Jump to content

User talk:Justyouraveragelechuga: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Undercover Police Car moved to draftspace: Suggesting expansion of the paragraph at the target (with at least 1 added ref.), starting discussion on talk page, or reverting my redirect and expanding the draft with references so it can be accepted at AfC. (This edit offering advice is not an endorsement of the WMF.)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 99: Line 99:


{{u|Justyouraveragelechuga}}
{{u|Justyouraveragelechuga}}

== Mistake made on MINDS Wikipage? ==

Hi, I have been trying to edit the MINDS Singapore page for a couple of days now. This is my first time working on wikipedia as a volunteer. I do not work for MINDS, I am a volunteer, I am simply updating the Wiki page, so that it would be true, factual and unbiased. Could you please point out where I have breached the Wikipedia guidelines? Would be greatly appreciated. [[Special:Contributions/103.252.201.66|103.252.201.66]] ([[User talk:103.252.201.66|talk]]) 03:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:09, 5 January 2023

Please read up on this policy before making future similar changes such as the one you made here. Heiro 18:02, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Me_Reply

ok

National varieties of English

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 01:01, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jksjjs

Ksksjc [IP] 14:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Counter-Vandalism Academy Program

As I do appreciate your enthusiasm and initiative to learn about counter-vandalism, it does not appear that you have enough experience to be able to sufficiently learn advanced concepts in the CVUA program. As a general rule of thumb you should have at a minimum 200 mainspace edits, These are edits to article and you can see a breakdown of the amounts of edits you have by going under "Contributions" then clicking "Edit Count". If you would like to advance your basic knowledge then I suggest completing WP:TWA. Thank you for your enthusiasm, and I will gladly accept you as a student in the future provided you achieve these goals. Toast (talk) 04:18, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Thanks for taking the time to say so! [IP] 11:37, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trail Life USA Freedom Award (November 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Compusolus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Compusolus (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Justyouraveragelechuga! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Compusolus (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Editing articles

Please use Help:Edit summary when you do. It helps other editors understand what you are doing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

okey [IP] 14:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

CVUA Program

Hello editor, Unfortunately at this time I cannot accept you as a CVUA student because of a lack of mainspace edits. These are edits to actual articles on wikipedia and not user, user talk, or other wikipedia pages. The minimum amount is 200 mainspace, as of right now you have 66. Your initiative is appreciated though, and I hope this does not affect your motivation for editing Wikipedia. Toast (talk) 18:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lechuga_Reply

Thanks for the quick reply!

Justyouraveragelechuga (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The "correct" way to reply to a message is to do this in the same section, indented. If you edit on a computer, you can simply click the reply button, and the software will do it for you. If you edit with mobile, you typically have to do it manually: you can indent by typing a colon at the beginning of your response (and two colons to indent even further). —Femke 🐦 (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Mehro Pilo

In the article Mehro Pilo, a village in Pakistan, you changed the spelling of a name from Khan to Kahn without citing a source. I have reverted the change as, given the location, it's more probable the name is of Indian extraction than Germanic. Please cite a source if you wish to change it again. Cabayi (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

very sorry that was a typo...

Justyouraveragelechuga my talk page

December 2022

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Classical education movement. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:44, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undercover Police Car moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Undercover Police Car, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 19:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justyouraveragelechuga, I have boldly redirected the draft to Police car#Unmarked car, where the topic is covered with references. You might want to have a look there to see whether you can see any ways to improve the section, but your draft was unreferenced, so I didn't see anything I should add. I suspect you didn't think to search for existing coverage under the term "unmarked", and therefore I think your title is a useful redirect, and I recreated it as a redirect (and also a parallel redirect at Undercover police car, with the capitalization that is preferred for article titles that are not proper names).
I see you've also had another article draftified. Were you aware that when you create an article, you should include two or three reliable sources from the start, both to support the information and to demonstrate that the topic is notable? See this summary. Yngvadottir (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yngvadottir Well, there is a difference from an unmarked police csr to an under cover police car. The unmarked police cars still can have lightbars, APLR, and other things. The undercovr police car has none of that (at least visible) and looks completely like a civillian vehicle. I say that the redirect be undone before someone gets the two confused.

--Lechuga I AM A RECENT CHANGES PATROLER 14:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The third paragraph distinguishes the two, with a reference; I didn't see anything in your article that that doesn't cover except the specific mention of stings, and the History section that you hadn't added any content to. Expand the paragraph (adding with one or more references)? You can also post to Talk:Police vehicle, but again, you should cite one or more references there. You are of course able to undo my redirection, but in that case you should expand the draft so that it becomes clear that there's too much that needs to be said on the topic for it to fit suitably into the section at Police car; and it needs to have several references (at least two extended articles in newspapers, magazines, or reliable websites, or book segments), to demonstrate the notability of the topic. After you do that and the draft gets accepted at AfC, my other two parallel redirects should be changed to point to your article. Yngvadottir (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User box

Please stop adding the recent changes patroller user box when you sign your talk page comments. That's a userbox and should be used on your user page only. Adding it with your signature is distracting, messes up formatting, is completely unnecessary and could be construed as disruptive. I notice you're doing it manually, not as part of your signature. Please stop adding it to talk pages. Canterbury Tail talk 02:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sorry!

Lechuga I AM A RECENT CHANGES PATROLER 14:47, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PERSONAL TEST PING BECAUSE MY NOTIFICATIONS BAR IS BROKEN

Justyouraveragelechuga

Mistake made on MINDS Wikipage?

Hi, I have been trying to edit the MINDS Singapore page for a couple of days now. This is my first time working on wikipedia as a volunteer. I do not work for MINDS, I am a volunteer, I am simply updating the Wiki page, so that it would be true, factual and unbiased. Could you please point out where I have breached the Wikipedia guidelines? Would be greatly appreciated. 103.252.201.66 (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]