User talk:Dr.Pinsky

Welcome!

Hi Dr.Pinsky! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:46, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1019762330 Heba Aisha (talk) 09:10, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Arrayed Tales, from its old location at User:Dr.Pinsky/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arrayed Tales (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arrayed Tales and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arrayed Tales, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Dr.Pinsky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 19:45, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundhi

In this page please remove the line which tells that Sundhi or soundik belongs to scheduled caste In West Bengal . I guess sunri is getting confused with soundik/sundhi. Even the support attachments of West Bengal talks about the sunri caste not sundhi. Please make a change. 2405:201:1007:A158:C03A:A61B:A335:BFE1 (talk) 10:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Sir/Madam, please take your concerns here Talk:Sundhi. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 19:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022

Sir/Madam, I didn't added any external link to Jaiswal (surname). All were verified citation created to support the sentences which you are continuously reverting blindly by java codes. It would be better to took your time and verify all of it. the First citation was for Liquor selling business made from PDF report generated for Government of West Bengal. The Second Citiaion was made to Support Vaishya Status by India TV(a prominent Indian TV News Channel) and by The Econimics Times (The Subsidary of The Times of India) and the third citation was for Somvanshiya Kshatirya Staus by Dainik Bhaskar (World 4th Largest Selling Newspaper) and Navbharat times. There is also book reference of People of India: Delhi by K. S. Singh and Daughters of the earth by Smita Tewari Jassal a notable historian. It would by better if you read all these references to satisfy yourself so that you can stop vandalizing the page. Thanks. Swapnil1101 (talk) 21:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Sir/Madam, I have just reverted your poorly sourced edits. Don’t refer constructive edit as vandalism. Regarding the sources, per WP:RS, India TV, The Times of India, Dainik Bhaskar, Navbharat times and matrimonial sites(jeevansathi.com) are not considered reliable on this project. As explained by me earlier, you will have to provide scholarly sources for the history/caste-related details. Also you have directly added level 2 warning. Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, also read WP:NOTVAND, WP:RS & WP:V. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 08:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Yarlovtsi, from its old location at User:Dr.Pinsky/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 15:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Yarlovtsi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yarlovtsi. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 15:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yarlovtsi has been accepted

Yarlovtsi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Sundhi / soundik

You are providing wrong info about this caste Please make sure you are updated . If you don’t have knowledge about this please stay away from this topic 2405:201:1007:A0B0:8E:3096:A0F7:478B (talk) 22:03, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Sir/Madam, What's your context here? The article is well sourced and ample WP:RS have been provided. Please read them, if the content is misrepresenting them in any way, discuss the matter at the article's talk page Talk:Sundhi and seek consensus. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:47, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey Pinsky I also think sundhi is misinterpreted with sunri They both are totally different could you please have a look and edit the same . JockerEdit (talk) 12:49, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Sir/Madam, please take your concerns here Talk:Sundhi. Also read WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:MOS#Grammar_and_usage. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 06:17, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi Pinsky I guess it’s mistaken from sunri caste . I know this caste very well and it’s not an Dalit caste I don’t know format to edit I request you to remove the word from Dalit to vashya . JockerEdit (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

I don’t know much about these keyword I can read npov and all but i am just mentioning it’s not correct info JockerEdit (talk) 13:51, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

@JokerEdit: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a WP:RS. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Recent Revert

If you can't provide satisfactory explanation, your recent revert at Baidya article would count as a vandalism. Nobita456 (talk) 18:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, Dr.Pinsky, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to hear you intend to help us with our coverage of women historians. Although you have been highly active as an editor, you have not yet created any biographies. You should therefore find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. As for historians, you'll find lots of names of interest in our Redlist index, including a Wikidata-based list of historians. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

April Editathons from Women in Red

Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228 Online events: New: Gender studies | French overseas territories New Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Suvarnabaniks

Hello Pinsky, I am not sure about your concerns. First you put OR tag on top article without explaining the reasons for it. Then you are supporting a major content removal, which doesn't fall under WP:REMOVAL, and again without appropriate explanations. I understand there could be a genuine mistake, so I fixed the citations. If you still have concerns, please start discussing on talk page, so that we can find a solution collaboratively. Thank you.Chanchaldm (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

you're supposed to initiate the discussion. Isn't it? Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

First I needed to know your concerns.Chanchaldm (talk) 11:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clayola Brown has been accepted

Clayola Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 00:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Random revert?

