Jump to content

Isotopes of nobelium: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
! &nbsp;<br />isotopic mass (u)<br />&nbsp;
! &nbsp;<br />isotopic mass (u)<br />&nbsp;
! rowspan="2" | half-life
! rowspan="2" | half-life
! rowspan="2" | decay<br>mode(s)<ref>http://www.nucleonica.net/unc.aspx</ref><ref group="n">Abbreviations:<br>EC: [[Electron capture]]<br>IT: [[Isomeric transition]]<br>SF: [[Spontaneous fission]]</ref>
! rowspan="2" | daughter<br>isotope(s)
! rowspan="2" | nuclear<br />spin
! rowspan="2" | nuclear<br />spin
|-
|-
Line 26: Line 28:
| 5/2+# -->
| 5/2+# -->
|-
|-
| <sup>250</sup>No
| rowspan=3|<sup>250</sup>No
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 148
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 148
| 250.08751(22)#
| rowspan=3|250.08751(22)#
| 5.7(8) µs
| rowspan=3|5.7(8) µs
| [[Spontaneous fission|SF]] (99.95%)
| 0+
| (various)
| rowspan=3|0+
|-
|-
| [[alpha decay|α]] (.05%)
| <sup>251</sup>No
| <sup>246</sup>Fm
| style="text-align:right" | 102
|-
| style="text-align:right" | 149
| [[beta decay|β<sup>+</sup>]] (2.5E-4%)
| 251.08901(19)#
| <sup>250</sup>Md
| 0.78(2) s
|-
| 7/2+#
| rowspan=3|<sup>251</sup>No
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 149
| rowspan=3|251.08901(19)#
| rowspan=3|0.78(2) s
| α (89%)
| <sup>247</sup>Fm
| rowspan=3|7/2+#
|-
| SF (10%)
| (various)
|-
| β<sup>+</sup> (1%)
| <sup>251</sup>Md
|-
|-
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>251m</sup>No
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>251m</sup>No
| colspan="3" style="text-indent:2em" | 110(180)# keV
| colspan="3" style="text-indent:2em" | 110(180)# keV
| 1.7(10) s
| 1.7(10) s
|
|
| 9/2-#
| 9/2-#
|-
|-
| <sup>252</sup>No
| rowspan=3|<sup>252</sup>No
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 150
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 150
| 252.088977(14)
| rowspan=3|252.088977(14)
| 2.27(14) s
| rowspan=3|2.27(14) s
| α (73.09%)
| 0+
| <sup>248</sup>Fm
| rowspan=3|0+
|-
| SF (26.9%)
| (various)
|-
| β<sup>+</sup> (1%)
| <sup>252</sup>Md
<!--|-
<!--|-
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>252m</sup>No
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>252m</sup>No
Line 57: Line 85:
|-->
|-->
|-
|-
| <sup>253</sup>No
| rowspan=3|<sup>253</sup>No
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 151
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 151
| 253.09068(11)#
| rowspan=3|253.09068(11)#
| 1.62(15) min
| rowspan=3|1.62(15) min
| (9/2-)#
| α (80%)
| <sup>249</sup>Fm
| rowspan=3|(9/2-)#
|-
| β<sup>+</sup> (20%)
| <sup>253</sup>Md
|-
| SF (1E-3%)
| (various)
|-
|-
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>253m</sup>No
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>253m</sup>No
| colspan="3" style="text-indent:2em" | 129(19) keV
| colspan="3" style="text-indent:2em" | 129(19) keV
| 31 µs
| 31 µs
|
|
| 5/2+#
| 5/2+#
|-
|-
| <sup>254</sup>No<ref group="n">First isotope synthesized</ref>
| rowspan=3|<sup>254</sup>No<ref group="n">First isotope synthesized</ref>
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 152
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 152
| 254.090955(19)
| rowspan=3|254.090955(19)
