User talk:Bakasuprman: Difference between revisions
→Articles on Indian parties: new section |
|||
| Line 519: | Line 519: | ||
Hi. I'd like to ask a question. It appears almost impossible to lift any article on Indian political parties to FA status. In articles such the ones on BJP, INC, CPI(M) and Shiv Sena, repeatedly get dragged down in quality as opponents of these parties use the wikiarticles as their own soapboxes. Would it be possible to work out a joint consensus on how to relate to inclusion/non-inclusion of allegations, that could be applied to articles on all major Indian parties? Perhaps drafting an essay? --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 21:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hi. I'd like to ask a question. It appears almost impossible to lift any article on Indian political parties to FA status. In articles such the ones on BJP, INC, CPI(M) and Shiv Sena, repeatedly get dragged down in quality as opponents of these parties use the wikiarticles as their own soapboxes. Would it be possible to work out a joint consensus on how to relate to inclusion/non-inclusion of allegations, that could be applied to articles on all major Indian parties? Perhaps drafting an essay? --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 21:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
:Thanks for the answer. I'll get back to you if a produce a proposal. I had also contact Hornplease on this, but he seems to have dropped out from wiki. In the meanwhile, please have a look at the [[Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist)]], were the present situation is far from satisfactory. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 10:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:08, 9 January 2008
|
|
| 1-2-3- 4-5-6-7-8-9 -10-11-12-13 -14-15-16-17-18 |
I give myself the authority to remove bogus warning templates from my page Bakaman Bakatalk 04:19, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Category:Iyers
Well, Iyer is not a jati. A Brahmin is a jati; a kshatriya is a jati; Iyers, Nairs etc. are ethnic groups or communities. Well, by the way, dont we have categories for Parsis, Jews,etc. Doesnt it breed religion-based discrimination of sorts. -Ravichandar84 17:11, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I request you to stop removing Category:Iyers from Wikipedia articles. I cant understand your motive ehind this. If at all you have any objections to the existence of the category, use proper procedure and apply for page deletion than removing entires. Regards -Ravichandar84 17:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
With regard to the pt ur tring to make, let me adsk you this question: There are categories for Parsis, Jews, Indian Muslims, etc.. Isnt there any chance of a communal riot brewing up in Wikipedia? I guess there is. Besides if a person gives relevant references then i dont really think the affiliation of the person to a particular community wud be a matter of doubt - Ravichandar84 17:42, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
In that case, the category page should be deleted with proper procedure and not blanked as you tried to. Thanks - Ravichandar84 17:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok thats ur point of justification. I still think its okay. -Ravichandar84 17:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Reg Wikiproject Dravidian people
Expecting ur help here.. :-)
-Ravichandar84 03:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Famous dalits
dear, why you delete "Famous Dalits" cat.??--Khan5 07:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Happy Diwali
BalanceΩrestored Talk 08:20, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 5th and 12th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 45 | 5 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 46 | 12 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Geetganga link from RSS Page
Why did you remove geetganga.org link from RSS page? I thought it would be very appropriate as it gives people idea behind RSS philosophy ... Sjain (talk) 17:34, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 47 | 19 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 48 | 26 November 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:47, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Congrats
For the 100th DYK on the WB portal - Asit Kumar Haldar. I just found out. You rock. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
deletion review
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Category:Politicians by religion. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.. I must respectfully disagree with your decision on the nomination and wish to bring a wider consensus.Bakaman 02:29, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the notice. I've commented there. And I hope you're having a great day : ) - jc37 02:43, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
ArbCom
I have filed a case here, I just listed myself an Dbachmann as the involved parties, because I was unsure how to do it, if you would also like to be listed as an involved party and make a statement, please feel free to add your name and statement. futurebird 20:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
bn script
I just noticed your post seeking Bengali script for Shamsunnahar Mahmud, and remembered you did the same on my talk page ages back, for Bharat Dev Varma. And, I also remembered, I haven't met your request yet. Well, I used to copy and paste Bengali letters from the Bengali Wikipedia to make Bengali names, which I can't do anymore because of some font support thing on my PC. But, I have a brilliant idea here. I am starting a Bengali script needed section on the Bangladesh Wikiproject. You can post your requests there. There are quite a few Bangladeshi editors who are arduously adding Bengali script to all Bangladesh related articles. May be they can help you with this. :) Aditya(talk • contribs) 13:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:59, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been added as a party to this case, which can be found here, at the request of an arbitrator. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dbachmann/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dbachmann/Workshop. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel(Talk) 18:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- Please turn your attention to this [1]. Regards -- and HAPPY NEW YEAR. Thanks. deeceevoice (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
DYK
History of Galatasaray S.K., which you nominated, was recently included in a DYK update. I added the note directly to your DYK subpage. Mangojuicetalk 21:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
Did you know? was updated. On 5 December, 2007, a fact from the article Wanganui Branch, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Adam Cuerden talk 05:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Western Chalukya architecture
Thanks for the support.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 12:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Did You Know...
