User talk:Saair

Welcome!

Hello, Saair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

MrX

Enabling Java script

How I can enable java script on my account. Sinner (talk) 04:26, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Whether or not javascript will work for you is a function of your browser and its settings. If you can edit WP pages at all, it's because of javascript code running in your browser. It's possible to browse Wikipedia without working javascript (though I'm pretty sure it would look strange).

So maybe you need to explain a bit more about what you would like to do and what's not working about it. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@jmcgnh, when I go to see current pages, I get a notice that this function needs java script enabled, that's why I want to enable java script. I can edit pages at all, but my browser or account do not have java script enabled. I want to ask how I can enable java script on my account/browser to be enable to see current pages. Sinner (talk) 06:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

I remember you said at one point that you had an internet connection that only allowed you to view Wikipedia and not the rest of the internet. I wonder if that could have something to do with it.

And I'm unclear on what you mean by "current pages". — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:56, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

@jmcgnh, That's right, I've such internet connection, "Current pages" means newly created pages in en.wikipedia that you can see in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges in 'utilities' section. I am unable to see these newly created pages even in wikipedia without java script. This option requires java script. I need java script to browse this option to see current pages. Sinner (talk) 07:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm a bit stumped. I'm working on a Chromebook at the moment and even setting a block for js from Wikipedia.com, i'm still getting full functionality and can't reproduce your problem. I'm away tomorrow, but if someone else has not come along to help you out, I can try on a different computer to see if I can block js for real, then maybe I can get some ideas. Sorry. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

sup> @Cordless Larry, Theroadislong, and 331dot: may be able to help. Sinner (talk) 09:36, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, that's outside my areas of knowledge. 331dot (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

I am using Chrome 60.0.3112.101 now with JavaScript disabled. No problem with seeing my Watched pages, no problem with seeing Recent changes, no problem with seeing and editing your Talk page. --CiaPan (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

sup>

@CiaPan: I also can do all of them with Opera, when I go to see "New pages" in utilities section, it says I need java script to visit that page. Please tell me how you enable and disable java script on your computer? Sinner (talk) 11:33, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

1. To be honest, I have no idea what you're talking about. I have no 'Utilities' section in the side menu, but I have 'tools'. And its contents depends on what kind of Wikipedia page I'm looking at – whether it's a main page, an article, my own watchlist, someone else's talk page... Anyway it never shows any 'New pages' link. However, I have 'Recent changes' link – but that's in the 'interaction' section.:(
   Moreover, you asked about Special:RecentChanges first, now you ask about some 'New pages'. Do you mean Special:NewPages? I can access that, too. But that is a dynamic list created on the fly, and is is not editable, either with Javascript or without it.
2. What concerns turning Javascript on or off, I click a three-dots button at the right end of the address bar, then invoke 'Settings', which opens a chrome://settings/ page. I scroll down to 'Advanced' and find the 'Contents settings' in the 'Privacy and security' section. Once I'm there I click 'JavaScript' and choose an off/on switch.
   But I doubt the above description applies to your browser if it's not Chrome... --CiaPan (talk) 12:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
   P.S. I'm not sure if all captions above are correct, I do not know their original version, I just tried to translate them from my language to English. CiaPan (talk)

