User talk:Viller the Great

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello! Welcome to my talk page. If you want to tell me something, write it below.

Welcome...

Hello, Viller the Great, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Unfortunately, your articles on elementary schools do not say why they are notable and do not have any references, so they are in danger of being deleted. Have a look at Wikipedia's policies on notability and citing sources and always add a reference or two when you add information or make a new article.

Again, welcome! Yngvadottir (talk) 06:22, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011[edit]

Thanks for contributing new article George Ralphs. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me.  dalahäst (talk) 03:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Ralphs[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article George Ralphs has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. RadioFan (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011[edit]

Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not replace pages with blank content, as you did with this edit to Jewel-Osco, as this is confusing to readers. The page's content has been restored for now. If there is a problem with the page, it should be edited or reverted to a previous version if possible; if you think the page should be removed entirely, see further information. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 04:01, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Gemco Logo.PNG needs authorship information[edit]

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Gemco Logo.PNG appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

  • If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Viller the Great}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
    or use the {{own}} template.
  • If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:ShawsStar.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ShawsStar.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Sourcing[edit]

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Upon looking at this edit, I would like to remind you to be careful when you add new info. It makes it look like the JR Gonzales source said that the Kroger logo was used for HP, when the source says no such thing. You should have added a {{fact}} tag after the logo sentence, to make it clear that it wasn't cited to JR Gonzales WhisperToMe (talk) 09:07, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:1987 American Stores Company Logo.PNG)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:1987 American Stores Company Logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

  • It is now superseded by a newer file, a copy of it in svg
Viller the Great (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Japan a potential superpower?[edit]

Hey Viller the Great; if you have the time at all to spare would you be able to contribute to a discussion about Japan at the Potential Superpowers article? Cheers, Comics (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Japan's potential for superpower[edit]

Hello, Viller, can you add Japan back as potential superpower please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sai317 (talkcontribs) 01:51, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Someone already readded the article. Unless, the community needs to discuss before we can add new powers.

File:Seessel's Logo.PNG missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

List of proposed state mergers[edit]

Hi Viller the Great. Thanks for your edit on this page. You are absolutely right to trim it down. I've trimmed it radically, leaving only the very likely ones. Please have a look. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 13:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

  • Hello Rui Correia. Thank you for your edits, they have helped a lot. I tried to get rid of the really crazy ones, but I see what you did as right. Not all of them are likely. Thank you for help. I have looked, and it has really been shrunk down. You really did the right thing. As the article noted, the list does not include separatist states, including Catalonia. Only state mergers. In the past week many crazy proposals have surfaced up. keep up the wok, and I will also do my part in keeping things in line. Regards, Viller the Great (talk) 05:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, Viller the Great. Good to know I can count on your assistance. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 06:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Albertsons (supermarket) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ** ''Albertsons'' (655 locations in Arizona, Northern California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:15, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aztlán may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • by Michelle J. Nealy, ''[http://diverseeducation.com/ DiverseEducation.com]'', November 20, 2007 (retrieved on December 6, 2010.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

PAN[edit]

Hey, thank you for the new logo and for your interest in Mexican politics. One of your recent edits on the PAN page stated that the party does not officially recognize its position as a "right wing" group. Do you have a source that backs this up? The only one I kinda found was this one, but maybe you have a more extensive one. If you do, I'll make sure to add the source. Thanks, ComputerJA () 17:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes the logo I added is the one used in the Spanish version of the page. The one formerly used was based and made to look likethe real one, but only partly looked like the real one. Sorry for the confusion, what I should have said is that the PAN does not fundamentally believe to be a conservative party, and can incorporate both left and right wing elements. I have a great love for my country. Thank you for your understanding Viller the Great (talk) 03:01, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Very true. Thanks for clearing it up. I'm also interested in Mexican politics (though I have to say most of my edits on Wikipedia hardly reflect that). If you ever decide to take on a topic regarding that, I will be more than willing to pitch in my two cents and have another pair of eyes on your work. Happy editing, ComputerJA () 05:29, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mexicans in Argentina[edit]

Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. Viller the Great, thanks for creating Mexicans in Argentina!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Some of this reads like WP:Original research - particularly because there are no citations. Are there books, magazines, newspapers, etc. where the material came from? If so, it would be great to add Citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. CaroleHenson (talk) 01:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Mexicans in Argentina[edit]

Hello, Viller the Great,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mexicans in Argentina should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexicans in Argentina .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, CaroleHenson (talk) 01:59, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I understand the process. I actually received the information by translating from the Spanish Wikipedia. I went to check and it has no citations. I have also tried to look for sources, it seems pretty difficult. I wanted to write more articles about my people around the globe. It appears according to the Spanish wiki there are in fact several Mexicans in Argentina. If the articles qualifies for deletion then it'll happen. We'll see, I'll keep looking. Viller the Great (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Safeway Inc. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • stores, one included the location at the former Centennial Village Mall, now Mayfield Common (the building sat vacant for years, before briefly housing Edmonton's first, but temporary [[Save-On-
  • {{Portal|San Francisco Bay Area|Companies|Food}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:58, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hispanosphere world map: Guinea Ecuatorial (both continental Ecuatorial Guinea and Fernando Poo island) should be marked in yellow too[edit]

Guinea Ecuatorial should be marked in yellow too in your Hispanosphere map. Also, I think that Isla de Pascua (a Chilean Island in the Pacific Ocean, Oceania), which is the most isolated inhabited land on earth, shold be marked in a circle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.0.240.166 (talk) 14:35, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Hello, if you look at the large version of the map Equatorial Guinea has blue and yellow dashes, representing how Equatorial Guinea has two Ibero-Romance language

s official, Spanish and Portuguese. French is also official, but it is not Ibero-Romance, it is Gallo-Romance. Chile's Easter Island is part of Chile and is not a separate country, but Chile is colored in yellow. Also the breakaway Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic in Africa has Spanish as co-official. Viller the Great (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

State mergers[edit]

Hi. Please see my note on the talk page at State mergers. I had before deleted the Nordic Federation, you agreed HERE on your page that what I had done was right and that it was much better after I trimmed it down. Then you go and put it back in? In the meantime it has already been taken off more than once by other editors. What does it take for you to get the message? If you are not sure, take it to the discussion page. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Oh, my friend, I did not notice that, for I can remember the five that were on there had been there after it had all been trimmed down. You can take it down if you don't find it suitable. From what I know it has been there for a while and I did not add it recently. I have seen the page recently but I haven't edited it since sometime last year. What you did was great and good because that page was extremely long. If you think something is wrong, feel free to remove it. I don't edit that page anymore, as the situation has calmed down. I could remove "Nordic Federation" myself if you want. Viller the Great (talk) 04:16, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Maps[edit]

Hey,

I don't know where you got your info from, but your maps are really wrong. Reverting... — kwami (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

  • Hello my friend, I tried to replace some raster PNG maps with svg, as with Spanish, which doesn't have an svg map. Same with French and Russian. I guess it wasn't necessary for English and Arabic, but let me be clear I did not make the maps. I found them on Wiki media Commons. I did realize afterwords Arabic was missing some notable countries. I really don't think Spanish nor Portuguese should have been reverted. Those maps were OK. I try to help, but I keep getting some things reverted. Also, I want to ask you why you reverted my language edits...I wasn't making it all up. I was using Ethnologue's classification of languages. Ibero-Romance etc. Viller the Great (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello Viller the Great and kwami. There is no point in disputing between yourselves. Saying something is really wrong and a counter-claim of being right is neither useful nor encyclopaedic. Please refer to the section I've added to the relevant talk page. I'm giving you both a heads up that I'm listing both maps as being unsourced at Wiki Commons. You'll need to make your arguments there and back them up with verifiable, reliable sources.
Please note that it is not my intention to be antagonistic. I simply want to make certain that the maps provided are, indeed, genuinely informative and accurate. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:15, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
@Villar: It would be one thing if you simply made svg versions of the png maps, but you didn't: You made new maps, ones which introduced errors such as claiming that English is the native language of the majority of Nigeria. All the maps had errors like that. The can be redone, but until then they don't belong in the articles. — kwami (talk) 06:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello my friend, I did not make the maps, they are on Wikipedia Commons, their author is the User:Eddo. I unfortunately don't have the software to make svg maps, so I am actively trying to find new maps that could be used in place. I was hoping they could have been revised later. Viller the Great (talk) 06:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't paying attention. I like the idea of having the same colors on each map, but I'm not sure what the distinction between light and dark green is. — kwami (talk) 09:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────Good to see you both discussing the veracity of the maps. Please let me know when you've reached some sort of consensus on the matter. Agreed, kwami. The legend isn't terribly informative, although I gather the lighter green represents where Spanish is considered the second language.

