User talk:AmirahBreen: Difference between revisions
AmirahBreen (talk | contribs) m →January 2023: indent |
AmirahBreen (talk | contribs) →January 2023: two edits |
||
Line 375: | Line 375: | ||
:::I accept that I used a sock to edit the article, but not that I used a sock in order to deliberately skew the POV. This is evidenced by the fact that I did not use sock puppet accounts until after I was blocked. If you wish to discuss my POV and intention you are welcome to do so following dispute resolution guidelines if I'm unblocked. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 01:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
:::I accept that I used a sock to edit the article, but not that I used a sock in order to deliberately skew the POV. This is evidenced by the fact that I did not use sock puppet accounts until after I was blocked. If you wish to discuss my POV and intention you are welcome to do so following dispute resolution guidelines if I'm unblocked. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 01:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::The answers above are not sufficient for me to recommend an unblock. While the block was for undisclosed paid editing and socking, other behaviour needs to be addressed, acknowledged, and corrected before it can be lifted. Otherwise, this behaviour will lead to more disputes, time taken away from improving Wikipedia, and possibly another block for AmirahBreen. Furthermore, citing [[WP:GAB]] as to why they are not discussing this issue is dodging the question and feels like [[WP:WL|Wikilawyering]]. The purpose of GAB's recommendation for staying on task is to prevent unblock requests from being too long; considering that AmirahBreen was directly asked about the Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed article, I do not see how GAB (an essay, and not a guideline or policy) prevents them from answering the question. I hope AmirahBreen changes their mind and chooses to address their conduct in the article below. Talking about their "POV and intention" after they are unblocked is too late. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 02:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
::::The answers above are not sufficient for me to recommend an unblock. While the block was for undisclosed paid editing and socking, other behaviour needs to be addressed, acknowledged, and corrected before it can be lifted. Otherwise, this behaviour will lead to more disputes, time taken away from improving Wikipedia, and possibly another block for AmirahBreen. Furthermore, citing [[WP:GAB]] as to why they are not discussing this issue is dodging the question and feels like [[WP:WL|Wikilawyering]]. The purpose of GAB's recommendation for staying on task is to prevent unblock requests from being too long; considering that AmirahBreen was directly asked about the Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed article, I do not see how GAB (an essay, and not a guideline or policy) prevents them from answering the question. I hope AmirahBreen changes their mind and chooses to address their conduct in the article below. Talking about their "POV and intention" after they are unblocked is too late. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 02:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::::I understand what you are saying about GAB not being a guideline or policy, and will attempt to answer your concerns as succintly as possible. Other than the behaviour for which I was blocked, I have always done my best to edit Wikipedia to the best of my ability following guidelines and policy to the best of my knowledge. As far as the article is concerned I have been accused in previous discussions of negative POV and have always maintained that I considered my edits a fair reflection of reliable published sources and still do. Since I was blocked editors have had ample opportunity to edit the article without any input from me at all. As the article now stands there |
:::::I understand what you are saying about GAB not being a guideline or policy, and will attempt to answer your concerns as succintly as possible. Other than the behaviour for which I was blocked, I have always done my best to edit Wikipedia to the best of my ability following guidelines and policy to the best of my knowledge. As far as the article is concerned I have been accused in previous discussions of negative POV and have always maintained that I considered my edits a fair reflection of reliable published sources and still do. Since I was blocked editors have had ample opportunity to edit the article without any input from me at all. As the article now stands there are only two edits which I would make if I were unblocked at this point in time. That is the internal link to [[Disappearance of Ikran Tahlil Farah]] which was broken when the article was renamed and the red link was removed. I would re-instate this link as I consider it a valid edit to the article. Whether this reflects positively or negatively on the subject of the bio, I would consider it a valid edit either way. I would also consider it relevant to add under the section Support for Ethiopia's military in Tigray, that General Tahalil was reported as saying that most of the 5,000 soldiers in Eritrea had been repatriated and that the rest would also be returning to Somalia soon. [https://www.garoweonline.com/en/news/somalia/general-tahalil-most-of-eritrean-trained-soldiers-returned-to-somalia] and since the training program is also mentioned in the article about Ikran, I would think that it should also be mentioned there too. |
||
:::::As with many bios the article on Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed contains information which reflects positively/negatively on the subject as well as information which reflects neither positively nor negatively. Much of the information in this article which may reflect positively on the subject was added by myself. For example, the Awards and honours section and the link to his thesis in External links. I still maintain that my POV is neutral on the subject and my intentions are honestly to improve Wikipedia as an encylopedia. In order to improve communications I would ask that other editors assume good faith and I am willing to do so myself. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 03:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
:::::As with many bios the article on Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed contains information which reflects positively/negatively on the subject as well as information which reflects neither positively nor negatively. Much of the information in this article which may reflect positively on the subject was added by myself. For example, the Awards and honours section and the link to his thesis in External links. I still maintain that my POV is neutral on the subject and my intentions are honestly to improve Wikipedia as an encylopedia. In order to improve communications I would ask that other editors assume good faith and I am willing to do so myself. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 03:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:45, 24 February 2023
This is AmirahBreen's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Thank you for your contributions on Africa
Hi AmirahBreen, We’ve noticed that you edited articles related to Africa. Thank you for your great contributions. Keep it up! Bobo.03 (talk) 16:07, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
GeneralNotability (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks. Amirah talk 14:49, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/57/Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg/70px-Wikipedia_New_page_reviewer.svg.png)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/13/NPP_backlog_September_2021.jpg/400px-NPP_backlog_September_2021.jpg)
Hello AmirahBreen,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/New_page_reviewer_of_the_year_cup.svg/50px-New_page_reviewer_of_the_year_cup.svg.png)
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 backlog drive
New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
December 2021
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}
at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:
- Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
- Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
