Jump to content

User talk:VanishedUserABC: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Hiss or myth: new section
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 276: Line 276:
:I have a strange feeling that this may be User:Serafin going through a proxy server. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007#top|talk]]) 05:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
:I have a strange feeling that this may be User:Serafin going through a proxy server. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007#top|talk]]) 05:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
::Well, in my opinion the lead should be revised to make the primary definition the psychiatric one (in accordance with [[DSM-IV Codes|DSM-IV]]). Narcissism is a psychological illness (''see [[Narcissistic personality disorder|here]]'') closely related to autism and schizophrenia (I have two qualifications in psychology as well as a fair amount clinical psychiatric experience). After taking my 'A' level in psychology I went to work in Napsbury Psychiatric Hospital. It was closed down after UK legislation changed the way acute sufferers of major psychiatric disorders are treated. My own view is that narcissism is related to an inability to enjoy sexual intercourse with another human being. A human being who can enjoy this in a loving and appreciative way rarely displays narcissistic traits. Anyhow, I think you were not really asking for my opinion were you? No, I believe our Dutch friend's edits to the Spirituality article undo the work of many good-natured editors over a long period (I have been editing wikipedia for eight years) and I do not think they improve what is there already. regards [[Special:Contributions/81.106.127.14|81.106.127.14]] ([[User talk:81.106.127.14|talk]]) 06:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
::Well, in my opinion the lead should be revised to make the primary definition the psychiatric one (in accordance with [[DSM-IV Codes|DSM-IV]]). Narcissism is a psychological illness (''see [[Narcissistic personality disorder|here]]'') closely related to autism and schizophrenia (I have two qualifications in psychology as well as a fair amount clinical psychiatric experience). After taking my 'A' level in psychology I went to work in Napsbury Psychiatric Hospital. It was closed down after UK legislation changed the way acute sufferers of major psychiatric disorders are treated. My own view is that narcissism is related to an inability to enjoy sexual intercourse with another human being. A human being who can enjoy this in a loving and appreciative way rarely displays narcissistic traits. Anyhow, I think you were not really asking for my opinion were you? No, I believe our Dutch friend's edits to the Spirituality article undo the work of many good-natured editors over a long period (I have been editing wikipedia for eight years) and I do not think they improve what is there already. regards [[Special:Contributions/81.106.127.14|81.106.127.14]] ([[User talk:81.106.127.14|talk]]) 06:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
:::Your edits start at 10 november 2011. Either you are boasting, or you're hiding something. [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<font size="2"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></font>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<font size="3"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></font>]] 07:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
::::What a churlish and presumptuous fellow you are! No, its just that you are unable to feel sympathetic joy and admiration for one whose work in Buddhism has been highly praised by leading scholars and practitioners or indeed that my work has been translated into Mandarin, Thai and Burmese and read on every continent of the globe. You have a very fragile ego and it is that which compels you to show resentment and hostility rather than respect and humility. To you it is boasting but to me it is displaying my credentials. I would be very surprised if you have a bachelor's degree. You certainly have no experience in publishing. Your copy-editing is appalling. Your English is clumsy and inelegant, full of errors of grammar and syntax. And yet you have the gall to go around destroying other people's work and replacing it with your pidgin English. [[Special:Contributions/81.106.127.14|81.106.127.14]] ([[User talk:81.106.127.14|talk]]) 08:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)


== Hiss or myth ==
== Hiss or myth ==

Revision as of 08:03, 3 February 2013


The answer to your question may already be in the FAQ section. That was just a test of the FAQ, no need to read it.

DYK for Supercomputing in China

The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Consecration and entrustment to Mary

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Areopagus sermon

The DYK project (nominate) 18:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for HIP 13044 b

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this one made over 11,200 hits. Simply south (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Animation database

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Knowledge of Christ

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Rich Representation Language

rʨanaɢ (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC) 18:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for PAD emotional state model

Thank you for your help Victuallers (talk) 06:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for NECA Project

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Holy Name of Jesus

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Person of Christ

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Right hemisphere brain damage

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Last Supper in Christian art

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jesus at Herod's Court

Materialscientist (talk) 06:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Langlois Bridge at Arles

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Wiki-Watch

Thanks for this article Victuallers (talk) 18:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ascension of Jesus in Christian art

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Imitation of Christ

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Five Discourses of Matthew

Calmer Waters 12:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Supercomputing in Japan

Materialscientist (talk) 16:11, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for History of supercomputing

The DYK project (nominate) 08:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Supercomputing in Europe

EncycloPetey (talk) 08:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Quasi-opportunistic supercomputing

Materialscientist (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Decision fatigue

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Water of Life (Christianity)

Materialscientist (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eternal life (Christianity)

Materialscientist (talk) 00:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Michaelion

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Left brain interpreter

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 18:38, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Intercession of Christ

Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Love of Christ

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Supercomputer architecture

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Supercomputer operating systems

--Allen3 talk 17:53, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Message passing in computer clusters

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting third opinion (again) on Spirituality

Hi History2007. Could you give a third opinion on Spirituality? See Talk:Spirituality#Lead, Talk:Spirituality#Conceptual background, Talk:Spirituality#Recent edits and Talk:Spirituality#Requesting third opinions on lead and definition. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:48, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a strange feeling that this may be User:Serafin going through a proxy server. History2007 (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, in my opinion the lead should be revised to make the primary definition the psychiatric one (in accordance with DSM-IV). Narcissism is a psychological illness (see here) closely related to autism and schizophrenia (I have two qualifications in psychology as well as a fair amount clinical psychiatric experience). After taking my 'A' level in psychology I went to work in Napsbury Psychiatric Hospital. It was closed down after UK legislation changed the way acute sufferers of major psychiatric disorders are treated. My own view is that narcissism is related to an inability to enjoy sexual intercourse with another human being. A human being who can enjoy this in a loving and appreciative way rarely displays narcissistic traits. Anyhow, I think you were not really asking for my opinion were you? No, I believe our Dutch friend's edits to the Spirituality article undo the work of many good-natured editors over a long period (I have been editing wikipedia for eight years) and I do not think they improve what is there already. regards 81.106.127.14 (talk) 06:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits start at 10 november 2011. Either you are boasting, or you're hiding something. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
What a churlish and presumptuous fellow you are! No, its just that you are unable to feel sympathetic joy and admiration for one whose work in Buddhism has been highly praised by leading scholars and practitioners or indeed that my work has been translated into Mandarin, Thai and Burmese and read on every continent of the globe. You have a very fragile ego and it is that which compels you to show resentment and hostility rather than respect and humility. To you it is boasting but to me it is displaying my credentials. I would be very surprised if you have a bachelor's degree. You certainly have no experience in publishing. Your copy-editing is appalling. Your English is clumsy and inelegant, full of errors of grammar and syntax. And yet you have the gall to go around destroying other people's work and replacing it with your pidgin English. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 08:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hiss or myth

You might, if you don't know about it already, find this gentleman's blog interesting.PiCo (talk) 06:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]