User talk:Tnoamen

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Tnoamen! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! roguegeek (talk·cont) 19:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

roguegeek (talk·cont) 19:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Policies[edit]

You need to read, understand and follow our policies on content neutrality. It is not improving the neutrality of the wikipedia to simply change terms that one feels are positively biased with terms that are instead negatively biased. Specifically the use of the word terrorist has to be used carefully based on reliable sources, and on consensus. Not simply as a way of smearing people with whom one disagrees politically. It is imperative that you understand and follow these rules, since failing to do so will eventually mean that your editing privileges will be suspended.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 22:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Terror (politics), especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. NebY (talk) 21:33, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gay icons[edit]

I don't know what concerns you about the observation that Judy Garland and Liza Minnelli are considered gay icons, but (a) it's true, (b) it's widely known and makes up a substantial part of the lore surrounding both of them, and (c) in the former article the assertion was sourced; I'm going to add a source for the latter. There's nothing political about inclusion of the information. Your removal of it seems to be political, however, especially in light of your edits of other articles. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Jihad" edits[edit]

Please see WP:NPOV. The page already contained sufficient information on the disagreement on the meaning of "jihad." Your edits made the discussion of the term completely one-sided. Rcrptmncr (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Wise. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 01:37, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was not vandalism, it was simply accurate. Mr. Wise's career centers around generating hatred of and calls for the extermination of the White races. Why do certain wikipedia editors wish to whitewash public incitements to genocide? The edit was neutral and accurate, please do not allow your support of people that promote the genocide of Whites to cause you to publish content that lacks neutrality. Tnoamen (talk) 21:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Tnoamen[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Axl Rose, you may be blocked from editing. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Axl Rose. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My edits were utterly objective and neutral. I simply removed content that was not neutral. It was blatantly political: anti-White and pro-homosexual. You have replaced that content with politically motivated anti-White content. And with politically motivated pro-homosexual content. It is unfortunate you seem to hold hostile opinions regarding White people and heterosexuals but please do not let your personal opinions cause you to publish material lacking neutrality. Tnoamen (talk) 21:20, 7 April 2018 (UTC)Tnoamen[reply]

(edit conflict) The sources used say "Guns N' Roses has been under fire for a host of inflammatory lyrics in its song "One in a Million," which uses derogatory epithets to describe blacks and gays.", not anything about "thought crimes". The source used to discuss his use of the racial slur say nothing about "widespread racially motivated violent crime perpetrated by black Americans". If you want to introduce that kind of information, you need to cite reliable sources. GorillaWarfare (talk) 21:33, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 21:31, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]