Jump to content

Breast cancer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
[pending revision][pending revision]
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→United States: copyedit
→Screening: the summary of Cochrane results and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force were too brief so I added more details
Line 102: Line 102:
Breast cancer screening refers to testing otherwise-healthy women for breast cancer in an attempt to achieve an earlier diagnosis. The assumption is that early detection will improve outcomes. A number of screening test have been employed including: clinical and self [[breast exams]], mammography, genetic screening, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Breast cancer screening refers to testing otherwise-healthy women for breast cancer in an attempt to achieve an earlier diagnosis. The assumption is that early detection will improve outcomes. A number of screening test have been employed including: clinical and self [[breast exams]], mammography, genetic screening, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.


A clinical or self [[breast exam]] involves feeling the breast for [[breast lump|lumps]] or other abnormalities. Evidence however does not support its use.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC |title=Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=2 |pages=CD003373 |year=2003 |pmid=12804462 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD003373 |url=}}</ref> [[Mammography|Mammographic screening]] for breast cancer is also controversial. It uses [[x-ray]]s to examine the breast for any uncharacteristic masses or lumps. The [[Cochrane collaboration]] in 2009 concluded that it is unclear whether screening does more good than harm.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M |title=Screening for breast cancer with mammography |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=4 |pages=CD001877 |year=2009 |pmid=19821284 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub3 |url=}}</ref> Many national organizations however recommend it. If mammography is decided upon it should only be done every two years in women between the ages of 50 and 74.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/USpstf/uspsbrca.htm |title=Breast Cancer: Screening |work=United States Preventive Services Task Force |accessdate=}}</ref>
A clinical or self [[breast exam]] involves feeling the breast for [[breast lump|lumps]] or other abnormalities. Research evidence does not support the effectiveness of either type of breast exam, because by the time a lump is large enough to be found it is likely to have been growing for several years and will soon be large enough to be found without an exam.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC |title=Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=2 |pages=CD003373 |year=2003 |pmid=12804462 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD003373 |url=}}</ref> [[Mammography|Mammographic screening]] for breast cancer uses [[x-ray]]s to examine the breast for any uncharacteristic masses or lumps. The [[Cochrane collaboration]] in 2009 concluded that mammograms reduce mortality from breast cancer by 15 percent but also result in unnecessary surgery and anxiety, resulting in their view that mammography screening may do more harm than good.<ref>{{cite journal |author=Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M |title=Screening for breast cancer with mammography |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=4 |pages=CD001877 |year=2009 |pmid=19821284 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub3 |url=}}</ref> Many national organizations recommend regular mammography, nevertheless. For the average woman, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends mammography every two years in women between the ages of 50 and 74.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/USpstf/uspsbrca.htm |title=Breast Cancer: Screening |work=United States Preventive Services Task Force |accessdate=}}</ref>


In women at high risk, such as those with a strong family history of cancer, additional testing may include genetic screening and / or [[magnetic resonance imaging]]. Genetic screening involves testing for mutations in the [[BRCA]] genes.
In women at high risk, such as those with a strong family history of cancer, mammography screening is recommended at an earlier age and additional testing may include genetic screening that tests for the[[BRCA]] genes and / or [[magnetic resonance imaging]].


==Treatment==
==Treatment==

Revision as of 20:40, 18 January 2010

Breast cancer
SpecialtyOncology Edit this on Wikidata

Breast cancer refers to cancers originating from breast tissue, most commonly from the inner lining of milk ducts or the lobules that supply the ducts with milk. Cancers originating from ducts are known as ductal carcinomas; those originating from lobules are known as lobular carcinomas. There are many different types of breast cancer, with different stages (spread), aggressiveness, and genetic makeup; survival varies greatly depending on those factors.[1] Computerized models are available to predict survival.[2] With best treatment, 10-year disease-free survival varies from 98% to 10%. Treatment includes surgery, drugs (hormonal therapy and chemotherapy), and radiation.

Worldwide, breast cancer comprises 10.4% of all cancer incidence among women, making it the second most common type of non-skin cancer (after lung cancer) and the fifth most common cause of cancer death.[3] In 2004, breast cancer caused 519,000 deaths worldwide (7% of cancer deaths; almost 1% of all deaths).[4] Breast cancer is about 100 times more common in women than in men, but survival rates are equal in both sexes.[5][6][7]

Some breast cancers require the hormones estrogen and progesterone to grow, and have receptors for those hormones. After surgery those cancers are treated with drugs that interfere with those hormones, usually tamoxifen, and with drugs that shut off the production of estrogen in the ovaries or elsewhere; this may damage the ovaries and end fertility. After surgery, low-risk, hormone-sensitive breast cancers may be treated with hormone therapy and radiation alone. Breast cancers without hormone receptors, or which have spread to the lymph nodes in the armpits, or which express certain genetic characteristics, are higher-risk, and are treated more aggressively. One standard regimen, popular in the U.S., is cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin (Adriamycin), known as CA; these drugs damage DNA in the cancer, but also in fast-growing normal cells where they cause serious side effects. Sometimes a taxane drug, such as docetaxel, is added, and the regime is then known as CAT; taxane attacks the microtubules in cancer cells. An equivalent treatment, popular in Europe, is cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF).[8] Monoclonal antibodies, such as trastuzumab, are used for cancer cells that have the HER2 mutation. Radiation is usually added to the surgical bed to control cancer cells that were missed by the surgery, which usually extends survival, although radiation exposure to the heart may cause damage and heart failure in the following years.[9]

