Jump to content

Talk:Ron DeSantis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Ron DeSantis/Archive 2) (bot
No edit summary
Line 76: Line 76:
Thank you [[Special:Contributions/2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352|2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352]] ([[User talk:2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352|talk]]) 20:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you [[Special:Contributions/2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352|2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352]] ([[User talk:2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352|talk]]) 20:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Added the archive link for the broken page rather than removing the entire statement and reference '''[[User:Bsoyka|<span style="color:#0b369b;">Bsoyka</span>]]''' ''([[User talk:Bsoyka|<span style="color:#066b9d;">talk</span>]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Bsoyka|<span style="color:#066b9d;">contribs</span>]])'' 22:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> Added the archive link for the broken page rather than removing the entire statement and reference '''[[User:Bsoyka|<span style="color:#0b369b;">Bsoyka</span>]]''' ''([[User talk:Bsoyka|<span style="color:#066b9d;">talk</span>]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/Bsoyka|<span style="color:#066b9d;">contribs</span>]])'' 22:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

== COVID ==
The first sentence of this section says there were "mixed reviews" by experts and the media of his handling of COVID, yet only critical opinions are included. The entire section is written in a negative tone. That doesn't seem very balanced.

Revision as of 01:06, 28 July 2021

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2021

Please do not claim that Florida was epicenter of COVID-19 pandemic that is simply not true and never was 172.58.175.36 (talk) 11:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That claim is supported by the Washington Post. Thank you for your input! P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 13:52, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2024 prospects

DeSantis recently topped a straw poll for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. I do not have the authority to add this information, and I'm not sure where it would best fit, but it warrants a mention.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/559382-desantis-tops-trump-in-2024-presidential-straw-poll

Environment

I do not want to get into a political battle here and do not identify with either major political party. There needs to be much more added on Governor DeSantis positive Environmental initiatives for the State of Florida. He and his cabinet are doing so much to protect our environment, actually more than I have seen of any state in my lifetime.

Re:

Environment

Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan, a suite of 68 projects designed to restore the "River of Grass." $473 Mil

EAA Reservoir $64 Mil

Florida Climate Change $1 Bil! https://www.flgov.com/2021/05/12/governor-ron-desantis-signs-bill-to-further-strengthen-floridas-resiliency-efforts/

Piney Point Closure: 13-Apr-2021 https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/04/13/piney-point-closing-florida-gov-ron-desantis-announces-closure-plan/7205116002/

Stiffens Penalties Florida Black Bear Poaching

https://www.clickorlando.com/news/florida/2020/06/20/florida-governor-stiffens-penalties-against-bear-poaching/?fbclid=IwAR1XEDx91cVXs5QVW7TW2h-BChd3piUOxI_I7i5UxF9xL82CAP0sZf7xzoM VM321 (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 18 July 2021

The line with citation #148, claiming “Ron Desantis supports an audit of The Federal Reserve”, is a dead link and the link needs to be removed as does the unsubstantiated claim on this protected Wikipedia page.

Thank you 2601:240:E300:D4E0:6D21:E91D:B212:8352 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Added the archive link for the broken page rather than removing the entire statement and reference Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 22:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COVID

The first sentence of this section says there were "mixed reviews" by experts and the media of his handling of COVID, yet only critical opinions are included. The entire section is written in a negative tone. That doesn't seem very balanced.