User talk:Polyenetian

Polyenetian, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Polyenetian! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! MPS1992 (talk) 16:34, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Taiping Heavenly Kingdom

Please see my apology for not making a clear explanation of WP policies at Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Talk Page. ch (talk) 03:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

We should discuss any further changes at the section on the Talk Page, linked above. You should bear in mind that continuing to make edits that go against Wikipedia policies and after these are pointed out, still refusing over a period of time to discuss them may constitute Disruptive editing. Let's talk it over!ch (talk) 21:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Reponse: The only thing which needs to be done is that you need to see the new credible source I provided which clearly states the massacre of 40,000 manchus by the taiping rebels in nanjing, but you keep stubbornly insisting on writing it your way and completely ignoring the source provided instead of easily figuring out yourself, I am begining to think that you don't want people to know that 40,000 manchus were killed in Nanjing by the taiping for some strange reason.

Thanks for your response. I can see that you are sincere and attentive, and I repeat my welcome to Wikipedia in hopes that you will go on to many more contributions. But in order to build the encyclopedia in an orderly and reliable way, you and I and all editors have to know the Wikipedia rules. You would save yourself (and me!) much trouble if you look through the links that MPS1992 left you at the top of this page. Clicking on one of the links, which are underlined in blue, will take you to the relevant article.

Among the rules mentioned above are to sign your TalkPage entries with four tildes, like this: ~~~~. You have to do this even on your own TalkPage!

Let's continue the discussion of the article at its TalkPage, which you can reach directly by clicking on this link:Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Talk Page. All the best.ch (talk) 05:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Parsley Man. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Antisemitism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Parsley Man (talk) 23:38, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cantonese people. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Imminent77 (talk) 02:05, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Well you appear to be lying, how the hell is improving the source with revelant well researched infromation an act of vandalism or being unconstructive? You are not making any sense, I was obviously greatly aiding in the increase of more useful information of that wikipage, just because you don't like my editing style and words does not prove that I am being unconstructive or engaging in vandalism.

Do not call editors liars. Please read WP:AGF. Our articles should use formal English, and "get ugly" is far too informal. You need to be willing to learn from more experienced editors. Doug Weller talk 20:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: I second Doug Weller's politely restrained advice. In response to an uncivil comment, I also called WP:AFG to Polyenetian's attention here as well as pointing out the need to sign all postings.ch (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Mirrors

Thanks for contributing to the article Cantonese people ‎. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 11:25, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution needs to be added or the material removed. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 20:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your bias anti-Cantonese feelings makes me angry

I've been using wikipedia since 2015 October and I no problem until now !!! Very disappointing to know a fellow Chinese was doing this. I stopped editing for a week and came back only to find out that a Hokkien deliberately editing negative contents against Cantonese everywhere.

Is so obvious the main point of all your edits on Cantonese people, Japanese occupation of Hong Kong, Guangzhou all involves killing Cantonese. I would have no problem if you done out of historical basis but than I saw you deliberately removed the content of the Yuan dynasty militia killing people in Quanzhou than I started to know whats up. I studied your edits well and can see what your true intentions really are. For that reason I will do the same aswell in revenge.

I can easily do the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoklo_people

HOKKIEN MASSACRE HISTORY

History; Hokkien massacre by Song and Qing ".

" During the Song dynasty 960 - 1279, Hokkien people were targeted by the emperor and ordered the massacre of Hokkien peopple , many were killed but some escaped by hiding themselves. [12] "

" During the Qing dynasty, the Qing army massacred 150,000 people from Fujian, More than 50,000 people in Chaozhou. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_China

--- Indonesian Hokkien ---

" The Hoklo or Hokkien make up one of the Malaysian Chinese groups. There are also Hokkien or Hoklo among the Chinese Indonesians. In the 1740 Batavia massacre around 10,000 Hokkien were massacred with only 300 or 600 surviving the attack. As the first group of Chinese people to settle in large numbers, the Hokkien of southern Fujian became the dominant immigrant group until the middle of the 19th century. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1740_Batavia_massacre

--- Japanese rule of Taiwan ---

" During the Japanese rule in 1895 - 1945 , around 2000 Taiwanese women ( mostly Hokkien ) were used as sexual slaves for the imperial Japanese army. [22] The Japanese invasion of Taiwan ended up killing 14,000 civilians. "

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2015/06/24/2003621455

STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING !!!!

