User talk:173.76.246.128

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (173.76.246.128) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! James-the-Charizard (talk to me!) (contribs) 00:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pokémon Diamond and Pearl has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pokémon Diamond and Pearl was changed by 173.76.246.128 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943819 on 2019-10-20T14:29:23+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kidnapping of Jayme Closs. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kidnapping of Jayme Closs was changed by 173.76.246.128 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938254 on 2019-10-20T14:32:30+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:32, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Patterson, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Patterson was changed by 173.76.246.128 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967657 on 2019-10-20T14:35:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:35, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Binary number. Favonian (talk) 14:59, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mgasparin (talk) 16:55, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Favonian (talk) 16:58, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Portal:Current events/2019 October 30

The news story you added is not notable enough for the current events section. See Wikipedia:How the Current events page works. shoy (reactions) 15:04, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Third have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McSly (talk) 22:29, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. McSly (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2008 K2 disaster. Dorsetonian (talk) 23:12, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 23:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Possible "Trivial Additions"

I hate to break it to you, but I feel like some of your additions to the pages on numbers, for "unique properties of numbers", just are... too trivial, and... not noteworthy? Well, maybe... maybe you could let me know why you think they are noteworthy, after all, I don't have the final say. You didn't do anything wrong or anything, I'm not going to revert your additions, I'm just letting you know what I think. MWYAHzephyriteMWYAH (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Only some of course, I'm just talking about stuff like "largest multiple of 60 below 100,000", that feels a bit... arbitrary, you could put loads of numbers up there for a reason like that, with a different number instead of 60. MWYAHzephyriteMWYAH (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

Hello, I'm Call me when you get the chance. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Portal:Current events/2020 August 12 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Call me when you get the chance 15:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Wayback Machine. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wayback Machine, you may be blocked from editing. Call me when you get the chance 22:54, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Nkon21. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Portal:Current events/2020 August 29—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 02:00, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 249 (number). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Call me when you get the chance 23:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 249 (number), you may be blocked from editing. Call me when you get the chance 03:04, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quarter month rule (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quarter month rule and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Quarter month rule, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, 173.76.246.128! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Quarter month rule

Hello, 173.76.246.128. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Quarter month rule, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Quarter month rule

Hello, 173.76.246.128. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quarter month rule".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2021 (UTC)