Jump to content

Monotheism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[pending revision][pending revision]
Content deleted Content added
Ilkali (talk | contribs)
stylistic corrections, small removal of OR
EGMichaels (talk | contribs)
"God" as normal usage of the word
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
: ''For the Celtic Frost album, see [[Monotheist (album)]]''
: ''For the Celtic Frost album, see [[Monotheist (album)]]''


In [[theology]], '''monotheism''' (from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:μόνος|μόνος]]}} "one" and {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:θεός|θεός]]}} "[[God (male deity)|god]]") is the belief in the existence of one [[deity]], or in the [[Oneness (concept)|oneness]] of a god.<ref>"Monotheism", in Britannica, 15th ed. (1986), 8:266.</ref> In a Western context, the concept of "monotheism" tends to be dominated by the concept of the god of the [[Abrahamic religion]]s and the [[Neoplatonism|Platonic]] concept of God as put forward by [[Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite]].
In [[theology]], '''monotheism''' (from [[Ancient Greek|Greek]] {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:μόνος|μόνος]]}} "one" and {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:θεός|θεός]]}} "[[God (male deity)|God]]") is the belief in the existence of one [[Deity]], or in the [[Oneness (concept)|oneness]] of God.<ref>“Monotheism”, in Britannica, 15th ed. (1986), 8:266.</ref> In a Western context, the concept of "monotheism" tends to be dominated by the concept of God found in [[Abrahamic religion]]s and the [[Neoplatonism|Platonic]] concept of God as put forward by [[Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite]].


The concept of monotheism has largely been defined in contrast with [[polytheism|polytheistic]] religions, and monotheism tends to overlap with other [[Unitary]] concepts, such as [[monism]].
The concept of monotheism has largely been defined in contrast with [[polytheism|polytheistic]] religions, and monotheism tends to overlap with other [[Unitary]] concepts, such as [[monism]].


Whereas monotheism is a self-description of religions subsumed under this term, there is no equivalent self-description for polytheist religions: monotheism asserts itself by opposing polytheism, while polytheism does not use the same argumentative device, as it includes a concept of divine unity despite worshipping a plethora of gods.<ref>Assman, Jan, ''Monotheism and Polytheism'', in Johnston, Sarah Iles, ''Ancient Religions'', pp. 17, The Belknap Press of Harvard University (2007), ISBN 978-0-674-02548-6</ref> By the same token, monotheistic religions may still include concepts of a plurality of the divine, for example the [[Trinity]], in which God is one being in three personal dimensions (the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit). Additionally, Christians believe Jesus to have two natures (divine and human), each possessing the full attributes of that nature, without mixture or intermingling of those attributes. Although Christian theology reserves worship for the Divine, the distinction between worshipping the divine nature of Jesus but not the human nature of Jesus can be difficult for non-Christians (and even Christian laity) to follow.
Whereas monotheism is a self-description of religions subsumed under this term, there is no equivalent self-description for polytheist religions: monotheism asserts itself by opposing polytheism, while polytheism does not use the same argumentative device, as it includes a concept of divine unity despite worshipping a plethora of gods.<ref>Assman, Jan, ''Monotheism and Polytheism'', in Johnston, Sarah Iles, ''Ancient Religions'', pp. 17, The Belknap Press of Harvard University (2007), ISBN 978-0-674-02548-6</ref> By the same token, monotheistic religions may still include concepts of a plurality of the Divine, for example the [[Trinity]], in which God is one being in three personal dimensions (the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit). Additionally, Christians believe Jesus to have two natures (divine and human), each possessing the full attributes of that nature, without mixture or intermingling of those attributes. Although Christian theology reserves worship for the Divine, the distinction between worshipping the divine nature of Jesus but not the human nature of Jesus can be difficult for non-Christians (and even Christian laity) to follow.


Christians of a [[catholic]] tradition [[veneration|venerate]] the [[Saints]] among them [[Theotokos|Mary]] as human beings that had remarkable qualities, have lived their faith in God to the extreme and [[intercession of saints|continue to assist in the process of salvation for others.]]<ref>''The Orthodox Church''. Ware, Timothy. Penguin Books, 1997. ISBN 0-14-014656-3</ref>
Christians of a [[catholic]] tradition [[veneration|venerate]] the [[Saints]] among them [[Theotokos|Mary]] as human beings that had remarkable qualities, have lived their faith in God to the extreme and [[intercession of saints|continue to assist in the process of salvation for others.]]<ref>''The Orthodox Church''. Ware, Timothy. Penguin Books, 1997. ISBN 0-14-014656-3</ref>


==Origin and development==
==Origin and development==
The word ''[[:wikt:monotheism|monotheism]]'' is derived from the [[Ancient Greek|Greek]], {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:μόνος|μόνος]]}} meaning "single" and {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:θεός|θεός]]}} meaning "[[God (male deity)|god]]".<ref>The compound {{lang|el|μονοθεισμός}} is current only in [[Modern Greek]]. There is a single attestation of {{lang|grc|μονόθεον}} in a Byzantine hymn (''Canones Junii'' 20.6.43; A. Acconcia Longo and G. Schirò, ''Analecta hymnica graeca, vol. 11 e codicibus eruta Italiae inferioris''. Rome: Istituto di Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici. Università di Roma, 1978)</ref> The English term was first used by [[Henry More]].
The word ''[[:wikt:monotheism|monotheism]]'' is derived from the [[Ancient Greek|Greek]], {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:μόνος|μόνος]]}} meaning "single" and {{lang|grc|[[:wikt:θεός|θεός]]}} meaning "[[God (male deity)|God]]".<ref>The compound {{lang|el|μονοθεισμός}} is current only in [[Modern Greek]]. There is a single attestation of {{lang|grc|μονόθεον}} in a Byzantine hymn (''Canones Junii'' 20.6.43; A. Acconcia Longo and G. Schirò, ''Analecta hymnica graeca, vol. 11 e codicibus eruta Italiae inferioris''. Rome: Istituto di Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici. Università di Roma, 1978)</ref> The English term was first used by [[Henry More]].


The concept sees a gradual development out of notions of [[henotheism]] and [[monolatrism]]. In the [[Ancient Near East]], each [[URU|city]] had a local patron deity, such as [[Shamash]] at [[Larsa]] or [[Sin (mythology)|Sin]] at [[Ur]]. The first claims of global supremacy of a specific god date to the [[Late Bronze Age]], with [[Akhenaten]]'s ''[[Great Hymn to the Aten]]'' (connected to [[Judaism]] by [[Sigmund Freud]] in his ''[[Moses and Monotheism]]''), and, depending on dating issues, [[Zoroaster]]'s [[Gatha]]s to [[Ahura Mazda]]. Currents of monism or monotheism emerge in [[Vedic period|Vedic India]] in the same period, with e.g. the [[Nasadiya Sukta]]. Philosophical monotheism and the associated concept of absolute [[good and evil]] emerges in [[Classical Antiquity]], notably with [[Plato]] (c.f. [[Euthyphro dilemma]]), elaborated into the idea of [[Absolute (philosophy)|The One]] in [[Neoplatonism]], later culminating in the doctrines of [[Christology]] in [[Early Christianity]] and finally (by the 7th century) in the radical ''[[tawhid]]'' in [[Islam]].
The concept sees a gradual development out of notions of [[henotheism]] and [[monolatrism]]. In the [[Ancient Near East]], each [[URU|city]] had a local patron deity, such as [[Shamash]] at [[Larsa]] or [[Sin (mythology)|Sin]] at [[Ur]]. The first claims of universal supremacy of a single God date to the [[Late Bronze Age]], with [[Akhenaten]]'s ''[[Great Hymn to the Aten]]'' (connected to [[Judaism]] by [[Sigmund Freud]] in his ''[[Moses and Monotheism]]''), and, depending on dating issues, [[Zoroaster]]'s [[Gatha]]s to [[Ahura Mazda]]. Currents of monism or monotheism emerge in [[Vedic period|Vedic India]] in the same period, with e.g. the [[Nasadiya Sukta]]. Philosophical monotheism and the associated concept of absolute [[good and evil]] emerges in [[Classical Antiquity]], notably with [[Plato]] (c.f. [[Euthyphro dilemma]]), elaborated into the idea of [[Absolute (philosophy)|The One]] in [[Neoplatonism]], later culminating in the doctrines of [[Christology]] in [[Early Christianity]] and finally (by the 7th century) in the radical ''[[tawhid]]'' in [[Islam]].


In Islamic theology, a person who spontaneously "discovers" monotheism is called a ''[[ḥanīf]]'', the original ''ḥanīf'' being [[Abraham]].
In Islamic theology, a person who spontaneously "discovers" monotheism is called a ''[[ḥanīf]]'', the original ''ḥanīf'' being [[Abraham]].
Line 24: Line 24:
*[[Henotheism]] involves devotion to a single god while accepting the existence of other gods. Similarly, [[monolatrism]] is the worship of a single deity independent of the ontological claims regarding that deity.
*[[Henotheism]] involves devotion to a single god while accepting the existence of other gods. Similarly, [[monolatrism]] is the worship of a single deity independent of the ontological claims regarding that deity.
* [[Theism]] a term that refers to the belief in the existence of a god or divine being.
* [[Theism]] a term that refers to the belief in the existence of a god or divine being.
* [[Deism]] is a form of monotheism in which it is believed that one god exists. However, a deist rejects the idea that this god intervenes in the world.
* [[Deism]] is a form of monotheism in which it is believed that one God exists. However, a deist rejects the idea that God intervenes in the world.
* [[Monistic Theism]] is the type of monotheism found in Hinduis, encompassing [[pantheism]], [[monism]], and at the same time the concept of a personal god
* [[Monistic Theism]] is the type of monotheism found in Hinduis, encompassing [[pantheism]], [[monism]], and at the same time the concept of a personal God
*[[Pantheism]] holds that [[Universe|the Universe]] itself is god. The existence of a transcendent supreme extraneous to nature is denied.
*[[Pantheism]] holds that [[Universe|the Universe]] itself is God. The existence of a transcendent supreme extraneous to nature is denied.
*[[Panentheism]], or Monistic Monotheism, is a form of theism that holds that god contains, but is not identical to, [[Universe|the Universe]]. The 'one god' is omnipotent and all-pervading, the universe is part of god, and god is ''both'' [[Immanence|immanent]] and [[transcendence (religion)|transcendent]].
*[[Panentheism]], or Monistic Monotheism, is a form of theism that holds that God contains, but is not identical to, [[Universe|the Universe]]. The 'one God' is omnipotent and all-pervading, the universe is part of God, and God is ''both'' [[Immanence|immanent]] and [[transcendence (religion)|transcendent]].
*[[Substance monotheism]], found in some indigenous African religions, holds that the many gods are different forms of a single underlying substance.
*[[Substance monotheism]], found in some indigenous African religions, holds that the many gods are different forms of a single underlying substance.


