User talk:Georgiamarlins: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 18:04, 4 April 2022

Welcome to my talk page feel free to notify ,advice or ask me anything. Click here to leave me a message

.

AfC notification: Draft:Diego Tryno has a new comment ==

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Diego Tryno. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Numbering convention on Wikipedia

Hi - I noticed you've changed a few articles by adding either duplicate numeral or text values for numbers. The convention on Wikipedia is to only show one number, and if it's 1-10 we usually write those out with numbers. Anything higher than 10 is spelled out. Please see MOS:NUMERAL. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:20, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I changed them back for you. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diego Tryno (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not meet the criteria for the notability of musicians, as far as I can tell

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Diego Tryno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Diego Tryno, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Georgiamarlins! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Georgiamarlins. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:46, 5 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Georgiamarlins! You created a thread called Requesting for information about a mainspace article at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Diego Tryno has been accepted

Diego Tryno, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Utopes (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Thank you for your hard work improving the encyclopedia! Utopes (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diego Tryno for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diego Tryno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego Tryno until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 10:05, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mai Chisamba (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Improving the grammar would also be nice.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mai Chisamba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mai Chisamba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 06:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject History!

Welcome to WikiProject History! We are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to history. Now that you're a member you might want to drop by one of our departments or join a task force. It is also recommended that you watchlist our talk page as well. Working Groups at WikiProject History:

Assessment · Collaboration · Review · Outreach · Task forces

Chris Troutman (talk) 23:39, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mai Chisamba has been accepted

Mai Chisamba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 01:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

MMXX Lunar Calendar

Georgiamarlins,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 04:54, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my family mate from the another mother. I am Ashlee Nyathi from Harare, Zimbabwe. I am the co-founder of Megprom trading company which supplier Kapenta fish. I had a wiki page last year and it was removed I guess deleted, I had 7 or 9 news sources when it was deleted. Now I have more then 15, but I don’t know who can help me to make it stand. Please please check it out and if it can stand please stand it and info me. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.246.52.11 (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ashlee greetings to you from Botswana,i'm sorry your article was deleted.I checked news sources for your name and company and its quite amazing that you have publications from big newspapers in Zimbabwe which are reliable newspapers.However,the articles reads like advertisements and some seems not so independent from you and your company, yes i know right! its surprising when someone says that to you.Well Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and topics are chose based on few things which includes notability ' If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.' Read more on WP:GNG WP:BLP and many other factors.When i choose to create an article about a person , i make sure that i'm convinced they are notable and they meet the guidelines and unfortunately in your case i'm not yet convinced.However don't loose hope, someone might create another article for you and if you feel its taking long ,there are some editors who accepts paid editing WP:PAID and you can ask for more help at WP:AFCHD .Feel free to ask more questions .Thank you for reaching out. Cheers!Georgiamarlins (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreas Shoko (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nightenbelle were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Remove unnecessary capitalization and please find more independent sources not by the same author.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andreas Shoko and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andreas Shoko, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list

Hi Georgiamarlins! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 161: / Line 161: @@
 [[User:Nightenbelle|Nightenbelle]] ([[User talk:Nightenbelle|talk]]) 20:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->
+== You have been pruned from a list ==
+'''Hi Georgiamarlins!''' You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants]], but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.
+Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting [[Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants]].
+'''Thank you!'''
+Message delivered to you with love by [[User:Yapperbot|Yapperbot]] :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact [[User talk:Naypta|my bot operator]]. &#124; Sent at  18:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)