Talk:Manosphere: Difference between revisions
Sangdeboeuf (talk | contribs) →Gotell & Dutton, 2016: doi-access=free Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
From the online abstract: "This book presents the first in-depth study of online misogyny and the manosphere from a [[psychoanalytic]] perspective." Could be useful for building the article. --[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 01:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC) |
From the online abstract: "This book presents the first in-depth study of online misogyny and the manosphere from a [[psychoanalytic]] perspective." Could be useful for building the article. --[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 01:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC) |
||
== The Manosphere has been associated with mass shootings etc. Really? == |
|||
I've just made an edit & had it reverted for reasons I don't understand so thought I'd raise it here. |
|||
The article makes this rather extravagant claim (twice): |
|||
It has also been associated with online harassment as well as some mass shootings and other real-world acts of violence, and has been implicated in radicalizing men into committing violence against women. |
|||
As it stands (after reversion & editing) that claim is supported by a fruit salad of references. I've checked the ones available to me & read the abstracts of the others. My comclusion is: |
|||
- None of the research cited supports the claim about mass shootings. |
|||
- None of the research cited supports the claim about real-world violence. |
|||
- The phrase "has been associated with" makes the claim essentially meaningless. One could make a similar claim about Santa Claus. |
|||
- Likewise "has been implicated in" |
|||
- The article as a whole has a political flavour rather than factual. Not what I'd like to see on Wikipedia. |
|||
Let me know if I'm wrong otherwise I will put my change back. |
|||
[[User:Tony999|Tony999]] ([[User talk:Tony999|talk]]) 07:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:27, 11 November 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manosphere article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
![]() | This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Agarcia584 (article contribs).
Gotell & Dutton, 2016
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- Gotell, Lise; Dutton, Emily (2016). "Sexual Violence in the 'Manosphere': Antifeminist Men's Rights Discourses on Rape". International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy. 5 (2): 65–80. doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.v5i2.310.
This (free to read) source could be useful for the article, as it has a good amount of material on the topic and can be freely used under a Creative Commons license. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- I remember coming across it in my research but for some reason I had doubts about its reliability. Can't for the life of me remember why now, though. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Johanssen, 2021
This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived. |
- Johanssen, Jacob (2021). Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003031581. ISBN 978-1-003-03158-1.
From the online abstract: "This book presents the first in-depth study of online misogyny and the manosphere from a psychoanalytic perspective." Could be useful for building the article. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
The Manosphere has been associated with mass shootings etc. Really?
I've just made an edit & had it reverted for reasons I don't understand so thought I'd raise it here.
The article makes this rather extravagant claim (twice): It has also been associated with online harassment as well as some mass shootings and other real-world acts of violence, and has been implicated in radicalizing men into committing violence against women.
As it stands (after reversion & editing) that claim is supported by a fruit salad of references. I've checked the ones available to me & read the abstracts of the others. My comclusion is: - None of the research cited supports the claim about mass shootings. - None of the research cited supports the claim about real-world violence. - The phrase "has been associated with" makes the claim essentially meaningless. One could make a similar claim about Santa Claus. - Likewise "has been implicated in" - The article as a whole has a political flavour rather than factual. Not what I'd like to see on Wikipedia.
Let me know if I'm wrong otherwise I will put my change back. Tony999 (talk) 07:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Start-Class Men's Issues articles
- Unknown-importance Men's Issues articles
- WikiProject Men's Issues articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Low-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class social movements task force articles
- Social movements task force articles
- Start-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- Start-Class Feminism articles
- Low-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Start-Class Discrimination articles
- Low-importance Discrimination articles
- WikiProject Discrimination articles
- Start-Class Conservatism articles
- Low-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- Start-Class Websites articles
- Low-importance Websites articles
- Start-Class Websites articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles