User talk:Piotrus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:25, 16 March 2007

File:WikipediaSignpost icon.png You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Piotrus/Archive 15. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you.

A misunderstanding

In your list of Poles you have listed two different people called Józef Bielawski. Now you have a link to Józef Bielawski because I have created an article about him. The problem is that I have created an article about Józef Bielawski - the Islamic scholar and not about Józef Bielawski - the violinist, or Józef Bielawski - the writer. I suggest we create a disambiguation page to solve this problem. Kkrystian 15:25 (UTC) 16 January 2007

Law and Justice, German National People's Party

Witam!

Proszę spojżec na historię tych artykułów. Moim zdaniem User:Deutscher Patriot powinien zostac przynajmniej ostrzeżony przez admina lub zablokowany(jestem za).

Proszę o reakcję. Pozdrawiam. Medard

Notes in small print

I have a question - how to make a list of notes, or references (like at the end of the Poland prehistory article I'm working on) make appear in small print? Also how to have a date and time automatically appended to the signature (like the one below)?

Orczar

link

http://nasz-czas.tripod.com/317/czas3.html

Aktorzy

bedziemy tworzyc ten artykuł o polskich aktorach? Patryczek94

Hello

Thank you for noticing - its nice to know someone actually reads the small contributions I make. --User:Gabe76

polish mafia

I do not apreciate you calling the polish mafia nonsencewhen you obiouisly know nothing about it. I'm sure you think you know everything but you don't, you can't prove to me or anyone else that there's not a polish mafia or that it wasn't formed the way that I explained it in my article unless you are a part of it (which I'm not but it made a good story). I took time out of my day to write that story and there are many people that would enjoy reading it but now they don't have the chance to read it because you who obiously know everything deleted it. By the way since you know everything you spelled nonsence, nonesence on the deletion page, GENIOUS. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Virgilv (talk • contribs) 03:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

your page

I would like for you to provide a source for your page or it is classified as nonsence and should be deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Virgilv (talk • contribs) 03:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

DYK

On March 1, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leon Wasilewski, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Did you know? was updated. On March 1, 2007, a fact from the article Lithuanization, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks very much Piotrus for all your work. Hope all is well!Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removal

I was a little surprised by your reason for removing the tag I placed on the stub, Mikhail Kovalov. The only intent was to flag a stub in order to encourage editor(s) to improve the article. An external link probably could have been provided in the time it took to remove the tag. Happy editing! --Stormbay 21:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your point is well taken! I often tag and watch the article when it is a subject that catches my interest, (as this one did). I often return to work on these articles myself at a later date. I hope that my note above did not sound snippy as I was genuinely curious as to why the tag was removed. Cheers! and thanks for your prompt reply. --Stormbay 21:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template spam

Ah, there's about three or four different versions of banner-collapsing templates floating around at this point, with people fighting over which one is better, and whether we should be using them at all. ;-)

(Frankly, I'm beginning to think that the templates are a symptom of a deeper issue rather than the problem in of themselves; c.f. Wikipedia:WikiProject reform.) Kirill Lokshin 00:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go board image: FPC

here's an edit. I didn't upload it onto the FPC because I figured its a bit late in the voting. If you want to put it on there feel free.

I saw the request for a edit of: Image:Go Board, Hoge Rielen, Belgium.jpg. I cut out the background, added some slight color effects to the black pieces and adjusted the color balance. It retains the high resolution of the origenal without the background. A few things to note:

Instead of croping out the shadow on the lower left of the board I clone stamped over it so the croping is somewhat different.
The background cutout has no errors or faults that I can see as oposed to the other edit.
I didn't adjust the color as drasticly as the other for verious reasons but I would be happy to do so if you want.