On the surface, monotheism is in contrast with [[polytheism]], which is the worship of several [[Deity|deities]]. Polytheism is however reconcilable with [[Inclusive monotheism]], which claims that all deities are just different names or forms for the single god. This approach is common in [[Hinduism]], e.g. in [[Smartism]]. [[Exclusive monotheism]], on the other hand, actively opposes polytheism. Monotheism is often contrasted with theistic [[dualism]] (ditheism). However, in dualistic theologies as that of [[Gnosticism]], the two deities are not of equal rank, and the role of the Gnostic [[demiurge]] is closer to that of [[Satan]] in Christian theology than that of a [[Diarchy|diarch]] on equal terms with god (who is represented in pantheistic fashion, as [[Pleroma]]).
On the surface, monotheism is in contrast with [[polytheism]], which is the worship of several [[Deity|deities]]. Polytheism is however reconcilable with [[Inclusive monotheism]], which claims that all deities are just different names or forms for the single God. This approach is common in [[Hinduism]], e.g. in [[Smartism]]. [[Exclusive monotheism]], on the other hand, actively opposes polytheism. Monotheism is often contrasted with theistic [[dualism]] (ditheism). However, in dualistic theologies as that of [[Gnosticism]], the two deities are not of equal rank, and the role of the Gnostic [[demiurge]] is closer to that of [[Satan]] in Christian theology than that of a [[Diarchy|diarch]] on equal terms with God (who is represented in pantheistic fashion, as [[Pleroma]]).


==Early History==
==Early History==
Line 42: Line 42:
[[Zoroastrianism]] is considered to be one of the earliest monotheistic beliefs, but the Zoroastrian definition of monotheism includes characteristics different from that found in some other monotheistic religions, including worship of subordinate nature-spirits and the use of fire-reverance. <ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle=Monotheism}}</ref>
[[Zoroastrianism]] is considered to be one of the earliest monotheistic beliefs, but the Zoroastrian definition of monotheism includes characteristics different from that found in some other monotheistic religions, including worship of subordinate nature-spirits and the use of fire-reverance. <ref>{{CathEncy|wstitle=Monotheism}}</ref>


In Zoroaster's revelation, [[Ahura Mazda]] is a transcendental and universal god, the one uncreated Creator (standard appellation) and to whom all worship is ultimately directed. However, Zoroaster also perceives Mazda to be wholly good, and that his creation is wholly good. In conflict with creation is ''anti-creation'', evident in the created world as decay and disorder. Since anti-creation is purely destructive it cannot have been created (otherwise it would self-destruct) and hence must - like the Creator himself - be uncreated.
In Zoroaster's revelation, [[Ahura Mazda]] is a transcendental and universal God, the one uncreated Creator (standard appellation) and to whom all worship is ultimately directed. However, Zoroaster also perceives Mazda to be wholly good, and that his creation is wholly good. In conflict with creation is ''anti-creation'', evident in the created world as decay and disorder. Since anti-creation is purely destructive it cannot have been created (otherwise it would self-destruct) and hence must - like the Creator himself - be uncreated.


In the [[Gathas]], Zoroaster does not acknowledge any divinity other than Ahura Mazda. However, the hymns of Indo-Iranian religious tradition (of which the Gathas are a part) are always addressed to a specific divinity and those closely associated with him, and in this sense the Gathas are not (necessarily) a denial of the other divinities, but the exaltation of a specific one. Although not mentioned by name (in the Gathas, [[Ahura]] Mazda is itself an epithet, not yet a proper name), Zoroaster implicitly acknowledges the existence of other [[Ahura|''Ahura''s]] "Lords", as in "thou who art the mightiest Ahura and the Wise (''Mazda'') One" (''[[Yasna]]'' 33.11). In addition to these lords that are "worthy of worship" (''[[yazata]]''), Zoroaster also refers to the [[daeva|''daeva''s]] as the 'wrong' gods, or 'false' gods, or gods 'that should not be worshipped' and whose followers are to be brought onto the path of righteousness. In later Zoroastrian tradition, the ''daeva''s are demons, but this is not yet evident in the prophet's own poetry.
In the [[Gathas]], Zoroaster does not acknowledge any divinity other than Ahura Mazda. However, the hymns of Indo-Iranian religious tradition (of which the Gathas are a part) are always addressed to a specific divinity and those closely associated with him, and in this sense the Gathas are not (necessarily) a denial of the other divinities, but the exaltation of a specific one. Although not mentioned by name (in the Gathas, [[Ahura]] Mazda is itself an epithet, not yet a proper name), Zoroaster implicitly acknowledges the existence of other [[Ahura|''Ahura''s]] "Lords", as in "thou who art the mightiest Ahura and the Wise (''Mazda'') One" (''[[Yasna]]'' 33.11). In addition to these lords that are "worthy of worship" (''[[yazata]]''), Zoroaster also refers to the [[daeva|''daeva''s]] as the 'wrong' gods, or 'false' gods, or gods 'that should not be worshipped' and whose followers are to be brought onto the path of righteousness. In later Zoroastrian tradition, the ''daeva''s are demons, but this is not yet evident in the prophet's own poetry.
Line 54: Line 54:


In traditional [[Jewish]] thought, which provided the basis of the [[Christian]] and [[Islamic]] religions, monolatrism was regarded as its most basic belief. [[Judaism]] and [[Islam]] have traditionally attempted to interpret scripture as [[exclusive monotheism|exclusively monotheistic]] whilst [[Christianity]] diverted to a more complex form of [[tripartite monotheism]], as a result of considering the Holy Spirit to be a part of God, and attributing divinity to [[Jesus]], a [[Judea]]n [[Judaism|Jew]], in the first century AD, defining him as the son of God. Thus, "Father, Son and Holy Spirit".
In traditional [[Jewish]] thought, which provided the basis of the [[Christian]] and [[Islamic]] religions, monolatrism was regarded as its most basic belief. [[Judaism]] and [[Islam]] have traditionally attempted to interpret scripture as [[exclusive monotheism|exclusively monotheistic]] whilst [[Christianity]] diverted to a more complex form of [[tripartite monotheism]], as a result of considering the Holy Spirit to be a part of God, and attributing divinity to [[Jesus]], a [[Judea]]n [[Judaism|Jew]], in the first century AD, defining him as the son of God. Thus, "Father, Son and Holy Spirit".

===Monotheism in the Hebrew Bible===
===Monotheism in the Hebrew Bible===
It is often argued that the [[Hebrew Bible]] takes a position not of monotheism, but of [[monolatrism]] or [[henotheism]]. God reveals himself not as the only god, but rather as the god whom Abraham knows. (Gen 15:7) In such a respect, the god of Israel is not God alone, but the god who was worshipped by Abraham's clan. In this context, the god of Israel is a type of tribal deity, that although was worshipped alone, did not explicitly exclude the existence of other gods, who were not relevant to them.<ref>R.G.Vincent, "Monotheism (in the Bible)" in New Catholic Encyclopedia, (1967), 9:1066.</ref>
It is often argued that the [[Hebrew Bible]] takes a position not of monotheism, but of [[monolatrism]] or [[henotheism]]. God reveals himself not as the only god, but rather as the god whom Abraham knows. (Gen 15:7) In such a respect, the god of Israel is not God alone, but the god who was worshipped by Abraham's clan. In this context, the god of Israel is a type of tribal deity, that although was worshipped alone, did not explicitly exclude the existence of other gods, who were not relevant to them.<ref>R.G.Vincent, "Monotheism (in the Bible)" in New Catholic Encyclopedia, (1967), 9:1066.</ref>


In the early Mosaic era, the possibility of other gods is left an open question, although by this stage Israel claims that their god is greater. (Ex 18:11) This same subtle shift is shown in 2 Chr 2:5, and could indicate that Israel understood that the god they recognised was God alone, and other gods were therefore false. This would be ''Monotheism'' in the proper sense of the word. By the time of the prophet Isaiah, ''Monotheism'' is solidly and explicitly accepted. "Thus says the {{LORD}}, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the {{LORD}} of hosts: "I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god." (Is 44:6) Thus, the development of the people of Israel to a true ''Monotheism'', appears to be a gradual process, with the exception of Gen 1:1 - which thus casts substantial doubt on the legitimacy of that hypothesis. It is into this context that Christianity emerges, and thus Christianity was from the outset ''Monotheistic''. (John 1:1)
In the early Mosaic era, the possibility of other gods is left an open question, although by this stage Israel claims that their god is greater. (Ex 18:11) This same subtle shift is shown in 2 Chr 2:5, and could indicate that Israel understood that the god they recognised was God alone, and other gods were therefore false. This would be ''Monotheism'' in the proper sense of the word. By the time of the prophet Isaiah, ''Monotheism'' is solidly and explicitly accepted. “Thus says the {{LORD}}, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the {{LORD}} of hosts: "I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god. (Is 44:6) Thus, the development of the people of Israel to a true ''Monotheism'', appears to be a gradual process, with the exception of Gen 1:1 - which thus casts substantial doubt on the legitimacy of that hypothesis. It is into this context that Christianity emerges, and thus Christianity was from the outset ''Monotheistic''. (John 1:1)


A strictly literal interpretation of Deuteronomy 4:39 excludes the possibility of henotheism. The verse states: "Know this day, and take it to heart, that [[Tetragrammaton|the {{LORD}}]] is God in heaven above and on earth below; there is none else." If one were to view that Deuteronomy is a late addition to the Five Books of Moses, this would reflect the later adoption of monotheism. However, if Deuteronomy is taken to be part of the original text, as it generally is among those who use it as scripture, this would indicate that the monotheistic concept existed from the time the Torah was composed.
A strictly literal interpretation of Deuteronomy 4:39 excludes the possibility of henotheism. The verse states: "Know this day, and take it to heart, that [[Tetragrammaton|the {{LORD}}]] is God in heaven above and on earth below; there is none else." If one were to view that Deuteronomy is a late addition to the Five Books of Moses, this would reflect the later adoption of monotheism. However, if Deuteronomy is taken to be part of the original text, as it generally is among those who use it as scripture, this would indicate that the monotheistic concept existed from the time the Torah was composed.
Line 111: Line 112:
[[Elohim]] is morphologically plural in form in Hebrew, but generally takes singular agreement when it refers to the god of Israel (so the verb meaning "said" in this verse is ''vayyomer'' ויאמר with singular inflection, and not ''vayyomru'' ויאמרו with plural inflection), and yet in this case the "our" and "us" seems to create a presumption of plurality, though it may just be God talking to angels and not another god.
[[Elohim]] is morphologically plural in form in Hebrew, but generally takes singular agreement when it refers to the god of Israel (so the verb meaning "said" in this verse is ''vayyomer'' ויאמר with singular inflection, and not ''vayyomru'' ויאמרו with plural inflection), and yet in this case the "our" and "us" seems to create a presumption of plurality, though it may just be God talking to angels and not another god.