Classification

Main article: Breast cancer classification

Breast cancers can be classified by different schema. They include stage (TNM), pathology, grade, receptor status, and the presence or absence of genes as determined by DNA testing:

  • Stage. The TNM classification for breast cancer is based on the size of the tumor (T), whether or not the tumor has spread to the lymph nodes (N) in the armpits, and whether the tumor has metastasized (M) or spread to a more distant part of the body. Larger size, nodal spread, and metastasis have a larger stage number and a worse prognosis.
  • Pathology. Most breast cancers are' derived from the epithelium lining the ducts or lobules. (Cancers from other tissues are considered "rare" cancers.) Carcinoma in situ is proliferation of cancer cells within the epithelial tissue without invasion of the surrounding tissue. Invasive carcinoma invades the surrounding tissue.[10] Cells that are dividing more quickly have a worse prognosis. One way to measure tumor cell growth is with the presence of protein Ki67, which indicates that the cell is in S phase, and also indicates susceptibility to certain treatments.[11]
  • Grade (Bloom-Richardson grade). When cells become differentiated, they take different shapes and forms to function as part of an organ. Cancerous cells lose that differentiation. Cells that normally line up in an orderly way to make up the milk ducts become disorganized. Cell division becomes uncontrolled. Cell nuclei become less uniform. Pathologists describe cells as well differentiated (low grade), moderately differentiated (intermediate grade), and poorly differentiated (high grade). Poorly-differentiated cancers have a worse prognosis.
  • Receptor status. Breast cancer cells have receptors on their surface. Chemical messengers such as hormones bind to receptors, and this causes changes in the cell. Breast cancer cells may or may not have three important receptors: estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2/neu. Cells with these receptors are called ER positive (ER+), ER negative (ER-), PR positive (PR+), PR negative (PR-), HER2 positive (HER2+), and HER2 negative (HER2-). Cells with none of these receptors are called basal-like or triple negative. ER+ cancer cells depend on estrogen for their growth, so they can be treated with drugs to reduce estrogen, and generally have a better prognosis. HER2+ cancer cells respond to drugs such as trastuzumab, and to high doses of doxorubicin. Generally, HER2+ has a worse prognosis.[12] These receptors are identified by immunohistochemistry.
Receptor status is used to divide breast cancer into four molecular classes: (1) Basal-like, which are ER-, PR- and HER2- (triple negative, TN). Most BRCA1 breast cancers are basal-like TN. (2) Luminal A, which are ER+ and low grade (3) Luminal B, which are ER+ but often high grade (4) HER2+, which have amplified ERBB2.[12]
  • DNA microarrays have compared normal cells to breast cancer cells and found differences in hundreds of genes, but the significance of most of those differences is unknown. Several screening tests are commercially marketed, but the evidence for their value is limited. The only test supported by Level II evidence is Oncotype DX, which is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) but is endorsed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. MammaPrint is approved by the FDA but is only supported by Level III evidence. Two other tests have Level III evidence: Theros and MapQuant Dx. No tests have been verified by Level I evidence (a prospective, randomized controlled trial in which patients who used the test had a better outcome than those who did not). In a review, Sotirou concluded, "The genetic tests add modest prognostic information for patients with HER2-positive and triple-negative tumors, but when measures of clinical risk are equivocal (e.g., intermediate expression of ER and intermediate histologic grade), these assays could guide clinical decisions."[12]

Breast cancer is usually, but not always, primarily classified by its histological appearance. Rare variants are defined on the basis of physical exam findings. For example, inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), a form of ductal carcinoma or malignant cancer in the ducts, is distinguished from other carcinomas by the inflamed appearance of the affected breast.[13] In the future, some pathologic classifications may be changed.

Signs and symptoms

The first noticeable symptom of breast cancer is typically a lump that feels different from the rest of the breast tissue. More than 80% of breast cancer cases are discovered when the woman feels a lump.[14] By the time a breast lump is noticeable, it has probably been growing for years. The earliest breast cancers are detected by a mammogram.[15] Lumps found in lymph nodes located in the armpits[14] can also indicate breast cancer.

Indications of breast cancer other than a lump may include changes in breast size or shape, skin dimpling, nipple inversion, or spontaneous single-nipple discharge. Pain ("mastodynia") is an unreliable tool in determining the presence or absence of breast cancer, but may be indicative of other breast health issues.[14][15][16]

When breast cancer cells invade the dermal lymphatics—small lymph vessels in the skin of the breast—its presentation can resemble skin inflammation and thus is known as inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). Symptoms of inflammatory breast cancer include pain, swelling, warmth and redness throughout the breast, as well as an orange-peel texture to the skin referred to as peau d'orange.[14]

Another reported symptom complex of breast cancer is Paget's disease of the breast. This syndrome presents as eczematoid skin changes such as redness and mild flaking of the nipple skin. As Paget's advances, symptoms may include tingling, itching, increased sensitivity, burning, and pain. There may also be discharge from the nipple. Approximately half of women diagnosed with Paget's also have a lump in the breast.[17]

Occasionally, breast cancer presents as metastatic disease, that is, cancer that has spread beyond the original organ. metastatic breast cancer will cause symptoms that depend on the location of metastasis. Common sites of metastasis include bone, liver, lung and brain.[18] Unexplained weight loss can occasionally herald an occult breast cancer, as can symptoms of fevers or chills. Bone or joint pains can sometimes be manifestations of metastatic breast cancer, as can jaundice or neurological symptoms. These symptoms are "non-specific", meaning they can also be manifestations of many other illnesses.[19]