I really can't believe a fellow Chinese decided to be so anti-Cantonese. I mean even a I edited stuff about human crimes and massacre but I did it out of historical basis but you did it for either pleasure to humiliate or shame. Look at my edits, most of them are not related with Chinese although, I just make many edits on Cantonese sportmanship and few edits marriages of Cantonese people because I'm proud to be Cantonese.

I don't like those Hong Kong pricks for saying " Shina " but you deliberately edited on Hong Kong just because you associate Hong Kong with being Cantonese. You should know that most of the victims in Hong Kong are aboriginal Hong Kong people; they include Hakka, Hokkien, Tanka, Cantonese-Waitou people and we still do not have the correct statistic on the number of Hong Kong female being killed or rape since there was never a case of Hong Kong women protesting against Japan for their crimes.

Is common knowledge in Hong Kong that most of the victims were: Indigenous inhabitants of the New Territories (Hong Kong) who were not only victims but the ones who did most of the fighting against Japanese. Their population were depopulated by Japanese and Hong Kong have many historical documents on such things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_inhabitants_of_the_New_Territories_(Hong_Kong)

I can easily find stuff about Hokkien being people being raped and massacred. Like this.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=e3rQEf61G74C&pg=PA17&dq=hokkien+massacre&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiJmM2v5Z7QAhVpAcAKHV6QB8oQ6AEIJzAC#v=onepage&q=hokkien%20massacre&f=false

I'll keep an eye on your edits from now. I hope you don't try to make any more disgusting edits against your Chinese brothers. If I find out you did this again promise you I will retaliate will full force. If I see anything edited against Cantonese people I would know it's you and I'll make sure everyone will know about the rape, killing of Hokkien people. This is the first time I ever had so much against my fellow Chinese. Is sad that we already have Hong Kong idiots and Taiwanese scums betraying Chinese but now even a fellow Chinese.

There are 300+ pages related with Hokkien, Fujian, Taiwanese and I doubt you could check everyone of them and even pages that unrelated I could easily mention Hokkien. Even if you trace my first account I'll make sure I use keep creating extra new account. I'll create dozens more so you can't trace no matter. It only takes me 2 minutes create a wiki account.

So please don't do this anymore. Remove the things I've edited on Hokkien and Fujian ( I did out anger and revenge, I really wanted to edited in hundreds of pages).

77.98.238.98 (talk) 12:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

RESPONSE:

Ha ha ha what are you talking about? The Batavia massacre only killed 10,000 hakkas (the batavia massacre happened at batavia where hakkas populated you stupid illogical idiot, just because hokiens form the majorit of chinese indonesians doesn't mean they occupy every single location where cinese indonesians reside). hakkas were killed. Yes, the japanese did kill 14,000 people on taiwan, but most of them were hakka soldiers and qing troops from other provinces, civilians were hardly killed :( And spekaing of 14,000 people killed, the japanese killed 14,000 (mostly cantonese) with bombing and occupation execution and raped 10,000 (mostly cantonese again) in both hong kong during both the battle and pccupation The japanese also killed 20,000 cantonese with bionic plague tests in unit 841 and many tens of thousands more cantonese were killed in various other open field and surgical experiments. and not to mention widespread killings, rapes and famine which killed an ernomous amount of catonese people all over guangdong, all these experiences the cantonese population suffered during WW2. There are thousands of eyewitnesses accounts and interviews from cantonese ww2 surivors who saw japanese massacring whole cantonese towns and villages, raping countless of cantonese women and forced many cantonese into prostitution in comfort stations.

I can also easily find many atrocities against cantonese, from manchus brutally kiling 100,000 cantonese in guangzhou to spanish, filipinos and japanese soldiers massacring 20,000 Cantonese in manila to 500,000 cantonese being hacked to death by hakkas during the punti-hakka clan wars, how do you feel about all these events? They seem far more brutal than what hokkiens have experienced :D. During the hakka punti clan wars, in sze yap taishan 93% of taishanese were killed by the hakkas alone! :D Maybe that's why taishanese are so helplessly stupid due to a severly small gene pool from having a huge less of their own to breed because they had less people to breed with? I undertsand you are trying to hide all these favts where cantonese were being killed like pigs, I have nothing against cantonese people but I only have a problem with not adding facts, I hav lately been interested in the violence affecting cantonese people and educate people on the horrors they saw, is there a problem with that? Just because I wrote a few historic accounts on historic cantonese deaths does not prove that I hate cantonese. In kuala lumpar malay rioters killed 143 cantonese and the police shot hundreds of cantonese to death during the 13 may incident, this is a fact, why are you so ashamed of it?

