User talk:CommanderInDubio: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 20:38, 17 February 2021

Archives

Index

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Great job on being one of the 4000 most active Wikipedians in just 1 month! ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 18:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My very first article Gig Performer

Hi CommanderWaterford,

I'm an IT specialist and a guitarist, and would like to contribute on pages in these respective fields. When I wrote about Gig Performer, I researched similar topics, such as: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guitar_Rig https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MainStage_(software) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_Visualiser etc. etc.

I wanted to maintain this simple and informative style: quick overview, basic features, info box, and references from magazines, independent authors and their documentation. This topic is surely notable, because software is used for live gigging among many musicians, i.e. Chris Broderick from In Flames. For some magazines I don't have live preview (they must be purchased, no preview). https://www.musictech.net/news/magazine/musictech-207-how-to-set-up-your-studio-for-online-collaboration/

I don't see any problems with my topic, because I used existing pages as a guideline to form a simple article, and everybody can contribute in future.

Best regards, --Npudar (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Npudar, well I had a short look on your draft and as you can read from the Reviewers Spicy comment it is by far too advertising. Have a close look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia - if you need any further help it would be more easy to ask in the Teahouse, I will sent you an invitation. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:05, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sexism

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Sexism has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Twofingered Typist, thaaankkk youuu CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:46, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CommanderWaterford: You're most welcome. Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:59, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Sir! Wafa0mirani (talk) 21:25, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.

Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia and for providing a quick guide to available help pages for Wikipedia editors. Roxanne-snowden (talk) 12:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have a Beer on Me Award

		A beer on me!
		For your great contributions in fighting vandalism (if don't drink like me - have your favorite breverage on me) Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020 GOCE drive bling

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to CommanderWaterford for copy edits totaling over 20,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE July 2020 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk (talk) 18:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Total Articles, 3rd Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to CommanderWaterford for copyediting 22 articles during the GOCE July 2020 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk (talk) 18:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Guild of Copy Editors Leaderboard Award: Longest Article, 5th Place
		This Leaderboard Barnstar is awarded to CommanderWaterford for copyediting one of the five longest articles – 6,980 words – during the GOCE July 2020 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Tdslk (talk) 18:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hello CommanderInDubio! Thanks for that warm welcome and for the tips I can use to improve around here. Chinogrids (talk) 05:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2HDN CE

Yo! Thanks for the CE at 2 Hours Doing Nothing. However the CE seemed odd: the prose now becomes weird, and some things have been removed, such as the icon of the game. Can you explain the changes? The reference for "it has been downloaded 100,000 times" seems to have been removed too. Gerald WL 14:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure although I do not see nothing weird at all - the icon for the game is completely unrelated to the subject of the article itself, so it had been removed. The section of the video game seems to be more like being promo for it. The video game would (perhaps) need to have an own article but is has almost nothing to do with the article subject itself. Indeed one sentence only like e.g. "there has been a video game of the name xyz imitating the video) would have been sufficient cover. I would suggest discussing this rather on the discussion page of the article. Hope I could clarify things for you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CommanderWaterford, thanks for the clarification, it absolutely makes sense. However could you address the removal of the reference on "As of August 2020, it has been downloaded over 10,000 times"? Gerald WL 15:23, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Waldo Luis, sure, done. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CommanderWaterford, thanks for that! Gerald WL 15:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Welcome back. We crossed paths at the closed Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CommanderWaterford/Archive. Thank you for cleaning up ([1], [2], [3], [4]) articles I created. Astral Leap (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the strawberries, was not aware of the SPI. Enjoy editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:20, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you so much for your advice! 😊 Whamrockers (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Serving His Children

Hi, as you know you recently tagged Serving His Children with multiple issues. The first regarding notability and the breadth of sources I believe I have fixed. The second on viewpoints remain, as I wish to get your input. I've added relevant comments on the talk page for you to interact with. DMT biscuit (talk) 16:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

hi commander water ford why my page has been criteria for speedy deletion ?--Omarsultann (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omarsultann, it is explained in the deletion notification. All sources given at the article were written by the subject of the article itself. In the current state I do not see why its subject - a mechanical engineer - is important or significant, a quick google search also only gave me self-published articles of him. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Cyprus amateur Radio Society

The club is recognized at an international level from ITU,IARU,UN.

Why is the article deleted? I mean we are compliant with all the sources. We provided articles from several News Papers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephmsallam (talk • contribs) 06:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my article Deleted?

Hello CommanderInDubio!,

Sir, I recently submitted an article on popular youtuber Ani. K. Aniyan with the all adquate references and with a lot of hardwork. i dont see any fault in tbat article. Could you please accept it?