I'm afraid I wasn't able to reproduce the symptom you report, so I am out of ideas. I'm glad CiaPan has taken a look. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I have no knowledge of JavaScript, so I am unable to help, and I note that you are now blocked in any case. I am confused, though, about your claim to have an internet connection that is restricted to viewing Wikipedia, and yet at the same time you were able to write articles and drafts based on material from other websites. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Cordless Larry, I have been blocked for just moving an article to Draft space for improvement. I do not believe the block without any chance is valid. Regarding internet connection, I am currently using Jazz Pakistan. It allows me to browse all internet 10 minutes a day. I browse and save the pages that are important to me during these 10 minutes. After those ten minutes, I view the pages and add the information to wikipedia, that I can use throughout the day. Sinner (talk) 13:39, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I see. Well, that explains that. I note that you also removed an AfD tag from the same article, and presume that that contributed to you being blocked. If you feel that you have been blocked unjustly though, you need to appeal it rather than explain your behaviour to me. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Pornography in Saudi Arabia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Pornography in Saudi Arabia. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Pornography in Asia#Saudi Arabia. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Pornography in Asia#Saudi Arabia. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. John from Idegon (talk) 15:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion has been prevented. Sinner (talk) 09:30, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Pornography in Saudi Arabia. Did you simply miss the big bold letters that state quite clearly that AfD templates are not to be removed and articles at AfD are not to be blanked? Or do you think that somehow they do not apply to you? Anything you contribute to Wikipedia becomes irrevocably Wikipedia's property the second you press the save button. Although the AfD discussion has not closed, the consensus is this is not a notable subject and is sufficiently covered in an existing article. The only objection was from you. You do not have the right to unilaterally override consensus. Your actions here and elsewhere do not bode well for your future as a Wikipedian, and I am not the first to tell you this. Time to start listening. John from Idegon (talk) 01:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, inability to show an understanding of or ability to adhere to any behavioral standards. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —SpacemanSpiff 02:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

John from Idegon, I did not know it was disruption, you gave me one chance, and SpacemanSpiff has blocked me without any chance, please give me this one chance, l shall not do anything like this again. Sinner (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Sinner does not need to repent

Upto this day, I could not understand what type of wikipedian wikipedia wants me to be. The day from which I intended to contribute constructively, I have been continuously warned and I leave that work for which I am being warned, I never used Bilad il Islamia after warning, left contributing to user space, left making comments at teahouse and started contributing to articles. I have recently created Wheel construction. I started Pornography in Saudi Arabia. Every user creates articles in several edits. I just made only one edit to this article when this was put at articles for deletion discussion. I was right to create this article, there is number of articles about pornography in individual countries like Pornography in Pakistan and Pornography in India. What I did wrong in creating a tantamount article about Saudi Arabia? Fellows are continuously pointing towards Pornography in Asia#Saudi Arabia. Are Pakistan and India not Asian countries so that they are allowed to have such article and Saudi Arabia does not? I did not know moving an article to draft is not allowed. In ignorance, I moved this article to draft just to improve it. I did not want to make any disruption. SpacemanSpiff has blocked me without giving a single chance to stop, for disruptive editing when I did not know my edit was disruptive so I should not make it again. I am a human, I also make mistakes like other humans. A man learns from mistakes. I have made mistakes, so I should not repeat them and I have never repeated any mistake. I have no apologize, no sorry because I am blocked for reason as a mistake, my article move was just for improvement, not disruption. I shall continue to make such mistakes out of ignorance, not intended. Seniors should let me know I am wrong so I should change my method. If you want I make ideal edits first time, then it is impossible. I shall make such mistakes and others will let me know which will give me experience and I shall become experienced user. I do not believe the block is valid. I am blocked for a page move which can be easily reverted. I do not need to give excuses to request unblock. If I am unblocked, I shall get experience from my mistakes, if not, then I do not believe my block for easily revertable move of a page is justified. Sinner (talk) 12:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