-Fcb981 06:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Empty images

I didn't realize what I had done until I had finished categorizing them. I'll tag them when I get a chance. Appleseed (Talk) 16:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Umedard templates

What crimes have I committed to deserve this request? :-) I tried before to clean up his contributions but I can't keep up, and it gets old after a while. Appleseed (Talk) 16:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have. He responded on my talk page, but I haven't noticed much improvement. Appleseed (Talk) 17:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nomination for Holy Cross Church, Warsaw was successful

Did you know? was updated. On March 2, 2007, a fact from the article Holy Cross Church, Warsaw, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 22:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit

I'll give it a light copy-edit ("light" copy-edits aren't really my style, but I'm up to my neck in researching an article at the moment, and I mustn't let myself get distracted). I'll report back once I've done something. (By the way, I'm staggered at how well you and other non-native speakers do in the English language: I have three foreign languages, but I wouldn't have the confidence to write articles on their wikis. Fist of respect.) qp10qp 23:40, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. Reading through my comments with horror, I feel as if I suddenly turned into Prosecutor Porfiry from Crime and Punishment there: sorry! But I really enjoyed the article: it filled me in on an area of history I'm not at all familiar with. I'm going to disengage myself from it now; but best of luck! Knowing you, I'm sure you'll wrestle it to FA standard. qp10qp 01:20, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Revisionist POV-pusher"

I would like to state that I consider being called a Revisionist POV-pusher extremely offensive; especially considering that I consider you and various other persons to be just that, and feel that I am only correcting POV. Antman -- chat 00:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On someone's talk page, you referred to the people who are trying to change the article Karlovy Vary to Carlsbad as 'Revisionist POV-pushers'. As I voted for, and support the change, that must imply that I am one as well. Antman -- chat 17:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And am I a member of the exceptions, or a member of the group? Antman -- chat 18:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd ask me (hi Piotrus btw) you've got the honorary membership.Rex 18:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I didn't ask you; that's the point. Antman -- chat 18:46, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from personal attacks. [[1]] Antman -- chat 18:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations go where they belong. Refrain or I will submit a formal request. Antman -- chat 18:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Antman, describing obvious situation is not a personal attack. Report whatever you want, but remember that nobody likes nationalistic POV pushers. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 20:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-)

Dear Piotrus,

Thank you for the comments back in January for the Ohio Wesleyan University article. I just nominated it in the FAC process. Thanks you once again!!! LaSaltarella 19:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rospuda

Witam. W artykule o rospudzie znajduje się wiele niedopowiedzeń. Niewątpliwie "zieloni" autorzy artykułu zapomnieli w nim dopisać wiadomności na temat protestów ludności Augustowa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wypisali natomiast wszystkie możliwe bzdury na temat polskiego rządu i informację o nieobiektywnej księdze na GWnie(internetowej oczywiście. Wiadomo przecież, że jak wystawie się jakąś księgę na portalu internetowym, o wiadomych ukierunkowaniach politycznych(tj. Zieloni 2000 czy jakoś tak, to z przekroczeniem 100000 wpisów nie ma żadnego problemu ). Nie są tam także umnieszczone informacje na temat sondaży opini publicznej. Artykuł jest zatem NPOV!!!!!!! Proszę o pomoc, ponieważ tak nieobiektywna wikipedia być poprostu nie może. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Umedard (talk • contribs) 22:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC). --Umedard ^Talk 22:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EN nomenclature

Huh, this one is good [2]. He will push his POV all over the wikipedia.

And in case of lack arguments he starts doing this [3] and this [4]. Oh man, some people are so rude. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 14:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm entitled to want to see English names on Wikipedia, am I not? Antman -- chat 17:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Odzyskiwane terytoria

Czują wolny pozwalać mnie poznają jeżeli wy potrzebujecie pomocy z powraca (3RR). ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 15:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Don't worry about writing essays

thanks for adding stuff to Wikipedia:Don't worry about writing essays. Good to have people reading stuff I make. --Montchav 19:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And this page is really annoying. I would tell you to change it, but you seem to be in a higher position in the Wikipedia hierarcy than me! --Montchav 19:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But anyway, your annoying flashin message inspired me to put an annoying message atop my talk page. --Montchav 19:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards Coordinator referendum

There has been some conflict at Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards. Please vote on the Coordinator referendum. --South Philly 20:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belarus again

Well, I took your suggestion and sent the Belarus article to GA. I found out today it has passed, so we are only inches away from it being FA. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 22:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I took the article to peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Belarus. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for trying to have me blocked, it is nice to see that when someone can't cooperate or compromise they resort to trying to have me blocked. makes me feel so important when people would rather slander/libel me or misrepresent my actions than talk to me.

