Jump to content

Talk:Anthropomorphism: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Anthropomorphism/Archive 3) (bot
No edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:


There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Talking animals in fiction#Requested move 10 February 2022|Talk:Talking animals in fiction]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Talking animals in fiction#Requested move 10 February 2022 crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 18:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on [[Talk:Talking animals in fiction#Requested move 10 February 2022|Talk:Talking animals in fiction]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. <!-- Talk:Talking animals in fiction#Requested move 10 February 2022 crosspost --> —[[User:RMCD bot|RMCD bot]] 18:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)


== In stocks ==

Anthropomorphizing is very prominent in reporting/commentary on stocks and indexes. I'm surprised there isn't a mention of this here because it's so prevalent.

Revision as of 17:06, 26 May 2022

Template:Vital article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amberdomanus.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism edit

I have updated the criticism section with info covering modern secular thought. If you have questions about the edit or the sources used, please let me know. Feel free to edit or modify it for further improvement. Thanks. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2019

In the 'In Religion and Mythology' section, change

"This often was based on a literal interpretation of Genesis 1:27: "So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them"."
to
"This often was based on a literal interpretation of Genesis 1:27: "So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them"." SomeKindOfGnome (talk) 03:18, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done kind of. Since I didn't find the exact quote you provided in any common translations (the existing archaically-worded quote was KJV), I used the NRSV rendering of the verse, since it is the academic standard as far as one exists. A2soup (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Moe-Anthropomorphism and Zemlya-chan

Maybe add a section about Moe-anthropomorphism (how in Japan they depict things or objects in the form of an anime girl)? Noraskulk (talk) 07:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The full article is moe anthropomorphism, by the way. And it's linked in the "see also" section of this article. Sandtalon (talk) 07:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I didn't notice. Noraskulk (talk) 14:14, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Talking animals in fiction which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:05, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


In stocks

Anthropomorphizing is very prominent in reporting/commentary on stocks and indexes. I'm surprised there isn't a mention of this here because it's so prevalent.