Most symptoms of breast disorder do not turn out to represent underlying breast cancer. Benign breast diseases such as mastitis and fibroadenoma of the breast are more common causes of breast disorder symptoms. The appearance of a new symptom should be taken seriously by both patients and their doctors, because of the possibility of an underlying breast cancer at almost any age.[20]

Risk factors

Main article: Risk factors of breast cancer

The primary risk factors that have been identified are sex,[21] age,[22] childbearing, hormones,[23] a high-fat diet,[24] alcohol intake,[25][26] obesity,[27] and environmental factors such as tobacco use, radiation[28], endocrine disruptors and shiftwork.[29]

Well established risk factors account for 47% of cases while 5% are attributable to hereditary syndromes.[30] In particular, carriers of the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, are at a 30-40% increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer, depending on in which portion of the protein the mutation occurs.[31]

  • Personal history of breast cancer: A woman who had breast cancer in one breast has an increased risk of getting cancer in her other breast.
  • Family history: A woman's risk of breast cancer is higher if her mother, sister, or daughter had breast cancer. The risk is higher if her family member got breast cancer before age 40. Having other relatives with breast cancer (in either her mother's or father's family) may also increase a woman's risk.
  • Certain breast changes: Some women have cells in the breast that look abnormal under a microscope. Having certain types of abnormal cells (atypical hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ [LCIS]) increases the risk of breast cancer.
  • Race: Breast cancer is diagnosed more often in Caucasian women than Latina, Asian, or African American women.
  • No physical activity: Women who are physically inactive throughout life may have an increased risk of breast cancer. Being active may help decrease risk.

Abortion has not been found to be a risk factor for breast cancer. The breast cancer abortion hypothesis, however, continues to be promoted by some pro-life groups.[32][33][34] United Kingdom being member of International Cancer Genome Consortium is leading efforts to map breast cancer's complete genome.

Pathophysiology

Main article: Carcinogenesis
Overview of signal transduction pathways involved in apoptosis. Mutations leading to loss of apoptosis can lead to tumorigenesis.

Breast cancer, like other cancers, occurs because of an interaction between the environment and a defective gene. Normal cells divide as many times as needed and stop. They attach to other cells and stay in place in tissues. Cells become cancerous when mutations destroy their ability to stop dividing, to attach to other cells and to stay where they belong. When cells divide, their DNA is normally copied with many mistakes. Error-correcting proteins fix those mistakes. The mutations known to cause cancer, such as p53, BRCA1 and BRCA2, occur in the error-correcting mechanisms. These mutations are either inherited or acquired after birth. Presumably, they allow the other mutations, which allow uncontrolled division, lack of attachment, and metastasis to distant organs.[28][35] Normal cells will commit cell suicide (apoptosis) when they are no longer needed. Until then, they are protected from cell suicide by several protein clusers and pathways. One of the protective pathways is the PI3K/AKT pathway; another is the RAS/MEK/ERK pathway. Sometimes the genes along these protective pathways are mutated in a way that turns them permanently "on", rendering the cell incapable of committing suicide when it is no longer needed. This is one of the steps that causes cancer in combination with other mutations. Normally, the PTEN protein turns off the PI3K/AKT pathway when the cell is ready for cell suicide. In some breast cancers, the gene for the PTEN protein is mutated, so the PI3K/AKT pathway is stuck in the "on" position, and the cancer cell does not commit suicide.[36]

Mutations that can lead to breast cancer have been experimentally linked to estrogen exposure.[37]

Failure of immune surveillance, a theory in which the immune system removes malignant cells throughout one's life.[38]

Abnormal growth factor signaling in the interaction between stromal cells and epithelial cells can facilitate malignant cell growth.[39][40]

People in less-developed countries report lower incidence rates than in developed countries.[citation needed]

In the United States, 10 to 20 percent of patients with breast cancer and patients with ovarian cancer have a first- or second-degree relative with one of these diseases. Mutations in either of two major susceptibility genes, breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) and breast cancer susceptibility gene 2 (BRCA2), confer a lifetime risk of breast cancer of between 60 and 85 percent and a lifetime risk of ovarian cancer of between 15 and 40 percent. However, mutations in these genes account for only 2 to 3 percent of all breast cancers.[41]

Diagnosis

Excised human breast tissue, showing an irregular, dense, white stellate area of cancer 2 cm in diameter, within yellow fatty tissue.

While screening techniques (which are further discussed below) are useful in determining the possibility of cancer, a further testing is necessary to confirm whether a lump detected on screening is cancer, as opposed to a benign alternative such as a simple cyst.

In a clinical setting, breast cancer is commonly diagnosed using a "triple test" of clinical breast examination (breast examination by a trained medical practitioner), mammography, and fine needle aspiration cytology. Both mammography and clinical breast exam, also used for screening, can indicate an approximate likelihood that a lump is cancer, and may also identify any other lesions. Fine Needle Aspiration and Cytology (FNAC), which may be done in a GP's office using local anaesthetic if required, involves attempting to extract a small portion of fluid from the lump. Clear fluid makes the lump highly unlikely to be cancerous, but bloody fluid may be sent off for inspection under a microscope for cancerous cells. Together, these three tools can be used to diagnose breast cancer with a good degree of accuracy.