Additionally a miraculous event happened in 1915 as a natural disaster hit guangdong and guangxi killing 100,000 cantonese in guangzhou alone, just imagine how many 100,000s of cantonese were killed in the other areas of the affected provinces. Also, 1 million people in guangdong, most of them cantonese, starved to death during the communist famine.

I can also find many instances where cantonese were being subjegated to masscare and rape: https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=ANsmE1gBRKsC&pg=PA181&dq=massacre+of+cantonese+people&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP66bZiaDQAhWIto8KHUW5CycQ6AEIHzAB#v=onepage&q=massacre%20of%20cantonese%20people&f=false After the taiping rebelion ended 70,000 cantonese were executed by the imperial chinese army and 1 million people were killed all over guangdong (most of them cantonese) : https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=XRTYwxpCDmIC&pg=PA231&lpg=PA231&dq=taishan+ww2+famine&source=bl&ots=ppLWsPWB-E&sig=GvmjkMQRj8ziPUBHqjwbG-wRKWA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixgs63qaDQAhWDsI8KHXOSBUwQ6AEISTAG#v=onepage&q=70,000%20killed%20in%20Guangzhou&f=false

Your ridiculous and baseless accusations saying I am hokkien, but I am not hokkien, I am something different which when revealed to you would come as a shock, if you choose to unreasonably respond just to silence me in writing historic truth on wikipage educating people, I would not hesitate to mention the ernomous number of massacres you cantonese felt, even in US you werke being hated by the white men. I could have said even worser things about you cantonese if I really wanted to be nasty, but I didn't, don't force me to be nasty because when I sart editing how many times you cantonese were being butchered, raped and starved to death, you will be regreting it for the rest of your life.

November 2016

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. "how many times you cantonese were being butchered, raped and starved to death, you will be regreting it for the rest of your life." The tone of your message is clearly inappropriate. You have been warned to be civilized before - this is your last warning. Cahk (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

== REPLY

Ha ha ha what are you talking about? The Batavia massacre only killed 10,000 hakkas (the batavia massacre happened on east java where hakkas populated you stupid fucking idiot, it doesn't where the location of manroity of minorities are). hakkas were killed. Yes, the japanese did kill 14,000 people on taiwan, but most of them were hakka soldiers and qing troops from other provinces, civilians were hardly killed :( And spekaing of 14,000 people killed, the japanese killed 14,000 (mostly cantonese) with bombing and occupation execution and raped 10,000 (mostly cantonese again) in both hong kong during both the battle and pccupation The japanese also killed 20,000 cantonese with bionic plague tests in unit 841 and many tens of thousands more cantonese were killed in various other open field and surgical experiments.

No No No.... sorry to disappoint yoyu. Batavia massacre were all 100% Hokkien, other Chinese did not even arrived until the 19th century. The first recorded batch of Chinese all game from Fujian provinces. Indonesian massacre of Indonesian-Chinese where the vast majority were Hokkien.: " Although the exact figures were not known, it was said that out of some 500,000 killed, 300,000 were ethnic Chinese "

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SGCkCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT92&dq=300,000+indonesian+chinese+killed&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi_ztThx6DQAhXqK8AKHd7XBWcQ6AEIRjAH#v=onepage&q=300%2C000%20indonesian%20chinese%20killed&f=false

MASSACRE OF TAIWANESE BY JAPANESE AND KUAMINTANG ( never mind the Dutch abusing Hokkiens as slaves labour aswell )

As for Taiwan, I wouldn't say hardly. 4,422 civilians dead and 2,660 military personnel killed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasion_of_Taiwan_(1895)

February 28 incident

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_28_Incident

10,000 to 30,000 or more Taiwanese people were killed/massacred by Kuamintang plus 100

Also known as White terror

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Terror_(Taiwan)

Around 140,000 Taiwanese were imprisoned during this period, of which about from 3,000–4,000 were executed

And speaking of rape here is Taiwanese DNA. 0.6% Of Taiwanese have a Y-DNA marker of Japanese men.

0.6% of 23 million Taiwanese = 138,000 Taiwanese people are descended from Japanese male ancestry ( grandfather, great-grandfather, great-great grandfather was Japanese ).

No surprise, because in addition to 2000 Taiwanese female sexual slaves you have include the 50 years of Japanese army visiting Taiwanese brothels and engaging sex with local females as 95% of Japanese in Taiwan were males, mostly soldiers.

