Can you explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship&diff=next&oldid=62356065 this]? --[[User:Ante Perkovic|Ante Perkovic]] 12:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Can you explain [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship&diff=next&oldid=62356065 this]? --[[User:Ante Perkovic|Ante Perkovic]] 12:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
After being blocked I decided to thoroughly contribute to the Wikipedia project under a different name (as you can see, it hasn't touched any Serbian articles, well some Serbian tennis player thanks to the random article button). It is nearly 8 o'clock in the morning, and I was having difficulties going to sleep, haven't actually been sleeping at all. (my last edit before that was at 2 am). I was rather tired (and still am) and I lost concentration for a moment. I thought that a fresh start would help things, but I made the unfortunate mistake of failing to log off while editing as PerfectStorm. My only contributions as C-c-c-c have been because of HRE "supposed death", where I felt that I needed to tell Bormalagurski, and since then only the edits to your allegations that you thankfully dropped. It didn't seem like it was Hipi, but Ferick does look like a plausible candidate, and I wanted the other uses to know that. Anyways, my user is a good guy:). He's got about 800 edits, mostly minor, spelling fixes, reverting vandalism. I've decided not to really change any content in the articles for fear of disputes and such. I've even been thanked for giving a user the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PerfectStorm#Thank_you_for_your_compliments.21 best compliment] he's ever gotten (changing his en-1 to en-2, because really his English was quite good and maybe deserved a en-3). I hope we can start of fresh, and I really hope Andrew Norman doesn't hear of this because even though I've been a valuable contributor, he will block me anyways. Here are my [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=PerfectStorm&offset=0&limit=2000 contributions], check them if you find a problem with any of them.
Triva: of my 751 edits to be exact, 750 have had edit summaries:) I was really mad when I forgot that one.
Statistics for: PerfectStorm
(Permissions: N/A)
- Total: 751 -
Main: 670
Talk: 8
User: 26
User talk: 34
Wikipedia: 9
Wikipedia talk: 4
-------------------
Total edits: 751
Minor edits: 388
Edits with edit summary: 750
Edits with manual edit summary: 750
Percent minor edits: 51.66% *
Percent edit summary use: 99.86% *
Percent manual edit summary use: 99.86%
Revision as of 12:41, 6 July 2006
Attention:
This IP address, 24.66.94.140, is registered to Shaw Communications (an ISP in Canada) and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Shaw Communications (an ISP in Canada) to report abuse.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to vandalism. Further acts of vandalism from this IP may result in another immediate block without warning. <center">[ contribs • block • block log]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Dan100 (Talk) 16:20, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do any testing here. CryptoDerk 06:22, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
This IP has been temporarily blocked because of vandalism to Wikipedia. To the party responsible: You are welcome to return when the block expires if you wish to make constructive edits. Wikipedia apologizes for any inconvenience to legitimate users on this IP. - Lucky 6.917:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Hall Monitor19:13, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Two of the articles you are editing, specifically Christina Aguilera and Britney Spears, are regular targets of vandalism, especially the sales figures sections you keep changing. So that I don't have to continually revert your changes, would you mind please providing a source for your edits, as per WP:CITE? Thank you. Hall Monitor23:06, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This is my second request asking that you WP:CITE sources for your changes to the Christina Aguilera article, which you failed to do today during this edit. Exactly one line above your edits it clearly states: "Do not edit this list without citing your changes in the edit summary. Failure to do so will have your edit reverted in accordance with WP:CITE". Continued edits in this fashion may be construed as vandalism and result in the removal of your editing priveleges. If you need assistance or have questions on how to properly provide sources, please contact me directly on my talk page. Thanks! Hall Monitor16:47, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit, Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. Thank you. Hall Monitor22:21, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.
Please do not remove links or blank info from the Walmart article. --Madchester 03:40, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Madchester 05:11, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
Please do not add vanity or advertising material on Wikipedia. Thank you. --Madchester 23:14, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -Loren05:24, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Enjoy your week-long block; cheers. --Madchester 07:05, August 28, 2005 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.-gadfium09:11, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Psy guy(talk)13:20, 21 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires.
October 2005
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ≈ jossi ≈20:38, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. JtkieferT | @ | C ----- 22:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This message is regarding the article Cell membrane. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [ contribs • block • block log ]
Regarding the article InvisionFree. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [ contribs • block • block log ]
I'd say you are looking for another block. I reverted your changes to Recent Deaths, since that was against the consensus we arrived at on the Talk page.