Other options for biopsy include core biopsy, where a section of the breast lump is removed, and an excisional biopsy, where the entire lump is removed.

Screening

Main article: Breast cancer screening
Invasive cell carcinoma in a 51 year old woman photographed with a thermographic camera

Breast cancer screening refers to testing otherwise-healthy women for breast cancer in an attempt to achieve an earlier diagnosis. The assumption is that early detection will improve outcomes. A number of screening test have been employed including: clinical and self breast exams, mammography, genetic screening, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.

A clinical or self breast exam involves feeling the breast for lumps or other abnormalities. Research evidence does not support the effectiveness of either type of breast exam, because by the time a lump is large enough to be found it is likely to have been growing for several years and will soon be large enough to be found without an exam.[42] Mammographic screening for breast cancer uses x-rays to examine the breast for any uncharacteristic masses or lumps. The Cochrane collaboration in 2009 concluded that mammograms reduce mortality from breast cancer by 15 percent but also result in unnecessary surgery and anxiety, resulting in their view that mammography screening may do more harm than good.[43] Many national organizations recommend regular mammography, nevertheless. For the average woman, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends mammography every two years in women between the ages of 50 and 74.[44]

In women at high risk, such as those with a strong family history of cancer, mammography screening is recommended at an earlier age and additional testing may include genetic screening that tests for theBRCA genes and / or magnetic resonance imaging.

Treatment

Main article: Breast cancer treatment
Chest appearance after right breast mastectomy.

Breast cancer is treated first with surgery, and then with drugs, radiation, or both. Treatments are given with increasing aggressiveness according to the prognosis and risk of recurrence. Early cancers with good prognosis (T1, N0) may be treated with lumpectomy plus radiation alone or hormone therapy alone. Later cancers with poorer prognosis and greater risk of recurrence may be treated with more aggressive chemotherapy with uncomfortable and life-threatening side effects, in order to increase the likelihood of cure and lower the risk of recurrence.

Drugs in addition to surgery are called adjuvant therapy. Hormone therapy is one class of adjuvant therapy. Some breast cancers require estrogen to continue growing. They can be identified by the presence of estrogen receptors (ER+) and progesterone receptors (PR+) on their surface (sometimes referred to together as hormone receptors, HR+). These ER+ cancers can be treated with drugs that block the production of estrogen or block the receptors, such as tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor).

Chemotherapy is given for more advanced stages of disease. They are usually given in combinations. One of the most common treatments is cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin (Adriamycin), known as CA; these drugs damage DNA in the cancer, but also in fast-growing normal cells where they cause serious side effects. Damage to the heart muscle is the most dangerous complication of doxorubicin. Sometimes a taxane drug, such as docetaxel, is added, and the regime is then known as CAT; taxane attacks the microtubules in cancer cells. Another common treatment, which produces equivalent results, is cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). (Chemotherapy can literally refer to any drug, but it is usually used to refer to traditional non-hormone treatments for cancer.)

Monoclonal antibodies are sometimes used. Some cancer cells have a receptor called HER2 on their surface. This receptor is normally stimulated by a growth factor which causes the cell to divide; in the absence of the growth factor, the cell normally stops growing. In breast cancer, the HER2 receptor is stuck in the "on" position (constitutively activated). The cell divides without stopping. Trastuzumab (Herceptin), a monoclonal antibody to HER2, can improve survival in these cancers. Other monoclonal antibodies can interrupt other cancer mechanisms in the cell.

Radiotherapy is given after surgery to the region of the tumor bed, to destroy microscopic tumors that may have escaped surgery. Radiation therapy can be delivered as external beam radiotherapy or as brachytherapy (internal radiotherapy). Radiation can reduce the risk of recurrence by 50-66% (1/2 - 2/3rds reduction of risk) when delivered in the correct dose.[45]

Treatments are constantly being evaluated in randomized, controlled trials, to evaluate and compare individual drugs, combinations of drugs, and surgical and radiation techniques. The latest research is reported annually at scientific meetings such as that of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium,[46] and the St. Gallen Oncology Conference in St. Gallen, Switzerland.[47] These studies are reviewed by professional societies and other organizations, and formulated into guidelines for specific treatment groups and risk category.

Prognosis

Recurrent breast cancer of the left breast.

A prognosis is a prediction of outcome, usually the probability of death (or survival), and the probability of progression-free survival (PFS) or disease-free survival (DFS). These predictions are based on experience with breast cancer patients with similar classification. A prognosis is an estimate, as patients with the same classification will survive a different amount of time, and classifications are not always precise. Survival is usually calculated as an average number of months (or years) that 50% of patients survive, or the percentage of patients that are alive after 1, 5, 15 and 20 years. Prognosis is important for treatment decisions because patients with a good prognosis are usually offered less invasive treatments, such as lumpectomy and radiation or hormone therapy, while patients with poor prognosis are usually offered more aggressive treatment, such as more extensive mastectomy and one or more chemotherapy drugs.

Prognostic factors include staging, tumor size and location, grade, whether disease is systemic (has metastasized, or traveled to other parts of the body), recurrence of the disease, and age of patient.

