Jump to content

User talk:Razr Nation: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Top 100 meter times by NFL players: Take your personal attakcs somewhere else, thanks.
Line 83: Line 83:
The [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/66th Academy Awards/archive1|featured list nomination page]] for the [[66th Academy Awards]] has not been closed despite being promoted to FL status back in January and being featured on the Main Page last month.
The [[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/66th Academy Awards/archive1|featured list nomination page]] for the [[66th Academy Awards]] has not been closed despite being promoted to FL status back in January and being featured on the Main Page last month.
:--[[User:Birdienest81|Birdienest81]] ([[User talk:Birdienest81|talk]]) 03:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
:--[[User:Birdienest81|Birdienest81]] ([[User talk:Birdienest81|talk]]) 03:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

== Top 100 meter times by NFL players ==

[[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Top_100_meter_times_by_NFL_players&diff=604098988&oldid=604095216|Regarding your sudden decision]]. What the fuck?! I leave 15 sources discussing the subject and you decided for an unsupported, unsourced, opinion? What kind of administrator or decision maker are you? Most important, with this irresponsible decision, (or any decision like this you might make in the future) you would have wiped out a lot of accurate, valuable information collected and sourced by wikipedia editors. Fortunately I have saved it for posting elsewhere. If you continue to make unfounded decisions like this, you could be a horribly destructive force to this project. [[User:Trackinfo|Trackinfo]] ([[User talk:Trackinfo|talk]]) 03:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:15, 14 April 2014

Contributions

Schedule · Academy · To do · RFA · Templates · Files · Barnstars & Awards · Featured content · Good articles · GA reviews · DYK · DYK reviews · Articles


Archive
Razr Nation's archives
Go to
2016
Go to
2017-19
Go to
2022
Go to
2023


Steeplechase 2013

Hi Hahc- Thanks for giving me the Steeplestarter. I just wanted to follow up on if I would be receiving the two main awards for the Steeplechase 2013. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 17:32, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I forgot about those. Yes, I will try to give them down to you this coming week. Cheers. → Call me Hahc21 22:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FLC request

Hey Harold! Do you think you could leave a comment for Lo Nuestro Award for Pop Album of the Year? Erick (talk) 04:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hahc21. I've pinged a couple editors for feedback on my draft SAS Institute page and since you did the GA review on SAS (software) I figured I also owed you an FYI ping. Like with any page that is very positive or very negative and also representative of the sources, I expect its neutrality to be contested, especially in the context of my COI. It may also not be clear how to avoid repetition between the two articles.

I don't think the SAS (software) page would be a good choice as my first FA candidate, especially because it is a technical subject where my comprehension is low. However, I'm thinking the Institute page may be a good candidate. It is shorter, has much better sources and I would be motivated to reassure the community that it is done correctly and the positivity is not merely a result of my COI. CorporateM (Talk) 14:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Seumas McNally Grand Prize

slakrtalk / 18:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 09 April 2014

Message

Since you remained silent after my last message on your talk page regarding the deletion of an article I created, I assume you realized you made a blunder. Jonas Vinther (talk) 07:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. The fact that you disagree with my close doesn't make it inappropriate at all. Again: the you violated WP:NPOV claim is nonsense. NPOV is for writing article content, not taking administrative actions. There's a big difference. However, the fact that I'm not willing to overturn my close doesn't mean either that you can't contest it. You can feel free to file a deletion review of my close, and if it's overturned, I won't have problem with that. → Call me Hahc21 14:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to go that far, because everything single edit I do on Wikipedia is in the belief it's good faith edits. I have my mind and heart in the right place and I know I make a difference to Wikipedia. Jonas Vinther (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, Razr Nation. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Flyer22 (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Flyer22: Looks like it got lost. Maybe send it again? → Call me Hahc21 18:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I sent it again. And, like last time, I'm not getting a copy of it (though the copy option is marked)...which suggests to me that you didn't receive it. How about you email me, and I'll reply to you that way? Flyer22 (talk) 19:00, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 16, 2014)

Entertainers at a festival
Hello, Hahc21.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Festival


Previous selections: Lobamba • April Fools' Day


Get involved with the TAFI project! You can...
Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 00:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Opt-out instructions[reply]

Curious on AFD closing

Hello! I'm curious about the reasoning behind the closure at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top 100 meter times by NFL players. All the closure says is "delete" but there's no description to assist with understanding. I was involved in the AFD and it seemed to me to be close. Not complaining, just curious.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added a brief reasoning. Though mostly I closed it as delete because the keep votes held no substantial weight against those commenting that the list was not notable. → Call me Hahc21 02:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, thank you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unclosed WP:FLC page

Hi there,

The featured list nomination page for the 66th Academy Awards has not been closed despite being promoted to FL status back in January and being featured on the Main Page last month.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]