Also, considering that Wikipedia aims to be disability friendly, if using one colour, there should be a stronger contrast in the shades of green used. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

IMO shading is more intuitive. There's nothing about red which suggests "sole official" and blue that means "multiple official". Also, I think the shades have been copied from the continent maps, but we could certainly make the lighter one more distinct. — kwami (talk) 21:29, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I do find the use of two colours to be unintuitive. The de facto regions would definitely be better represented with a lighter shade of the choice of colour for the official language countries. As noted, however, there should be enough distinction between the lighter shade for someone who is, for example, sight impaired to not encounter difficulties in distinguishing between the two. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Well, the us of two colors could be replaced but the map in general is OK. If we do want to make a distinction, we can use the lighter red/pinkish color that was used for filling the US and use it for the bilingual areas. Viller the Great (talk) 01:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
As it is kwami who is reworking the map, I'm fine with any variants on a given colour: red & pink; dark blue & light blue; dark green & light green. kwami, are you prepared to make the relevant colour scheme changes? I've already started a dialogue on Wiki Commons about deleting the two maps currently there and have asked for redirects to the Countries with Spanish as an official language.svg you've been reworking. Do you wish to continue using that particular file as the replacement, or are you envisaging uploading a new version under a different name? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

(This even applies for infoboxes.)

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 13:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

  • Thank you for clarifying this. I hadn't been told this before, so I wouldn't have had prior knowledge. Thank you very much for the help and improvement of the article. I see what you mean, some things are pretty clear themselves. Viller the Great (talk) 03:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Potential superpowers nominated for GA[edit]

Potential superpowers has been nominated for GA status. I thought that the article has no bias and it has finally achieved accuracy. Listing can be found here. Thanks OccultZone (Talk) 12:49, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

It's great to hear this, for this article was indeed inaccurate for a long time. It does not have bias because we only left countries that have sources that show proof that they are potential superpowers. It should win this nomination, it clearly has improved and I would agree to that status. Some people may disagree with the list, but it is what we have for the time being. Good job to all the contributors that helped to improve the article. How could it win the nomination though? Viller the Great (talk) 04:39, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
GA's nomination and review list is backlogged right now. So let us wait for few weeks or even months.. Meanwhile, other articles such as Small powers, Superpower can be made better. OccultZone (Talk) 03:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
I'll make an effort to improve those articles whenever I can. A few weeks is alright considering all the changes that had to be implemented on the article. Viller the Great (talk) 03:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Mexicans in Panama[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your edit expanding Mexicans in Panama. However, can I ask what your sources are for this, as you haven't cited most of the material? Cordless Larry (talk) 06:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello Cordless Larry. I always try to help improve new articles that would otherwise be deleted. I got most of the information from the Spanish version of the page, which I believed was appropriate because it had longer explanation of the Mexican presence in Panama and there were about four citations. I thought it would help out. If you believe the information is unsourced I understand. It is fine by me to do whatever you think is appropriate. I think the article is alright for now. Thank you. Viller the Great (talk) 07:34, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I removed most of the material because it was unsourced, and several of the citation links didn't actually work. Perhaps someone needs to point that out on the Spanish Wikipedia. Thanks for your efforts though. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I understand what you mean. I think there is more regulation of articles on this Wikipedia than the Spanish one, hopefully soon I can point that out in the Spanish Wikipedia. I believe most of the citations were dead links. Until reliable sources are found, the page shouldn't be expanded. I noted that there were different numbers of how large the Mexican population is in Panama and that some of the information was copied from the "Mexicans in Uruguay" page and the person only changed Uruguay to Panama. Viller the Great (talk) 00:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)