Stage is the most important, as it takes into consideration size, local involvement, lymph node status and whether metastatic disease is present. The higher the stage at diagnosis, the worse the prognosis. The stage is raised by the invasiveness of disease to lymph nodes, chest wall, skin or beyond, and the aggressiveness of the cancer cells. The stage is lowered by the presence of cancer-free zones and close-to-normal cell behaviour (grading). Size is not a factor in staging unless the cancer is invasive. Ductal Carcinoma in situ throughout the entire breast is stage zero.

Grading is based on how biopsied, cultured cells behave. The closer to normal cancer cells are, the slower their growth and the better the prognosis. If cells are not well differentiated, they will appear immature, will divide more rapidly, and will tend to spread. Well differentiated is given a grade of 1, moderate is grade 2, while poor or undifferentiated is given a higher grade of 3 or 4 (depending upon the scale used).

Younger women tend to have a poorer prognosis than post-menopausal women due to several factors. Their breasts are active with their cycles, they may be nursing infants, and may be unaware of changes in their breasts. Therefore, younger women are usually at a more advanced stage when diagnosed. There may also be biologic factors contributing to a higher risk of disease recurrence for younger women with breast cancer.[48]

The presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the cancer cell, while not prognostic, is important in guiding treatment. Those who do not test positive for these specific receptors will not respond to hormone therapy.

Likewise, HER2/neu status directs the course of treatment. Patients whose cancer cells are positive for HER2/neu have more aggressive disease and may be treated with trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets this protein.

Elevated CA15-3, in conjunction with alkaline phosphatase, was shown to increase chances of early recurrence in breast cancer.[49]

Psychological aspects

The emotional impact of cancer diagnosis, symptoms, treatment, and related issues can be severe. Most larger hospitals are associated with cancer support groups which provide a supportive environment to help patients cope and gain perspective from cancer survivors. Online cancer support groups are also very beneficial to cancer patients, especially in dealing with uncertainty and body-image problems inherent in cancer treatment.

Not all breast cancer patients experience their illness in the same manner. Factors such as age can have a significant impact on the way a patient copes with a breast cancer diagnosis. Premenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer must confront the issues of early menopause induced by many of the chemotherapy regimens used to treat their breast cancer, especially those that use hormones to counteract ovarian function.[50]

On the other hand, a recent study conducted by researchers at the College of Public Health of the University of Georgia showed that older women may face a more difficult recovery from breast cancer than their younger counterparts.[51] As the incidence of breast cancer in women over 50 rises and survival rates increase, breast cancer is increasingly becoming a geriatric issue that warrants both further research and the expansion of specialized cancer support services tailored for specific age groups.[51]

Epidemiology

Age-standardized death from breast cancer per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.[52]
  no data
  less than 2
  2-4
  4-6
  6-8
  8-10
  10-12
  12-14
  14-16
  16-18
  18-20
  20-22
  more than 22

Worldwide, breast cancer is the most common cancer in women after skin cancer representing 16% of all female cancers.[53] The rate is more than twice that of colorectal cancer and cervical cancer and about three times that of lung cancer.[citation needed] Mortality worldwide is 25% greater than that of lung cancer in women.[3] In 2004, breast cancer caused 519,000 deaths worldwide (7% of cancer deaths; almost 1% of all deaths).[4] The number of cases worldwide has significantly increased since the 1970s, a phenomenon partly attributed to the modern lifestyles.[54][55]

The incidence of breast cancer varies greatly around the world, being lower in less-developed countries and greatest in the more-developed countries. In the twelve world regions, the annual age-standardized incidence rates per 100,000 women are as follows: in Eastern Asia, 18; South Central Asia, 22; sub-Saharan Africa, 22; South-Eastern Asia, 26; North Africa and Western Asia, 28; South and Central America, 42; Eastern Europe, 49; Southern Europe, 56; Northern Europe, 73; Oceania, 74; Western Europe, 78; and in North America, 90.[56]

Breast cancer is strongly related to age with only 5% of all breast cancers occur in women under 40 years old.[57]

United States

The lifetime risk for breast cancer in the United States is usually given as 1 in 8 (12.5%) with a 1 in 35 (3%) chance of death.[58] A recent analysis however has called this estimate into question when it found a risk of only 6% in healthy women.[59]

The United States have the highest annual incidence rates of breast cancer in the world; 128.6 per 100,000 in whites and 112.6 per 100,000 among African Americans.[58][60] It is the second-most common cancer (after skin cancer) and the second-most common cause of cancer death (after lung cancer).[58] In 2007, breast cancer was expected to cause 40,910 deaths in the US (7% of cancer deaths; almost 2% of all deaths).[15] This figure includes 450-500 annual deaths among men out of 2000 cancer cases.[61]

In the US, both incidence and death rates for breast cancer have been declining in the last few years in Native Americans and Alaskan Natives.[15][62] Nevertheless, a US study conducted in 2005 by the Society for Women's Health Research indicated that breast cancer remains the most feared disease,[63] even though heart disease is a much more common cause of death among women.[64] Many doctors say that women exaggerate their risk of breast cancer.[65]

Racial disparities

Several studies have found that black women in the U.S. are more likely to die from breast cancer even though white women are more likely to be diagnosed with the disease. Even after diagnosis, black women are less likely to get treatment compared to white women.[66][67][68] Scholars have advanced several theories for the disparities, including inadequate access to screening, reduced availability of the most advanced surgical and medical techniques, or some biological characteristic of the disease in the African American population.[69] Some studies suggest that the racial disparity in breast cancer outcomes may reflect cultural biases more than biological disease differences.[70] Research is currently ongoing to define the contribution of both biological and cultural factors.[67][71]