If this text is meant to be an unblock request, you need to format it as described above. 331dot (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Please review my block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am a new one who does not know what to do and what not to. I created an article, Pornography in Saudi Arabia. It was listed at AfD. I thought the article should exist. I did not know removing AfD tag is disruption. I moved the article to Draft space and removed the tag. I did not know it was disruption, if I knew that, I had never done so. Please also view my current contributions to other articles. I am trying my best to improve them. I do not have much knowledge of wikipedia, therefore, I often make mistakes, I have never repeated any mistake. It was first time when I removed AfD tag and I shall never make this mistake again. Please unblock me, I am inexperienced, I make mistakes, I do not want to make disruptions. Please unblock me! Sinner (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have been making the same kind of disruption despite of a large number of editors telling you explicitly not to do so. You also appear to have the impression that repeating the same simple apology time after time without addressing the core issues will get you unblocked (leading to extremely ill-advised edits like this). This is a clear case of WP:NOTHERE as a result of WP:CIR. Unless if you can provide a more convincing rationale, I highly doubt you will find another editor that will believe you. Alex Shih^Talk 08:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• This is just one minor bit of your disruption, you've been warned many many times about this. You've been wasting the time of many many editors on here and have clearly failed to show that you understand what an encyclopaedia is or an ability to follow our policies. —SpacemanSpiff 15:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
• Note also that AfD templates have very clear warnings that they are not to be removed while discussion is ongoing, as can be seen in the case concerned here. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

First I moved the page to draft space, when the draft page appeared, it said AfD template is used in wrong place, so I removed it from draft. When I removed the tag, it was not an article, it was a draft. I have really changed me, SpacemanSpiff, I have left wasting time of others. Give me just one chance, please! I'm very sure you will not see this in future, it was a mistake, please! Sinner (talk) 16:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I'm not going to unblock you and I'm not in favor of an unblock either as you've been given multiple chances, all that changes is that each time you find a new method to continue your disruptive behavior, but another admin will review and decide. —SpacemanSpiff 16:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff, I do not do intentionally, I am a new one and do not want any disruption. Anything that I once find is wrong, I never do it again. Sinner (talk) 16:35, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I think the main issues lies within your approach. Most editors show up, dip a toe into the pool and feel the waters. If the temperature is to their liking, they dive in. You seemed to have skipped all of those steps and jumped right into the deep end of the pool. Yes, everyone makes mistakes - we are all human. The problem is that you've made some "more noticable" mistakes, so there are members here who keep a closer eye on you than they do other editors. So yes, jumping right into the pool is just fine on occasion, but make sure you take your shoes and socks off first; otherwise you're going to hear about it. If you get unblocked again, I advise you to take a step back and make small steps in contributions. Make referenced edits to articles. Help others in research. Then get into article creation and the "heavier" workloads. - NsTaGaTr ^(Talk) 16:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My trend was recently towards creating articles, following my unblock, my trend will be to make constructive edits to available articles. I shall get experience before creating new articles in future, whenever I am stuck, or I'm going to do something new, first I shall ask from experienced users before taking any step that whether that act is right or not. You will not have to notice me for any act in future. Please give me a single chance. I have carefully read WP:Here and WP:NOTHERE and I shall prove I'm WP:HERE. Please give me a last chance. I shall not give you any chance to notice me for wrong in future. I shall be very thankful if I'm granted a last chance, Please unblock me as a last chance, please! Sinner (talk) 09:42, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I just don't see this as possible. as stated above, you were given multiple chances in the past and all of them led to yet another block for disruption. Seeing the admins you pinged to you page to look into this and continue it's apparent you still do not understand the reason you were blocked, and I would agree that there is a competency issue at play here. As such I'm declining this request. RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please give me last chance

SpacemanSpiff, John from Idegon, Alex Shih and Nihonjoe, Welcome! I admit I have made mistakes, I have been blocked. My mistake was I moved an article listed at AfD to draft and then removed AfD tag from the draft. I am new user, inexperienced, I admit I have made a mistake. If you unblock me, I shall make constructive edits to already existing articles and I shall get experience from this. I shall first ask about validity of an act from experienced users before doing a new thing. I ensure I shall not give you any chance of objection in future. I ask for a last chance. If I am granted, I shall get experience before going to depth. Please unblock me as a last warning and a last chance. I shall not disappoint you this time. Please unblock me, please grant me a last chance, please! Sinner (talk) 14:17, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Stop pinging SpacemanSpiff and I, who have clearly expressed no interest in this matter anymore. Admin shopping is not going to get you anywhere. Your unblock request will wait with every other requests in Category:Requests for unblock. Alex Shih^Talk 14:25, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Add me to the list of people not to ping either. Actually, since the only thing you are allowed to use your talk page for when blocked is making formal unblock requests or clarification of your block, I'm asking any the other editors who are getting pinged here to remove his talk page and email access too. Continuing the behavior you were blocked for (wasting other editor's time) is a very valid reason to remove TP access. Let him waste URTS's time for a while. SINNER, please do not reply. John from Idegon (talk) 18:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Please give me a last chance

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am a new inexperienced user. I did not know removing AfD tag was so serious. I moved Pornography in Saudi Arabia to draft space and removed AfD tag from the draft. When I removed the tag it was not an article, it was a draft. I apologize for my act. After my unblock, I shall never do any new thing without asking from experienced users. I shall never ping any user, I shall not waste time of any user. Please review my current edits to Wheel construction. I shall make edits like I made to this article. I shall make constructive edits to other articles. I admit I am guilty of disruption. I shall not repeat anything that I have been doing. I shall really not make any disruption in future. Please forgive me for my disruption. I apologize, I shall not waste time of any user. Please unblock me as a last warning. Please give me a last chance. Please unblock me, I am asking for a last chance, please! Sinner (talk) 03:33, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a procedural decline for duplicate request. Please use the UTRS for your next request. Alex Shih^Talk 05:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please explain how it is you are going to ask other users before doing anything, and yet not waste other editor's time? Reviewing administrator, please revoke TP access. The complete lack of WP:CIR is self evident in their statement. John from Idegon (talk) 03:40, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

I mean I shall ask for help before doing some thing. Please do not block my talkpage access. I am asking for a last chance, please! I shall not disrupt any article and I shall not waste time of any editor. Please give a last chance as a last warning, please unblock me. I promise I shall not do any wrong thing. Please unblock me last time. I shall be very very thankful for providing me a last chance. Sinner (talk) 04:20, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your inability to see the logical disconnect in your statements is complete indication of what I said above. By the way, your reply in and of itself is wasting other editor's time. At least you didn't ping me. John from Idegon (talk) 04:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Talk page access has been revoked. Alex Shih^Talk 05:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

 Clerk note: See also the massive sockfarm at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nazim Hussain Pak. GAB^gab 00:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am very sorry for my past behaviour. I did not follow guidelines. I am very sorry and apologise for this. Being a human, I made mistakes, but I'm really very sorry for that. I shall follow all rules . Current accusation of sock is also not true. Those accounts are really not mine. I'm using a shared service provider Jazz Pakistan And the users using same model of phone have been suspected as my socks. Please unblock me, I shall make no vandalism anymore.I shall be a good user after unblockSinner119.160.97.6 (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have not even followed the simple instruction above that you use UTRS for future unblock requests, and have instead chosen to evade your block and post on this talkpage (which you are not currently permitted to do). It seems pretty obvious that you still either don't understand or choose not to follow the rules here. Yunshui ^雲_水 13:56, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yunshui, I know this is wrong and I should not do this but the reason for this is 'I do not have any email account which is essential to use UTRS. That's why I posted the message here. You are an admin. Please help me. 119.160.98.236 (talk) 14:40, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

You have internet access, and free burner email accounts are two a penny. I for one see no likelihood that you will ever abide by the rules of the site, and would strongly recommend against unblocking. You may, however, want to consider Wikipedia's standard offer, which could potentially provide you with a route back to editing in six months' time. Yunshui ^雲_水 14:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Chak Choti Shafi

Draft:Chak Choti Shafi, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chak Choti Shafi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Chak Choti Shafi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 19:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Wheel construction for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wheel construction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wheel construction until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hagennos (talk) 18:52, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

