User talk:Triddle

Any sufficiently popular wiki is bound to devolve exactly the way that Usenet has since the 80s. -- Triddle

Making wiki better

In your view, how would you improve this wiki, Wikipedia? Even though I don't agree with you on some issues, I think you are a good contributor, and hope that you continue to provide feedback on how to make this place a better one. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with the entire "wiki philsophy" at this point. I'm fed up with watching not just my work (which i know is far from perfect) but the work of others get stomped all over by amateurs or people who otherwise have good intent but are just ignorant. The rules say to love and coddle them which definitely helps attract and keep users to the site but that is not in the best interest of the Wikipedia. Wikipedia had been in a few very strong drives to secure resource allocation, those resources being information, editors, and eyeballs. The drive for information has been scaled back somewhat by more stringent rules on citations which is a good thing but eyeballs and editors is still running rampant.

Wikipedia has the eyeballs, brand name recognition, and stature to complete it's mission at this point. The drive for such should be over but is not - wikipedia also has a huge mass of editors and this drive should be slowed but as well is not. The fundamental problem of scaling is that it's hard to find good people. Scaling in this manner is not inherently attracting the quality people that such an open editing process needs. The wiki process is supposed to compensate for this through the community process however the community process itself is also failing. In much the same way that democracies tend to evolve and die I believe that the wikipedia community is going through the same process. Both are an emergent behavior of people unfortunately and I think it is silly to assume this trend will not continue.

I don't necessarily have any solution as I believe the problem is with humanity and not so much technology. This is why after I attempted to act in what I believe are Wikipedia's policies and in the best interest of the project only to have the community as a whole undo the work and tell me I'm wrong I've decided to just excuse myself from the community. Triddle (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

To say that this all saddens me is a massive understatement. You are a very valued "janitor" around here and I'll miss you. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 09:43, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

One way I have found to avoid burnout is to answer questions on the Help desk, and focus on other people's problems. Plus there's a lot of internal tool-building work where the technical difficulty tends to screen out the kind of people who ruined Usenet. --Teratornis (talk) 03:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Stub sensor

Just a thought. As User:Triddle/stubsensor/20070716 gets older the number of works that still have the stub tag get less. Maybe rerun it at the next data dump and stop the old one even if it is not completed? Jeepday (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi Jeepday, I respect you a lot because I throughly enjoyed working with you on the stubsensor project so I didn't want to leave you hanging. Unfortunately Wikipedia has let the quality of the process that generates the dumps slip making it difficult to get up-to-date ones and right now I don't have the time or the inkling to go through a lot of effort to do something to increase the quality of the product the people produce that I'm working around (this is also why I rather dislike Red Hat but I digress). Wikipedia has turned into a celebrity including driving around drunk with their baby in their lap and it's time for me to move on. If you would be interested in running the software that produces the reports I would not mind sharing but at this time I don't see myself doing another stubsensor run any time soon.Triddle (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Triddle, I understand. I can't see myself building the Stub sensor, so after this one I will put it to bed until you return to it. Good luck in the future, I look forward to seeing your concerns addressed and to your return to stubsensor. Jeepday (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Done, Jeepday (talk) 03:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

• Image:Frequency_Selected_Statistical_Sound_Energy_Beat_Detection.ogg

Thank you. Oli Filth^(talk) 00:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

By all means please delete the entire encyclopedia while you are at it. Then have Jimmy buy everyone a huge $1200 steak. Triddle (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Photographs by User:Triddle

Category:Photographs by User:Triddle, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Speedy deletion of List of bong patents

A tag has been placed on List of bong patents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!)} 15:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kompressor-crush television-200.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kompressor-crush television-200.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kompressor-world domination-200.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kompressor-world domination-200.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kompressor-discipline-600.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kompressor-discipline-600.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

stubsensor code request

Can I have the source code for the stub sensor? --Ipatrol (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:IBM 5363 front.triddle.jpg

File:IBM 5363 front.triddle.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:IBM 5363 front.triddle.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:IBM 5363 front.triddle.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject help desk

I have nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject help desk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Intelligentsium 00:42, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IBM 5363 MSP C.triddle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IBM 5363 MSP C.triddle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IBM 5363 MSP D.triddle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IBM 5363 MSP D.triddle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IBM 5353 CSP.triddle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:IBM 5353 CSP.triddle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:37, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor

As a previous volunteer at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor I though you might like to know there is a new set available for work at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor/20100826. Hope to see you there. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Camas, WA welcome sign.triddle.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Camas, WA welcome sign.triddle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly ^hi! 19:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Broken nitro tc3.triddle.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Broken nitro tc3.triddle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ken Demarest.face.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ken Demarest.face.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Michael Badnarik and Triddle.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael Badnarik and Triddle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

File:T-maxx broken control arm.triddle.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:T-maxx broken control arm.triddle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Triddle.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Triddle.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:18, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Scarecrow.triddle.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scarecrow.triddle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cube00 (talk) 13:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:PsychedelicsDissociativesDeliriants-tiny.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PsychedelicsDissociativesDeliriants-tiny.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Michael Badnarik and Triddle.jpg

The file File:Michael Badnarik and Triddle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Personal file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:55, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Traxxas tmaxxs.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Traxxas tmaxxs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Miller spot welder photo

Hello Triddle,

Mindless of the value of my time yesterday, I procrastinated another job by fiddling around with an excellent photo of yours, Spot welder.miller.triddle.jpg, because I had been working on the Spot welding and Electric resistance welding articles. The problem as I saw it was that the copper tongs and electrodes had as their background a copper-colored curtain, making it difficult to interpret, so I extended the light brickwork background leftwards, which contrasted with the components.

Of course I did not amend your photo, but instead uploaded the photo I modified as a different file: Spot welder (Miller 12,000 amp model).jpg.

I noticed that your photo appears in a huge number of articles, and today it occurred to me to contact you to see whether you saw any benefit in replacing your original photo with the new version, in the interests of clarity. What do you think? I can assure you I have no interest in doing that other than to illustrate the components more clearly on these other pages – so if you don't like the idea I will not be at all bothered. Cheers, Simon – SCHolar44 🇦🇺 💬 at 04:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)