--Jadger 01:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MTR FAR

MTR has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. LuciferMorgan 02:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tak sobie

witam tutaj Tymek 03:19, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Tak obserwuje czasami Twoje wysilki na rzecz popularyzacji Polski i wszystkiego co z nasza ojczyzna jest zwiazane. Jestem pelen podziwu, doprawdy robisz bardzo dobra robote, za co naleza Ci sie brawa. Ja sam niestety pozostawilem moja biblioteke w Polsce (teraz los mnie rzucil do USA), wiec pozbawiony zrodel nie jestem w stanie robic tego wszystkiego co planuje. Jeszcze raz pisze - szacunek dla Ciebie, a gdybys pytal dlaczego to w ogole pisze? Otoz nie mam pojecia. pozdro[reply]

DYK

On 5 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Silesia Stadium, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 17:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wesele

May I ask you to move The Wedding (1972 film) to Wesele for the sake of simplicity? There’s no article on the play by Wyspiański and yet, the spoiler for the film reveals its entire plot with ending details. “Wesele” is the original title of the 1901 play by Wyspiański on which movie by Wajda (1972) was based. In case of a naming conflict, the title can be expanded in future articles on the same subject, which is unlikely considering, that the story line is already explained. One good example of a similar simplification is Being There with two paralel meanings. Is a well known movie based on a well known book, combined into one article. Both are closely related.

BTW - The Wedding (2004 film) made by Smarzowski is a modern comedy that has nothing to do with "Wesele" by Wyspiański and the Young Poland movement, or Wajda. It does not have to be disambiguated at par. For example, at the Internet Movie Database it goes by the title "Wesele (2004)" and that's the way it could also be named in Wikipedia. [5] Thanks for the understanding. --Poeticbent talk 23:09, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of Poles

Since discussion isn't getting us anywhere, I'm going to go through these lists and move any name of someone not born in Poland (or living a significant portion of their lives in Poland) and move them to the talk page with a notice that they can be reinserted only if a good source is found describing the person in question as Polish. It's possible I will be met with resistance on several lists. Users have lately been stuffing lists like List of Ukrainians with questionable additions and User:Beaumont has been dealing with that. LeszekB 01:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rawa River on DYK for 6 March 2007

On 6 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rawa River, which you substantially expanded and nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thank you for expanding the article and for the nomination! — ERcheck (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nombre

Just a comment. Prokonsul Piotr Konieczny, isn't that Polish for Praefect Peter ______(Konieczny-"King_something_" or something similar?-- Hrödberäht (gespräch) 04:38, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 10	5 March 2007	About the Signpost

New Yorker correction dogs arbitrator into departure	WikiWorld comic: "The Rutles"
News and notes: Picture of the Year, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Extra Edit Buttons

This is a message to a number of Wikipedians. If you wish to reply to this message please do so on my talk page.

Extra edit buttons has received a significant update today. The most significant change is the introduction of popups for some of these buttons. These are small dialog forms which float over the web page. They allow the user to specify the details of the markup code they want added to the page. For example the popup for the table button allows the user to specify things such as the number of the rows and columns in a table and whether or not there should be a header row. As well as the popups there are some extra buttons and other changes to the way the code works. The documentation for XEB will be updated over the next few days.

This new version also includes an extra button, as requested by yourself, to insert warning templates into a uesr's talk page. The documentation will be updated to cover this button in the next few days

If you have any problems with the new version, or suggestions for XEB then please contact me via my talk page. -- MarkS (talk) 10:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some interesting stuff about Piłsudski

Hi, Piotrus, and sorry for not picking up on previous issues (I'm caught up in some other stuff). Since you seem the Polish contributor most interested in Romanian-Polish connections, and since you have contributed to expanding information about the period I'll be referring to, I thought you would be most capable of evaluating whether this info is noteworthy and where it should fit in articles (if at all).