UK

45,000 cases diagnosed and 12,500 deaths per annum. 60% of cases are treated with Tamoxifen, of these the drug becomes ineffective in 35%.[72]

Developing countries

As developing countries grow and adopt Western culture they also accumulate more disease that has arisen from Western culture and its habits (fat/alcohol intake, smoking, exposure to oral contraceptives, the changing patterns of childbearing and breastfeeding, low parity). For instance, as South America has developed so has the amount of breast cancer. "Breast cancer in less developed countries, such as those in South America, is a major public health issue. It is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women in countries such as Argentina, Uruguay, and Brazil. The expected numbers of new cases and deaths due to breast cancer in South America for the year 2001 are approximately 70,000 and 30,000, respectively." [73] However, because of a lack of funding and resources, treatment is not always available to those suffering with breast cancer.

History

Breast cancer may be one of the oldest known forms of cancerous tumors in humans. The oldest description of cancer was discovered in Egypt and dates back to approximately 1600 BC. The Edwin Smith Papyrus describes 8 cases of tumors or ulcers of the breast that were treated by cauterization.The writing says about the disease, "There is no treatment."[74] For centuries, physicians described similar cases in their practises, with the same conclusion. It was not until doctors achieved greater understanding of the circulatory system in the 17th century that they could establish a link between breast cancer and the lymph nodes in the armpit. The French surgeon Jean Louis Petit (1674–1750) and later the Scottish surgeon Benjamin Bell (1749–1806) were the first to remove the lymph nodes, breast tissue, and underlying chest muscle. Their successful work was carried on by William Stewart Halsted who started performing mastectomies in 1882. The Halsted radical mastectomy often involved removing both breasts, associated lymph nodes, and the underlying chest muscles. This often led to long-term pain and disability, but was seen as necessary in order to prevent the cancer from recurring.[75] Radical mastectomies remained the standard until the 1970s, when a new understanding of metastasis led to perceiving cancer as a systemic illness as well as a localized one, and more sparing procedures were developed that proved equally effective.

Prominent women who died of breast cancer include Empress Theodora, wife of Justinian; Anne of Austria, mother of Louis XIV of France; Mary Washington, mother of George, and Rachel Carson, the environmentalist.[76]

The first case-controlled study on breast cancer epidemiology was done by Janet Lane-Claypon, who published a comparative study in 1926 of 500 breast cancer cases and 500 control patients of the same background and lifestyle for the British Ministry of Health.[77][verification needed][78]

Society and culture

A pink ribbon, the universal symbol of breast cancer awareness.

In the fall of 1991, Susan G. Komen for the Cure handed out pink ribbons to participants in its New York City race for breast cancer survivors.[79]

The widespread acceptance of second opinions before surgery, less invasive surgical procedures, support groups, and other advances in patient care have stemmed, in part, from the breast cancer advocacy movement.[80]

In the month of October, the National Breast Cancer Awareness Month is recognized by survivors, family and friends of survivors and/or victims of the disease.[81] A pink ribbon is worn to recognize the struggle that sufferers face when battling with the cancer.[82]

Pink for October is an initiative started by Matthew Oliphant, which asks that any sites willing to help make people aware of breast cancer, change their template or layout to include the color pink, so that when visitors view the site, they see that the majority of the site is pink. Then after reading a short amount of information about breast cancer, or being redirected to another site, they are aware of the disease itself.[83]

The patron saint of breast cancer is Agatha of Sicily.[84]