| 51(10) s
| rowspan=3|51(10) s
| α (89.3%)
| 0+
| <sup>250</sup>Fm
| rowspan=3|0+
|-
|-
| style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>254m</sup>No
| β<sup>+</sup> (10%)
| <sup>254</sup>Md
| colspan="3" style="text-indent:2em" | 500(100)# keV
| 0.28(4) s
| 0+
|-
|-
| SF (.31%)
| <sup>255</sup>No
| (various)
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 153
| 255.093241(11)
| 3.1(2) min
| (1/2+)
|-
|-
| <sup>256</sup>No
| rowspan=2 style="text-indent:1em" | <sup>254m</sup>No
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=2 colspan="3" style="text-indent:2em" | 500(100)# keV
| rowspan=2|0.28(4) s
| style="text-align:right" | 154
| [[Isomeric transition|IT]] (80%)
| 256.094283(8)
| <sup>254</sup>No
| 2.91(5) s
| 0+
| rowspan=2|0+
|-
|-
| α (20%)
| <sup>257</sup>No
| <sup>250</sup>Fm
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 155
| 257.096877(23)
| 25(2) s
| (7/2+)
|-
|-
| <sup>258</sup>No
| rowspan=2|<sup>255</sup>No
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=2 style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 156
| rowspan=2 style="text-align:right" | 153
| rowspan=2|255.093241(11)
| 258.09821(22)#
| 1.2(2) ms
| rowspan=2|3.1(2) min
| α (61.4%)
| 0+
| <sup>251</sup>Fm
| rowspan=2|(1/2+)
|-
|-
| <sup>259</sup>No
| β<sup>+</sup> (38.6%)
| <sup>251</sup>Md
| style="text-align:right" | 102
|-
| style="text-align:right" | 157
| rowspan=3|<sup>256</sup>No
| 259.10103(11)#
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| 58(5) min
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 154
| (9/2+)#
| rowspan=3|256.094283(8)
| rowspan=3|2.91(5) s
| α (99.44%)
| <sup>252</sup>Fm
| rowspan=3|0+
|-
| SF (.55%)
| (various)
|-
| [[Electron capture|EC]] (.01%)
| <sup>256</sup>Md
|-
| rowspan=2|<sup>257</sup>No
| rowspan=2 style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=2 style="text-align:right" | 155
| rowspan=2|257.096877(23)
| rowspan=2|25(2) s
| α (99%)
| <sup>253</sup>Fm
| rowspan=2|(7/2+)
|-
| β<sup>+</sup> (1%)
| <sup>253</sup>Md
|-
| rowspan=3|<sup>258</sup>No
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 156
| rowspan=3|258.09821(22)#
| rowspan=3|1.2(2) ms
| SF (99.99%)
| (various)
| rowspan=3|0+
|-
| α (.01%)
| <sup>254</sup>Fm
|-
| β<sup>+</sup>β<sup>+</sup> (rare)
| <sup>258</sup>Fm
|-
| rowspan=3|<sup>259</sup>No
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=3 style="text-align:right" | 157
| rowspan=3|259.10103(11)#
| rowspan=3|58(5) min
| α (75%)
| <sup>254</sup>Fm
| rowspan=3|(9/2+)#
|-
| EC (25%)
| <sup>259</sup>Md
|-
| SF (10%)
| (various)
|-
|-
| <sup>260</sup>No
| <sup>260</sup>No
Line 121: Line 206:
| 260.10264(22)#
| 260.10264(22)#
| 106(8) ms
| 106(8) ms
| SF
| (various)
| 0+
| 0+
<!-- |-
<!-- |-
Line 130: Line 217:
| 3/2+# -->
| 3/2+# -->
|-
|-
| <sup>262</sup>No
| rowspan=2|<sup>262</sup>No
| style="text-align:right" | 102
| rowspan=2 style="text-align:right" | 102
| style="text-align:right" | 160
| rowspan=2 style="text-align:right" | 160
| 262.10730(48)#
| rowspan=2|262.10730(48)#
| ~5 ms
| rowspan=2|~5 ms
| 0+
| SF
| (various)
| rowspan=2|0+
|-
| β<sup>-</sup> (rare)
| <sup>262</sup>Lr
<!-- |-
<!-- |-
| <sup>263</sup>No
| <sup>263</sup>No

