User talk:Hope&Act3!

Welcome

Hello Hope&Act3! and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 21:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

{{helpme}}

I'm not recognized in the pages of languages read from right to left, the "!" is moved to the extreme left before "Hope" can that be fixed please ? Hope&Act3! (talk) 13:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

We can really only provide help with English Wikipedia. You can, however, request a namechange for English Wikipedia here. //roux   14:12, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

thanks for your answer, but I like that name and I want to keep it, I'll try sth else, if it works I'll let you know, have a good day, Hope&Act3! (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Red-linked user name

Your user name displays in red because you have not yet added anything to your user page at User:Hope&Act3!. Once you add something to the page, it will display in blue. – ukexpat (talk) 20:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

History of the Kurdish people

Yes I can answer that one - see the link above - the lower case "p" is the key. Next question!  – ukexpat (talk) 21:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Translation

Yes, that's it. Many thanks. Anthony on Stilts (talk) 00:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zionist political violence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Zionist political violence was changed by Hope&Act3! (u) (t) deleting 11932 characters on 2009-08-16T21:33:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

== Alternate account question == Thanks for the message. It is not a problem having an alternate account so long as the purpose of it is not to evade a block or a ban, and the other account is not used disruptively. Of course, neither of those apply in your case. I think you have a couple of options - first, abandon the previous account completely and never log into it and use it again, or, second, redirect the user page and user talk pages of that account to the user and user talk pages, respectively, of this account. I have an alternate account - User:Ukexpatmobile - that I use when accessing Wikipedia from a mobile device. I have redirected the user and user talk pages to the pages of the Ukexpat account. Hope this helps. Feel fee to ask again if you have any more questions. – ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

I can add the redirect code for you, but it will delete the contents of the page, just leaving the redirect in place. Is that what you want? – ukexpat (talk) 19:20, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Leaving as is is fine. – ukexpat (talk) 19:47, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Symbol

Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

doves are not peaceful beings

Your AIV report

Hey. You recently posted on WP:AIV about some offensive content in a page log. As far as I can tell, this has been deleted on English Wikipedia for some time. The file in question is File:Hip.jpg, yes? If you have any more questions, let me know. Ale_Jrb^talk 00:15, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

OK, no more questions, it's just fine, as you understood, I discovered it tonight in commons and since I didn't know how it was here I wanted to check with you, thanks again, --Hope&Act3! (talk) 00:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Few things

About thr capital thing, I think you are just right my dear!!! About the gilad shalit issue, the source is on hebrew, so i'm trying to find English one.--Sipio (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Ok I didnt know that hebrew sources are counted here too. Anyway everything got removed, so it doesn't matter anymore. Have a great day.--Sipio (talk) 13:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

depopulated villages

Please stop removing the word "Palestinian" from the articles on depopulated Palestinian villages. The name of the template does not give you any justification to do this. This has been attempted by others a number of times. Sources invariably refer to the people that were expelled from these villages as "Palestinians". nableezy - 16:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Stop doing this. If you wish to discuss whether or not the label is valid do it on the talk pages. But do please cease making such contentious edits. nableezy - 17:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. nableezy - 17:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I don't know what you think you're going to accomplish, but you're going about it the wrong way. Please discuss your changes on the articles' Talk pages, or start a centralized discussion at WT:PALESTINE. Continuing down this road will result in your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 12 hours, for making questionable edits in articles subject to Wikipedia:ARBPIA without responding to talk page queries. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Please note that discretionary sanctions, including blocks of up to 1 year, may be placed under the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles decision for editors who persist in disruption. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hope&Act3! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I don't understand why you've blocked me, I was only modifying an inaccurate term, these villages were 'Arab' as described in the Infobox and I stated that in the modification log which I believe is the required civil behaviour, a dispute with Nableezy is never constructive and I prefer working positively on the articles, my aim on wp being to collaborate in an encyclopedia that offers free and reliable knowledge, I may be a bit naive since I am well aware of the ongoing battles on wp:en for the identity of the I/P territories but I try to keep out of it as much as possible, in that line I thought it was safe to stick to the previous decisions (if the Infobox states 'Arab' it is 'Arab' not 'Palestinian') I guess that I might have walked on s.b.'s toes which had in the past enjoyed peperring Palestinian all over but being new I am not aware of the full History and as I said I took the queue from the Infobox. Besides I intend now to request that the reference of the 'Palestinian' adjective as accurate be provided (I remind every one that the 1947 Partition decision was for a Jewish and an 'Arab' -not Palestinian- state) all the villages which were depopulated were inhabited by Arab and Bedouin and in some of them there were already Jews inhabitants, even the List of Arab villages depopulated .... I don't know by heart the full name of the list but nevertheless it does say 'Arab', not 'Palestinian'. This is really unfair to attack my editing when they are in accord with all these previous decisions (the Infobox and the List I'm sure were not named on a whim but after some concensus was reached) I don't know what else to say, thanks for taking the time, hopefully this message will be transfered I did not quite understand the preview unblocked here