'and not to mention widespread killings, rapes and famine which killed an ernomous amount of catonese people all over guangdong, all these experiences the cantonese population suffered during WW2. There are thousands of eyewitnesses accounts and interviews from cantonese ww2 surivors who saw japanese massacring whole cantonese towns and villages, raping countless of cantonese women and forced many cantonese into prostitution in comfort stations.Italic text

Go ahead and show me this countless rapes, prostitution, eyewitness accounts, interviews. YOU'RE FULL OF CRAP. I suggest you take a look at rape of nanking to learn more about eyewitness and interviews. Do you really think that mere empty words are going to prove anything.

You should know = Guangdong = Hakka, Cantonese, Taishanese, Teochew, Tanka, Hokkien, ( in fact southwestern Guangdong are Hokkien )

Try this " 8 Nation orgy alliance-gangbang in Northern China; by Japan, Germany, France, US. England, Australia, Dutch, Italy "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boxer_Rebellion

Thousands of Chinese women committed suicide; The Daily Telegraph journalist E. J. Dillon stated it was to avoid rape by Alliance forces, and he witnessed the mutilated corpses of Chinese women who were raped and killed by the Alliance troops. The French commander dismissed the rapes, attributing them to "gallantry of the French soldier." A foreign journalist, George Lynch, said "there are things that I must not write, and that may not be printed in England, which would seem to show that this Western civilization of ours is merely a veneer over savagery."[108]

" I can also easily find many atrocities against cantonese, from manchus brutally kiling 100,000 cantonese in guangzhou to spanish, filipinos and japanese soldiers massacring 20,000 Cantonese in manila to 500,000 cantonese being hacked to death by hakkas during the punti-hakka clan wars, how do you feel about all these events? They seem far more brutal than what hokkiens have experienced :D. During the hakka punti clan wars, in sze yap taishan 93% of taishanese were killed by the hakkas! :D Maybe that's why taishanese are so helplessly stupid due to a severly small gene pool from having a huge less of their own to breed because they had less people to breed with? I undertsand you are trying to hide all these favts where cantonese were being killed like pigs, I have nothing against cantonese people but I only have a problem with not adding facts, I hav lately been interested in the violence affecting cantonese people and educate people on the horrors they saw, is there a problem with that? Just because I wrote a few historic accounts on historic cantonese deaths does not prove that I hate cantonese. In kuala lumpar malay rioters killed 143 cantonese and the police shot hundreds of cantonese to death during the 13 may incident, this is a fact, why are you so ashamed of it? "

Manchus killing 100,000 mostly Ming dynasty soldiers and local civilians ( Guangzhou the last hold ).

As for Filipino-Chinese, you cannot even find one single text from google book source of even from articles saying the early Filipino-Chinese were Cantonese or even from Guangdong. The only part that says it's in wikipedia and without even a damn source to back it up. So please go ahead and show this year 1603 Filipino Chinese is Cantonese. Hard to trust a messy wiki page with over 200 citations ( lacking source ). I could easily remove the data write now since there is no source to even back it up.

Malaysian Chinese, Kuala Kumpar. You really are a joke, again it does not mention Cantonese and not to mention the demographic population from 1966 is different to the ones in 1980's where it started become mostly Cantonese. For example: Kuala Lumpur demographic: " A census in 1891 of uncertain accuracy gave a figure of 43,796 inhabitants, 79% of whom were Chinese (71% of the Chinese were Hakka), 14% Malay, and 6% Indian.[98] "

Lol We are talking exaggerated bullshit here, you really need to get back to your human senses.Lol 500,000 Cantonese and 93% Taishanese killed in Punti-Hakka war that's like saying 8 million Hakka were killed by Taishanese, Cantonese. We Hakka in Sze yup ( Taishan, Xinhui, Heshan, Enping, Kaiping ) dropped to 3%, so does that mean 97% Hakka were killed.