User:Dr.Pinsky Are you aware what you are doing?

I added the information supported by the sources and removed what isn't supported by the sources.

You are supporting an editor who just got a final warning[1] few hours ago for his disruptive editing and he just had his report rejected against me.[2]

I also resolved the tags that were added by this user and he thanked me on talk page for resolving them.[3]

P.S. this user is violating 3RR on other article too. [4]

I am sure that your revert was completely random, but you should just undo your own edit because it restored the bad version. 106.215.40.96 (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

I want to AGF, but, this really is a lot. Am I the only one starting to find the sudden appearance of this IP on this very specific article, with this kind of mentality, and so well versed in the WP processes (much more than me, obviously!) a little... fishy? EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

If you wanted to AGF then you wouldn't be dropping 2 baseless warning templates on my talk page. 106.215.40.96 (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

What's AGF? EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

@106.215.40.96 @EnlightenmentNow1792, the impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk page to try to reach consensus, rather than undoing other’s edit. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 19:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

@Dr.Pinsky I've been edit-warring??? EnlightenmentNow1792 (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Dr.Pinsky! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:37, Thursday, April 14, 2022 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Rollback granted

Hi Dr.Pinsky. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 2022-07-25. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 11:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Wrt Yadav short description

Hi, You recently reverted my short description at Yadav, kindly please suggest what should be the appropriate short desc here. The short desc of Social Community is not right, reason being this word is used by communities after Sanskritisation in late 19th century. This needs to be pointed out. RS6784 (talk) 16:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Dr.Pinsky: please suggest an appropriate short desc fulfilling the article description and other than the social community. RS6784 (talk) 16:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm not proposing anything. I'm merely stating that, changes made by you was not an improvement. Please refer WP:SDFORMAT and try to discuss with the involved editors. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 16:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Dr.Pinsky:, as per WP:SDFORMAT, it says "be short – no more than about 40 characters (but this can be slightly exceeded if necessary)

The Shortdesc helper gadget displays a character count as the description is changed. be written in plain text – without HTML tags or wiki markup start with a capital letter avoid initial articles (A, An, The) except when required for correct grammar and meaning avoid a final full stop."- I just violated A, An, the"- if I correct this it is fine. This will make it under 40 characters as well. My points is shortdesc must support the article, the issue is Yadav as word has been adopted very recently by many groups ( under 120 yrs), so we can't call it only social community. RS6784 (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@RS6784: It should be concise explanation of the scope of the page. Regarding "Sanskritisation in late 19th century", I'm sure this is mentioned in the body of the article. A term used by various communities of India since late 19th century is a less disjointed and confusing than what the article currently has in the "short description". Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@Dr.Pinsky: thanks again, I will take your points wholeheartedly here. I am suggesting a shortdesc like either it should be - Social Communities or Social Community formed post-19th century. Yes, the sanskritisation part is mentioned but it must reflect in the short description as the term Yadav is used by many communities since 19th century. It would be helpful if you can also suggest a short description. Thanks and Best RS6784 (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

@RS6784: I appreciate your patience. Regards. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi, may I proceed on of the above suggested short desc? RS6784 (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

@RS6784: You may proceed. But I'd suggest you to discuss with the involved editors and establish a consensus for this alteration. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 11:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

May Women in Red events

Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230 Online events: New: Women in the Ancient World | British Overseas Territories Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (second month) Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman See also: Wikimedia District of Columbia: 100 DC Women contest The Wikipedia Library: #1Lib1Ref Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Sundhi is not a Dalit community in Odisha