After Three Years

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello dear Admin! I have been an active Wikipedia user in 2017, I created this account in July 2016 and it was my first account. Unfortunately, being a new user at that time, I didn't understand community scope and standards. With a childish stupidity, I created an another account with the name User:Bilad il Islamia, I didn't know I were doing that wrong. Admins can check I made fewer than a hundred edits with that account that it was blocked. By then, I were fond of talking to admins rather than constructive editing. I created a few articles that are still a part of the encyclopedia like Chak Shafi, Wheel construction and Sky Pool, Houston. Due to misunderstanding of the scope, I created an article Pornography in Saudi Arabia, going against community standards. Because of this and many other things, like my disruptive attitude and clock-running strategies that were too stupid, I got blocked and then because of my foolishness, I created 3 sock-puppets, all of them were blocked. I acknowledge it my greatest mistake and I'm very sorry for that. I didn't create any sock after November 2017. My last sock account was User:Don'twasteTime, it was blocked on November 25, 2017. Acknowledging my mistake, I didn't create any account after that, and no account has been blocked as my sock since then. I admit and acknowledge all my mistakes. It was just my bad. And I'm sorry for that. I'm not a paid user. And I have not been blocked on any other language Wikipedia. I have been active on other wikis during my block and have improved and created multiple articles on Urdu and Fiji Hindi wikis (like hif:Muhammad Ali Jinnah) and have posted multiple pictures to Wikimedia:Commons. I admit and acknowledge all my mistakes. It was just my bad. And I'm sorry for that. And honestly didn't make any violations since then. I promise I won't repeat my past mistakes, being 19, I hope to do something good becoming a good member of the great wikipedian community again. I request you to unblock me, promising I'll not do anything in the future that goes against community standards. I request you to consider there have been 3 years to my block, it is a very long period of time and everything changes in such a long period. If you have any questions, you can ask me anything here on my talk page or on my email account nazimhussainsinner@gmail.com Thank you so much for reviewing my request. Sinner (speak) 04:28, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) What pages do you plan to edit if unblocked. Heart ^(talk) 04:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

HeartGlow30797, I'm very much interested in History, Geography and Literature and I shall mostly edit articles related to these fields. And shall try my best to improve articles related to ever every other field I know about. Sinner (speak) 04:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

• SpacemanSpiff I'm trying to clear out the unblock request backlog; this request seems reasonable to me, and I know it's been awhile, but if you have any comment on this, it'd be appreciated. 331dot (talk) 11:00, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
  • @331dot:Been a long time so I don't remember clearly but looking through the SPI I think the main problems back then were around historic places articles, so maybe some sort of WP:ARBIPA restriction on that would not be out of order. —SpacemanSpiff 13:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• I would be willing to unblock you if you agree to be subject to WP:ARBIPA restrictions with regards to articles about historic places in India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan, as described in the notice below. Please refrain from editing about historic places for at least six months, when you can appeal the restriction. 331dot (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

After 3 Years Reply

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Saair (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm thankful to NinjaRobotPirate for reviewing my request and to 331dot and Spaceman for their constructive comments.

As a fact, I was blocked 3 years ago for non-constructive behavior and manners. I would like to discuss them here:

• Sock Accounts

As I confessed in my previous request, I had 5 sock accounts. All of them had been blocked by November 23, 2017 (more than 3 years ago). I did not create any sock account after that, therefore, no account has been blocked as my sock since then. I don't have any other account at present and I promise I won't create any sock account in future.

• Nonconstructive editing

3 years ago, I made more edits to talk pages (59%) than to actual articles (41%). If I am unblocked, I shall make more edits to the articles and shall contact other users only and if necessary. I won't waste anyone's time anymore.

