User talk:BabbaQ: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:47, 13 August 2011

Hello, BabbaQ. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, BabbaQ. You have new messages at TJRC's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome

Hello, BabbaQ! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jaguar (talk) 15:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

User talk:BabbaQ/Archive1

Nomination of Love on Top for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Love on Top is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:33, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack

Comment on content, not contributors. It wasn't a very mean personal attack, I'll admit, but it was one nonetheless. And I agree debate is healthy. Me-123567-Me (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you have a nice day too. :-) Me-123567-Me (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD !votes

Hi!. If you have the time, I just wanted to recommend that you check out Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Arguments such as "it exists" or "he has a website" are not valid reasons to keep an article and don't really add anything to the discussion. Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I gave that sense. Believe me, I have no intention of following you around or putting roadblocks in front of what you do. But I did want to bring attention to (and ideally correct) the flawed arguments you've made that are quite frankly unacceptable for these discussions.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:29, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did you at least get a chance to check out that page? Also, sorry if anything came off as harsher than necessary.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Leal Garcia v. Texas

On 5 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leal Garcia v. Texas, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Leal Garcia v. Texas, a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case, dealt with the relationship between international law, U.S. state law, and acts of Congress? If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 16:03, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Ronnia Fornstedt

Hello! Your submission of Ronnia Fornstedt at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:06, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwon Hyi-ro

User:Location gave some good advice as to where I might look for coverage, and based upon that guidence I have expanded and better sourced the article in question. I ask that you might revisit Kwon Hyi-ro and and consider moving from "week keep" to just "keep" per the improvements. Thanks, Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Glad to have helped. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Everything (Lifehouse song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Everything (Lifehouse song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence and not on a majority of votes that follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 16:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I beg of you

Please, when you get the chance, at least try to skim Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions! Thank you.--Yaksar (let's chat) 01:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

Hello BabbaQ, I would like to inform you of an article for deletion discussion I would like your input on: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dethcentrik_(2nd_nomination). If you're wondering where I've seen you before it's here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Elctrikchair_(3rd_nomination), and I valued your input there and would appreciate it here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BusyWikipedian (talk • contribs) 07:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to please ask that you mention why specific sources are notable or not, as it would greatly strengthen any argument you have. I think it will help you in the future as well (I apologize but I can't help but notice how much user:Yaksar is telling you about your votes, but I believe you make vote in good faith, and that's why I'd like yours now BusyWikipedian (talk) 07:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 60: / Line 60: @@
 Please, when you get the chance, at least try to skim [[Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions]]! Thank you.--[[User: Yaksar|Yaksar]] [[User talk: Yaksar|(let's chat)]] 01:03, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
+== Hello. ==
+Hello BabbaQ, I would like to inform you of an article for deletion discussion I would like your input on: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dethcentrik_(2nd_nomination)]]. If you're wondering where I've seen you before it's here: [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Elctrikchair_(3rd_nomination)]], and I valued your input there and would appreciate it here.  <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:BusyWikipedian|BusyWikipedian]] ([[User talk:BusyWikipedian|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/BusyWikipedian|contribs]]) 07:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+::I would like to please ask that you mention why specific sources are notable or not, as it would greatly strengthen any argument you have. I think it will help you in the future as well (I apologize but I can't help but notice how much [[user:Yaksar]] is telling you about your votes, but I believe you make vote in good faith, and that's why I'd like yours now [[User:BusyWikipedian|BusyWikipedian]] ([[User talk:BusyWikipedian|talk]]) 07:47, 13 August 2011 (UTC)