Judaism, however, insists that the "{{LORD}} is One", as in the Shema, and at least two interpretations exist to explain the Torah's use of the plural form. The first is that the plural form "Elohim" is analogous to the [[royal plural]] as used in English. The second is that, in order to set an example for human kings, Elohim consulted with his court (the angels, just created) before making a major decision (creating man).
Judaism, however, insists that the "{{LORD}} is One," as in the Shema, and at least two interpretations exist to explain the Torah's use of the plural form. The first is that the plural form "Elohim" is analogous to the [[royal plural]] as used in English. The second is that, in order to set an example for human kings, Elohim consulted with his court (the angels, just created) before making a major decision (creating man).


===Christian view===
===Christian view===
Christians profess belief in one god. Historically, most Christian churches have taught that the nature of God is something of a mystery. Among [[Early Christians]] there was considerable debate over the nature of [[godhead]], with some factions arguing for the divinity of Jesus and others calling for a unitary conception of God. These issues of [[Christology]] were to form one of the main subjects of contention at the [[First Council of Nicea]].
Christians believe in one God. Historically, most Christian churches have taught that the nature of God is a mystery; something that must be revealed by [[special revelation]] rather than deduced through [[general revelation]]. Among [[Early Christians]] there was considerable debate over the nature of [[Godhead]], with some factions arguing for the deity of Jesus and others calling for a unitarian conception of God. These issues of [[Christology]] were to form one of the main subjects of contention at the [[First Council of Nicea]].


The '''First Council of Nicaea''', held in [[Nicaea (city)|Nicaea]] in [[Bithynia]] (in present-day [[Turkey]]), convoked by the [[Roman Emperors|Roman Emperor]] [[Constantine I (emperor)|Constantine I]] in 325, was the first [[ecumenical council|ecumenical]]<ref>''Ecumenical'', from [[Koine Greek]] [[Oikoumene|oikoumenikos]], literally meaning worldwide but generally assumed to be limited to the Roman Empire as in Augustus' claim to be ruler of the oikoumene/world; the earliest extant uses of the term for a council are Eusebius' ''Life of Constantine'' 3.6[http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/books/eusebius/vc/gr/index.htm] around 338 "{{polytonic|σύνοδον οἰκουμενικὴν συνεκρότει}}" (he convoked an Ecumenical council), Athanasius' Ad Afros Epistola Synodica in 369[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2819.htm], and the Letter in 382 to [[Pope Damasus I]] and the Latin bishops from the [[First Council of Constantinople]][http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-14/Npnf2-14-63.htm#TopOfPage]</ref> conference of [[bishop]]s of the Christian Church, and most significantly resulted in the first uniform Christian [[doctrine]], called the [[Nicene Creed]]. With the creation of the creed, a precedent was established for subsequent 'general ([[ecumenical]]) councils of Bishops' ([[Synod]]s) to create statements of belief and [[Canon law|canons]] of doctrinal [[orthodoxy]]&mdash; the intent being to define unity of beliefs for the whole of [[Christendom]].
The '''First Council of Nicaea''', held in [[Nicaea (city)|Nicaea]] in [[Bithynia]] (in present-day [[Turkey]]), convoked by the [[Roman Emperors|Roman Emperor]] [[Constantine I (emperor)|Constantine I]] in 325, was the first [[ecumenical council|ecumenical]]<ref>''Ecumenical'', from [[Koine Greek]] [[Oikoumene|oikoumenikos]], literally meaning worldwide but generally assumed to be limited to the Roman Empire as in Augustus' claim to be ruler of the oikoumene/world; the earliest extant uses of the term for a council are Eusebius' ''Life of Constantine'' 3.6[http://khazarzar.skeptik.net/books/eusebius/vc/gr/index.htm] around 338 "{{polytonic|σύνοδον οἰκουμενικὴν συνεκρότει}}" (he convoked an Ecumenical council), Athanasius' Ad Afros Epistola Synodica in 369[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/2819.htm], and the Letter in 382 to [[Pope Damasus I]] and the Latin bishops from the [[First Council of Constantinople]][http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/NPNF2-14/Npnf2-14-63.htm#TopOfPage]</ref> conference of [[bishop]]s of the Christian Church, and most significantly resulted in the first uniform Christian [[doctrine]], called the [[Nicene Creed]]. With the creation of the creed, a precedent was established for subsequent 'general ([[ecumenical]]) councils of Bishops' ([[Synod]]s) to create statements of belief and [[Canon law|canons]] of doctrinal [[orthodoxy]]&mdash; the intent being to define unity of beliefs for the whole of [[Christendom]].
Line 120: Line 121:
The purpose of the council was to resolve disagreements in the [[List of Patriarchs of Alexandria|Church of Alexandria]] over the nature of [[Jesus]] in relationship to the Father; in particular, whether Jesus was of the same [[ousia|substance]] as [[God the Father]] or merely of similar substance. [[St. Alexander of Alexandria]] and [[Athanasius]] took the first position; the popular [[presbyter]] [[Arius]], from whom the term [[Arianism|Arian controversy]] comes, took the second. The council decided against the Arians overwhelmingly (of the estimated 250-318 attendees, all but 2 [[voting|voted]] against Arius).
The purpose of the council was to resolve disagreements in the [[List of Patriarchs of Alexandria|Church of Alexandria]] over the nature of [[Jesus]] in relationship to the Father; in particular, whether Jesus was of the same [[ousia|substance]] as [[God the Father]] or merely of similar substance. [[St. Alexander of Alexandria]] and [[Athanasius]] took the first position; the popular [[presbyter]] [[Arius]], from whom the term [[Arianism|Arian controversy]] comes, took the second. The council decided against the Arians overwhelmingly (of the estimated 250-318 attendees, all but 2 [[voting|voted]] against Arius).


Most modern Christian traditions follow this decision, which was codified in 381 and reached its full development through the work of the [[Cappadocian Fathers]]. They consider God to be a triune entity, called the [[Trinity]], comprised of the three "Persons" [[God the Father]], [[God the Son]], and [[God the Holy Spirit]], the three of this unity are described as being "of the same substance" ([[ousia|{{Polytonic|ὁμοούσιος}}]]). The true nature of the Trinity is held to be an inexplicable mystery.
Christian orthodox traditions (Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Evangelical) follow this decision, which was codified in 381 and reached its full development through the work of the [[Cappadocian Fathers]]. They consider God to be a triune entity, called the [[Trinity]], comprised of the three "Persons" [[God the Father]], [[God the Son]], and [[God the Holy Spirit]], the three of this unity are described as being "of the same substance" ([[ousia|{{Polytonic|ὁμοούσιος}}]]). The true nature of an infinite God, however, is beyond definition, and "the word 'person' is but an imperfect expression of the idea. In common parlance it denotes a separate rational and moral individual, possessed of self-consciousness, and conscious of his identity amid all changes. Experience teaches that where you have a person, you also have a distinct individual essence. Every person is a distinct and separate individual, in whom human nature is individualized. But in God there are no three individuals alongside of, and separate from, one another, but only personal self distinctions within the Divine essence, which is not only generically, but also numerically, one."<ref>Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology, page 87</ref>


Some critics contend that the Trinity originated in the [[Pagan]] [[Celtic polytheism|Celtic]] tradition, in which many gods and goddesses were [[Triple Goddess|tripartite]], and that its incorporation into Christianity is a corruption of the original doctrines, similar to the adoption of many Pagan gods and goddesses such as [[Brigid]] as Christian [[Saints]]. Other critics contend that because of the adoption of a tripartite conception of deity, Christianity is actually a form of [[Tritheism]] or [[Polytheism]]. This concept dates from the teachings of the Alexandrian Church, which claimed that Jesus, having appeared later in the Bible than his "Father", had to be a secondary, lesser, and therefore "distinct" god. This controversy led to the convention of the Nicean council in 325 CE. While this might be the case in various unorthodox (non-[[Nicene Creed|Nicene]]) instances, Christianity is popularly misunderstood as [[Tripartite monotheism]].<ref name=MuslimCritic>For Muslim critiques, see [http://www.answering-christianity.com/allah_responds.htm Allah Almighty's Response to pagan and trinitarian polytheism]; Miller, Dr. Gary, [http://thetruereligion.org/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=122 A concise reply to Christianity].</ref> For [[Jews]] and [[Muslims]], the idea of God as a [[trinity]] is [[heretical]] - it is considered akin to [[polytheism]]. Christians overwhelmingly assert that monotheism is central to the Christian faith, as the very Nicene Creed (among others) which gives the orthodox Christian definition of the Trinity does begin with: "I believe in one God".
Some critics contend that the Trinity originated in the [[Pagan]] [[Celtic polytheism|Celtic]] tradition, in which many gods and goddesses were [[Triple Goddess|tripartite]], and that its incorporation into Christianity is a corruption of the original doctrines, similar to the adoption of many Pagan gods and goddesses such as [[Brigid]] as Christian [[Saints]]. Other critics contend that because of the adoption of a tripartite conception of deity, Christianity is actually a form of [[Tritheism]] or [[Polytheism]]. This concept dates from the teachings of the Alexandrian Church, which claimed that Jesus, having appeared later in the Bible than his "Father," had to be a secondary, lesser, and therefore "distinct" god. This controversy led to the convention of the Nicean council in 325 CE. While this might be the case in various unorthodox (non-[[Nicene Creed|Nicene]]) instances, Christianity is popularly misunderstood as [[Tripartite monotheism]].<ref name=MuslimCritic>For Muslim critiques, see [http://www.answering-christianity.com/allah_responds.htm Allah Almighty's Response to pagan and trinitarian polytheism]; Miller, Dr. Gary, [http://thetruereligion.org/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=122 A concise reply to Christianity].</ref> For [[Jews]] and [[Muslims]], the idea of God as a [[trinity]] is [[heretical]] - it is considered akin to [[polytheism]]. Christians overwhelmingly assert that monotheism is central to the Christian faith, as the very Nicene Creed (among others) which gives the orthodox Christian definition of the Trinity does begin with: "I believe in one God".