Hakka lost the war to Taishanese, Cantonese. What's your point?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punti-Hakka_Clan_Wars

"Conflict reached a devastating scale. Over a million died and thousands of villages were destroyed. Because the Punti significantly outnumbered the Hakka, the Hakka losses were more extensive. After the clan war, the population share of Hakka in the Sze Yup area dropped to 3% with many relocated to Guangxi. "

" Additionally a miraculous event happened in 1915 as a natural disaster hit guangdong and guangxi killing 100,000 cantonese in guangzhou alone, just imagine how many 100,000s of cantonese were killed in the other areas of the affected provinces. Also, 1 million people in guangdong, most of them cantonese, starved to death during the communist famine. " Italic text

Don't get cocky

Guangxi population: 32% Guangxi Chinese, 35% Cantonese, 20% Hunanese dialect speakers, 10% Hakka,

Guangdong population: 60 million Cantonese, 7 million Taishanese, 25 million Teochew, 70 million Hakka, 4 million Hokkien

Cantonese/Taishanese make up 40% of Hong Kong in the past before 1949 but 67% population today are Cantonese and Taishanese after 1949, 33% belong to other dialect group. More importantly pre-1949 a third (1/3) of Hong Kong used to belong to indigenous inhabitants. Many areas, districts, towns, villages in Hong Kong are populated by people of non-Cantonese origin although there is a saying that all Hong Kong people can be regarded as Cantonese since they have assimilated into Cantonese culture, language but from my experience Hong Kong have this strong identity with being Hong Kongers so it's not about being Cantonese

" I can also find many instances where cantonese were being subjegated to masscare and rape: https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=ANsmE1gBRKsC&pg=PA181&dq=massacre+of+cantonese+people&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP66bZiaDQAhWIto8KHUW5CycQ6AEIHzAB#v=onepage&q=massacre%20of%20cantonese%20people&f=false After the taiping rebelion ended 70,000 cantonese were executed by the imperial chinese army and 1 million people were killed all over guangdong (most of them cantonese) : https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=XRTYwxpCDmIC&pg=PA231&lpg=PA231&dq=taishan+ww2+famine&source=bl&ots=ppLWsPWB-E&sig=GvmjkMQRj8ziPUBHqjwbG-wRKWA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixgs63qaDQAhWDsI8KHXOSBUwQ6AEISTAG#v=onepage&q=70,000%20killed%20in%20Guangzhou&f=false "Italic text

Lol what a moron idiot. You take these google book wordings too seriously. It says " Perhaps " 1 million people were executed , meaning the it is just the guessing of author wakeman, it's not official data. It is the same shit with hindus author exaggerating Muslims killed 200 million Indians, totally different to official data of Nanking. A written statistic not a official statistic, you can find those in thousands of google books. It's not my fault that you idiots believe in everything you read.

Where does it say Cantonese anyway ? it's clearly talking about the Taiping rebels and their families.

" After the surrender of the Hakkas, the Chinese authorities committed enormous massacres against the Hakkas, executing at least 30,000 Hakkas each day during the height of their operation.[33] These policies of mass murder of civilians occurred elsewhere in China, including Anhui,[34][35] and Nanjing.[36] "

If we follow your stupid ass logic than we should edit on Wikipedia 80,000 Nanjing women were raped instead and you can find over 100+ books with these 80,000 figure but most people are hesitant to post this because is too offensive and hurting to the Chinese.

" A recent study has shown that as many as 80,000 women had been raped, many of them then murdered, at Nanjing "

Science and Football III: Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Science ...

By Thomas Reilly

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=EisnZHAMbqkC&pg=PA224&dq=rape+of+nanking+80,000+women&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjHwOXrwqDQAhVFK8AKHSkoDmo4ChDoAQg-MAY#v=onepage&q=rape%20of%20nanking%2080%2C000%20women&f=false

" Your ridiculous and baseless accusations saying I am hokkien, but I am not hokkien, I am something different which when revealed to you would come as a shock, if you choose to unreasonably respond just to silence me in writing historic truth on wikipage educating people, I would not hesitate to mention the ernomous number of massacres you cantonese felt, even in US you were being hated by the white men. I could have said even worser things about you cantonese if I really wanted to be nasty, but I didn't, don't force me to be nasty because when I sart editing how many times you cantonese were being butchered, raped and starved to death, you will be regreting it for the rest of your life. "

I can clearly see your Hokkien after watching your edit in Hokkien and Hokkien-related wiki pages. It's not that hard to reach to a conclusion that you're some type of Hokkien.

Go ahead and try mention these enormous massacres of Cantonese. I guarantee what you can give to Cantonese I will give 10x more to you Hokkien shit or Northern Chinese.

Speaking of raped, butchered, starved to death....... a complete joke if we can compare with the rest of China. I haven't even mention the conquests of northern China 20x by nomadic warriors from the north.

77.98.238.98 (talk) 04:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)