Fixing i-Sprint Innovations Page

Hi CommanderWaterford,

Thank you for viewing the i-Sprint Innovations Page on 4 Feb and indicated the need to fix the page due to notability issue. I have added some reference and like to have you to check on it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:I-Sprint_Innovations

Thank you.

Breezywind (talk) 09:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Breezywind, I added for you the resubmit button so you can submit your modified draft for review. Please also have a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A7s on old articles

Hi. I've seen you putting A7 tags on a number of articles that have been around for a long time such as Max Longin. The problem is, I have to go through every revision of the article (remember that a CSD only applies if there is no possible revision to revert to - this stops somebody blanking an article they don't like and then putting {{db-a1}} on it) and it's quite a time consuming task, and in a number of cases I've decided it's easier to put a PROD tag instead. Can I recommend you do this as well; if the article is abandoned and nobody cares about it, I can't imagine a PROD being controversial in the slightest. Plus it's easier for admins to delete as an expired PRODs can just be deleted without having to think about them. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ritchie333, I totally understand and see your point, I will give it a try with PROD although my experiences the last couple of days are making me feel that PROD is going to be easily removed and the articles will remain in almost the same state as before. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page

I note that you have a habit of very quickly archiving discussions on your talk page that you don't like, rather than replying to them (such as this), but leave discussions that you like around, such as those that are visible here. You can (within reason) do what you want with your own talk page, but please be aware that such selective archiving only invites further scrutiny of your edits, rather than avoiding it. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Bridger, I saw no question and I archived it after 12 or so hours but I am glad that you demonstrate such interest for my talk Page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The question preceded the question mark, as usual. Please stop characterising non-vandalistic edits as vandalism, or I will ask for you to be blocked for doing so. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Placing A7s

Hi CommnaderWaterford. Please do not place A7 on an article 1 minute after creation as you did here. General practice is to wait at least 15 minutes (but an hour or two can't hurt). Such a quick placement of a tag may be considered WP:BITEY. Please let me know if you have any questions, by pinging me here or leaving a message on my talk page. Barkeep49 (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Barkeep49, I saw several sysops and other experienced editors e.g. the last days doing the same but I will sure take it in the future into account. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am happy to have this same word with anyone, even sysops. Feel free to give me a diff or two here or via email. Again thanks for taking this into account going forward. Best,

Thanks!

Just stopping by to say thanks for your help fixing up the stub tags on the articles I created :) ThereWerentAnyUsernamesLeft (talk) 07:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ThereWerentAnyUsernamesLeft, Coincidence :), you are welcome, please do not forget to provide more sources to your articles. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Coincidence? :) And I will, for those I was trying to create stubs to get things started. ThereWerentAnyUsernamesLeft (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs for places

I notice that you recently PRODded several articles on places (settlements and geographical features) on the grounds that there were no refs. Could you take a bit more time over your WP:BEFORE checks, including checking the available interWiki links, which for almost all those articles produced entirely adequate references. Perhaps take it a bit more slowly? Ingratis (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ingratis, yes that was a mistake I made a week ago or so which another editor pinged me, too, I saw you now added sources to all of those articles, thanks for that but will check my PRODS of this day again today. If I am PRODing nowadays I searched for sources w/o success. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, great - thanks.Ingratis (talk) 18:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on Draft:The 1220 to 1224 Camas, WA Mayor

Thanks for your edits to Draft:The 1220 to 1224 Camas, WA Mayor.

Tagged with G3 as vandalism. Aasim (talk) 06:12, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On a different note, with regards to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard - Wikipedia it would be more helpful if you explained your positioning. I think Voice of America is an appropriate source because even though it is funded by Congress, it still largely relies on independent reports from CNN and NPR (see NewsGuard Nutrition Label (newsguardtech.com)). That is just my two cents. It seems as if this editor you are dealing with is a new editor, not a problem troublemaker, so explaining will take some time. :) Aasim (talk) 06:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome Aasim, honestly I was not aware of any further discussion on VOA, I will have a look later on. PS: Tthis editor btw is not new IMHO, their seem to be an experienced editor on the Myanmar version and know exactly where and from whom to look for help here, how to tag etc etc. but I will sure check later on. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Helping me with an article on an Indian Model/ TV Personality

Hi CommanderWaterford! You've recently moved my article on the Indian Model/ TV Personality Scarlett M Rose to drafts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Scarlett_Rose). Could you help me out with this article? Because I can't be writing an article on her as she is my employer. I will provide links to articles about her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HashtagCJ (talk • contribs) 06:31, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HashtagCJ, you would need to have a look at Wikipedia:CONFLICT and perhaps might be an Idea to ask for help at the Teahouse, I saw you already have an invitation on your talk page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:21, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent PROD

