Talk:Scarlett Johansson: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:27, 6 August 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scarlett Johansson article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 30 days

Scarlett Johansson is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 30, 2019.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 19, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
August 9, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept
November 23, 2017	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers FA‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as High-importance).

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

New York City FA‑class Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pop music FA‑class Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Women FA‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Template:Vital article

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 28, 2017.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Template:Friendly search suggestions

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 22, 2018.

Lead section lacking in post-2014 material

Hey y'all, the lead has almost nothing about Johansson's post-2014 career, which seems like an oversight (especially given that she was the highest-grossing actress of 2016). Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 03:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

6 images is cap. End of.

I’m not going back and forth with you.... There were way too many pictures on this page including the one hanging off the edge, and two candids so I did my duty trim it down. We don’t even need her acting school. Another editor agreed with me. The MOS for images is abundantly clear. Trillfendi (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You made a bold edit and were reverted. By WP:BRD cycle, gain consensus for your edits instead of edit-warring. Also, I'm always smiling like the bitch I am but out here, WP:No personal attacks. ;) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Krimuk2.0: Where is the personal attack or are you too sensitive to understand lyrics to a hit song? Trillfendi (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm highly sensitive to songs and even more sensitive to reverts. My soul weeps. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I'm not seeing an excessive amount here - I would say the amount is fine. If there's an MOS that states 6 is enough then that should be presented. –Davey2010^Talk 14:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New lead image

I think we should replace the current lead image with this new image uploaded by Gage Skidmore on Commons. It's recent (July 2019) and is good enough to replace the old one IMO. Let me know what you think. --Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 16:05, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the current image is terrible. This one is way better. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think the replacement/2019 pic is better but - not having looked at the CC-BY-SA licensure - can it possibly be cropped to be more of a close-up? Shearonink (talk) 16:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging all May 2019 RFC participants @Trillfendi, Kolya Butternut, Rusted AutoParts, Flyer22 Reborn, and Ktrimi991:. –Davey2010^Talk 16:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed the most recent picture is much better, Maybe the image should be cropped on her face only tho?, Also apologies if it seemed OTT to revert however there's been continuous edit wars in the past of the infobox image which is why I prefer every infobox image change to seek consensus first. –Davey2010^Talk 16:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 :I think the replacement/2019 pic is better but - not having looked at the CC-BY-SA licensure - can it possibly be cropped to be more of a close-up? [[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 16:17, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 ::<small>Pinging all May 2019 RFC participants {{ping|Trillfendi|Kolya Butternut|Rusted_AutoParts|Flyer22 Reborn|Ktrimi991}}. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 16:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)</small>
+:Agreed the most recent picture is much better, Maybe the image should be cropped on her face only tho?, Also apologies if it seemed OTT to revert however there's been continuous edit wars in the past of the infobox image which is why I prefer every infobox image change to seek consensus first. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 16:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)