Revision as of 09:25, 22 May 2011

Nobelium (No) has no stable isotopes. There are 12 known radioisotopes from 250No to 262No, and 3 isomers, 251mNo, 253mNo, and 254mNo. The isotope with the longest half-life is 259No with a half-life of 58 minutes. The longest-lived isomer is 251mNo with a half-life of 1.7 seconds. A standard atomic mass cannot be given due to nobelium being an artificial element.

Table

nuclide
symbol
Z(p) N(n)  
isotopic mass (u)
 
half-life decay
mode(s)[1][n 1]
daughter
isotope(s)
nuclear
spin
excitation energy
250No 102 148 250.08751(22)# 5.7(8) µs SF (99.95%) (various) 0+
α (.05%) 246Fm
β+ (2.5E-4%) 250Md
251No 102 149 251.08901(19)# 0.78(2) s α (89%) 247Fm 7/2+#
SF (10%) (various)
β+ (1%) 251Md
251mNo 110(180)# keV 1.7(10) s 9/2-#
252No 102 150 252.088977(14) 2.27(14) s α (73.09%) 248Fm 0+
SF (26.9%) (various)
β+ (1%) 252Md
253No 102 151 253.09068(11)# 1.62(15) min α (80%) 249Fm (9/2-)#
β+ (20%) 253Md
SF (1E-3%) (various)
253mNo 129(19) keV 31 µs 5/2+#
254No[n 2] 102 152 254.090955(19) 51(10) s α (89.3%) 250Fm 0+
β+ (10%) 254Md
SF (.31%) (various)
254mNo 500(100)# keV 0.28(4) s IT (80%) 254No 0+
α (20%) 250Fm
255No 102 153 255.093241(11) 3.1(2) min α (61.4%) 251Fm (1/2+)
β+ (38.6%) 251Md
256No 102 154 256.094283(8) 2.91(5) s α (99.44%) 252Fm 0+
SF (.55%) (various)
EC (.01%) 256Md
257No 102 155 257.096877(23) 25(2) s α (99%) 253Fm (7/2+)
β+ (1%) 253Md
258No 102 156 258.09821(22)# 1.2(2) ms SF (99.99%) (various) 0+
α (.01%) 254Fm
β+β+ (rare) 258Fm
259No 102 157 259.10103(11)# 58(5) min α (75%) 254Fm (9/2+)#
EC (25%) 259Md
SF (10%) (various)
260No 102 158 260.10264(22)# 106(8) ms SF (various) 0+
262No 102 160 262.10730(48)# ~5 ms SF (various) 0+
β- (rare) 262Lr
  1. ^ Abbreviations:
    EC: Electron capture
    IT: Isomeric transition
    SF: Spontaneous fission
  2. ^ First isotope synthesized

Notes

  • Values marked # are not purely derived from experimental data, but at least partly from systematic trends. Spins with weak assignment arguments are enclosed in parentheses.
  • Uncertainties are given in concise form in parentheses after the corresponding last digits. Uncertainty values denote one standard deviation, except isotopic composition and standard atomic mass from IUPAC which use expanded uncertainties.

History of synthesis of isotopes by cold fusion

208Pb(48Ca,xn)256-xNo (x=1,2,3,4) This cold fusion reaction was first studied in 1979 at the FLNR. Further work in 1988 at the GSI measured EC and SF branchings in 254No. In 1989, the FLNR used the reaction to measure SF decay characteristics for the two isomers of 254No. The measurement of the 2n excitation function was reported in 2001 by Yuri Oganessian at the FLNR.

Patin et al. at the LBNL reported in 2002 the synthesis of 255-251No in the 1-4n exit channels and measured further decay data for these isotopes.

The reaction has recently been used at the Jyvaskylan Yliopisto Fysiikan Laitos (JYFL) using the RITU set-up to study K-isomerism in 254No. The scientists were able to measure two K-isomers with half-lives of 275 ms and 198 µs, respectively. They were assigned to 8- and 16+ K-isomeric levels.

The reaction was used in 2004-5 at the FLNR to study the spectroscopy of 255-253No. The team were able to confirm an isomeric level in 253No with a half-life of 43.5 µs.

208Pb(44Ca,xn)252-xNo (x=2) This reaction was studied in 2003 at the FLNR in a study of the spectroscopy of 250No.

207Pb(48Ca,xn)255-xNo (x=2) The measurement of the 2n excitation function for this reaction was reported in 2001 by Yuri Oganessian and co-workers at the FLNR. The reaction was used in 2004-5 to study the spectroscopy of 253No.

206Pb(48Ca,xn)254-xNo (x=1,2,3,4) The measurement of the 1-4n excitation functions for this reaction were reported in 2001 by Yuri Oganessian and co-workers at the FLNR. The 2n channel was further studied by the GSI to provide a spectroscopic determination of K-isomerism in 252No. A K-isomer with spin and parity 8- was detected with a half-life of 110 ms.