While I was researching the article on Constantin Stere (I'm only halfway through), I came accross an intersting tidbit on Józef Piłsudski. Presumably, this could be included in the article on the man as well. This is it, in my phrasing:

In 1889, while in Krasnoyarsk, Piłsudski shared his exile with Constantin Stere, a Bessarabia-n born Romanian author and politician. The two remained friends for the rest of their lives; Stere included the Polish leader, under the name Stadnicki, as a character in his account of the Siberian sojourn, the novel În preajma revoluţiei ("On the Eve of the Revolution").

(Feel free to rephrase and split the above as you see fit)

The reference for both sentences is: Z. Ornea, Viaţa lui C. Stere, Vol. I, Cartea Românească, Bucharest, 1989, p.113 (red links are pending articles, so it's best not to remove them if you decide to use it).

I do not want to impose on the article (though I cannot help to notice that it needs several copyedits), and I don't know where in it this info could go (for example, perhaps asection on "Józef Piłsudski in literature" or "in art" or "in popular culture" could be created, but I don't know if you main contributors will consider that probable or necessary). Tell me what you think about. Oh, and in case you decide to use it, please let me know where it is: I haven't finished the Ornea books, and there may be more detail on this later on. Dziękuję. Dahn 15:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 6 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Łódź Army, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 23:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filing of request for arbitration re: move of Juozas Lukoševičius to Józef Łukaszewicz

I plan to file a request for arbitration. A mediator at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/Possible bad faith in use of citations involved in the move of Juozas Lukoševičius to Józef Łukaszewicz stated that bad faith issues should be handled by arbitration. Novickas 14:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Case filed: [6] Novickas 18:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Case closed: [7]

Per WP:DR, the steps in disputes are: discuss on the talk page, sleep on it, ask for mediation, ask for arbitration. These steps were followed. My eyes were open: I know that bad faith issues aren't covered in WP policy; the hope was to spur some evolution. Novickas 00:33, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The page Wikipedia:Resolving disputes listed the informal mediation cabal as the step before RFC; the mediator cabalist's comment was "Allegations of bad faith are probably more appropriate for arbitration than mediation."[8] I now see that the cabalist probably meant "Go to RFC as a form of arbitration", but in my inexperience I interpreted the comment as "Go to RFA". Novickas 12:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Wikify tag on Territorial changes of Germany after World War II

This article has plenty of Wikilinks. Perhaps there is another type of Wikification that you think this article needs. Can you be more explicit as to why you put the Wikify tag on the article? Thanks.

--Richard 19:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DYK

Ah ha! I was wondering why you hadn't responded to my reply. I just noticed on your talk page that you don't watch Talk Pages of other editors for replies to your messages. So here (belatedly) is my reply to your original message. --Richard 19:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I never thought of them as DYK candidates. If you tell me what you think would be a good DYK, I might get motivated and clean up the articles ASAP as opposed to "when I get around to it". I will admit that I am not a good polisher and therefore might need to enlist some help. --Richard 23:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrained

Anything you can do to help educate Ukrained (talk · contribs)? He seems to have some serious attitude issues (e.g. [9]) and is about to try to get Khoikhoi sanctioned for what looks on the face of it like a legitimate block. A bit of commoon sense from the right corner of the globe might go down well. Thanks, Guy (Help!) 13:24, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I had a feeling you might be a bit more sympathetic to his issues than some. Oh, you have the PotD on your user page, and today it's the Gherkin (30 St Mary Axe) - I'll be at 33 St Mary Axe, right opposite, tomorrow :-) Guy (Help!) 17:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Poland related contributions

Dziękuję za zaproszenie. Chętnie się włączę i posłucham mądrzejszych, bo - prawdę powiedziawszy - nie mam pojęcia how to share my contributions i wrzucam je jak leci. Mam w swoich zasobach w redakcji wiele ciekawych zdjęć i chętnie się nimi podzielę. Polskie zasoby na Commons są już całkiem spore, ale wciąż czegoś brak. Pozdrawiam serdecznie belissarius 05:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Hel

Hello. You create this article, that's why I ask you. May be, I found little mistake - please, watch to Talk:Battle of Hel. Ingwar JR 12:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Łysica