• Future Horizons

It's not that all my edits were nonconstructive. I made constructive edits too. Here is the list of the articles I created that are still a part of the encyclopedia:

• • Chak Shafi
  • Sky Pool, Houston
  • Pakpattan Canal
  • Chilam Joshi
  • Wheel construction

During my block at English Wikipedia, I have been active on other language Wikipedias like Fiji Hindi Wikipedia and Urdu Wikipedia. I created a few articles there like hif:Muhammad Ali Jinnah and ur:یشمک. I have also uploaded a few pictures to wikimedia commons.

If I'm unblocked, I shall not violate community standards anymore and shall make constructive editing. As Spaceman said above, I should not edit articles related to geography of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan as it is considered I shall not be able to edit them constructively. I have read and well understood community standards and guidelines and I promise I shall abide by them. Please consider I have been blocked for more than 3 years. Its a very long period of time. If I'm unblocked, you will never see any violations from me in future.

If you have any questions, please ask me. I hope to see a positive response from you. Sinner (speak) 10:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I'm thankful to [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] for reviewing my request and to [[User:331dot|331dot]] and [[User:Spaceman|Spaceman]] for their constructive comments. As a fact, I was blocked 3 years ago for non-constructive behavior and manners. I would like to discuss them here: *'''Sock Accounts''' As I confessed in my previous request, I had 5 sock accounts. All of them had been blocked by November 23, 2017 (more than 3 years ago). I did not create any sock account after that, therefore, no account has been blocked as my sock since then. I don't have any other account at present and I promise I won't create any sock account in future. *'''Nonconstructive editing''' 3 years ago, I made more edits to talk pages (59%) than to actual articles (41%). If I am unblocked, I shall make more edits to the articles and shall contact other users only and if necessary. I won't waste anyone's time anymore. *'''Future Horizons''' It's not that all my edits were nonconstructive. I made constructive edits too. Here is the list of the articles I created that are still a part of the encyclopedia: **[[Chak Shafi]] **[[Sky Pool, Houston]] **[[Pakpattan Canal]] **[[Chilam Joshi]] **[[Wheel construction]] During my block at English Wikipedia, I have been active on other language Wikipedias like Fiji Hindi Wikipedia and Urdu Wikipedia. I created a few articles there like [[hif:Muhammad Ali Jinnah]] and [[ur:یشمک]]. I have also uploaded a few pictures to wikimedia commons. If I'm unblocked, I shall not violate community standards anymore and shall make constructive editing. As [[User:Spaceman|Spaceman]] said above, I should not edit articles related to geography of [[India]], [[Pakistan]] and [[Afghanistan]] as it is considered I shall not be able to edit them constructively. I have read and well understood community standards and guidelines and I promise I shall abide by them. Please consider I have been blocked for more than 3 years. Its a very long period of time. If I'm unblocked, you will never see any violations from me in future. If you have any questions, please ask me. I hope to see a positive response from you. '''[[User:Nazim Hussain Pak|<span style="color:red">Si</span><span style="color:orange">nn</span><span style="color:green">er</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Nazim Hussain Pak|<span style="color:grey">speak</span>]]) 10:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm thankful to [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] for reviewing my request and to [[User:331dot|331dot]] and [[User:Spaceman|Spaceman]] for their constructive comments. As a fact, I was blocked 3 years ago for non-constructive behavior and manners. I would like to discuss them here: *'''Sock Accounts''' As I confessed in my previous request, I had 5 sock accounts. All of them had been blocked by November 23, 2017 (more than 3 years ago). I did not create any sock account after that, therefore, no account has been blocked as my sock since then. I don't have any other account at present and I promise I won't create any sock account in future. *'''Nonconstructive editing''' 3 years ago, I made more edits to talk pages (59%) than to actual articles (41%). If I am unblocked, I shall make more edits to the articles and shall contact other users only and if necessary. I won't waste anyone's time anymore. *'''Future Horizons''' It's not that all my edits were nonconstructive. I made