204Pb(48Ca,xn)252-xNo (x=2) The measurement of the 2n excitation function for this reaction was reported in 2001 by Yuri Oganessian at the FLNR. They reported a new isotope 250No with a half-life of 36µs. The reaction was used in 2003 to study the spectroscopy of 250No.They were able to observe two spontaneous fission activities with half-lives of 5.6µs and 54µs and assigned to 250No and 249No, respectively. The latter activity was later assigned to a K-isomer in 250No.[2] The reaction was reported in 2006 by Peterson et al. at the Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) in a study of SF in 250No. They detected two activities with half-lives of 3.7 µs and 43 µs and both assigned to 250No, the latter associated with a K-isomer.[3]

History of synthesis of isotopes by hot fusion

232Th(26Mg,xn)258-xNo (x=4,5,6) The cross sections for the 4-6n exit channels have been measured for this reaction at the FLNR.

238U(22Ne,xn)260-xNo (x=4,5,6) This reaction was first studied in 1964 at the FLNR. The team were able to detect decays from 252Fm and 250Fm. The 252Fm activity was associated with an ~8 s half-life and assigned to 256102 from the 4n channel, with a yield of 45 nb. They were also able to detect a 10 s spontaneous fission activity also tentatively assigned to 256102. Further work in 1966 on the reaction examined the detection of 250Fm decay using chemical separation and a parent activity with a half-life of ~50 s was reported and correctly assigned to 254102. They also detected a 10 s spontaneous fission activity tentatively assigned to 256102. The reaction was used in 1969 to study some initial chemistry of nobelium at the FLNR. They determined eka-ytterbium properties, consistent with nobelium as the heavier homologue. In 1970, they were able to study the SF properties of 256No. In 2002, Patin et al. reported the synthesis of 256No from the 4n channel but were unable to detect 257No.

The cross section values for the 4-6n channels have also been studied at the FLNR.

238U(20Ne,xn)258-xNo This reaction was studied in 1964 at the FLNR. No spontaneous fission activities were observed.

236U(22Ne,xn)258-xNo (x=4,5,6) The cross sections for the 4-6n exit channels have been measured for this reaction at the FLNR.

235U(22Ne,xn)257-xNo (x=5) This reaction was studied in 1970 at the FLNR. It was used to study the SF decay properties of 252No.

233U(22Ne,xn)255-xNo The synthesis of neutron deficient nobelium isotopes was studied in 1975 at the FLNR. In their experiments they observed a 250 µs SF activity which they tentatively assigned to 250No in the 5n exit channel. Later results have not been able to confirm this activity and it is currently unidentified.

242Pu(18O,xn)260-xNo (x=4?) This reaction was studied in 1966 at the FLNR. The team identified an 8.2 s SF activity tentatively assigned to 256102.

241Pu(16O,xn)257-xNo This reaction was first studied in 1958 at the FLNR. The team measured ~8.8 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 30 s and assigned to 253,252,251102. A repeat in 1960 produced 8.9 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 2-40 s and assigned to 253102 from the 4n channel. Confidence in these results was later diminished.

239Pu(18O,xn)257-xNo (x=5) This reaction was studied in 1970 at the FLNR in an effort to study the SF decay properties of 252No.

239Pu(16O,xn)255-xNo This reaction was first studied in 1958 at the FLNR. The team were able to measure ~8.8 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 30 s and assigned to 253,252,251102. A repeat in 1960 was unsuccessful and it was concluded the first results were probably associated with background effects.

243Am(15N,xn)258-xNo (x=4) This reaction was studied in 1966 at the FLNR. The team were able to detect 250Fm using chemical techniques and determined an associated half-life significantly higher than the reported 3 s by Berkeley for the supposed parent 254No. Further work later the same year measured 8.1 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 30-40 s.

243Am(14N,xn)257-xNo This reaction was studied in 1966 at the FLNR. They were unable to detect the 8.1 MeV alpha particles detected when using a N-15 beam.

241Am(15N,xn)256-xNo (x=4) The decay properties of 252No were examined in 1977 at Oak Ridge. The team calculated a half-life of 2.3 s and measured a 27% SF branching.