Hello CommanderWaterford, thank you for rescuing the article that I'd tagged recently under BLPROD. Apologies for the quick tag, I should have probably waited for a longer time. I've just started reviewing articles (not as a patroller) but just like how I review drafts at AfC, and have made a few wrong tags here and there. I'd appreciate any advice that you'd like to give me for future article tags. Thanks, --Ashley yoursmile! 13:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleyyoursmile, honestly I was thinking about draftifyng this article but a 2 min Google Search gave me several good source so I just added them. :) No prob at all. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bahara Alavi

Hi, would you please send the draft to review? it's cleaned up and prapered. Khabat4545 (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khabat4545, I put a submit template into it, you can submit it now by yourself if you like to, you just need to hit the submit button. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very muchKhabat4545 (talk) 20:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can I be blocked from wikipedia

Can you explain can I get blocked from wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annoymous604 (talk • contribs) 21:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annoymous604, in general the answer would be yes if there is a reason for it but what makes you think that you could be blocked?! Perhaps your question is better located at the Teahouse. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will I be blocked if I keep doing copyright infringement

Hi will I be blocked if I keep doing copyright infringement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annoymous604 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Annoymous604, of course you will be blocked if you do so, have a look over here Wikipedia:Copyrights#Using_copyrighted_work_from_others. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

is wikipedia a super reliable source

hi commander i need to talk about dogs for my speech and the source needs to be very reliable so is Wikipedia super reliable — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annoymous604 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank's for taking down my article, it actually helped me, I am currently changing some mistakes that I did not realize, if you had no notified me, I would probably have not known that those mistakes were there, your work is appreciated. Thank you :) Signed, (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks! Hook0601 (talk) 22:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bands include people

Because bands include people they have been considered BLPs. Why are you removing the project from band articles? Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Görlitz, Because the template says "a living persoN" and not "persoNS" and because there are running DB reports on this issue. Groups of Persons cannot have a biography as far as I learned it in University. But I found now WP:BLPGROUP although I must admit this still does not clarify.CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I had not seen running db reports on the issue that bands and groups of people were tagged as part of the BLP project. I'd be interested to see those.

The issue is that BLPs have more rules governing certain statements and so band members need that protection. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And to be fair, I was initially opposed to the idea of adding them, but I have changed my opinion. Others have not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walter Görlitz, IMHO this makes no sense but still I have not found any essay/policy saying this. Anyway for any editor this would be very difficult to understand, I have no problem stopping this immediately (and I did in good faith) but there need some kind of clarification. Report: See here, one example Wikipedia:Database reports/Potential biographies of living people (1), lots of groups and bands listed. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How does bands include people and as people, they need BLP protection not make sense? If you check the history of the band articles you're changing, you should see when they were added to the BLP project and who added them. Follow-up on that level. You might also want to discuss with the musicians project. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

This commander is a very nice guy. I created my first article today and Commander introduced me to your community. Thanks for the warm welcome! Signed, TicTacTax (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inter Discount

My friend, there's literally a wikipedia page for Walmart, why would there be a problem for the second biggest electronics retail in Switzerland? Btw the page is already present on the german and french wikipedias. SamZane (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SamZane, your page had been without sources and read like an advertisement so I tagged it for speed deletion and Administrator Jimfbleak seemed to be of the same opinion so he deleted it. On your talk page you have an explanation. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

amir khoshbin

More resources and documentation have been added, including IDs and valid links to the article(amir khoshbin)and The sources used were also edited and most of the sources can be cited in English which I hope will resolve your ambiguities about the article. Thanks Mohammadkazemm (talk) 18:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mohammadkazemm, did you resubmit it for review? CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

:amir khoshbin

hi .in Articles for deletion/Amir Khoshbin You mentioned that some sources do not have the name of the person in question, so I added related links and ID cards, photos and more sources to prove ... Also, some links were modified ... I hope the reforms are convincing for you thanks Mohammadkazemm (talk) 19:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding draft:Javid_Parsa

Hello ; hope you are doing good , Please help me with Draft:Javid_Parsa i might had made some mistakes while creating this article please help me to improve this draft as an admin has put it on speedy deletion , please i request you make some possible changes in this draft thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prakrutiprajapanti (talk • contribs) 10:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prakrutiprajapanti, your draft has been deleted by Nick. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P has asked many editors to help her with her drafts. She has been advised to do her own work. David notMD (talk) 10:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David notMD, I see :) CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:51:27, 13 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Flashthomsom

Flashthomsom (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Carmel School Madhupur (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I've recently published an article on Carmel School Madhupur which isn't published because I have not added any reliable resource but i already added the school website and other link about the school website.