Witaj. Widziałem, że dodałeś tu przed chwilą zalążek o Łysicy. Jedna sprawa - na Łysicy nie ma żadnych ruin. U podnóża góry, we wsi pl:Święta Katarzyna znajduje się opactwo, ale wcale nie jest zrujnowane. Pozdrawiam Jakubhal 14:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrained

Thanks for your comments, Piotrus. I respectfully disagree, as IMHO, this is indeed a personal attack:

To Irpen: AlexPU was recently blocked for frank discussion of your "Ukrainian patriotism", so I'll refrain from a similar attempt. After all, who knows how many "embedded admins" have you recruited or lobbied (I already know two Russian ones threatening me, and two DYK foreigners that just "look away"). Instead I'll try to concentrate on your permanent breaches of WP rules (yes, this IS threat and warning). But PLEASE DON'T CALL ME YOUR "BUDDY", I CONSIDER IT AS A PERSONAL ATTACK AND TROLLING. Thank you all, Ukrained 21:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

I explained to him earlier that he should be focusing on discussing the article, not other editors. If this and other comments he made didn't violate WP:NPA, then they certainly violated WP:CIVIL. As for AlexPU, I blocked him for 2 weeks based on his block log (all the blocks were for personal attacks), and the fact that he had just come off a one week-block.

On an entirely different matter, I noticed parts of the Przasnysz article (such as the dates, etc.) are still in Polish. Is there any chance you could translate them to English? Thanks, Khoikhoi 18:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are three things going on here. First, Ukrained has been incivil and has edit warred. He needs to be gently informed that this is not acceptable, by someone he will not immediately denounce as being in the cabal (TINC). Piotrus seemed to me like a good candidate for that job. Second, he has concerns with content, and needs help putting his point across without pissing everybody off and getting blocked again. Piotrus can probably help here, too, as Piotrus (unlike me) understands the underlying content issues. No doubt you, Khoikhoi, can also help, but he won't listen to you because you are "in the Cabal" (TINC). Third, he is agitating about being blocked. I think it's a righteous block given his behaviour. I don't believe Khoikhoi was in a content dispute with Ukrained at the time, so I don't see any reason that another admin should have done it, but either way a block was justified. Probably for others, too. So if Piotrus and Khoikhoi can work together perhaps the fighting can be stopped. Guy (Help!) 19:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder whether Piotrus took even time to read Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive212#Personal Attacks by User:Ukrained or he just rushed to defend a user based on the "enemy of my enemy" logic. Anyway, I will make a point of Piotrus' suddenly grown tolerance towards aggressive trolling and will hope that he will extend this not only to pushers of the "right" POV. So, we are to see less of Piotrus' complaints all around Wikipedia aimed at sanctioning his content opponents.

Finally, it would be a poor precedent to insist on removing of the blocking admin from the right to deal with the user simply because the user actively trolled the admin in response. There were no edit conflicts whatsoever. There is no evidence that Khoi conspired with anyone either. Otherwise, we open a path to a total immunity by some who simply post "all admins are dicks" at their talk pages. --Irpen 05:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthead

Hi, could you please check Mattheads edits like this [10], he is pushing german translations all over the inapropriate places. ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 09:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New article announcements

I have noticed that on 4 March 2007 User:Umedard created a stub called Krościenko nad Dunajcem. It is quite unfortunate that the user does not have the habit of checking for existing articles first. Besides, the title of the article is written in Polish, not in English. Please see also: Krościenko. I'm letting you know about this because you placed his stub at Portal:Poland/New article announcements on 12 March 2007. --Poeticbent talk 18:43, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Skidel

It is now a blue link (and a stub). User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 01:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 12th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 11	12 March 2007	About the Signpost

Report of diploma mill offering pay for edits	Essay tries to clarify misconceptions about Wikipedia
Blog aggregator launched for Wikimedia-related posts	WikiWorld comic: "Cartoon Physics"
News and notes: Wikimania 2007, milestones	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation


Home \| Archives \| Newsroom \| Tip Line \| Single-Page View	Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Redirect

Can you remove this redirect? [11] I think it is mean spirited, created only to prove a point in the days gone by. --Poeticbent talk 06:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Polish Jews

