Jump to content

R v Perka: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

17 July 2021

23 June 2019

30 March 2018

  • curprev 21:1421:14, 30 March 2018174.2.3.100 talk 11,520 bytes +262 The previous line was inaccurate. Dickson actually said that the crew COULD rely on necessity, but that the trial judge had incorrectly instructed the jury on the defence. undo

14 December 2017

28 August 2017

21 August 2017

16 August 2017

4 July 2017

23 January 2017

29 August 2016

  • curprev 12:5112:51, 29 August 2016210.22.142.82 talk 11,065 bytes −131 →‎Raid: Incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial. That is not the ONLY conclusion one could draw, therefore it does not belong. For instance, crew claim was they went to calm water to allow sediment to settle out of the fuel. Perhaps that happened ~~~~ undo

25 January 2015

8 January 2015

6 January 2015

7 December 2014

24 September 2014

31 July 2014

13 December 2012

19 October 2012

26 September 2012

24 August 2012

25 November 2011

22 April 2011

19 February 2011

1 April 2010

25 January 2010

8 August 2008

2 July 2008

9 February 2008

3 December 2007

28 July 2007

27 July 2007

26 July 2007

22 July 2007

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)