Some Christian groups eschew orthodox theology, such as the [[Jehovah's Witnesses]], followers of [[Mormonism]], [[Oneness Pentecostal]]s, the [[Unitarian]]s, [[Christadelphians]], [[Church of God General Conference (Abrahamic Faith)]], [[Socinian]] and some of the Radical Reformers (Anabaptists), do not teach the doctrine of the Trinity at all. The [[Rastafari movement|Rastafarians]], like many Christians, hold that God is both a unity and a trinity, in their case God being [[Haile Selassie]].
Some Christian groups eschew orthodox theology, such as the [[Jehovah's Witnesses]], followers of [[Mormonism]], [[Oneness Pentecostal]]s, the [[Unitarian]]s, [[Christadelphians]], [[Church of God General Conference (Abrahamic Faith)]], [[Socinian]] and some of the Radical Reformers (Anabaptists), do not teach the doctrine of the Trinity at all. The [[Rastafari movement|Rastafarians]], like many Christians, hold that God is both a unity and a trinity, in their case God being [[Haile Selassie]].
Line 129: Line 130:
{{main|Oneness of God (Islam)|Hanif}}
{{main|Oneness of God (Islam)|Hanif}}


The [[religious text|holy book]] of [[Islam]], the [[Qur'an]], asserts the existence of a single and absolute truth that transcends the world; a unique and indivisible being who is independent of the creation.<ref name="EncRel"> Vincent J. Cornell, Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol 5, pp.3561-3562</ref> The indivisibility of God implies the indivisibility of [[Allah|God's]] (called ''Allah'' in [[Arabic language|Arabic]]) sovereignty which in turn leads to the conception of universe as a just and coherent moral universe rather than an existential and moral chaos (as in [[Shirk (Islam)|polytheism]]). Similarly the Qur'an rejects the binary modes of thinking such as the idea of duality of God by arguing that both [[Goodness and evil|good and evil]] generate from God's creative act and that the evil forces have no power to create anything. God in Islam is a universal god rather than a local, tribal or parochial one; an absolute who integrates all affirmative values and brooks no evil. <ref name="Barlas96"> Asma Barlas, Believing Women in Islam, p.96 </ref>
The [[religious text|holy book]] of [[Islam]], the [[Qur'an]], asserts the existence of a single and absolute truth that transcends the world; a unique and indivisible being who is independent of the creation.<ref name="EncRel"> Vincent J. Cornell, Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol 5, pp.3561-3562</ref> The indivisibility of God implies the indivisibility of [[Allah|God's]] (called ''Allah'' in [[Arabic language|Arabic]]) sovereignty which in turn leads to the conception of universe as a just and coherent moral universe rather than an existential and moral chaos (as in [[Shirk (Islam)|polytheism]]). Similarly the Qur'an rejects the binary modes of thinking such as the idea of duality of God by arguing that both [[Goodness and evil|good and evil]] generate from God's creative act and that the evil forces have no power to create anything. God in Islam is a universal God rather than a local, tribal or parochial one; an absolute who integrates all affirmative values and brooks no evil. <ref name="Barlas96"> Asma Barlas, Believing Women in Islam, p.96 </ref>


[[Tawhid]] constitutes the foremost article of the Muslim profession. <ref name="EoI"> D. Gimaret, ''Tawhid'', [[Encyclopedia of Islam]] </ref> To attribute divinity to a created entity is the only unpardonable sin mentioned in the [[Qur'an]]. <ref name="Barlas96"/> [[Muslim]]s believe that the entirety of the Islamic teaching rests on the principle of Tawhid ( Oneness of God ). <ref>Ramadan (2005), p.230</ref>
[[Tawhid]] constitutes the foremost article of the Muslim profession. <ref name="EoI"> D. Gimaret, ''Tawhid'', [[Encyclopedia of Islam]] </ref> To attribute divinity to a created entity is the only unpardonable sin mentioned in the [[Qur'an]]. <ref name="Barlas96"/> [[Muslim]]s believe that the entirety of the Islamic teaching rests on the principle of Tawhid ( Oneness of God ). <ref>Ramadan (2005), p.230</ref>
Line 135: Line 136:
===Bahá'í view===
===Bahá'í view===
{{main|God in the Bahá'í Faith}}
{{main|God in the Bahá'í Faith}}
The Oneness of God is one of the core teachings of the [[Bahá'í Faith]]. Bahá'ís believe that there is one supernatural being, God, who has created all existence. God is described as "a personal God, unknowable, inaccessible, the source of all Revelation, eternal, omniscient, omnipresent and almighty".<ref>{{cite book |first = Shoghi |last = Effendi |authorlink = Shoghi Effendi |year = 1944 |title = God Passes By |publisher = Bahá'í Publishing Trust |location = Wilmette, Illinois, USA |pages = p. 139 |id = ISBN 0877430209 |url = http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/se/GPB/gpb-9.html#gr26 }}</ref>
The Oneness of God is one of the core teachings of the [[Bahá'í Faith]]. Bahá'ís believe that there is one supernatural being, God, who has created all existence. God is described as "a personal God, unknowable, inaccessible, the source of all Revelation, eternal, omniscient, omnipresent and almighty."<ref>{{cite book |first = Shoghi |last = Effendi |authorlink = Shoghi Effendi |year = 1944 |title = God Passes By |publisher = Bahá'í Publishing Trust |location = Wilmette, Illinois, USA |pages = p. 139 |id = ISBN 0877430209 |url = http://reference.bahai.org/en/t/se/GPB/gpb-9.html#gr26 }}</ref>


Bahá'ís believe that although people have different concepts of God and his nature, and call him by different names, everyone is speaking of the same entity. God is taught to be a [[personal god]] in that God is conscious of his creation and has a mind, will and purpose. At the same time the Bahá'í teachings state that God is too great for humans to fully understand him or to create a complete and accurate image of him. [[Bahá'u'lláh]] teaches that human knowledge of God is limited to those attributes and qualities which are understandable to us, and thus direct knowledge about the essence of God is not possible. Bahá'ís believe, thus, that through daily prayer, meditation, and study of revealed text they can grow closer to God. The [[Obligatory Bahá'í prayers|obligatory prayers]] in the Bahá'í Faith involve explicit monotheistic testimony.<ref>{{cite book |last = Smith |first = P. |year = 1999 |title = A Concise Encyclopedia of the Bahá'í Faith |publisher = Oneworld Publications |location = Oxford, UK |id = ISBN 1851681841 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last = Momen |first = M. |year = 1997 |title = A Short Introduction to the Bahá'í Faith |publisher = One World Publications |location = Oxford, UK |id = ISBN 1851682090 |url = http://bahai-library.com/?file=momen_short_introduction_bahais }}</ref>
Bahá'ís believe that although people have different concepts of God and his nature, and call him by different names, everyone is speaking of the same entity. God is taught to be a [[personal god]] in that God is conscious of his creation and has a mind, will and purpose. At the same time the Bahá'í teachings state that God is too great for humans to fully understand him or to create a complete and accurate image of him. [[Bahá'u'lláh]] teaches that human knowledge of God is limited to those attributes and qualities which are understandable to us, and thus direct knowledge about the essence of God is not possible. Bahá'ís believe, thus, that through daily prayer, meditation, and study of revealed text they can grow closer to God. The [[Obligatory Bahá'í prayers|obligatory prayers]] in the Bahá'í Faith involve explicit monotheistic testimony.<ref>{{cite book |last = Smith |first = P. |year = 1999 |title = A Concise Encyclopedia of the Bahá'í Faith |publisher = Oneworld Publications |location = Oxford, UK |id = ISBN 1851681841 }}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last = Momen |first = M. |year = 1997 |title = A Short Introduction to the Bahá'í Faith |publisher = One World Publications |location = Oxford, UK |id = ISBN 1851682090 |url = http://bahai-library.com/?file=momen_short_introduction_bahais }}</ref>
Line 147: Line 148:
In [[Hinduism]], views are broad and range from, [[monism]], [[dualism]], [[panentheism]] and [[pantheism]], alternatively called monistic theism by some scholars, to strict monotheism, see [[Hindu denominations]]. Monotheism in Hinduism is known as "Ekanyana" and God Almighty is Ekam (''One''.)
In [[Hinduism]], views are broad and range from, [[monism]], [[dualism]], [[panentheism]] and [[pantheism]], alternatively called monistic theism by some scholars, to strict monotheism, see [[Hindu denominations]]. Monotheism in Hinduism is known as "Ekanyana" and God Almighty is Ekam (''One''.)


As one scholar has said, "...Hinduism includes both monism and monotheism. It is misleading to call the Abrahamic religions, "the monotheistic traditions", implying that monotheism is absent from the Eastern traditions. [[Vedanta]] includes many monotheistic schools; They may accept the existence of many gods and goddesses, but strongly emphasise the pre-eminence of the supreme deity.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hinduism.iskcon.com/tradition/1102.htm|title=hinduism.iskcon.com/tradition/1102.htm Iskcon.com article on Hinduism}}</ref>
As one scholar has said, "...Hinduism includes both monism and monotheism. It is misleading to call the Abrahamic religions, "the monotheistic traditions," implying that monotheism is absent from the Eastern traditions. [[Vedanta]] includes many monotheistic schools; They may accept the existence of many gods and goddesses, but strongly emphasise the pre-eminence of the supreme Deity.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hinduism.iskcon.com/tradition/1102.htm|title=hinduism.iskcon.com/tradition/1102.htm Iskcon.com article on Hinduism}}</ref>


Many Hindus, including [[Smartas]], believe in God having three aspects as [[Brahma]], [[Vishnu]] and [[Shiva]], the [[Trimurti]] (also called the Hindu trinity.) and these different aspects are part of one and the same god.
Many Hindus, including [[Smartas]], believe in God having three aspects as [[Brahma]], [[Vishnu]] and [[Shiva]], the [[Trimurti]] (also called the Hindu trinity.) and these different aspects are part of one and the same God.
Four major sects of modern Hinduism, [[Vaishnavism]], [[Shaivism]], [[Shaktism]], and [[Smartism]], all believe in one god but differ in their conceptions. The two primary form of differences are between the two monotheistic denominations of [[Vaishnavism]] which conceives God as [[Vishnu]] and [[Shaivism]], which conceives God as [[Shiva]]. Other aspects of God are in fact aspects of Vishnu or Shiva. [[Smartas]], who follow [[Advaita]] philosophy, are [[monism|monists]], and view multiple manifestations of the one god or source of being. Hindu monists see one unity, with the personal gods, different aspects of only one supreme being, like a single beam of light separated into colours by a prism, and are valid to worship. Some of the Smarta aspects of God include [[Devi]], [[Vishnu]], [[Ganesh]], and [[Siva]].
Four major sects of modern Hinduism, [[Vaishnavism]], [[Shaivism]], [[Shaktism]], and [[Smartism]], all believe in one God but differ in their conceptions. The two primary form of differences are between the two monotheistic denominations of [[Vaishnavism]] which conceives God as [[Vishnu]] and [[Shaivism]], which conceives God as [[Shiva]]. Other aspects of God are in fact aspects of Vishnu or Shiva. [[Smartas]], who follow [[Advaita]] philosophy, are [[monism|monists]], and view multiple manifestations of the one god or source of being. Hindu monists see one unity, with the personal gods, different aspects of only one supreme being, like a single beam of light separated into colours by a prism, and are valid to worship. Some of the Smarta aspects of God include [[Devi]], [[Vishnu]], [[Ganesh]], and [[Siva]].


