but I wan't sure where else it was linked from. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

You wrote: "Re Mather Byles DesBrisay, one of the external links was changed to a reference citation using the wiki style of referencing...[[Wikipedia:Citation templates]. Could more be added to the article to support Wikipedia:Notability."

On the contrary, you did the opposite and changed a reference citation to an external link. Nonetheless, it seems rather odd to change the single most important and reliable reference source that far exceeds Wikipedia:Notability requirements to an external link then turn around and say: "Could more be added to the article to support Wikipedia:Notability". Being new, I prefer to yield to others more experienced but frankly, neither your message to me nor your edit, makes any sense. Please elucidate. Thank you. Jonathan Logan (talk)

Public Transit in Saskatchewan

Thank you for your invitation to join the Saskatchewan Project, because I created the Prince Albert Transit article, but unfortunately I really don't know much about the province. My task is a sort of "if you build it they will come" project, to create an entry for every public transit system in Canada. Because the quality and quantity of information available on the internet varies I have to rely on locals to contribute supplementary input that may not be available online and to take photographs of buses and terminals that I cannot supply. Perhaps you can help me contact a 'Saskapedian' (do you like this word?) who would be willing to upload photographs relating to the Category:Transit agencies in Saskatchewan and also the Saskatchewan Transportation Company. Thank you. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the pictures. I have used three edited versions in the Saskatoon Transit article. What I have to do with many of my own photographs is trim off the asphalt in the foreground, otherwise objects can seem to float. For the downtown terminal I simply removed that excess and changed it into a 16x9 widescreen format, which I find to be pleasant dimensions (like HDTV). The other two pics focus on buses in different paint schemes; the current one for the infobox and the old one in 'Fleet'. Julia, cooperation like this is what makes Wikipedia enjoyable. Thanks again. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:17, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


a couple of subjects :)

  1. Your edit here may have been misplaced. That article is for stuff in the 20th century. 2004 is a part of the 21st century. You may want to put it in the main article at Royal tours of Canada.
  2. With regards to this edit, why was {{WPCFL}} added?
  3. With this edit, the credit should go to G2Bambino as all I did was split the 20th century off into it's own article.--Rockfang (talk) 02:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the support, I will continue to make my contribution. Hope things are well with you and family. ----M@sk (talk) 03:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


Hi

Hi SriMesh, how are you doing? I've been meaning to write to you for a while just to say hello, but haven't had any particular special news to write so I have held off. Have you been keeping busy with Saskatchewan-related articles? How's that going? Recently I have become involved in WikiProject Vancouver, which has been fun. Actually I saw you had written a note or two on I think the WikiProject Vancouver discussion page, was it? I can't remember for sure. Anyway, I hope all is well. Look forward to hearing from you whenever you have time. Moisejp (talk) 03:32, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi again, thanks for your note. I'm glad you liked my article, thank you. Good job on your two SK highway GAs, too. And I see you're doing GA reviewing too, that's cool. That's something I would like to try at some point, but right now I just don't have the time (plus I figure maybe I should write one or two more GAs myself before reviewing others). Actually, my end of June resolution that I decided on last night is that I unfortunately need to take a break from Wikipedia for a while, to get caught up on some other commitments in my life. Which is too bad, because I do love Wikipedia so. But I will be back sooner or later. (And who knows, maybe I won't be able to keep away, but I have to at least try!) Take care, and talk to you later! Moisejp (talk) 00:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

NY Route 343 GAN

There are some issues with your review, could you please take a look? Comments have arised mainly about unnecessary stuff and all.Mitch32contribs 22:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I've made changes that could be made per your suggestions. Most of what you said should definitely be incorporated or at least touched upon in the article. However, there is a lack of sources (at least those accessible online) on the influence of this road on the communities around it. In terms of construction and paving, I don't think there is anything noteworthy about this particular case as it is a regular minor rural highway. Anyway, please have a look at the article again to see if it is good enough. We will definitely try and add your suggestions over time as sources are found (which may require a trip to a local public library or historical society). Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 23:16, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up regarding the CD. I'll be sure to let you know as soon as I get it. --Polaron | Talk 01:04, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Zack Smith

It would appear that he doesn't meet the criteria for notabiliy as he's never competed in a fully professional league or played at the highest level of amateur competition where as Brent Bobyck has played professional hockey. If he doesn't meet those criteria or the general criteria at WP:N then he shouldn't have an article. --JD554 (talk) 09:35, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I expanded upon this article a bit for you. If you want to try to remove the PROD, go for it. I'd say your only stance for argument of keeping the article, though, is that he did play in six games with the Manitoba Moose (of the AHL, a fully professional league) during the 07-08 playoffs. Skudrafan1 (talk) 11:51, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I should have looked in to his playing career rather than taking the article at face value. If he's played in a pro league then he meets WP:ATHLETE. I've removed the prod. --JD554 (talk) 13:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 7 - July 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 12:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Arpad Vass

Updated DYK query On 8 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Arpad Vass, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 03:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:Reward Board Request

Hi-
I'm not sure if this is the sort of thing you were looking for, but I'm not very good at article writing, so I made a graphic. It's a map that shows all the villages along with Saskatchewan Highway 11:
Map
It's in a vector format, so you can resize it as you see fit. I used the colors defined by the MOS for maps, but I can change them if you wish.
I spent about an hour and a half on it between tracing maps, finding the cities, etc etc. Let me know if this is acceptable to you--
L'Aquatique[review] 07:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

NY highway sufficiency database

Hi. I replied to your posting on Talk:New York State Route 343. The database is indeed a very rich source of information for highway articles in New York and the State Routes project would definitely make extensive use of this. Is there a way we can get a copy of this from you? Do you have any suggestions for sending such a large file? I can probably setup an FTP server if needed. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 14:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