Decline reason:

At the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents material referred to above, the blocking administrator, User:SarekOfVulcan said succinctly "Blocked 12 hours in an attempt to get more discussing and less reverting", and I think this was a sensible action. It seems as though someone needed to do something to turn your attention to discussions. 12 hours is not forever and it will give you time to become thoroughly familiar with the specific policies in this contentious area, particularly Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles; I'm sure you will grasp that tensions run high in the area covered by your edits and that editors should proceed very carefully. I note that there is a suggestion in the AN/I material that you should consider acquiring a mentor and I think that's something you might consider; I suspect you will enjoy your contributions here more and be less stressed if you allow yourself to be guided by a more experienced editor. You seem anxious to contribute usefully and I hope you will do so in the future. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:50, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gaza Strip. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Warring on this content [1]. RomaC ^TALK 10:09, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

wow! the big words: vandalism !!!! me? warring!!! me??? saying that Hamas is a terrorist organization is vandalising and warring? As a matter of fact I believe that you are the one which has been warring around in the I-P fields, and you know very well that I'm not the only one.

as far as I am concerned I am only trying to improve wp so that its content is more accurate, nothing I did is addressed in these guide lines:

:Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.

And for Hamas:

The European Union, Israel, Japan, Canada, and the United States classify Hamas as a terrorist organization.

...right out of the article! see I didn't make it up...

:Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. :Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not vandalism. For example adding a controversial personal opinion to an article is not vandalism, although reinserting it despite multiple warnings can be disruptive (however, edits/reverts over a content dispute are never vandalism, see edit warring). Not all vandalism is obvious, nor are all massive or controversial changes vandalism. Careful thought may be needed to decide whether changes made are beneficial, detrimental but well-intended, or outright vandalism.

I consider your warning to be a bad faith statement constituting an actual threat and a definite unfriendly gesture, expecting your excuses Hope&Act3! (talk) 20:45, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

I have restored your edit and have added sources for same. I have also issued RomaC a warning about referring to other good-faith edits as vandalism. Don't be intimidated. Happy editing--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:59, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Hope, there had been two IP edits right before yours adding "terror" sorry if I incorrectly associated your reversion with those, and right the edit is not "vandalism" striking that. You might want to read WP:Terrorist, re words to avoid on Wikipedia, cheers RomaC ^TALK 01:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

There is currently an ongoing discussion here in which you are mentioned. You may wish to participate in the discussion.--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 17:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Canvassing

Please do not canvass as you did at WP Israel. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 19:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

I meant to help you in your active search for fellow editors, hope I've been successful, this is not called canvassing but extending an helpful hand don't get confused Hope&Act3! (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Geography of Israel issue

Please I need your help they destroy the article! They dont follow the source of CIA which everyone use it! the source says 22,072!! Please help I cant take control my my self of those 2 Pov'ers.