Stumbled upon a little clique of identically editing users trying to make up their own definition of "Polish Jew" on there. None make an effort to provide a reference for all the people they keep returning as Polish. Appreciate some comments. Same measures worked out fine on List of Poles and List of Polish painters though, as expected. LeszekB 14:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anonimous contributions

Sorry, I don't know, where I must write this. Wery strange edits of anonimous user: [12]. If you can, advice please, where I must to inform about such cases. Ingwar JR 09:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Polish clans, Polish families and Polish coats of arms

Dear friends:

If you have some extra time, I would appreciate if you can take a look to Category:Coats of arms of clans of Poland and Category:Polish nobility coats of arms images, mainly the Talk pages.

There is an Italian wikipedian, who knows nothing about Polish history and Polish szlachta and he is rearranging the categories in Category:Coats of arms of Poland

In commons he is User:G.dallorto

My point of view may have some mistakes but I would thank you very much your thought and your discussion on this issue.

As today I got few time I am sending this same message to:

If you know somebody else interested in Polish heraldry and Polish szlachta, please invite him to join this Discussion.

Best regards, my friends, and thank you by your answer to this request. --Gustavo 08:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nazwy gmin polskich

Witaj! Mamy duży problem. Lajskonik stworzył listę gmin, napisał gminy jako "Gmina XXX", ale zauważyliśmi, że już są opisane niektóre gminy, tyle, że jako "Gmina of XXX". Moglibyśmy to poprzenościć, ale nie jesteśmy pewni, jak jest. Co ty o tym sądzisz? Marcin Suwalczan [our talk] 14:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of Poland

Hi. It looks a lot better, and I think it'll end up being kept. You might want to get someone to give the article a copy-edit to weed out any lingering minor issues. I would help, but I've been swamped with Final Fantasy WikiProject tasks. — Deckill er 17:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Soviet invasion of Poland (1939)

The only thing I'd still like to see changed is the "See also" section, but that can likely wait until FAC; so please feel free to nominate the article for A-Class. Kirill Lokshin 18:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MHR#A-CLASS. ;-) Kirill Lokshin 18:46, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help with fixing an image

Hi Piotrus

I just noticed a small error in Image:Podział administracyjny I RP.png uploaded by Commons:User:Poznaniak who apparently doesn't speak any language I know. Could you possibly drop him a small note in Polish? The error is that he has labelled the island of Öland (Olandia) as Danish, however this island has always been Swedish. All other islands are correctly labelled. Happy editing. Valentinian ^{T / C} 06:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Valentinian ^{T / C} 16:44, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

prosba

witam dobry pomysl, bede linkowal artykuly, zawsze to jest odnosnik dla uzytkownikow

co do polskich znakow (np. Lodz) to mam problem bo operuje komputerem McIntosh i jest on bardzo dziwna maszyna i zmienia mi te znaki wiec nie jestem w stanie tego zrobic

jesli chodzi o te trivia to jestes ekspertem wikipediowym moze sam gdzies to dorzucisz? gdzie uwazasz? pozdro Tymek 13:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Panieri11.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Panieri11.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop stalking me

After this one [13] I do feel obliged to report a trolling action of an admin. Untill now I did feel free to edit whatewer I felt I had some expertise on, although edit summaries like (tag {{WikiProject Lithuania}} for Lokyz) seems to me like stalking and trying to push me to behave unreasonably. Therefore i do demand deletion of this edit summary and a personal appology with a promise I'll be not stalked in the future.--Lokyz 22:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 532: / Line 532: @@
 This is an automated notice by [[User:OrphanBot|OrphanBot]]. For assistance on the image use policy, see [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions]]. 19:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
+==Please stop stalking me==
+After this one [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APonary_massacre&diff=115610756&oldid=114238435] I do feel obliged to report a trolling action of an admin. Untill now I did feel free to edit whatewer  I felt I had some expertise on, although edit summaries like <nowiki>(tag {{WikiProject Lithuania}} for Lokyz)</nowiki> seems to me like stalking and trying to push me to behave unreasonably. Therefore i do demand deletion of this edit summary and a personal appology with a promise I'll be not stalked in the future.--[[User:Lokyz|Lokyz]] 22:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)