User talk:Neo-Jay

Pushpin maps

When adding a pushpin map to an article infobox, please use the provincial one (China XX) when available. The national map does not provide enough detail on the location of a county. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 和 贡献 (C) 17:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, since the province-level map also cannot provide enough details, I will add pushpin maps on both provincial (if available) and national levels to China's city or county. I found that U.S cities (e.g., New York City) and counties (e.g. Madison County, Florida) also have maps on both state and national levels. Thanks. --Pengyanan (talk) 00:28, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I disagree about including a national map for something as small as a county. Most articles on US cities. However, all US counties use {{Infobox U.S. county}}, which by default provides two maps: Location of county within state, and location of state (not county) in the US. It seems editors there have agreed to So if you are going to do this to any article you find, the way forward should be carved out at WT:CHINA. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 和 贡献 (C) 01:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I am fine if you add province-level map to China's county. But I personally disagree about excluding the national map from it. It seems that Wikipedia has no consensus on which map should be used for Chinese counties. If you are going to add province-level map to, and remove national map from, any article you find, the way forward should also be carved out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China. --Pengyanan (talk) 02:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Fuquan Olympic School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fuquan Olympic School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuquan Olympic School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Madalibi (talk) 04:48, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for this notice. The article Fuquan Olympic School was created by Jackknightly on 10 May 2011. I have added more references to prove this school's notability and left my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuquan Olympic School to explain why it should not be deleted. --Pengyanan (talk) 06:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Neo-Jay! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

SS Edmund Fitzgerald

Nice deep undo on the SS Edmund Fitzgerald article! Thanks for all your hard work, making Wikipedia even more awesome! --pmj (talk) 08:45, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

You are welcome. And thank you for your contributions! --Pengyanan (talk) 09:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alibaba.com

Hello, Neo-Jay, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you worked on, Alibaba.com, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. fix the issues it addresses
3. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
4. save the page

It helps to explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the Help Desk. Thanks again for contributing!Template:Z79 W☯W ^t/c 04:33, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Your proposal was reverted. Your reason was "This is mostly a copy of sections of Alibaba Group." Then you should ask to merge Alibaba.com to Alibaba Group, not to delete it. Please see Wikipedia:Proposed deletion" and Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Thanks. --Pengyanan (talk) 07:20, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Ottoman Safavid War

Hi Neo Jay, you have recently created the disambiguation page of Ottoman-Safavid War. Well that information is already included in Ottoman–Persian Wars. Happy editting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your information. I redirected the disambiguation page Ottoman–Safavid War to the main article Ottoman–Persian Wars. --Pengyanan (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Hello, Neo-Jay. When you moved Richard Garnett to a new title and then changed the old title into a disambiguation page, you may have overlooked WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix all resulting mis-directed links.

Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Richard Garnett" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, R'n'B. Thanks for your message. I have updated all the rest 21 articles (not including talk pages and user pages), 3 Wikipedia project pages and 1 file page that contain internal links to Richard Garnett. Best regards. --Pengyanan (talk) 17:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Entombment of Christ

I'm afraid you are absolutely wrong about this. There are literally tens of thousands of "Entombments" in art, with the titles having many variants which are used by art historians according to taste. A page that just lists the handful that we happen to have articles on is no help to the reader, as the odds that the one he is looking for is one of these are really vanishingly small. It is far better to take the reader straight to an article, or section of the article, on the subject as a subject, with a list of links to the works on which we have an article. Pages supposedly disambiguating standard subjects of religious art like this are among the most useless on Wikipedia. Johnbod (talk) 06:23, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

I see you have reverted me without any further discussion. Please enter into discussion on this matter. Johnbod (talk) 06:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

It is you that redirected an established disambiguation article without any discussion. I have invited you to discuss at Talk:The Entombment (disambiguation), not here. You are not welcome to leave any comment about this issue at my talk page. BTW, thanks for your polite words. -- Sincerely yours, absolutely wrong Pengyanan (talk) 06:53, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Let me get this straight. You don't want my comments here, you say they should go somewhere else. When I post them there, you remove them. And your main editing interest is the Chinese Communist Party. I think I see now. Johnbod (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

What I removed is my own comment duplicated by you and a completely out-of-context and misleading comment moved from my user page. I am happy to discuss this issue at Talk:The Entombment (disambiguation), not here. BTW, are you implying that I am a communist? If so, I believe you are absolutely wrong about this. Don't you understand that editing a subject of articles does not mean supporting or favoring that subject? And what on earth is the relation between communism and our discussion about a disambiguation page? Please maintain civil. If you don't know how to, please read Wikipedia:Civility. It will be great if you will not come here annoying me any more. Thanks. --Pengyanan (talk) 17:06, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Mulan AfD / Your talk page

Hello Pengyanan / Neo-Jay. I just nominated Mulan (upcoming film)‎ for deletion, as you advised, see here.

Meanwhile, I must say that I find it confusing that you are using your "Pengyanan" account, but that you are using the talk page of the "Neo-Jay" account. Why not stick with User talk:Pengyanan? Cheers, theFace 15:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Face. Thanks for your information. I hope that Mulan (upcoming film)‎ can be kept as an article in Wikipedia, at least until we confirm that this film project is really cancelled. I found a news story released on May 9, 2011 (in Chinese), in which Zhang Ziyi said that the film Mulan was postponed because she had to finish Wong Kar-wai's film The Grandmasters first. I have posted my comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mulan (upcoming film), proposing wait and see. As for my account name, Pengyanan is my temporary name for some personal reason. I will switch my account name back to Neo-Jay some day. Thanks! --Pengyanan (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

The Artist

There is nothing in WP:RECENTISM about primary topics or redirects. If this principle did apply to redirects, it would mean that an established consensus should not be altered unduly to accommodate a recent event. In this situation, we are talking about a redirect that you retargeted without discussion just recently. Kauffner (talk) 13:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The Artist was a disambiguation page before I moved it to Artist (disambiguation). That means that I did not retarget it. It is you that regargeted it to The Artist (film). If you think that the film should be the primary page for The Artist, please go through the process of Wikipedia:Requested moves, asking to move The Artist (film) to The Artist. I presume that the rationale of your move request is that the film is more popular than other same-title articles. That might be because this film receives much recent public attention, thus relating to the spirit of Wikipedia:Recentism. --Pengyanan (talk) 13:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

User name

I think your two user names are set up incorrectly. You are obviously not using this user name any longer and instead are using the "P" name. Would you like assistance in fixing this? - UtherSRG (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2012 (UTC)