User talk:Nihonjoe: Difference between revisions
→Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox disputed islands: split section, answer |
→FYI: new section |
||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
who is the leader of Japan? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55|2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55]] ([[User talk:2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55#top|talk]]) 18:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
who is the leader of Japan? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55|2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55]] ([[User talk:2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55#top|talk]]) 18:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
:{{re|2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55}} Depends on what you mean by "leader". The [[Prime Minister of Japan]] and the [[Naruhito|current emperor]] both have leadership roles. Or are you meaning something else? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 22:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
:{{re|2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55}} Depends on what you mean by "leader". The [[Prime Minister of Japan]] and the [[Naruhito|current emperor]] both have leadership roles. Or are you meaning something else? ···[[User:Nihonjoe|<span style="color:darkgreen;">日本穣</span>]] · <small>[[Special:Contributions/Nihonjoe|<span style="color:blue;">投稿</span>]] · [[User talk:Nihonjoe|Talk to Nihonjoe]] · [[WP:JA|<span style="color:maroon;">Join WP Japan</span>]]!</small> 22:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
== FYI == |
|||
An then-new-ish (since July 2020) editor you blocked late last year has a new, unblocked declared alt-account.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:JapanMunicialityRedirecter&diff=next&oldid=1008416965] |
|||
It's been a few months so ''if'' his current edits are not themselves disruptive, perhaps a "block with an opportunity to unblock ONE account, with appropriate conditions" either immediately or after a short "block-evasion-penalty-period" (say, 4-5 days, the age of the new account) might be in order. If his new account's contributions are similar to the old one, then it's just a routine block-evading sock. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 18:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:34, 23 February 2021
Generally, I'll reply here if you post here, so please watch this page if you want to see my reply. If replying on another page, use the A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Tottori Prefecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Akita Prefecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC) A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Ehime Prefecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC) A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Fukui Prefecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC) A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Okayama Prefecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC) A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Toyama Prefecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:26, 4 November 2020 (UTC) Use images of Studio GhibliHello Nihonjoe, on 18 September 2020, Studio Ghibli released images of 8 anime movies on their website. It says "Feel free to use it within the bounds of common sense." Can it be used on Wikipedia? Also see this article on Soranews. - Artanisen (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Translation for Paper Mario: The Origami KingHello! I've been sent by SandyGeorgia because I need your help in translation of a reference on Paper Mario: The Origami King that's in Japanese. It's reference 30, a review by the Famitsu Magazine. All I need to know is the title for the "title translation" parameter. Hope you can help! Le Panini Talk 22:39, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Revoking permission to move pagesHello Nihonjoe, since you commented on WP:ANI#Concerns about AichiWikiFixer's competence and lack of communication, I'm hoping you can coach me a little, since I'm out of practice with most admin tools. SnowFire's suggestion to revoke permission to move pages sounded like a no-brainer, so I thought I'd just go ahead and do that. But then I realized two things: ① I don't know how to remove user rights, and I see no how-to instructions for admins on Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Granting and revoking user rights and Wikipedia:Page mover. ② The user doesn't have the page mover permission. If I understand it correctly, then, what they do doesn't require any permission. So the only thing we can do is ask them. Right? On a related note; asking you since you have 日本 in your username: Do you think the lack of communication might be explained by a language barrier? ◅ Sebastian 14:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter messageHappy Thanksgiving!
Happy Bureaucratship Anniversary! Wishing Nihonjoe a very happy bureaucratship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:28, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
User:AquakulturinfoIs a scientist I am just teaching Wikipedia. As I don't see any edits except his "Hallo" can you please tell me how you knew what his purpose in Wikipedia was and blocked him? -- Dirk Franke (talk) 18:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
TfD ClosureI am a little confused by your close of Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_November_17#Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_assignment. Mainly, I don't understand what PAG rationale makes the keep votes (which were roughly equal in number) "stronger" than delete votes. And I'm also not sure why it was closed very soon after the 7th day when discussion was still active - with 3 extra responses on the day of closure; why wasn't it relisted? I'm also a bit concerned by the principle that a third party software (to my understanding, anyway) can mass-put a template on various articles, not bother clean it up after it is no longer relevant, something even multiple keep voters expressed concerns with and supported the removal of. TfD is, and often does, have closes which deal with these problems, and I think your close, despite all the discussion and substantial support for talk message conversion / orphaning expired usages, puts us right back to before the TfD started with no progress made. Hope you can advise on these concerns. Thanks, ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now openG'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Russian Academy of Natural SciencesCould you please rollback Russian Academy of Natural Sciences (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to the last stable version, or change the protection to partial from full? All I'm seeing is a number of new SPA accounts and ips edit-warring there. --Hipal (talk) 17:09, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closingG'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team I need some help for the "Wicked City (novel series)" articleJust now, I noticed that you needed the English titles for the "Wicked City" light novels back in 2015. So far, I improved the Wiki article so that it would be more encompassing of the series. I was wondering if you were able to create a synopsis (and review section) from Japanese sources. Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 06:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Brian Niemeier for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Niemeier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Niemeier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Date article Nihonjoe@Nihonjoe: Hello, I saw your year calendar editation, and it is absolutely all right. This user Elizium23 is just professional bully who just overturns Wikipedia rules and tries to devastate good environment of editations with his agressive litteral sticking to the rules paragraphs, and turn them over. Thanks for your time. --ThecentreCZ (talk) 06:53, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Misato Katsuragi § Misato on Rebuild.You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Misato Katsuragi § Misato on Rebuild.. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Template:Z48 Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox disputed islandsTemplate:Infobox disputed islands has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox islands. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Izno (talk) 01:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Leader of Japanwho is the leader of Japan? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6080:6F08:C200:1142:561:89C1:9D55 (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
FYIAn then-new-ish (since July 2020) editor you blocked late last year has a new, unblocked declared alt-account.[1] It's been a few months so if his current edits are not themselves disruptive, perhaps a "block with an opportunity to unblock ONE account, with appropriate conditions" either immediately or after a short "block-evasion-penalty-period" (say, 4-5 days, the age of the new account) might be in order. If his new account's contributions are similar to the old one, then it's just a routine block-evading sock. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 18:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC) |