It may take a bit more time to setup the FTP server. However, if you don't mind the postage and blank CD cost, snail mail might actually be easier. Let me know if that's alright with you and I'll email you my mailing address. Otherwise, I'll work on setting up FTP this weekend. Thanks again. --Polaron | Talk 14:25, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Saskatchewan Portal Issue Still Unresolved

I have looked over the Saskatchewan portal and can't figure out how to make it so it fits on the page. It still is stretching the page. I have looked at other portals like Iceland and New South Wales and all their content fits well on the page without stretching it. I have read your comments on the Saskatchewan Portal talk page about you having a wide screen monitor. Now I think the portal should fit nicely on the page regardless of the reasons. A lot of people do use 1024x768 setting for their monitor. Besides, it would look much better if it was back to the width it originally was while still having the current layout. Mr. C.C. (talk) 06:38, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

It looks great now. Mr. C.C. (talk) 22:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for the barnstar! I am going to be taking the weekend offwiki but when I get back I will start working on similar maps for the other highways. Peace- L'Aquatique[review] 20:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Please see my response on my talk page...L'Aquatique[review] 20:47, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Red Maple Leaf Award

A Barnstar!
The Maple Leaf Award

Here is the Red Maple Leaf Award for your work on all things Canada. Thank you for all of your hard work. Mr. C.C. (talk) 05:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Adding Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods WikiProject To Canada Template

On the Template:WikiProject Canada I noticed that the page has been locked. It would nice if WP:SKCN was able to put on that template. Mr. C.C. (talk) 13:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, this will be good for the project. Mr. C.C. (talk) 06:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for getting that done. I do appreciate it. Mr. C.C. (talk) 05:21, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

A Few Items

  1. Thanks for fixing that. It didn't look right with cellpadding and cellspacing. Thanks again for fixing that.
  2. You do a lot with Canadian articles and you deserve the award.
  3. Also take a look at the new colours on the WP: SKCN navigation template. I wanted to use the colours on the Saskatchewan flag. Tell me what you think.
  4. Have been adding stuff the WP: SKCN Assesment Department and added a list of B-Class articles. If there are other articles for FA, GA, or start class, than add them in.
  5. I added some article class icons to the Saskatchewan Assesment Department.
  6. I want it to get done so Assesments for WP: SKCN can get started.

Thanks, Mr. C.C. (talk) 02:04, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Mitchazenia, Spotlight Award Recipient

Just to give you a heads up, Mitchazenia is August's Spotlight Award Recipient. You can read why in the newsletter or the spotlight page. Mr. C.C. (talk) 02:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Canada talk page template

Sorry for the late reply. I'm currently on the road and don't have access to a full computer, so I don't think I can properly look over templates, otherwise I'd love to help out. I hope that Qyd was able to help you. If I'm reading your code right, will it make it so that articles tagged as both SK and as a community will automatically be also added to a third SK-communities project? If this is that case, cool idea.  :) --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 21:50, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know that after putting in the code, I realized the importance categories for WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods didn't match the quality categories (missing a related), so the editorial bot didn't count the stats. I've fixed the issue on the Canada banner {{WikiProject Canada}} and I'm putting in the old importance categories for deletion. Best, --Jh12 (talk) 22:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the award! I did a lot of similar template work for WikiProject Schools. Incidentally, I've been working on the Schools Portal and I noticed Portal:Saskatchewan had a peer review. If you don't mind, I could make some minor changes to that. Best, --Jh12 (talk) 00:44, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

GAN reminder

Hi. This is just a reminder that it has been over 14 days since you placed the good article nomination for New York State Route 100 on hold. If the article does not yet meet the GA criteria, you may wish to contact the nominating editor. Thank you for your help. -epicAdam (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

How goes the review for New York State Route 100? I was looked through the backlog and noticed it had been on hold for awhile. Looking at the talk page, though, it doesn't seem like any of your concerns have been addressed. If that is the case, I think it is safe to fail it for now. Just a friendly reminder in case you forgot (which happens a lot!). :) Nikki311 02:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

LOL! After I posted this, I noticed that someone else got here first (see above). Nikki311 02:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you. Re both of above, will attend to GA review soon, will have a day off around the corner. The NY articles have a new database to draw engineering information from, so the articles should soon show some engineering content as well as route info. Kind Regards

SriMesh | talk 05:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

NY highway database

Just letting you know that I received the DVD with the database yesterday. This information will definitely be a big help in making the NY state highway articles more comprehensive. Thanks so much for this. --Polaron | Talk 22:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Saskatoon Symphony Orchestra

Hi SriMesh, You incorrectly ascribed the changes made to this page to me. I am not the user at 198.169.119.202 and did not include copyrighted (or possibly copyrighted) material in my contribution. I'm concerned that this be resolved without prejudice to my account. I agree that the material as it stands is likely in violation. Smartbottom (talk) 02:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

  • Further to this, I'd like to move forward with the editing of this article, but am stymied by the copyright violation template. I'm (obviously) new to wikipedia... is there any way to move forward with this page other than through the /Temp location? Smartbottom (talk) 03:04, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your notes on my talk page. I look forward to seeing your contributions as well! Smartbottom (talk) 06:14, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Saskatchewan Newsletter: Volume 2, Issue 8 - August 2008

New condensed format delivered by: ENewsBot. Thank you!

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 22:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

FPC candidate on Commons

I left a comment on your talk page on Commons. --S23678 (talk) 05:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!SriMesh | talk 10:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

hello

I'm trying. Thanks for introducing me to Wikipedia.64.201.207.241 (talk) 01:51, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

hello again

Just wanted to see if I could do this on my own. I like your Mistatim article. Erzi (talk) 02:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)