It is the Smarta view that dominates the view of Hinduism in the West. By contrast with Smarta/Advaita belief, [[Vaishnavism]] and [[Shaivism]] follows a singular concept of God, or [[panentheistic]] monotheism or panentheistic [[monism]]. A [[Smarta]] following the [[Advaita]] tradition can select their "[[Ishta-deva]]" (''God that one prays to most''.) This is not strictly true of other faiths such as [[Vaishnavism]]; however, Vaishnavites may stress worship on one aspect of [[Vishnu]] such as [[Rama]].
It is the Smarta view that dominates the view of Hinduism in the West. By contrast with Smarta/Advaita belief, [[Vaishnavism]] and [[Shaivism]] follows a singular concept of God, or [[panentheistic]] monotheism or panentheistic [[monism]]. A [[Smarta]] following the [[Advaita]] tradition can select their "[[Ishta-deva]]" (''God that one prays to most''.) This is not strictly true of other faiths such as [[Vaishnavism]]; however, Vaishnavites may stress worship on one aspect of [[Vishnu]] such as [[Rama]].
Line 180: Line 181:


The [[Nyaya]] school of Hinduism has made several arguments regarding a monotheistic view.
The [[Nyaya]] school of Hinduism has made several arguments regarding a monotheistic view.
The Naiyanikas have given an argument that such a god can only be one. In the ''Nyaya Kusumanjali'', this is discussed against the proposition of the [[Mimamsa]] school—that let us assume there were many demigods ([[Deva (Hinduism)|Deva]]s) and sages ([[rishi]]s) in the beginning, who wrote the [[Veda]]s and created the world. Nyaya says that:
The Naiyanikas have given an argument that such a God can only be one. In the ''Nyaya Kusumanjali'', this is discussed against the proposition of the [[Mimamsa]] school—that let us assume there were many demigods ([[Deva (Hinduism)|Deva]]s) and sages ([[rishi]]s) in the beginning, who wrote the [[Veda]]s and created the world. Nyaya says that:<blockquote>[if they assume such] omniscient beings, those endowed with the various superhuman faculties of assuming infinitesimal size, and so on, and capable of creating everything, then we reply that the ''law of parsimony'' bids us assume only one such, namely Him, the adorable Lord. There can be no confidence in a non-eternal and non omniscient being, and hence it follows that according to the system which rejects God, the tradition of the Veda is simultaneously overthrown; there is no other way open.</blockquote> In other words, Nyaya says that the polytheist would have to give elaborate proofs for the existence and origin of his several celestial spirits, none of which would be logical. So it is much more logical to assume only One, eternal and omniscient God.

<blockquote>[if they assume such] omniscient beings, those endowed with the various superhuman faculties of assuming infinitesimal size, and so on, and capable of creating everything, then we reply that the ''law of parsimony'' bids us assume only one such, namely Him, the adorable Lord. There can be no confidence in a non-eternal and non omniscient being, and hence it follows that according to the system which rejects God, the tradition of the Veda is simultaneously overthrown; there is no other way open.</blockquote>

In other words, Nyaya says that the polytheist would have to give elaborate proofs for the existence and origin of his several celestial spirits, and that none of these would be logical.


====Monotheism in Vaishnavism====
====Monotheism in Vaishnavism====
{{see|Bhagavan svayam}}
{{see|Bhagavan svayam}}
It is often argued that [[Vaishnavism]] is one of the earliest impicit manifistations of exclusive monotheism in the traditions of Vedas. ''Svayam bhagavan'' - (''{{IAST|svayam bhagavān kṛṣṇa}}'' in [[IAST]]) is a Sanskrit term for the original [[deity]] of the supreme god worshiped across many traditions of the [[Vaisnavism]] as the source of all, the monotheistic absolute deity. <ref name=Delmonico2004>{{cite journal
It is often argued that [[Vaishnavism]] is one of the earliest impicit manifistations of exclusive monotheism in the traditions of Vedas. ''Svayam bhagavan'' - (''{{IAST|svayam bhagavān kṛṣṇa}}'' in [[IAST]]) is a Sanskrit term for the original [[deity]] of the Supreme God worshiped across many traditions of the [[Vaisnavism]] as the source of all, the monotheistic absolute Deity. <ref name=Delmonico2004>{{cite journal
| author = Delmonico, N.
| author = Delmonico, N.
| year = 2004
| year = 2004
Line 244: Line 241:
| publisher = Motilal Banarsidass Pub
| publisher = Motilal Banarsidass Pub
| isbn =
| isbn =
}}</ref> is a real person and his variegated creation is also real.<ref name = "Elkman1986">{{cite book
}}</ref> is a real person and His variegated creation is also real.<ref name = "Elkman1986">{{cite book
| author = Elkman, S.M.
| author = Elkman, S.M.
| coauthors = Gosvami, J.
| coauthors = Gosvami, J.
Line 259: Line 256:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Krishna worshiped in Vaisnava religion as the Supreme came into being as soon as all creatures came into existence. [[Brahma]] was the first Vaisnava. In [[Gaudiya Vaishnavism]], [[Shiva]] [[Mahadeva]] is also a [[Vaisnava]]; in [[Shaivism]], by contrast, Shiva is the supreme god. The ancient Prajapaties are all Vaisnavas. [[Narada]] who is the born child of Brahma, is a Vaisnava. Thus pure monotheistic Vaisnava religion began with the beginning of history.<ref name= Thomson>{{cite journal
Krishna worshiped in Vaisnava religion as the Supreme came into being as soon as all creatures came into existence. [[Brahma]] was the first Vaisnava. In [[Gaudiya Vaishnavism]], [[Shiva]] [[Mahadeva]] is also a [[Vaisnava]]; in [[Shaivism]], by contrast, Shiva is the supreme God. The ancient Prajapaties are all Vaisnavas. [[Narada]] who is the born child of Brahma, is a Vaisnava. Thus pure monotheistic Vaisnava religion began with the beginning of history.<ref name= Thomson>{{cite journal
| author = Richard Thompson, Ph. D.
| author = Richard Thompson, Ph. D.
| year = December 1994
| year = December 1994
Line 287: Line 284:
It is often said that the 1430 pages of the [[Sri Guru Granth Sahib]] are all expansions on the [[Mool Mantra]]. Although the Sikhs have many names for God, they all refer to the same supreme being.
It is often said that the 1430 pages of the [[Sri Guru Granth Sahib]] are all expansions on the [[Mool Mantra]]. Although the Sikhs have many names for God, they all refer to the same supreme being.


The Sikh holy scriptures refer to the One God who pervades the whole of space and is the creator of all beings in the whole [[Universe]]. The following quotation from the [[Guru Granth Sahib]] highlights this point:
The Sikh holy scriptures refer to the One God who pervades the whole of Space and is the creator of all beings in the whole [[Universe]]. The following quotation from the [[Guru Granth Sahib]] highlights this point:


{{quote|"Chant, and meditate on '''the One God, who permeates and pervades the many beings of the whole Universe'''. God created it, and God spreads through it everywhere. Everywhere I look, I see God. The Perfect Lord is perfectly pervading and permeating the water, the land and the sky; there is no place without Him."|[[Guru Granth Sahib]], Page 782}}
{{quote|"Chant, and meditate on '''the One God, who permeates and pervades the many beings of the whole Universe'''. God created it, and God spreads through it everywhere. Everywhere I look, I see God. The Perfect Lord is perfectly pervading and permeating the water, the land and the sky; there is no place without Him."|[[Guru Granth Sahib]], Page 782}}

Revision as of 03:06, 3 September 2008

For the Celtic Frost album, see Monotheist (album)

In theology, monotheism (from Greek μόνος "one" and θεός "God") is the belief in the existence of one Deity, or in the oneness of God.[1] In a Western context, the concept of "monotheism" tends to be dominated by the concept of God found in Abrahamic religions and the Platonic concept of God as put forward by Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite.

The concept of monotheism has largely been defined in contrast with polytheistic religions, and monotheism tends to overlap with other Unitary concepts, such as monism.

Whereas monotheism is a self-description of religions subsumed under this term, there is no equivalent self-description for polytheist religions: monotheism asserts itself by opposing polytheism, while polytheism does not use the same argumentative device, as it includes a concept of divine unity despite worshipping a plethora of gods.[2] By the same token, monotheistic religions may still include concepts of a plurality of the Divine, for example the Trinity, in which God is one being in three personal dimensions (the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit). Additionally, Christians believe Jesus to have two natures (divine and human), each possessing the full attributes of that nature, without mixture or intermingling of those attributes. Although Christian theology reserves worship for the Divine, the distinction between worshipping the divine nature of Jesus but not the human nature of Jesus can be difficult for non-Christians (and even Christian laity) to follow.

Christians of a catholic tradition venerate the Saints among them Mary as human beings that had remarkable qualities, have lived their faith in God to the extreme and continue to assist in the process of salvation for others.[3]

Origin and development

The word monotheism is derived from the Greek, μόνος meaning "single" and θεός meaning "God".[4] The English term was first used by Henry More.

The concept sees a gradual development out of notions of henotheism and monolatrism. In the Ancient Near East, each city had a local patron deity, such as Shamash at Larsa or Sin at Ur. The first claims of universal supremacy of a single God date to the Late Bronze Age, with Akhenaten's Great Hymn to the Aten (connected to Judaism by Sigmund Freud in his Moses and Monotheism), and, depending on dating issues, Zoroaster's Gathas to Ahura Mazda. Currents of monism or monotheism emerge in Vedic India in the same period, with e.g. the Nasadiya Sukta. Philosophical monotheism and the associated concept of absolute good and evil emerges in Classical Antiquity, notably with Plato (c.f. Euthyphro dilemma), elaborated into the idea of The One in Neoplatonism, later culminating in the doctrines of Christology in Early Christianity and finally (by the 7th century) in the radical tawhid in Islam.

In Islamic theology, a person who spontaneously "discovers" monotheism is called a ḥanīf, the original ḥanīf being Abraham.

Austrian anthropologist Wilhelm Schmidt in the 1910s postulated an Urmonotheismus, "original" or "primitive monotheism", a thesis now widely rejected in comparative religion but still occasionally defended in creationist circles.

Varieties

Some argue that there are various forms of monotheism, including:

  • Henotheism involves devotion to a single god while accepting the existence of other gods. Similarly, monolatrism is the worship of a single deity independent of the ontological claims regarding that deity.
  • Theism a term that refers to the belief in the existence of a god or divine being.
  • Deism is a form of monotheism in which it is believed that one God exists. However, a deist rejects the idea that God intervenes in the world.
  • Monistic Theism is the type of monotheism found in Hinduis, encompassing pantheism, monism, and at the same time the concept of a personal God
  • Pantheism holds that the Universe itself is God. The existence of a transcendent supreme extraneous to nature is denied.
  • Panentheism, or Monistic Monotheism, is a form of theism that holds that God contains, but is not identical to, the Universe. The 'one God' is omnipotent and all-pervading, the universe is part of God, and God is both immanent and transcendent.
  • Substance monotheism, found in some indigenous African religions, holds that the many gods are different forms of a single underlying substance.

On the surface, monotheism is in contrast with polytheism, which is the worship of several deities. Polytheism is however reconcilable with Inclusive monotheism, which claims that all deities are just different names or forms for the single God. This approach is common in Hinduism, e.g. in Smartism. Exclusive monotheism, on the other hand, actively opposes polytheism. Monotheism is often contrasted with theistic dualism (ditheism). However, in dualistic theologies as that of Gnosticism, the two deities are not of equal rank, and the role of the Gnostic demiurge is closer to that of Satan in Christian theology than that of a diarch on equal terms with God (who is represented in pantheistic fashion, as Pleroma).

Early History

In ancient Egypt

Ancient Middle-Eastern religions may have worshipped a single god within a pantheon and the abolition of all others, as in the case of the Aten cult in the reign of the Egyptian pharaoh Akhenaten. Iconoclasm during this pharaoh's rule is considered a chief origin for the subsequent destruction by some groups of idols, holding that no other god before the preferred deity (dually and subtly acknowledging the existence of the other gods, but only as foes to be destroyed for their drawing of attention away from the primary deity).

Other issues such as Divine Right of Kings may possibly also stem from pharaonic laws on the ruler being the demigod or representative of the Creator on Earth. The massive tombs in the Egyptian pyramids which aligned with astronomical observations, perhaps exemplify this relationship between the pharaoh and the heavens.

Zoroastrianism

Zoroastrianism is considered to be one of the earliest monotheistic beliefs, but the Zoroastrian definition of monotheism includes characteristics different from that found in some other monotheistic religions, including worship of subordinate nature-spirits and the use of fire-reverance. [5]

In Zoroaster's revelation, Ahura Mazda is a transcendental and universal God, the one uncreated Creator (standard appellation) and to whom all worship is ultimately directed. However, Zoroaster also perceives Mazda to be wholly good, and that his creation is wholly good. In conflict with creation is anti-creation, evident in the created world as decay and disorder. Since anti-creation is purely destructive it cannot have been created (otherwise it would self-destruct) and hence must - like the Creator himself - be uncreated.

In the Gathas, Zoroaster does not acknowledge any divinity other than Ahura Mazda. However, the hymns of Indo-Iranian religious tradition (of which the Gathas are a part) are always addressed to a specific divinity and those closely associated with him, and in this sense the Gathas are not (necessarily) a denial of the other divinities, but the exaltation of a specific one. Although not mentioned by name (in the Gathas, Ahura Mazda is itself an epithet, not yet a proper name), Zoroaster implicitly acknowledges the existence of other Ahuras "Lords", as in "thou who art the mightiest Ahura and the Wise (Mazda) One" (Yasna 33.11). In addition to these lords that are "worthy of worship" (yazata), Zoroaster also refers to the daevas as the 'wrong' gods, or 'false' gods, or gods 'that should not be worshipped' and whose followers are to be brought onto the path of righteousness. In later Zoroastrian tradition, the daevas are demons, but this is not yet evident in the prophet's own poetry.

Zoroastrianism is thus monotheistic inasfar as all worship is ultimately directed to Ahura Mazda. However, unlike Zurvanite Zoroastrianism, neither revealed nor present-day Zoroastrianism is monist. At no time did Zoroastrianism preclude the existence or worship of other divinities, which are today considered to be aspects or evidence of creation and hence of the Creator. The invocation of divinities besides Ahura Mazda is however common practice in Zoroastrian tradition, and is not necessarily either a sign of henotheism (the one extreme interpretation) or the worship of pure abstractions (the other extreme): In the past it was common for an individual, household or clan to adopt a patron divinity and although several attempts have been made to define ancient Zoroastrianism on the evidence of such adoptions - for instance, in inscriptions or in theophoric names - these are inherently unsuitable for that purpose.

Abrahamic religions

The major source of monotheism in the modern Western World is the narrative of the Hebrew Bible, the source of Judaism, which was created from the 13th century BCE to the 4th century BCE. Judaism may have received influences from various non-biblical religions present in Egypt and Syria. This can be seen by the Torah's reference to Egyptian culture in Genesis and the story of Moses, as well as the mention of Hittite and Hurrian cultures of Syria in the Genesis story of Abraham.

In traditional Jewish thought, which provided the basis of the Christian and Islamic religions, monolatrism was regarded as its most basic belief. Judaism and Islam have traditionally attempted to interpret scripture as exclusively monotheistic whilst Christianity diverted to a more complex form of tripartite monotheism, as a result of considering the Holy Spirit to be a part of God, and attributing divinity to Jesus, a Judean Jew, in the first century AD, defining him as the son of God. Thus, "Father, Son and Holy Spirit".

Monotheism in the Hebrew Bible

It is often argued that the Hebrew Bible takes a position not of monotheism, but of monolatrism or henotheism. God reveals himself not as the only god, but rather as the god whom Abraham knows. (Gen 15:7) In such a respect, the god of Israel is not God alone, but the god who was worshipped by Abraham's clan. In this context, the god of Israel is a type of tribal deity, that although was worshipped alone, did not explicitly exclude the existence of other gods, who were not relevant to them.[6]

In the early Mosaic era, the possibility of other gods is left an open question, although by this stage Israel claims that their god is greater. (Ex 18:11) This same subtle shift is shown in 2 Chr 2:5, and could indicate that Israel understood that the god they recognised was God alone, and other gods were therefore false. This would be Monotheism in the proper sense of the word. By the time of the prophet Isaiah, Monotheism is solidly and explicitly accepted. “Thus says the LORD, the King of Israel and his Redeemer, the LORD of hosts: "I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god.” (Is 44:6) Thus, the development of the people of Israel to a true Monotheism, appears to be a gradual process, with the exception of Gen 1:1 - which thus casts substantial doubt on the legitimacy of that hypothesis. It is into this context that Christianity emerges, and thus Christianity was from the outset Monotheistic. (John 1:1)

A strictly literal interpretation of Deuteronomy 4:39 excludes the possibility of henotheism. The verse states: "Know this day, and take it to heart, that the LORD is God in heaven above and on earth below; there is none else." If one were to view that Deuteronomy is a late addition to the Five Books of Moses, this would reflect the later adoption of monotheism. However, if Deuteronomy is taken to be part of the original text, as it generally is among those who use it as scripture, this would indicate that the monotheistic concept existed from the time the Torah was composed.

In the west, the Hebrew Bible has been the primary source describing how and when Monotheism was introduced into the Middle East and the west. As believed by followers of some of the Abrahamic religions, it teaches that when Abraham discovered God (Genesis 12:1-9 [4] ; 13:14-18 [5] ; 15 [6] 18 [7] ; and 22 [8]), he thus became the world's first Monotheist. According to these, until then, in ancient history all cultures believed in a variety of multiple deities such as in idolatry, forces and creatures of nature as in animism, or in celestial bodies as in astrology, but did not know the one and only true god.

However, the Hebrew Bible teaches that, at Creation, Adam and Eve knew God (and so did their descendants) but that over the ages, God and his name were forgotten. This is how one of the most important Jewish sages, Maimonides describes the process in his work the Mishneh Torah:

In the days of Enosh mankind made a huge error...they reasoned that since the Lord created the stars and the heavenly spheres and placed them in the skies giving them great significance, and they serve before Him, it is therefore fitting to praise and elevate them and give them honor believing this to be the Lord's will to honor that which He makes great and honorable...The people then built altars to worship the stars and to praise and bow down to them...and this was the essence of idol worship (avoda zara)...After a few generations false prophets arose and said that the Lord had actually commanded people to worship the stars...and they built images in their honor...spreading these false images by building them in gathering places, under trees, on tops of hills, and in valleys, gathering people who bowed down to them declaring: 'Such and such an image brings good or bad luck and therefore fear it'...after a number of generations, the Divine Name was completely forgotten...until the mighty one (Abraham), began to question this in his mind and asked 'How could it be that the heavenly sphere moves without a Mover behind it? because it is impossible that it moves itself', and he had no teacher and no-one to inform him for he lived in Ur of the Chaldees surrounded by foolish idol worshippers...He (Abraham) subsequently arose and made it known to the people that there is only one Lord in the entire world and that only He should be worshipped, gathering people from city to city and kingdom to kingdom until he came to the land of Canaan calling out as it says: 'Abraham planted a tamarisk tree in Beersheba, and there he called in the name of God, Lord of the Universe (El olam) (Genesis 21:33)'

— Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Sefer Mada ("Book of Knowledge"), Chapter 1, Hilchos Avodah Zarah

Jewish view

Judaism is one of the oldest known monotheistic faiths. The best-known Jewish statements of monotheism occur in the Shema prayer, the Ten Commandments and Maimonides' 13 Principles of faith, Second Principle:

God, the Cause of all, is one. This does not mean one as in one of a pair, nor one like a species (which encompasses many individuals), nor one as in an object that is made up of many elements, nor as a single simple object that is infinitely divisible. Rather, God is a unity unlike any other possible unity. This is referred to in the Torah (Deuteronomy 6:4): "Hear Israel, the LORD is our God, the LORD is one."

There has historically been disagreement between the Hasidic Jews and the Mitnagdim Jews on various Jewish philosophical issues surrounding certain concepts of monotheism. A similar situation of differing views is seen in modern times among Dor Daim, students of the Rambam, segments of Lithuanian Jewry, and portions of the Modern Orthodox world toward Jewish communities that are more thoroughly influenced by Lurianic Kabbalistic teachings such as Hasidism and large segments of the Sepharadi and Mizrahi communities. This dispute is likely rooted in the differences between what are popularly referred to as the "philosophically inclined" sources and the "kabbalistic sources;" the "philosophic sources" include such Rabbis as Saadia Gaon, Rabenu Bahya ibn Paquda, Abraham ibn Ezra, and Maimonides. The "kabbalistic sources" include Rabbis such as Nahmanides, Bahya ben Asher, Rabbi Yitzhak Saggi Nehor, and Azriel. The Vilna Gaon is usually granted great respect in modern times by those who side with both views; by the more kabbalistic segments of Judaism he is regarded as a great kabbalist; those who take the other side of the issue regard him as a strict advocate of the people of Israel's historical monotheism.