constructive edits too. Here is the list of the articles I created that are still a part of the encyclopedia: **[[Chak Shafi]] **[[Sky Pool, Houston]] **[[Pakpattan Canal]] **[[Chilam Joshi]] **[[Wheel construction]] During my block at English Wikipedia, I have been active on other language Wikipedias like Fiji Hindi Wikipedia and Urdu Wikipedia. I created a few articles there like [[hif:Muhammad Ali Jinnah]] and [[ur:یشمک]]. I have also uploaded a few pictures to wikimedia commons. If I'm unblocked, I shall not violate community standards anymore and shall make constructive editing. As [[User:Spaceman|Spaceman]] said above, I should not edit articles related to geography of [[India]], [[Pakistan]] and [[Afghanistan]] as it is considered I shall not be able to edit them constructively. I have read and well understood community standards and guidelines and I promise I shall abide by them. Please consider I have been blocked for more than 3 years. Its a very long period of time. If I'm unblocked, you will never see any violations from me in future. If you have any questions, please ask me. I hope to see a positive response from you. '''[[User:Nazim Hussain Pak|<span style="color:red">Si</span><span style="color:orange">nn</span><span style="color:green">er</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Nazim Hussain Pak|<span style="color:grey">speak</span>]]) 10:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I'm thankful to [[User:NinjaRobotPirate|NinjaRobotPirate]] for reviewing my request and to [[User:331dot|331dot]] and [[User:Spaceman|Spaceman]] for their constructive comments. As a fact, I was blocked 3 years ago for non-constructive behavior and manners. I would like to discuss them here: *'''Sock Accounts''' As I confessed in my previous request, I had 5 sock accounts. All of them had been blocked by November 23, 2017 (more than 3 years ago). I did not create any sock account after that, therefore, no account has been blocked as my sock since then. I don't have any other account at present and I promise I won't create any sock account in future. *'''Nonconstructive editing''' 3 years ago, I made more edits to talk pages (59%) than to actual articles (41%). If I am unblocked, I shall make more edits to the articles and shall contact other users only and if necessary. I won't waste anyone's time anymore. *'''Future Horizons''' It's not that all my edits were nonconstructive. I made constructive edits too. Here is the list of the articles I created that are still a part of the encyclopedia: **[[Chak Shafi]] **[[Sky Pool, Houston]] **[[Pakpattan Canal]] **[[Chilam Joshi]] **[[Wheel construction]] During my block at English Wikipedia, I have been active on other language Wikipedias like Fiji Hindi Wikipedia and Urdu Wikipedia. I created a few articles there like [[hif:Muhammad Ali Jinnah]] and [[ur:یشمک]]. I have also uploaded a few pictures to wikimedia commons. If I'm unblocked, I shall not violate community standards anymore and shall make constructive editing. As [[User:Spaceman|Spaceman]] said above, I should not edit articles related to geography of [[India]], [[Pakistan]] and [[Afghanistan]] as it is considered I shall not be able to edit them constructively. I have read and well understood community standards and guidelines and I promise I shall abide by them. Please consider I have been blocked for more than 3 years. Its a very long period of time. If I'm unblocked, you will never see any violations from me in future. If you have any questions, please ask me. I hope to see a positive response from you. '''[[User:Nazim Hussain Pak|<span style="color:red">Si</span><span style="color:orange">nn</span><span style="color:green">er</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Nazim Hussain Pak|<span style="color:grey">speak</span>]]) 10:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

As a note, I fixed your unblock request so that the template works properly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:06, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm fine with this conditional unblock -- WP:ARBIPA TBAN from geography (places etc) articles for India/Pakistan/Afghanistan for at least six months, appealable then to either the unblocking admin or AN/AE. —SpacemanSpiff 12:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Spaceman, I shall abide by WP:ARBIPA. I shall not edit articles related to the geography of India, Pakistan and Afghanistan for at least six months when I shall request the admins to consider and give me permission if I can edit those articles. I promise to abide by all the community guidelines and standards. Regards! Sinner (speak) 02:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)