Hi @Flashthomsom:,I left you a comment while rejecting: Please have a look at Wikipedia:Notability (schools), your own school web site is not a reliable source because it is self-published. You could also ask for further help at the WPTeahouse. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the board website where it's clearly shows all the name and details about Carmel school Madhupur. Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Please publish my article Jayantamitra980 (talk) 17:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edits added to the page Henk Borgdorff

Dear,

I have edited my page Henk Borgdorff, following the instructions I received: CoI added and references to external sources (ORCOD-iD and Google Scholar). Do I answer the objections?

Kind regards, Henk Borgdorff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Henk Borgdorff (talk • contribs) 12:48, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Henk Borgdorff, I did a resubmit on your behalf, some other reviewer will have a look at it. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Henk Henk Borgdorff (talk) 13:11, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Elizabeth Mincoff-Marriage

Hi, I noticed you put the page Elizabeth Minncoff-Marriage back into draft (fair enough as it was basically a blank page!) However, I thought I'd followed the steps from Wikipedia:Translation to request a translation from its current page in German to an English version. Ie: create the page, add

in the article and submitting it. What had I done wrong? Any guidance greatly appreciated :) Richjones91 (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richjones91, it was a blank page (which is not an article by definition) only with the tag. If you would request a translation from the german version you would need to start the article, at least creating a so called stub WP:STUB OR you can request a translation from the Wikipedia:Requested articles (see also here: WP:TRANSLATETOHERE ). Hope that helps. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Richjones91 (talk) 17:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Sorry, just to double check. If I was to add some basic information into that draft page, enough to class it as a stub, and then add that tag? Richjones91 (talk) 17:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Richjones91, exactly, let me know as soon as you done it, please.CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help & advices

Hello

Thanks for reviewing my article. I intend to create multiple pages of artists and will be in need of your review and help to improve my contribution conformity with Wikipedia.

You can check the new draft (Tony Jazz) I have submitted for proposal if you have time.

Thanks in advance !--Art&football (talk) 22:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Art&football, as a rule of thumb I do not review articles again which I previously have rejected (for neutrality reasons), I guess one of the other reviewers will have a look over it shortly, please be patient there are more than 4,000 drafts on the queue. CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability Template

Hi, thank you for reviewing the article "Aimee Ng." Based on your suggestions, I have since added new content to it, and wonder if the article now fulfills the wikipedia requirements. If not, I'd appreciate your further advice or suggestions. Thank you! One2clear (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi CommanderWaterford! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! KirkburnFandom (talk) 07:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Commander has been here for much longer than you, why are you welcoming him KirkburnFandom?--Astral Leap (talk) 08:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know that but nobody left him a welcome message at the top of his talk page. Sorry about that though. KirkburnFandom (talk) 10:25, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

KirkburnFandom, oh there had been some a long time ago but contents of a talk page can (and should) be archived, see WP:ARCHIVE, anyway I appreciate it. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:47, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Thanks. Sorry about that. KirkburnFandom (talk) 10:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021 GOCE Drive bling

		The Modest Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to CommanderWaterford for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

	First editor
	Thanks for taking the time to review my first article. 17Gonzo (talk) 21:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

jacques & sadiki

Im not using vandalism, even used sources for both articles

why u trying to stop my work?

Hi @Dantasu:, I am not stopping your work at all nor did I marked it as vandalism, you are simply creating BLP articles without providing inline citations and are marking them in your first version directly by yourself as being "unsourced and needs sources" - I put them into Draft so you can work on your drafts calmly. Please have a look at Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:MINREF, a biography needs inline citations. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

jacques & sadiki

which kind of citation u mean ? i used sources like transfermarkt and ogol, isnt them enough?

is not the enough?