The Shema

Judaism's earliest history, beliefs, laws, and practices are preserved and taught in the Torah (the Hebrew Bible) which provides a clear textual source for the rise and development of what is named Judaism's ethical monotheism which means that:

(1) There is one God from whom emanates one morality for all humanity. (2) God's primary demand of people is that they act decently toward one another...The God of ethical monotheism is the God first revealed to the world in the Hebrew Bible. Through it, we can establish God's four primary characteristics:
  1. God is supernatural.
  2. God is personal.
  3. God is good.
  4. God is holy.
...in the study of Hebrew history: Israel's monotheism was an ethical monotheism. Dennis Prager

When Moses returned with the Ten Commandments, the second of those stated that "you shall have no other gods before me" (Exodus 20:3), right after the first, which affirmed the existence of God. Furthermore, Israelites recite the Shema Yisrael ("Hear O' Israel") which partly says, "Hear, O' Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one." Monotheism was and is the central tenet of the Israelite and the Jewish religion.

The Shema
Hebrew שמע ישראל יי אלהנו יי אחד
Common transliteration Shema Yisrael Adonai Eloheinu Adonai Echad
English Hear, O Israel! The LORD is our God! The LORD is One!

The literal word meanings are roughly as follows:

  • Shema — 'listen' or 'hear.' The word also implies comprehension.
  • Yisrael — 'Israel', in the sense of the people or congregation of Israel
  • Adonai — often translated as 'Lord', it is used in place of the Tetragrammaton
  • Eloheinu — 'our God', a plural noun (said to imply majesty rather than plural number) with a pronominal suffix ('our')
  • Echad — 'one'

In this case, Elohim is used in the plural as a form of respect and not polytheism.

Gen.1:26 And Elohim said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.

Elohim is morphologically plural in form in Hebrew, but generally takes singular agreement when it refers to the god of Israel (so the verb meaning "said" in this verse is vayyomer ויאמר with singular inflection, and not vayyomru ויאמרו with plural inflection), and yet in this case the "our" and "us" seems to create a presumption of plurality, though it may just be God talking to angels and not another god.

Judaism, however, insists that the "LORD is One," as in the Shema, and at least two interpretations exist to explain the Torah's use of the plural form. The first is that the plural form "Elohim" is analogous to the royal plural as used in English. The second is that, in order to set an example for human kings, Elohim consulted with his court (the angels, just created) before making a major decision (creating man).

Christian view

Christians believe in one God. Historically, most Christian churches have taught that the nature of God is a mystery; something that must be revealed by special revelation rather than deduced through general revelation. Among Early Christians there was considerable debate over the nature of Godhead, with some factions arguing for the deity of Jesus and others calling for a unitarian conception of God. These issues of Christology were to form one of the main subjects of contention at the First Council of Nicea.

The First Council of Nicaea, held in Nicaea in Bithynia (in present-day Turkey), convoked by the Roman Emperor Constantine I in 325, was the first ecumenical[7] conference of bishops of the Christian Church, and most significantly resulted in the first uniform Christian doctrine, called the Nicene Creed. With the creation of the creed, a precedent was established for subsequent 'general (ecumenical) councils of Bishops' (Synods) to create statements of belief and canons of doctrinal orthodoxy— the intent being to define unity of beliefs for the whole of Christendom.

The purpose of the council was to resolve disagreements in the Church of Alexandria over the nature of Jesus in relationship to the Father; in particular, whether Jesus was of the same substance as God the Father or merely of similar substance. St. Alexander of Alexandria and Athanasius took the first position; the popular presbyter Arius, from whom the term Arian controversy comes, took the second. The council decided against the Arians overwhelmingly (of the estimated 250-318 attendees, all but 2 voted against Arius).

Christian orthodox traditions (Eastern Orthodox, Roman Catholic, Protestant, and Evangelical) follow this decision, which was codified in 381 and reached its full development through the work of the Cappadocian Fathers. They consider God to be a triune entity, called the Trinity, comprised of the three "Persons" God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit, the three of this unity are described as being "of the same substance" ([[ousia|ὁμοούσιος]]). The true nature of an infinite God, however, is beyond definition, and "the word 'person' is but an imperfect expression of the idea. In common parlance it denotes a separate rational and moral individual, possessed of self-consciousness, and conscious of his identity amid all changes. Experience teaches that where you have a person, you also have a distinct individual essence. Every person is a distinct and separate individual, in whom human nature is individualized. But in God there are no three individuals alongside of, and separate from, one another, but only personal self distinctions within the Divine essence, which is not only generically, but also numerically, one."[8]

Some critics contend that the Trinity originated in the Pagan Celtic tradition, in which many gods and goddesses were tripartite, and that its incorporation into Christianity is a corruption of the original doctrines, similar to the adoption of many Pagan gods and goddesses such as Brigid as Christian Saints. Other critics contend that because of the adoption of a tripartite conception of deity, Christianity is actually a form of Tritheism or Polytheism. This concept dates from the teachings of the Alexandrian Church, which claimed that Jesus, having appeared later in the Bible than his "Father," had to be a secondary, lesser, and therefore "distinct" god. This controversy led to the convention of the Nicean council in 325 CE. While this might be the case in various unorthodox (non-Nicene) instances, Christianity is popularly misunderstood as Tripartite monotheism.[9] For Jews and Muslims, the idea of God as a trinity is heretical - it is considered akin to polytheism. Christians overwhelmingly assert that monotheism is central to the Christian faith, as the very Nicene Creed (among others) which gives the orthodox Christian definition of the Trinity does begin with: "I believe in one God".

Some Christian groups eschew orthodox theology, such as the Jehovah's Witnesses, followers of Mormonism, Oneness Pentecostals, the Unitarians, Christadelphians, Church of God General Conference (Abrahamic Faith), Socinian and some of the Radical Reformers (Anabaptists), do not teach the doctrine of the Trinity at all. The Rastafarians, like many Christians, hold that God is both a unity and a trinity, in their case God being Haile Selassie.

Islamic view

The holy book of Islam, the Qur'an, asserts the existence of a single and absolute truth that transcends the world; a unique and indivisible being who is independent of the creation.[10] The indivisibility of God implies the indivisibility of God's (called Allah in Arabic) sovereignty which in turn leads to the conception of universe as a just and coherent moral universe rather than an existential and moral chaos (as in polytheism). Similarly the Qur'an rejects the binary modes of thinking such as the idea of duality of God by arguing that both good and evil generate from God's creative act and that the evil forces have no power to create anything. God in Islam is a universal God rather than a local, tribal or parochial one; an absolute who integrates all affirmative values and brooks no evil. [11]

Tawhid constitutes the foremost article of the Muslim profession. [12] To attribute divinity to a created entity is the only unpardonable sin mentioned in the Qur'an. [11] Muslims believe that the entirety of the Islamic teaching rests on the principle of Tawhid ( Oneness of God ). [13]

Bahá'í view

The Oneness of God is one of the core teachings of the Bahá'í Faith. Bahá'ís believe that there is one supernatural being, God, who has created all existence. God is described as "a personal God, unknowable, inaccessible, the source of all Revelation, eternal, omniscient, omnipresent and almighty."[14]

Bahá'ís believe that although people have different concepts of God and his nature, and call him by different names, everyone is speaking of the same entity. God is taught to be a personal god in that God is conscious of his creation and has a mind, will and purpose. At the same time the Bahá'í teachings state that God is too great for humans to fully understand him or to create a complete and accurate image of him. Bahá'u'lláh teaches that human knowledge of God is limited to those attributes and qualities which are understandable to us, and thus direct knowledge about the essence of God is not possible. Bahá'ís believe, thus, that through daily prayer, meditation, and study of revealed text they can grow closer to God. The obligatory prayers in the Bahá'í Faith involve explicit monotheistic testimony.[15][16]

Eastern religions

Hinduism

In Hinduism, views are broad and range from, monism, dualism, panentheism and pantheism, alternatively called monistic theism by some scholars, to strict monotheism, see Hindu denominations. Monotheism in Hinduism is known as "Ekanyana" and God Almighty is Ekam (One.)

As one scholar has said, "...Hinduism includes both monism and monotheism. It is misleading to call the Abrahamic religions, "the monotheistic traditions," implying that monotheism is absent from the Eastern traditions. Vedanta includes many monotheistic schools; They may accept the existence of many gods and goddesses, but strongly emphasise the pre-eminence of the supreme Deity.[17]

Many Hindus, including Smartas, believe in God having three aspects as Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva, the Trimurti (also called the Hindu trinity.) and these different aspects are part of one and the same God. Four major sects of modern Hinduism, Vaishnavism, Shaivism, Shaktism, and Smartism, all believe in one God but differ in their conceptions. The two primary form of differences are between the two monotheistic denominations of Vaishnavism which conceives God as Vishnu and Shaivism, which conceives God as Shiva. Other aspects of God are in fact aspects of Vishnu or Shiva. Smartas, who follow Advaita philosophy, are monists, and view multiple manifestations of the one god or source of being. Hindu monists see one unity, with the personal gods, different aspects of only one supreme being, like a single beam of light separated into colours by a prism, and are valid to worship. Some of the Smarta aspects of God include Devi, Vishnu, Ganesh, and Siva.

It is the Smarta view that dominates the view of Hinduism in the West. By contrast with Smarta/Advaita belief, Vaishnavism and Shaivism follows a singular concept of God, or panentheistic monotheism or panentheistic monism. A Smarta following the Advaita tradition can select their "Ishta-deva" (God that one prays to most.) This is not strictly true of other faiths such as Vaishnavism; however, Vaishnavites may stress worship on one aspect of Vishnu such as Rama.

All the Hindu scriptures (The Vedas, Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita) ultimately stress the one-ness of God and describe God as the Eternal Truth that is birthless, ageless, and omnipresent. Many scholars interpret the verses as either Monotheistic and Pantheistic or a combination of both.

The Rig Veda, the first book of the four Vedas, contains evidence for monotheistic thought. Often quoted are pada 1.164.46c,

ékam sád víprā́ bahudhā́ vadanti

"There is one truth, though the sages know them by many names", Rigveda 1.164.46

Out of the many verse, some other popular verses (Atharva Veda) verse 13.5.20

"He is One and One forever remaineth alone; Believe it. There is no second in God"

and the Nasadiya Sukta, dealing with a creator deity, especially verse 10.129.7:

iyám vísṛṣṭiḥ yátaḥ ābabhûva / yádi vā dadhé yádi vā ná / yáḥ asya ádhyakṣaḥ paramé vyóman / sáḥ aṅgá veda yádi vā ná véda
"He, the first origin of this creation, whether he formed it all or did not form it, / Whose eye controls this world in highest heaven, he verily knows it, or perhaps he knows not." (trans. Griffith)

Many Hindus believe that God has six attributes. However, the actual number of auspicious qualities of God, are countless, with the following six qualities being the most important.