Dr.Pinsky, As the original creator of the Sundhi page in 2006, I can definitely say that Sundhi is not a Dalit community in Odisha. If other reference sources say that Sundhi is an OBC caste in Odisha, how can we take into account a source which talks about the Sundhi caste of Odisha and at the same time mentions it as Dalit community. I am not argueing to prove whether the caste is Dalit or not but I can definitely say that it is not a Dalit community in Odisha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhuvannalla (talk • contribs) 17:45, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

@Bhuvannalla: Please discuss content issues on article talk page Talk:Sundhi. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 20:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

St. Gabriel's vandal

Hi Dr.Pinsky,

Just would like to let you know that the phrase "Knn cb" is a very offensive term I would prefer not to describe here (you may Google it). I have reported the user accordingly. For your knowledge, cheers. Seloloving (talk) 08:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. The user certainly deserves a long vacation. Cheers. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Revert on Chitpavan

Hi, I noticed you recently reverted a good-faith edit on the page Chitpavan. I agree that the content should have cited a source, but it seems to me that there is sourced content in the body of the article which says the same thing. In my opinion, it might therefore make sense to leave it in the article with a citation needed tag. Thoughts? --Lenny Marks (talk) 09:37, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

@Lenny Marks: Thanks for letting me know. Some of the sources do say. Will ask someone better than I. @Fylindfotberserk: would you mind having a look [5]. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 10:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

The link with Israel is mythological and anecdotal. If you see the section Chitpavan#Origin, it says "As per Tudor Parfitt and Yulia Egorova, the Parashurama mythological story of shipwrecked people is similar to the mythological story of the Bene Israel Jews of Raigad district. According to the historian Roshen Dalal, similarities between the legends may be due to a connection between the Chitpavans and the Bene Israel communities. The history of the Bene Israel, who also settled in Konkan, claims that the Chitpavans are also of Jewish origin." . Not leadworthy at all. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Fylindfotberserk. Hope you are doing well. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 10:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Welcome mate . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:16, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for checking it out :) Lenny Marks (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Al lo davar. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:The Kashmir Files on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Greenland and the Faroes | Women in music Contest (Apr/May/Jun): Translation contest (third and last month) Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:United States on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Standard notice for editors

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Standard notice for editors

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dr.Pinsky (talk) 18:11, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

response

@Dr.Pinsky hello. thanks for your advice. also I'm not new, just lost my username & password on bad luck, however appreciate your kindness. basically I'm into expansion for articles,. no doubt. here is a problem which is I expanded the article you can see for yourself in the history cited daily mail etc, the user generalrelative removed them a couple of times based on unreliablity of sources sent me WP policy. I tried to discuss & solve the problem on the user talk page but the user deleted all them either, you can see for yourself. finally I said ok that's unreliable so it's also for guardian & independent etc. wouldn't accept it either. basically user tried to promote page. any neutral intervention appreciate by me Freethinker6799 (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@Freethinker6799: If you were reverted by a handful of editors, you should start a discussion on the article talk page rather than starting an edit war on the article. Reverting back and forth is going to get you blocked. Please adhere to WP:BRD and focus on the sources and content rather than editors. You may find noticeboards like WP:BLPN, WP:RSN or WP:NPOV useful. If you fail to achieve a consensus, consider starting an RFC or DRN. (cc:Generalrelative). Regards. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 20:13, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

@Dr.pinsky: yes, dear thanks, actually it's not a lot of situations, dispute is on a certain passage.

I'm not into any kind of war, including edit warring, while @Generalrelative prefer to get me blocked instead of discussion. repoted me to notice board for block. that's very telling. I want the page be neutral and scientific. Freethinker6799 (talk) 20:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your efforts in counter-vandalism... Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 07:36, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Standard notice for editors

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dr.Pinsky (talk) 08:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Standard notice for editors

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Dr.Pinsky (talk) 08:18, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Trying to add Further Reading section

Hello Dr. Pinsky,

I am part of a research class and we are trying to add further readings to The World, the Flesh, and the Devil.

Thank you very much.