Talk:Theranos: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:29, 2 September 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Theranos article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 90 days

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area C‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Crime and Criminal Biography C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Hematology-oncology B‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hematology-oncology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Technology C‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Rachel Levy (December 13, 2019). "How the 1% Scrubs Its Image Online". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 15, 2019. That account made several favorable edits to Theranos' Wikipedia page. One edit removed a reference to an article in the Journal reporting Theranos devices often failed accuracy requirements.

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Jppcap (talk · contribs) has been paid by Status Labs on behalf of Theranos. Their editing has included contributions to this article.

Article Structure

The outline or structure of this article is a mess. It needs to be reconfigured. It should be almost entirely chronological in the body. Blue Tie (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criminal investigation

I just came across this news article this morning:

Theranos Is Subject of Criminal Probe by U.S.. "Federal prosecutors have launched a criminal investigation into whether Theranos Inc. misled investors about the state of its technology and operations..."

Is this something that should be included in the article, or is it too soon? Gnome de plume (talk) 13:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"False" claims

There's been some controversy over whether to use the word "false" in the first sentence. I'm leaning toward keeping it. A ton of reliable sources (and the US government) say that Theranos made false claims. Before I revert, I want to open up the topic for discuss. Andrew³²⁷ 16:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The firm has avoided actual testing of its techniques. Thus, the remote possibility exists that there is a fine pig in the poke. User:Fred Bauder Talk 23:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Theranos had no techniques to test. Everything it had, it stole from others--and what it didn't have, it entirely made up. This company was nothing more than a scam perpetrated by a pair of grifters.

12 missing years

What, in detail, went on from 2003 to 2015? When did the representation that so much could be done with a few drops of blood began and who made it? How were the major investors brought in? By who? Need a section on the charismatic characteristics of the founder, including some illustrative videos like those used in the 60 Minutes segment. User:Fred Bauder Talk 23:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indictment

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/elizabeth-holmes-founder-of-blood-testing-company-theranos-indicted-on-wire-fraud-federal-authorities-announce/2018/06/15/8779f538-70df-11e8-bd50-b80389a4e569_story.html User:Fred Bauder Talk 12:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Late July: additional indctment ( https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/07/31/theranos-founder-holmes-hit-with-12th-fraud-charge-again/) while Holmes questions grand jury selection (https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/07/28/theranos-deadlines-set-after-elizabeth-holmes-claims-coronavirus-changes-may-have-violated-her-rights/)67.209.133.238 (talk) 03:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Holmes PR photograph

Someone claiming to be a Theranos employee and PR head has uploaded a publicity photograph of Elizabeth Holmes to Commons. There is an Image for Deletion discussion here (scroll to bottom for active discussion) -- GreenC 20:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edison machines

There seems to be surprisingly little information about the actual machines. According to this article the Edison appears to be a glorified autosampler that required all the usual vials and chemicals, albeit in smaller quantities. Some say they did work but were inaccurate or unreliable, others suggest they were fake or vaporware. If they did work they would perhaps be similar to a Keurig or Nespresso machine which did not reinvent the way coffee is made but simply made it more convenient for the user and much more profitable for the seller. Did Theranos publish any technical details?--92.201.201.61 (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary restriction?

Theranos has recently been made popular again by the ongoing trial of the former owner and a copious amount of social media posts. could a temporary edit protection be proposed? 93.144.52.130 (talk) 09:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New section needed on the trial

We have a bit on the allegations and a bit on the indictment. A new section is needed. S C Cheese (talk) 11:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Section added on "Criminal proceedings" and some text moved. S C Cheese (talk) 11:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now needs reconciling with the summary at the top. S C Cheese (talk) 11:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if we should have a "See also" or "Main" template linking to Elizabeth Holmes#Criminal charges. GA-RT-22 (talk) 13:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Kissinger

Is there a reason Henry Kissinger isn't listed on the Board? In May 2016 he was still on. He was not removed until December of that year. The article cited does not claim to be a complete list of board members.KaturianKaturian 14:56, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

You mean in the infobox? It shouldn't list individual board members at all. It didn't use to, then someone added George Shultz (thinking "he's important") then someone else piled on and added Robertson. Those should both be removed, not added to. GA-RT-22 (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 41: / Line 41: @@
 There's been some controversy over whether to use the word "false" in the first sentence. I'm leaning toward keeping it. A ton of reliable sources (and the US government) say that Theranos made false claims. Before I revert, I want to open up the topic for discuss. <span style="color:orange">[[User:Andrewman327|Andrew]]<sup>[[User talk:Andrewman327|327]]</sup></span> 16:47, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 :The firm has avoided actual testing of its techniques. Thus, the remote possibility exists that there is a fine pig in the poke. [[User:Fred Bauder]] [[User talk:Fred Bauder|Talk]] 23:21, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
+::: Theranos had no techniques to test. Everything it had, it stole from others--and what it didn't have, it entirely made up. This company was nothing more than a scam perpetrated by a pair of grifters.
 ==12 missing years==