Louis De La Costa

Help Me! hey Commander Waterford not sure what i did wrong but you rejected my creation of Louis De La Costa on Sons of Anarchy I am he everything is factual look me up @LouisDeLaCosta

Space industry in India

Can you move Space industry in India back to the main space? It easily meets the criteria of WP:DYK now, since it has more than 1,600 characters. Raymond3023 (talk) 04:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond3023, you can easily can get it reviewed again by yourself, you just need to push the Resubmit Button in your article. CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jalaludin Rakhmat notability

Sorry, but I inform you that Rakhmat was a member of national parliament that I surely believe pass WP:NPOL. Thank you. --Tensa Februari (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Musicians

Hi Commander! Regarding your recent edits to Talk:Said Senhaji and Talk:Phil Jones (musician), {{WikiProject Musicians}} is a redirect to {{WikiProject Biography}}, so you've effectively added {{WikiProject Biography}} twice to these talk pages. Both of these talk pages have now been fixed. Could you please only add {{WikiProject Biography}} with the proper parameters in the future? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Adding {{WikiProject Musicians}} adds the page to Category:Biography articles without living parameter, which is what drew me to the pages. GoingBatty (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GoingBatty, I see, did not know that, I apologise. It was showed to me as a template wrapper. Will not happen again. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My use of the word "redirect" wasn't correct - you're correct that it's a wrapper. However, Template:WikiProject Musicians states that the template should always be substituted. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAC: Love for Sale

Hi. Found your name on my watchlist and wanted to ask if you can comment on or review my FAC, Love for Sale (Bilal album). It has been stale for a few weeks, and there are ambiguous or reluctant takes on the sourcing in the article that could use further discussion. The criteria for featured articles is WP:FA?, if you choose to do so. Thanks. All the best. isento (talk) 11:33, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving preliminary page to the mainspace

Hey CommanderWaterford. I was wondering why you re-directed a page from my sandbox to the mainspace. As you could probably tell, it was quite literally in its preliminary stages, and was not even close to ready for others to tag, categorize, read, etc. The page was User/Murphanian777/Preliminary football at Notre Dame. I'm sure there was a good reason, but I was hoping you could explain your reasoning. You have my best, Murphanian777 (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murphanian777, you accidentally published your sandbox as a mainspace article, I moved it into the mainspace assuming you wanted to have it there, let me know if I should move it back to Draftspace. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, how strange. Thank you then, and yes, I would prefer it back in draftspace at this time. 15:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

article removed? I don't understand

Hello, I am trying to add a page about the DiSSCo research infrastructure, first it was on the list for deletion because of a "copyright infringment", ok so I completely rewrote it, in a style not in any way promoting, in my own words, with a lot of independent resources etc and it is still deleted?? I put a lot of effort in in getting all the resources. I was fan of Wikipedia but am getting very disappointing now. Can you please undelete so I can discuss in the forum how the article can be further improved if further improvements are needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waddink (talk • contribs) 20:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waddink, your article was deleted by @Jimfbleak: because of a Copyright Infringement reported by @Sphilbrick:, you will need to ask them, also have a look at WP:COPY. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright infringement report was for the 15 Feb version, deleted also Feb 15, after which I wrote an entire new version of the article Feb 16 (no new copyright infringement reported) but that was deleted Feb 17. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waddink (talk • contribs) 20:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Waddink, your draft has been rejected by me 15 feb at 09.47am, the Copyvio was reported on your second draft at 3pm and today it was deleted by Jimfbleak and I am more than confident that there was a good reason for doing so but you will have to ask them. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suppprt, I have left a message for Jimfbleak. I have no clue how on earth this new draft could be a copyvio since I did not copy any text. Also I think the article gave a nice compilation of information about the subject that cannot currently be found anywhere else on the internet. Anyway, I will wait for a response from Jim because I think this is a misunderstanding. I still do not understand why you rejected it on the basis of missing independent resources though as I had included several. But that is fixable as there are plenty available.

@@ Line 424: / Line 424: @@
 The copyright infringement report was for the 15 Feb version, deleted also Feb 15, after which I wrote an entire new version of the article Feb 16 (no new copyright infringement reported) but that was deleted Feb 17.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><span class="autosigned" style="font-size:85%;">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Waddink|Waddink]] ([[User talk:Waddink#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Waddink|contribs]]) 20:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)</span> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 :{{u|Waddink}}, your draft has been rejected by me 15 feb at 09.47am, the Copyvio was reported on your second draft at 3pm and today it was deleted by Jimfbleak and I am more than confident that there was a good reason for doing so but you will have to ask them. [[User:CommanderWaterford|CommanderWaterford]] ([[User talk:CommanderWaterford#top|talk]]) 20:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
+Thanks for your suppprt, I have left a message for Jimfbleak. I have no clue how on earth this new draft could be a copyvio since I did not copy any text. Also I think the article gave a nice compilation of information about the subject that cannot currently be found anywhere else on the internet. Anyway, I will wait for a response from Jim because I think this is a misunderstanding. I still do not understand why you rejected it on the basis of missing independent resources though as I had included several. But that is fixable as there are plenty available.