  • The number six is invariably given, but the individual attributes listed vary. One set of attributes (and their common interpretations) are:
    • Jñāna (Omniscience), defined as the power to know about all beings simultaneously;
    • Aishvarya (Sovereignty, derived from the word Ishvara), which consists in unchallenged rule over all;
    • Shakti (Energy), or power, which is the capacity to make the impossible possible;
    • Bala (Strength), which is the capacity to support everything by will and without any fatigue;
    • Vīrya (Vigor), or valour which indicates the power to retain immateriality as the supreme being in spite of being the material cause of mutable creations; and
    • Tejas (Splendor), which expresses his self-sufficiency and the capacity to overpower everything by his spiritual effulgence.; (cited from Bhakti Schools of Vedanta, by Swami Tapasyānanda.)

The Nyaya school of Hinduism has made several arguments regarding a monotheistic view.

The Naiyanikas have given an argument that such a God can only be one. In the Nyaya Kusumanjali, this is discussed against the proposition of the Mimamsa school—that let us assume there were many demigods (Devas) and sages (rishis) in the beginning, who wrote the Vedas and created the world. Nyaya says that:

[if they assume such] omniscient beings, those endowed with the various superhuman faculties of assuming infinitesimal size, and so on, and capable of creating everything, then we reply that the law of parsimony bids us assume only one such, namely Him, the adorable Lord. There can be no confidence in a non-eternal and non omniscient being, and hence it follows that according to the system which rejects God, the tradition of the Veda is simultaneously overthrown; there is no other way open.

In other words, Nyaya says that the polytheist would have to give elaborate proofs for the existence and origin of his several celestial spirits, none of which would be logical. So it is much more logical to assume only One, eternal and omniscient God.

Monotheism in Vaishnavism

It is often argued that Vaishnavism is one of the earliest impicit manifistations of exclusive monotheism in the traditions of Vedas. Svayam bhagavan - (svayam bhagavān kṛṣṇa in IAST) is a Sanskrit term for the original deity of the Supreme God worshiped across many traditions of the Vaisnavism as the source of all, the monotheistic absolute Deity. [18][19] [20] Within Hinduism, Krishna is worshiped from a variety of perspectives.[21] However it must be noted that the Svayam bhagavan concept refers to the Supreme Being of the Orthodox Gaudiya Vaishnavism,[22] the Vallabha Sampradaya and the Nimbarka Sampradaya, where Krishna is worshiped as the source of all other avatars (including Vishnu).[23][24][25] A distinguishing feature of the Vaisnava teachings is that God, Krishna or Vishnu,[19] is a real person and His variegated creation is also real.[19][26]

Krishna worshiped in Vaisnava religion as the Supreme came into being as soon as all creatures came into existence. Brahma was the first Vaisnava. In Gaudiya Vaishnavism, Shiva Mahadeva is also a Vaisnava; in Shaivism, by contrast, Shiva is the supreme God. The ancient Prajapaties are all Vaisnavas. Narada who is the born child of Brahma, is a Vaisnava. Thus pure monotheistic Vaisnava religion began with the beginning of history.[26] In the recent times man arrived once again at the instinctive monotheism of the Aryans and Vaisnavas.[27]

Sikhism

Sikhism is a distinctly monotheistic faith that rose in northern India during the 16th and 17th centuries. Sikhs believe in one, timeless, omnipresent, supreme creator. The opening verse of the Guru Granth Sahib, known as the Mool Mantra signifies this:

Punjabi: ੴ ਸਤਿ ਨਾਮੁ ਕਰਤਾ ਪੁਰਖੁ ਨਿਰਭਉ ਨਿਰਵੈਰੁ ਅਕਾਲ ਮੂਰਤਿ ਅਜੂਨੀ ਸੈਭੰ ਗੁਰ ਪ੍ਰਸਾਦਿ ॥
Transliteration: Ik ōaṅkār(or ikoo) sat nām karatā purakh nirabha'u niravair akāl mūrat ajūnī saibhaṁ gur prasād.
English: One Universal Creator God. The Name Is Truth. Creative Being Personified. No Fear. No Hatred. Image Of The Timeless One, Beyond Birth, Self-Existent. By Guru's Grace ~

The word "ੴ" is pronounced "Ik ōaṅkār" and is comprised to two parts. The first part is simply: "੧" - This is simply the digit "1" in Gurmukhi signifying the singularity of the creator. Together the word means: "There is only one creator god"

It is often said that the 1430 pages of the Sri Guru Granth Sahib are all expansions on the Mool Mantra. Although the Sikhs have many names for God, they all refer to the same supreme being.

The Sikh holy scriptures refer to the One God who pervades the whole of Space and is the creator of all beings in the whole Universe. The following quotation from the Guru Granth Sahib highlights this point:

"Chant, and meditate on the One God, who permeates and pervades the many beings of the whole Universe. God created it, and God spreads through it everywhere. Everywhere I look, I see God. The Perfect Lord is perfectly pervading and permeating the water, the land and the sky; there is no place without Him."

— Guru Granth Sahib, Page 782

The Sikhs believe that God has many names - but they call God VāhiGurū. The word Guru means teacher in Sanskrit Similarly, the name Hari, Raam, Allah, Paarbrahm, Krsna which are names of God are frequently mentioned in the Sikh holy scriptures. The same god of the Muslims, Hindus, etc is known as the Akal Purakh (which means 'the true immortal', i.e God) or Waheguru, the primal being.

It is also stated in Guru Granth Sahib ji that:

Awal Allah Noor Upaya, Kudrat kae sab bandey
ek noor tae sabh jag upjaya, kaun bhaley kaun mandey

Which means that from that god we all are created nobody is above or beneath anyone.

Notes

  1. ^ “Monotheism”, in Britannica, 15th ed. (1986), 8:266.
  2. ^ Assman, Jan, Monotheism and Polytheism, in Johnston, Sarah Iles, Ancient Religions, pp. 17, The Belknap Press of Harvard University (2007), ISBN 978-0-674-02548-6
  3. ^ The Orthodox Church. Ware, Timothy. Penguin Books, 1997. ISBN 0-14-014656-3
  4. ^ The compound μονοθεισμός is current only in Modern Greek. There is a single attestation of μονόθεον in a Byzantine hymn (Canones Junii 20.6.43; A. Acconcia Longo and G. Schirò, Analecta hymnica graeca, vol. 11 e codicibus eruta Italiae inferioris. Rome: Istituto di Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici. Università di Roma, 1978)
  5. ^ Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Monotheism" . Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
  6. ^ R.G.Vincent, "Monotheism (in the Bible)" in New Catholic Encyclopedia, (1967), 9:1066.
  7. ^ Ecumenical, from Koine Greek oikoumenikos, literally meaning worldwide but generally assumed to be limited to the Roman Empire as in Augustus' claim to be ruler of the oikoumene/world; the earliest extant uses of the term for a council are Eusebius' Life of Constantine 3.6[1] around 338 "σύνοδον οἰκουμενικὴν συνεκρότει" (he convoked an Ecumenical council), Athanasius' Ad Afros Epistola Synodica in 369[2], and the Letter in 382 to Pope Damasus I and the Latin bishops from the First Council of Constantinople[3]
  8. ^ Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology, page 87
  9. ^ For Muslim critiques, see Allah Almighty's Response to pagan and trinitarian polytheism; Miller, Dr. Gary, A concise reply to Christianity.
  10. ^ Vincent J. Cornell, Encyclopedia of Religion, Vol 5, pp.3561-3562
  11. ^ a b Asma Barlas, Believing Women in Islam, p.96
  12. ^ D. Gimaret, Tawhid, Encyclopedia of Islam
  13. ^ Ramadan (2005), p.230
  14. ^ Effendi, Shoghi (1944). God Passes By. Wilmette, Illinois, USA: Bahá'í Publishing Trust. pp. p. 139. ISBN 0877430209. {{cite book}}: |pages= has extra text (help)
  15. ^ Smith, P. (1999). A Concise Encyclopedia of the Bahá'í Faith. Oxford, UK: Oneworld Publications. ISBN 1851681841.
  16. ^ Momen, M. (1997). A Short Introduction to the Bahá'í Faith. Oxford, UK: One World Publications. ISBN 1851682090.
  17. ^ "hinduism.iskcon.com/tradition/1102.htm Iskcon.com article on Hinduism".
  18. ^ Delmonico, N. (2004). "The History Of Indic Monotheism And Modern Chaitanya Vaishnavism". The Hare Krishna Movement: The Postcharismatic Fate of a Religious Transplant. Retrieved 2008-04-12.
  19. ^ a b c Elkman, S.M. (1986). Jiva Gosvamin's Tattvasandarbha: A Study on the Philosophical and Sectarian Development of the Gaudiya Vaisnava Movement. Motilal Banarsidass Pub. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  20. ^ Klostermaier, K. (1974). "The Bhaktirasamrtasindhubindu of Visvanatha Cakravartin". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 94 (1): 96–107. doi:10.2307/599733. Retrieved 2008-04-12.
  21. ^ Mahony, W.K. (1987). "Perspectives on Krsna's Various Personalities". History of Religions. 26 (3): 333–335. Retrieved 2008-04-12.
  22. ^ Kennedy, M.T. (1925). The Chaitanya Movement: A Study of the Vaishnavism of Bengal. H. Milford, Oxford university press.
  23. ^ Ojha, P.N. (1978). Aspects of Medieval Indian Society and Culture. BR Pub. Corp.; New Delhi: DK Publishers' Distributors.
  24. ^ Bhag 1.3.28 "All of the above-mentioned incarnations are either plenary portions or portions of the plenary portions of the Lord, but Lord Sri Krishna is the original Personality of Godhead."
  25. ^ See McDaniel, June, "Folk Vaishnavism and Ṭhākur Pañcāyat: Life and status among village Krishna statues" in Beck 2005, p. 39
  26. ^ a b Richard Thompson, Ph. D. (December 1994). "Reflections on the Relation Between Religion and Modern Rationalism". Retrieved 2008-04-12. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  27. ^ Dalmia-luderitz, V. (1992). "Hariscandra of Banaras and the reassessment of Vaisnava bhakti in the late nineteenth century". Devotional Literature in South Asia: Current Research, 1985-8. Retrieved 2008-04-12.

Further reading

  • Dever, William G.; (2003). Who Were the Early Israelites?, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI.
  • Silberman, Neil A.; and colleagues, Simon and Schuster; (2001) The Bible Unearthed New York.
  • Whitelam, Keith; (1997). The Invention of Ancient Israel, Routledge, New York.
  • Hans Köchler, The Concept of Monotheism in Islam and Christianity. Vienna: Braumüller, 1982. ISBN 3-7003-0339-4 (Google Print)

See also

External links