Jump to content

User talk:Steven Paul Fisher: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
CorenSearchBot (talk | contribs)
Notifying user of possible copyvio on Doug scrivner
Line 171: Line 171:


Steven Paul Fisher[[Special:Contributions/24.9.139.246|24.9.139.246]] ([[User talk:24.9.139.246|talk]]) 13:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Steven Paul Fisher[[Special:Contributions/24.9.139.246|24.9.139.246]] ([[User talk:24.9.139.246|talk]]) 13:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
==[[:Doug scrivner]]==
[[Image:Copyright-problem.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]]
This is an automated message from [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]]. I have performed a web search with the contents of [[:Doug scrivner]], and it appears to include material copied directly from http://educatingtomorrowslawyers.du.edu/about-etl/etl-advisory-committee/douglas-g-scrivner/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not [[Wikipedia:Public domain|public domain]] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyright policy]] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see [[Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials]] for the procedure.)<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 18:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:05, 23 June 2015

Hello. Dr. Fisher. I have just reviewed the OTRS permission ticket for the article Harold Mendelsohn. I see that you were given some code to paste on the talk pages of articles you create to help avoid confusion over the copyright status of the content. I have pasted this code (with slight modification, to identify the university) on your user page, at User:Steven Paul Fisher. You should be able to just copy-paste it (curly brackets and all) to the article's talk pages. Please be sure you are logged in when you do this - these tags are not generally supposed to be applied by individuals who are not OTRS agents, and I fear that your doing so as an IP edtor is likely to cause some confusion. If people are confused by your doing so under your named account, you can simply point them to your user page and note that the template was placed there by somebody who is an OTRS agent. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

As an additional note, I noticed your talk page was getting a bit long and unwieldy. Since I see you've edited in response to your last notice, I have taken the great liberty of archiving it for you. This is meant to be helpful to you; if this is unwelcome, I do apologize and will happily restore your talk page to the condition it was in. :) None of the contents have been deleted; they are simply now located at User talk:Steven Paul Fisher/Archive 1. We generally do not encourage deletion of talk page contents, but archival is common. I'd encourage you to transfer anything from your talk page that you are finished reading and no longer want or need to that subpage.

Happy editing, and do please feel free to stop by my talk page if I can be of assistance. I would also encourage you to visit the Wikipedia:Teahouse if you need help. This is meant to be a welcoming environment for newcomers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to determine how many times a page I created was visited/hit?

Steven Paul FisherSteven Paul Fisher (talk) 20:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks. One of the frustrating things about creating entries for Wikipedia is you never get the same editor and so you get conflicting information and feedback. 16:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)24.9.139.246 (talk)Steven Paul Fisher


Hi - thank you - you are a big help. I had a couple of Sandbox questions - is it really three weeks before a response? I was encouraged to use Sandbox rather than creating a new articles directly, but three weeks is very long. Also - is it ok to post more than one article draft in Sandbox at a time?

Steven Paul Fisher — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.253.229.146 (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia articles

If you go to other encyclopedias you will notice that the first sentence of an article often defines the topic. Would you add such a sentence to Deatt Hudson? MicroPaLeo (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have an unrlated question. I currently have an article in Sandbox awaiting review. Can I start on a draft of another article in Sandbox? I don't see where to start/edit/submit another article.

Steven Paul Fisher — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.253.229.146 (talk) 21:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Earl Roeder (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Onel5969 (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Steven Paul Fisher, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 22:48, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Earl Roeder (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CraigyDavi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. —CraigyDavi (TC@) 17:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Earl Roeder (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Graeme Bartlett was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is the use of the OTRS tagging on the article draft. That suggests that it is copied from somewhere else. Given that you have a number it means that you have a response. However only an OTRS volunteer can confirm that it is OK and correct. I did not see any OTRS volunteer put it there. However if you can point out to me where the volunteer did place that template on Wikipedia then I could change my mind. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:27, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Now I see that User:Moonriddengirl asked you to do it. She should have included a link back to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Steven_Paul_Fisher&oldid=643003121 to show where this came from. I will take another look at the draft to see if there is any real problem. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Earl Roeder has been accepted

Robert Earl Roeder, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:43, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You made my day! Thank you 24.9.139.246 (talk) 12:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]