Not commenting on the messages immediately above, you've thrice removed a note from the 2005 French civil unrest article (or whatever they're calling it now) overview that noted that the rioters were largely Muslim, apparently on the grounds that there's no evidence that they're practicing muslims and Islam is a religion of peace. Well, aside from the fact that it's allover the media, there's the French news broadcast tape I found while removing anti-Islamic bias from the article that contains rioters shouting "allahu akbar!" on their merry way. More importantly: I think that Christianity, my religion, is a tool of peace, but that doesn't mean I can (or should want to) deny that the Crusades happened. --Kizor08:29, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked for 3 months for continuing to vandalise Wikipedia despite repeated requests not to. Please note that this is now your ninth unique block, [1] and any further acts of vandalism will consequently result in a significantly longer ban. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to resume editing after the block expires. Until then, you shall be able to read Wikipedia articles, but not write page changes. Should you have any questions regarding this restriction of editing privileges, please do not hesitate to have your school or district system administrator contact me directly. Best regards, Hall Monitor22:39, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This broadband cable IP is from Winnipeg and is from Shaw Communications. It is unfortunate that it is shared by many users. I wish I could edit.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. –Abe Dashiell(t/c)02:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text, deliberate misinformation, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. –Abe Dashiell(t/c)04:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --NaconKantari (話)|(郵便) 21:54, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with the page Profession on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Eddie23:34, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Funky Monkey20:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed undone by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot208:03, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to [[:Rave {24.66.94.140]], you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. } A link to the edit I have identified as vandalism can be found here: link. If you believe this edit is not vandalism, please contact me. AmiDaniel (Talk) 08:04, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot206:54, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. ¡Dustimagic!(T/C)19:32, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
April 2006
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. -- ReyBrujo03:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Physical change was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot201:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Jacek Kendysz14:10, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Wal-Mart on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ˉˉanetode╞┬╡ 05:50, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. malo(tlk)(cntrbtns)02:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Ian Mortier was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot204:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to February 19 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot203:44, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Simple Plan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot202:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to The Beatles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger2202:18, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, please refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. --Yamla02:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Some Enchanted Evening (The Simpsons), are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. - Dakota~19:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Domo-kun was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot223:08, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Matthew Perry (actor) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot223:10, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Ringo Starr on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger2222:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Remy Shand. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger2222:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Sugar Jones, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Anger2222:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Johnny Eck, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Zpb5203:47, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Neil Young, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tachyon0120:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Neil Young was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot220:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Water pollution on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. DakPowers (Talk) 16:15, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Dog, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Alias Flood02:41, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Alpine skiing at the 1994 Winter Olympics was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot222:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
June 2006
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. - Mike Rosoft16:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Alexisonfire was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot215:17, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Tefillin on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Disavian03:46, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. Sango12321:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. Yanksox03:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Accuracy International AWP, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. David.Mestel16:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page Zeus on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kafziel20:16, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Climate was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot221:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Wolfmother. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Mets501talk22:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Shaun Eccles-Smith02:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Chronology, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Mets501 (talk)02:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Phone was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot203:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Pikachu was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot21:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wright brothers, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. —Mets501 (talk)21:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vandalism to 2006 FIFA World Cup - warning bv
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to 2006 FIFA World Cup, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. King of♥♦♣♠22:44, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. --Dakota~18:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for experimenting with the page AIDS on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. PrometheusX30312:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Blink-182 (album) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot207:40, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?!07:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Mea culpa. For some reason, for the moment I red your post, I understood that you are talking on the basis of some outside information. When I saw that all this is a hoax, I made wrong conclusion. I apologise for incovenience. --Ante Perkovic22:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have no news about him and have what happened to him. My guess is that he planned a scheme that went wrong and now he is trying to find a way out. There is possibility that there really was an accident, but that scenario is beginning to look very unlikely.
Do you know anyone here who know his e-mail address? Did anyone tried to send him an email? There must be someone from Serb community here who know his name and email address. I would expect some of you guys to dig out some info on what really happened. --Ante Perkovic23:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Republika Srpska (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot402:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
C-c-c-c?
Hi,
Regardless of quality of your edits (which I didn't bother to check)... someone using this IP signed as Cccc recently. See those 4 edits. Not that I care, but shouldn't you pause from editing wikipedia since your username is blocked?
After being blocked I decided to thoroughly contribute to the Wikipedia project under a different name (as you can see, it hasn't touched any Serbian articles, well some Serbian tennis player thanks to the random article button). It is nearly 8 o'clock in the morning, and I was having difficulties going to sleep, haven't actually been sleeping at all. (my last edit before that was at 2 am). I was rather tired (and still am) and I lost concentration for a moment. I thought that a fresh start would help things, but I made the unfortunate mistake of failing to log off while editing as PerfectStorm. My only contributions as C-c-c-c have been because of HRE "supposed death", where I felt that I needed to tell Bormalagurski, and since then only the edits to your allegations that you thankfully dropped. It didn't seem like it was Hipi, but Ferick does look like a plausible candidate, and I wanted the other uses to know that. Anyways, my user is a good guy:). He's got about 800 edits, mostly minor, spelling fixes, reverting vandalism. I've decided not to really change any content in the articles for fear of disputes and such. I've even been thanked for giving a user the best compliment he's ever gotten (changing his en-1 to en-2, because really his English was quite good and maybe deserved a en-3). I hope we can start of fresh, and I really hope Andrew Norman doesn't hear of this because even though I've been a valuable contributor, he will block me anyways. Here are my contributions, check them if you find a problem with any of them.
Triva: of my 751 edits to be exact, 750 have had edit summaries:) I was really mad when I forgot that one.
Attention:
Ready Aim Fire! 05:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I'm PerfectStorm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gordon Downie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 17:51, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