|
|
On 5 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shamsunnahar Mahmud, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Woody (talk) 14:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
When you have time, do take a look at it. Thanks Taprobanus (talk) 17:16, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
- Keep a "watch" please also I am developing a article called Royal flag of the Jaffna Kingdom. I have a RS source a Codrington that says it is based out of Eastern Ganga dynasty standards. The eastern Ganga article is of no help to locate a source that describes their standards, flags or insignia. If you can locate one whicg describes their flag/standrads/insignia should depict a pouncing Nandi bull with a Sun surrounding it. Thanks Taprobanus (talk) 20:12, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, what I am looking for is the description of Eastern Ganga flag/standrad/insignia directly itself. Taprobanus (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
Did you know? was updated. On 9 December, 2007, a fact from the article Bradford Kelleher, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Carabinieri (talk) 21:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
Friend it would be great if you could review this article on Iyers. It was earlier evaluated by someone who had assigned a B-grade. However, it was so long ago and since then, the reference links have nearly doubled. I have worked up the page extensively quoting Brahmin as well as anti-Brahmin sources. So you will observe that the article abides by neutrality. I've also submitted this article for peer-review as I believe that the article is certainly good enough for a higher grade. However, the person who had evaluated it took it personally and saw to it that the article isnt considered for a higher grade. You will observe this from the comments section of the 'Peer review requests' page. Unfortunately, Wikipedia has become a place for individuals to display their favoritism or personal prejudice. It would great if u cud step in and help in. Thanks --
15:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 50 | 10 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK
|
|
On 12 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Habibullah Bahar Chowdhury, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Cirt (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Lal Masjid
If you think it's ready, you're welcome to renominate of course. And you need not go through me, especially if it was a quick fail. However, I would say that the multiple {{fact}} tags in the article must be remedied before any nomination occurs. Other than that, the article looks pretty good! VanTucky talk 05:52, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: back
Hi Baka, sorry for being so tardy in replying; am busy in real life and so my time on wikipedia is severely limited - especially as far as getting involved in "talk page discussion" is concerned. However, rest assured, that I have no plans to retire, and will be dropping by periodically over the next few weeks, and hopefully will become more active sometime in early 2008. Hope you and other editors are doing well on and off wikipedia! Regards. Abecedare (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Hello... here's a peer review
I have taken Sitakunda Upazila to Wikipedia:Peer review/Sitakunda Upazila, and so far recieved no comments, almost. Please, take a look, and be ruthless if you want. I have high hopes for the article. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:21, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 51 | 17 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 18:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
DYK mistake
Hi Bakasuprman - there was a small error you made - [2] - which I've taken the liberty of correcting. Hope you don't mind, ShivaeVolved 19:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
And a Happy New Year to you.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
On Hinduism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_United_States#Hinduism —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esimal (talk • contribs) 10:10, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 52 | 26 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi - most of those facts I've read on TOI, so I guess those web stories can be easily available via Indiatimes. It will take me 1-2 days to work on this, as naturally, time is a little tight right now. Interesting username, btw. ShivaeVolved 15:54, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hope you had a Merry Christmas - and will have a prosperous New Year! ShivaeVolved 15:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Pakistanphobia
I noticed you participated in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Pakistani sentiment. The article Anti-Pakistani sentiment was eventually moved to Pakistanphobia. Now Pakistanphobia has been nominated for deletion. I thought you might be interested in participating in the AfD debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakistanphobia. Feel free to come by and contribute your thoughts.Bless sins (talk) 05:08, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Azizul Huque, was selected for DYK!
|
|
On December 31, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Azizul Huque, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 (talk) 07:23, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Indian religions
I know that the talk page at Indian religions is probably the largest in wikipedia, but I sincerely request your assistance in countering repeat reverts of AnishShah19 who claims that Jainism stretched back to the Indus Valley civilization. He concludes that the Vedic tradition was parallel to Jainism and sramana.
Just browse through the page in 10 minutes you'll get his line of discussion (Harappan rishabha seals, naked munis described in Vedas and the standing posture of some Indus valley seals ). I'm in dire need of support from co-religionists too (he too is one, but astray). Indian_Air_Force (IAF) (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks... thank you so much
Thanks for dropping in. I was actually planning to ask you to take a look at Sitakunda Upazila. But, Your Kindness was faster than I... thanks again. Please, be ruthless in making suggestions and criticism. And, if possible, please, lend a hand in developing the "Pilgrimage sites". Keeper76 won't touch it, though he rendered much copyediting support to most of the rest of the article. BTW, I am really sorry to see you facing so much bad faith here on Wikipedia. Aditya(talk • contribs) 21:13, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- The pleasure is all mine. Don't be away for too long, Wikipedia (and Bangladesh, too) needs you. Aditya(talk • contribs) 21:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Let's Collaborate on Sunderbans and Cox's Bazar
Hello! Please note Sunderbans and Cox's Bazar have been selected as the current WikiProject Bangladesh collaboration topics. As you may be aware that these two are currently candidates for natural wonders of the world, it is extremely important to ensure that the Wikipedia articles on these topics make a clear and complete reflection of these topics. Any contribution that you can make to these topics is very welcome. Arman (Talk) 03:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
See above Taprobanus (talk) 13:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- I need some help in copy editing Aryacakravarti dynasty please. Thanks Taprobanus (talk) 14:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Articles on Indian parties
Hi. I'd like to ask a question. It appears almost impossible to lift any article on Indian political parties to FA status. In articles such the ones on BJP, INC, CPI(M) and Shiv Sena, repeatedly get dragged down in quality as opponents of these parties use the wikiarticles as their own soapboxes. Would it be possible to work out a joint consensus on how to relate to inclusion/non-inclusion of allegations, that could be applied to articles on all major Indian parties? Perhaps drafting an essay? --Soman (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer. I'll get back to you if a produce a proposal. I had also contact Hornplease on this, but he seems to have dropped out from wiki. In the meanwhile, please have a look at the Talk:Communist Party of India (Marxist), were the present situation is far from satisfactory. --Soman (talk) 10:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)