The pink and blue ribbon was designed in 1996 by Nancy Nick, President and Founder of the John W. Nick Foundation to bring awareness that "Men Get Breast Cancer Too!"[85]
In 2009 Out of the Shadow of Pink, A Man's Pink and the Brandon Greening Foundation for Breast Cancer in Men joined together to globally establish the third week of October as Male Breast Cancer Awareness Week[86]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Merck Manual Online, Breast Cancer".
  2. ^ CancerMath.net Calculates survival with breast cancer based on prognostic factors and treatment. From the Laboratory for Quantitative Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital.
  3. ^ a b "World Cancer Report". International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2003. Retrieved 2009-03-26. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. ^ a b "Fact sheet No. 297: Cancer". World Health Organization. 2006. Retrieved 2009-03-26. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  5. ^ "Male Breast Cancer Treatment". National Cancer Institute. 2006. Retrieved 2006-10-16.
  6. ^ "Breast Cancer in Men". Cancer Research UK. 2007. Retrieved 2007-11-06.
  7. ^ "What Are the Key Statistics About Breast Cancer in Men?". American Cancer Society. September 27, 2007. Retrieved 2008-02-03.
  8. ^ Muss HB, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women with early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 14;360(20):2055-65.
  9. ^ Buchholz TA. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 1;360(1):63-70. Radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.
  10. ^ Merck Manual, Professional Edition, Ch. 253, Breast Cancer.
  11. ^ Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, 16th ed., Ch. 76, Breast Cancer, Mark E. Lippman
  12. ^ a b c Molecular origin of cancer: gene-expression signatures in breast cancer, Christos Sotirou and Lajos Pusztai, N Engl J Med 360:790 (2009 Feb 19)
  13. ^ Giordano SH, Hortobagyi GN (2003). "Inflammatory breast cancer: clinical progress and the main problems that must be addressed". Breast Cancer Research. 5 (6): 284–8. doi:10.1186/bcr608. PMC 314400. PMID 14580242.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  14. ^ a b c d Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy (2003). "Breast Disorders: Cancer". Retrieved 2008-02-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. ^ a b c d American Cancer Society (2007). "Cancer Facts & Figures 2007" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-04-26.
  16. ^ eMedicine (2006). "Breast Cancer Evaluation". Retrieved 2008-02-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  17. ^ National Cancer Institute (2005). "Paget's Disease of the Nipple: Questions and Answers". Retrieved 2008-02-06. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  18. ^ Lacroix M (2006). "Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells". Endocrine-related Cancer. 13 (4): 1033–67. doi:10.1677/ERC-06-0001. PMID 17158753. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  19. ^ National Cancer Institute (2004). "Metastatic Cancer: Questions and Answers". Retrieved 2008-02-06. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  20. ^ Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy (2003). "Breast Disorders: Introduction". Retrieved 2008-02-05. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  21. ^ Giordano SH, Cohen DS, Buzdar AU, Perkins G, Hortobagyi GN (2004). "Breast carcinoma in men: a population-based study". Cancer. 101 (1): 51–7. doi:10.1002/cncr.20312. PMID 15221988. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ^ "Breast Cancer Risk Factors". 2008-11-25. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
  23. ^ Yager JD (2006). "Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer". New Engl J Med. 354 (3): 270–82. doi:10.1056/NEJMra050776. PMID 16421368. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  24. ^ Chlebowski RT, Blackburn GL, Thomson CA; et al. (2006). "Dietary fat reduction and breast cancer outcome: interim efficacy results from the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study". Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 98 (24): 1767–76. doi:10.1093/jnci/djj494. PMID 17179478. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  25. ^ Boffetta P, Hashibe M, La Vecchia C, Zatonski W, Rehm J (2006). "The burden of cancer attributable to alcohol drinking". International Journal of Cancer. 119 (4): 884–7. doi:10.1002/ijc.21903. PMID 16557583. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  26. ^ [1]
  27. ^ BBC report Weight link to breast cancer risk
  28. ^ a b American Cancer Society (2005). "Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2005-2006" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-04-26.
  29. ^ WHO international Agency for Research on Cancer Press Release No. 180, December 2007.
  30. ^ Madigan MP, Ziegler RG, Benichou J, Byrne C, Hoover RN (1995). "Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors". Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 87 (22): 1681–5. doi:10.1093/jnci/87.22.1681. PMID 7473816. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. ^ Venkitaraman AR (2002). "Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2". Cell. 108 (2): 171–82. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00615-3. PMID 11832208. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  32. ^ "WHO - Induced abortion does not increase breast cancer risk". who.int. Retrieved 2007-12-24.
  33. ^ "ACS :: Can Having an Abortion Cause or Contribute to Breast Cancer?". cancer.org. Retrieved 2008-03-31.
  34. ^ "Summary Report: Early Reproductive Events Workshop - National Cancer Institute". cancer.gov. Retrieved 2007-11-04.
  35. ^ Dunning AM, Healey CS, Pharoah PD, Teare MD, Ponder BA, Easton DF (1 October 1999). "A systematic review of genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk". Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 8 (10): 843–54. PMID 10548311.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ^ "32nd Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium" (PDF). Sunday Morning Year-End Review. Dec. 14, 2009. {{cite conference}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  37. ^ Cavalieri E, Chakravarti D, Guttenplan J; et al. (2006). "Catechol estrogen quinones as initiators of breast and other human cancers: implications for biomarkers of susceptibility and cancer prevention". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1766 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.03.001. PMID 16675129. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  38. ^ Farlex (2005). ">immunological surveillance "The Free Dictionary: Immunological Surveilliance". Retrieved 2008-02-10. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  39. ^ Haslam SZ, Woodward TL. (2003). "Host microenvironment in breast cancer development: epithelial-cell-stromal-cell interactions and steroid hormone action in normal and cancerous mammary gland". Breast Cancer Res. 5 (4): 208–15. doi:10.1186/bcr615. PMC 165024. PMID 12817994. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  40. ^ Wiseman BS, Werb Z: Stromal effects on mammary gland development and breast cancer. Science 296:1046, 2002.
