Jump to content

Talk:Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Reverted New topic
Line 51: Line 51:


:This case does not appear to be a ruling on the 4A. Do you want this case added to the article? If yes, where? [[User:SMP0328.|SMP0328.]] ([[User talk:SMP0328.|talk]]) 23:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
:This case does not appear to be a ruling on the 4A. Do you want this case added to the article? If yes, where? [[User:SMP0328.|SMP0328.]] ([[User talk:SMP0328.|talk]]) 23:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

== Missing Text - Unreasonable Search and Unreasonable Seizure ==

Unreasonable Search is also known as invasion of privacy.

Unreasonable Seizure is also known as theft (by government).

[[Special:Contributions/76.135.14.59|76.135.14.59]] ([[User talk:76.135.14.59|talk]]) 09:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Tae Hyun Song

Revision as of 09:17, 13 October 2022

Former featured article candidateFourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleFourth Amendment to the United States Constitution has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 19, 2013Good article nomineeListed
February 22, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Metadata ruling

https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2020/09/02/13-50572.pdf:

The panel affirmed the convictions of four members of the Somali diaspora for sending, or conspiring to send, $10,900 to Somalia to support a foreign terrorist organization, in an appeal that raised complex questions regarding the U.S. government’s authority to collect bulk data about its citizens’ activities under the auspices of a foreign intelligence investigation, as well as the rights of criminal defendants when the prosecution uses information derived from foreign intelligence surveillance.

The panel held that the government may have violated the Fourth Amendment when it collected the telephony metadata of millions of Americans, including at least one of the defendants, pursuant to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), but that suppression is not warranted on the facts of this case.

Jeffrey Walton (talk) 21:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This case does not appear to be a ruling on the 4A. Do you want this case added to the article? If yes, where? SMP0328. (talk) 23:07, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing Text - Unreasonable Search and Unreasonable Seizure

Unreasonable Search is also known as invasion of privacy.

Unreasonable Seizure is also known as theft (by government).

76.135.14.59 (talk) 09:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Tae Hyun Song[reply]