My article draft in Sandbox was accepted and posted to Wikipedia. How do I now remove it from Sandbox and begin a new draft there? Steven Paul Fisher Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you click on User:Steven Paul Fisher/sandbox now, you are taken to the article; but at the top, just under the title, is a line "(Redirected from User:Steven Paul Fisher/sandbox)". That is a link, and clicking on it will take you back to the actual sandbox page, which you can edit to remove the "redirect" that is there, and add something new.
You don't have to use the same sandbox page for each article: you can make as many WP:User subpages as you like, each starting with "User:Steven Paul Fisher/". A good way is to click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title, which will make a draft page for you with a link to useful advice and a button to send it for review when it is ready. JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK -I made a new Sandbox page and have a draft on it. One question - I am not ready to submit it yet but I do not see where you do that. I recall seeing a submit tab (or something similar) in my first Sandbox page. Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]

Put {{User sandbox}} at the top of the page. That will produce a "sandbox" template including a "submit" button for when you are ready. JohnCD (talk)

Not sure where you mean - can you be more specific?130.253.229.146 (talk) 19:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]

Hi, Professor Fischer. Thanks for creating this article. I have edited it a bit to add some footnotes to the references.
About creating new pages, maybe I could explain the method I use. You can create a user subpage with the name of the article that you want to create, say User:Steven Paul Fisher/draft MyNewArticle. See User subpages for instructions on how to do this. Basically you search for the name of the page you want to create, and it won't exist yet, so Wikipedia will offer to create it. I use this method because it makes it easier to manage multiple drafts and to delete them after the draft is moved to the main article space. And it leaves my sandbox for experimenting with various things. If you you have multiple subpages off of your user page, adding {{subpages}} to your user page makes them easier to find. You can see my user page for an example of how to do this. – Margin1522 (talk) 19:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SO MUCH for the great changes you made to my entry. It looks GREAT!24.9.139.246 (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Steven Paul Fisher[reply]

And thank you for creating this. It was an interesting article. – Margin1522 (talk) 14:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be my only reviewer? 24.9.139.246 (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]

I'd be happy to, but I'm not a member of the reviewers project yet. But I can stop by from time to time to see if there is anything that needs to be addressed. Generally the reviewers are more concerned with the sources than the formatting, so the best way to make them happy is to give lots of details about the sources that you already have. – Margin1522 (talk) 15:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by the reviewer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JMHamo (talk) 18:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JMHamo (talk) 14:34, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Bond (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Primefac (talk) 17:29, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use Wikipedia on there as that is not a link that goes there, thank you. Wgolf (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then why was I asked to add links to other related Wikipedia entries? I did andd one and it worked earler - now it is not there.130.253.229.146 (talk) 20:38, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Steven Paul Fisher[reply]

(talk page watcher) You should add links to other Wikipedia articles as Wikilinks, not as references. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 20:48, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Steven Paul Fisher. Please don't forget to use the code you were given on the talk pages of articles into which you paste copied content. A good bit of Emmit McHenry, for instance, is copied from the alumni page (See [1]). Without that notice, I'm afraid that content like this may be deleted at any time.

Again, the code is on your user page. If you don't understand how to use it, please leave a note at my talk page, and I am happy to explain. I do need to ask you, though, to please place the code on the talk pages of this and any other article you've created by copying content from your employer's website that does not bear this notice already. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Bond (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
wia (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steven, regarding Levette J. Davidson, you said that this article text comes from [2] (which I have visited the site and seen where it is available under the "Historical or Biographical Note" section) and that "This is a public domain, open access site with no copyright." That is not correct. Any creative work published in the United States beginning in 1989 is copyrighted, regardless of whether or not it bears a copyright notice. In order to accept this text, we would have to have proven that one of the following is the case: (a) it was published before 1978 with no copyright notice, (b) it was published before 1989 with no copyright notice AND the copyright was not subsequently registered, or (c) it was published before 1964 and the copyright was not renewed. From merely looking at the text on a website, we have no idea if any of those might be true and, accordingly, I have deleted the article. --B (talk) 13:12, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, B . :) Ticket:2015010610010681 applies to this. Mr. Fisher has a template he can put on the talk pages of new articles, but I'm afraid that this particular article predated the delivery of that template. He is the University Historian at the University of Denver. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:24, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Moonriddengirl: I have restored it. Will one of you please add the template and remove or modify the message claiming that being published on the web makes it public domain? --B (talk) 13:30, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since Mr. Fisher hasn't logged in for a while, happy to! Thanks. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:33, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Moonridden girl!

Steven Paul Fisher24.9.139.246 (talk) 13:42, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Doug scrivner, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://educatingtomorrowslawyers.du.edu/about-etl/etl-advisory-committee/douglas-g-scrivner/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]