248Cm(18O,αxn)262-xNo (x=3) The synthesis of the new isotope 259No was reported in 1973 from the LBNL using this reaction.

248Cm(13C,xn)261-xNo (x=3?,4,5) This reaction was first studied in 1967 at the LBNL. The new isotopes 258No,257No and 256No were detected in the 3-5n channels. The reaction was repeated in 1970 to provide further decay data for 257No.

248Cm(12C,xn)260-xNo (4,5?) This reaction was studied in 1967 at the LBNL in their seminal study of nobelium isotopes. The reaction was used in 1990 at the LBNL to study the SF of 256No.

246Cm(13C,xn)259-xNo (4?,5?) This reaction was studied in 1967 at the LBNL in their seminal study of nobelium isotopes.

246Cm(12C,xn)258-xNo (4,5) This reaction was studied in 1958 by scientists at the LBNL using a 5% 246Cm curium target. They were able to measure 7.43 MeV decays from 250Fm, associated with a 3 s 254No parent activity, resulting from the 4n channel. The 3 s activity was later reassigned to 252No, resulting from reaction with the predominant 244Cm component in the target. It could however not be proved that it was not due to the contaminant 250mFm, unknown at the time. Later work in 1959 produced 8.3 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 3 s and a 30% SF branch. This was initially assigned to 254No and later reassigned to 252No, resulting from reaction with the 244Cm component in the target. The reaction was restudied in 1967 and activities assigned to 254No and 253No were detected.

244Cm(13C,xn)257-xNo (x=4) This reaction was first studied in 1957 at the Nobel Institute in Stockholm. The scientists detected 8.5 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 10 minutes. The activity was assigned to 251No or 253No. The results were later dismissed as background. The reaction was repeated by scientists at the LBNL in 1958 but they were unable to confirm the 8.5 MeV alpha particles. The reaction was further studied in 1967 at the LBNL and an activity assigned to 253No was measured.

244Cm(12C,xn)256-xNo (x=4,5) This reaction was studied in 1958 by scientists at the LBNL using a 95% 244Cm curium target. They were able to measure 7.43 MeV decays from 250Fm, associated with a 3 s 254No parent activity, resulting from the reaction (246Cm,4n). The 3 s activity was later reassigned to 252No, resulting from reaction (244Cm,4n). It could however not be proved that it was not due to the contaminant 250mFm, unknown at the time. Later work in 1959 produced 8.3 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 3 s and a 30% SF branch. This was initially assigned to 254No and later reassigned to 252No, resulting from reaction with the 244Cm component in the target. The reaction was restudied in 1967 at the LBNL and an new activity assigned to 251No was measured.

252Cf(12C,αxn)260-xNo (x=3?) This reaction was studied at the LBNL in 1961 as part of their search for element 104. They detected 8.2 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 15 s. This activity was assigned to a Z=102 isotope. Later work suggests an assignment to 257No, resulting most likely from the α3n channel with the 252Cf component of the californium target.

252Cf(11B,pxn)262-xNo (x=5?) This reaction was studied at the LBNL in 1961 as part of their search for element 103. They detected 8.2 MeV alpha particles with a half-life of 15 s. This activity was assigned to a Z=102 isotope. Later work suggests an assignment to 257No, resulting most likely from the p5n channel with the 252Cf component of the californium target.

249Cf(12C,αxn)257-xNo (x=2) This reaction was first studied in 1970 at the LBNL in a study of 255No. It was studied in 1971 at the Oak Ridge Laboratory. They were able to measure coincident Z=100 K X-rays from 255No, confirming the discovery of the element.

References

  1. ^ http://www.nucleonica.net/unc.aspx
  2. ^ Belozerov; Chelnokov, M.L.; Chepigin, V.I.; Drobina, T.P.; Gorshkov, V.A.; Kabachenko, A.P.; Malyshev, O.N.; Merkin, I.M.; Oganessian, Yu.Ts.; et al. (2003). "Spontaneous-fission decay properties and production cross-sections for the neutron-deficient nobelium isotopes formed in the 44, 48Ca + 204, 206, 208Pb reactions". European Physical Journal A. 16 (4): 447–456. doi:10.1140/epja/i2002-10109-6. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |last= (help); More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
  3. ^ D. Peterson; et al. (2006). "Decay modes of 250No". Physical Review C. 74: 014316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.014316. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)