  41. ^ Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Richard Wooster and Barbara L. Weber, New Engl J Medicine, 348:2339-2347, June 5, 2003. [Free Full Text
  42. ^ Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC (2003). "Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2): CD003373. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003373. PMID 12804462.
  43. ^ Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M (2009). "Screening for breast cancer with mammography". Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4): CD001877. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001877.pub3. PMID 19821284.
  44. ^ "Breast Cancer: Screening". United States Preventive Services Task Force.
  45. ^ Breastcancer.org Treatment Options
  46. ^ San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Abstracts, newsletters, and other reports of the meeting.
  47. ^ Annals of Oncology 2009 20(8):1319-1329; doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp322 Special article: Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2009, A. Goldhirsch, J. N. Ingle, R. D. Gelber, et al. Review of latest research in breast cancer, as reported by expert panels at the St. Galen Oncology Conference, St. Galen, Switzerland. Free full text.
  48. ^ Peppercorn J (2009). "Breast Cancer in Women Under 40". Oncology. 23 (6).
  49. ^ Keshaviah A, Dellapasqua S, Rotmensz N; et al. (2007). "CA15-3 and alkaline phosphatase as predictors for breast cancer recurrence: a combined analysis of seven International Breast Cancer Study Group trials". Annals of Oncology. 18 (4): 701–8. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl492. PMID 17237474. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. ^ Pritchard KI (2009). "Ovarian Suppression/Ablation in Premenopausal ER-Positive Breast Cancer Patients". Oncology. 23 (1).
  51. ^ a b Robb C, Haley WE, Balducci L; et al. (2007). "Impact of breast cancer survivorship on quality of life in older women". Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology. 62 (1): 84–91. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.11.003. PMID 17188505. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  52. ^ "WHO Disease and injury country estimates". World Health Organization. 2009. Retrieved Nov. 11, 2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  53. ^ "Breast cancer: prevention and control". World Health Organization.
  54. ^ Laurance, Jeremy (2006-09-29). "Breast cancer cases rise 80% since Seventies". The Independent. Retrieved 2006-10-09.
  55. ^ "Breast Cancer: Statistics on Incidence, Survival, and Screening". Imaginis Corporation. 2006. Retrieved 2006-10-09. {{cite web}}: External link in |work= (help)
  56. ^ Stewart B. W. and Kleihues P. (Eds): World Cancer Report. IARCPress. Lyon 2003
  57. ^ Breast Cancer: Breast Cancer in Young Women WebMD. Retrieved on September 9, 2009
  58. ^ a b c American Cancer Society (2007). "What Are the Key Statistics for Breast Cancer?". Retrieved 2008-02-03. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  59. ^ W.B. Cutler, R.E. Burki, E. Genovesse, M.G. Zacher (2009). "Breast cancer in postmenopausal women: what is the real risk?". Fertility and Sterility. 92 (3): S16. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.061.. PMID 123455. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help); Unknown parameter |doi_brokendate= ignored (|doi-broken-date= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  60. ^ "Browse the SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2006".
  61. ^ http://www.medicinenet.com/male_breast_cancer/article.htm
  62. ^ Espey DK, Wu XC, Swan J; et al. (2007). "Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2004, featuring cancer in American Indians and Alaska Natives". Cancer. 110 (10): 2119–52. doi:10.1002/cncr.23044. PMID 17939129. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  63. ^ "Women's Fear of Heart Disease Has Almost Doubled in Three Years, But Breast Cancer Remains Most Feared Disease" (Press release). Society for Women's Health Research. 2005-07-07. Retrieved 2007-10-15.
  64. ^ "Leading Causes of Death for American Women 2004" (PDF). National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Retrieved 2007-10-15.
  65. ^ In Breast Cancer Data, Hope, Fear and Confusion, By DENISE GRADY, New York Times, January 26, 1999.
  66. ^ Wisconsin Cancer Incidence and Mortality, 2000-2004 Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
  67. ^ a b Tammemagi CM (2007). "Racial/ethnic disparities in breast and gynecologic cancer treatment and outcomes". Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 19 (1): 31–6. doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e3280117cf8. PMID 17218849.
  68. ^ Hirschman J, Whitman S, Ansell D (2007). "The black:white disparity in breast cancer mortality: the example of Chicago". Cancer Causes Control. 18 (3): 323–33. doi:10.1007/s10552-006-0102-y. PMID 17285262.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  69. ^ Breast cancer rates differ in races by Amanda Villa Wednesday, October 24, 2007. Badger Herald
  70. ^ Benjamin M, Reddy S, Brawley OW (2003). "Myeloma and race: a review of the literature". Cancer Metastasis Rev. 22 (1): 87–93. doi:10.1023/A:1022268103136. PMID 12716040.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  71. ^ Demicheli R, Retsky MW, Hrushesky WJ, Baum M, Gukas ID, Jatoi I (2007). "Racial disparities in breast cancer outcome: insights into host-tumor interactions". Cancer. 110 (9): 1880–8. doi:10.1002/cncr.22998. PMID 17876835.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  72. ^ Daily Mail (UK) 13 Nov 2008
  73. ^ (Schwartzmann, 2001, p 118)
  74. ^ "The History of Cancer". American Cancer Society. 2002-03-25. Retrieved 2006-10-09.
  75. ^ [2]
  76. ^ James S. Olson. Bathsheba's Breast: Women, Cancer, and History, 1st edition, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005 [ISBN 0801880645. ISBN 978-0801880643]
  77. ^ Lane-Claypon, Janet Elizabeth (1926). A further report on cancer of the breast, with special reference to its associated antecedent conditions. London, Greater London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO). OCLC 14713036. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  78. ^ Alfredo Morabia (2004). A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts. Boston: Birkhauser. pp. 301–302. ISBN 3-7643-6818-7. Retrieved 2007-12-31.
  79. ^ http://ww5.komen.org/uploadedFiles/Content_Binaries/The_Pink_Ribbon_Story.pdf
  80. ^ http://www.crcfl.net/content/view/history-of-breast-cancer-advocacy.html
  81. ^ "Breast Cancer Awareness Month". Retrieved 2008-01-04.
  82. ^ "Pink Ribbon". Retrieved 2008-01-04.
  83. ^ "Pink for October". Retrieved 2008-01-04.
  84. ^ "Index of Saints". Catholic Forum. Retrieved 2008-01-04.
  85. ^ "About Our Ribbon". Retrieved 2008-09-17.</
  86. ^ "Male Breast Cancer Awareness Week Campaign". Retrieved 2009-10-01.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Breast cancer.
The Wikibook Sexual Health has a page on the topic of: Cancer#Breast Cancer


Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Breast_cancer&oldid=338614708"