- And before you go about denying this: I am looking at your UpWork. I see accepted jobs for articles that you have created. Because this block involves offwiki evidence, I have marked it as appealable only to the Arbitration Committee (you may contact arbcom-en
wikimedia.org to appeal), but again: I am looking at your UpWork account right now, so you're going to need one heck of a good explanation if you're going to be unblocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeneralNotability (talk • contribs) 17:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Refuweegee moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Refuweegee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:31, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Missing person cases in Somalia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Category:Missing person cases in Somalia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Defectors from Al-Shabaab
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Category:Defectors from Al-Shabaab indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 16:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Carriers of Hope
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carriers of Hope, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Swindon Corn Exchange
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Swindon Corn Exchange, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Arnaud Marolleau
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arnaud Marolleau, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Ahanchian v Xenox Pictures Inc., et al
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahanchian v Xenox Pictures Inc., et al, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Cyrus Ahanchian
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cyrus Ahanchian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Swindon Corn Exchange
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Swindon Corn Exchange".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:10, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Noticeboard discussion: Disputed territory between Somaliland and Puntland discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[1]] regarding efforts to reach concensus on articles in the disputed regions of Sool, Sanaag and Cayn.Shirshore (talk) 01:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rhys William
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rhys William, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Category:Zaidi scholars has been nominated for merging
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
Category:Zaidi scholars has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Mike Buss
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mike Buss, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Hyphened Nation (book)
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hyphened Nation (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Fiona Lovatt
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fiona Lovatt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Zakariya Ismail Ahmed Hersi
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zakariya Ismail Ahmed Hersi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Utanga refugee camp
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Utanga refugee camp, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:International intervention in Somalia
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International intervention in Somalia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Council of Presidential Candidates in Somalia
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Council of Presidential Candidates in Somalia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Djibouti Agreement
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Djibouti Agreement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Maritime border dispute between Kenya and Somalia
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maritime border dispute between Kenya and Somalia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:24, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Qatalog
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Qatalog, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hyphened Nation (book)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hyphened Nation".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Fiona Lovatt
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fiona Lovatt".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Zakariya Ismail Ahmed Hersi
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zakariya Ismail Ahmed Hersi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Utanga refugee camp
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Utanga refugee camp".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:International intervention in Somalia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "International intervention in Somalia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Council of Presidential Candidates in Somalia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Council of Presidential Candidates in Somalia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Djibouti Agreement
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Djibouti Agreement".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:31, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Maritime border dispute between Kenya and Somalia
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maritime border dispute between Kenya and Somalia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:51, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Online Gravity
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Online Gravity, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Qatalog
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Qatalog".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:59, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Online Gravity
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Online Gravity".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Care4Calais
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Care4Calais, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:International Conference on Somali Oil and Gas
Hello, AmirahBreen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:International Conference on Somali Oil and Gas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Care4Calais
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Care4Calais".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
AmirahBreen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please see my email to the Arbitration Committee Amirah talk 10:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We can't see your emails to ArbCom, and even if we could, it doesn't matter. This block is only appealable to them. If you have done so, they will handle it. 331dot (talk) 12:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your draft article, Draft:Cyrus Ahanchian
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, AmirahBreen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cyrus Ahanchian".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:11, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
January 2023
The Arbitration Committee has resolved to remove the part of your block that is designated as a CU block. This means that you will need to further appeal to the community for the socking and undisclosed paid editing with an appeal on your talk page, where an administrator will be able to review it and potentially take further action. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for further details. Izno (talk) 22:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/Appointment_blue.svg/48px-Appointment_blue.svg.png)
AmirahBreen (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
- The Arbitration Committe has advised me to appeal to the community for the socking and undisclosed paid editing with an appeal on my talk page, where an administrator will be able to review it and potentially take further action.
- 1. The issue my account AmirahBreen I was initially blocked for was paid editing. I have listed all the paid editing below.
- After being blocked for paid editing I found that much of my unpaid work (the vast majority of work I had done on Wikipedia was unpaid) was being deleted. I found this upsetting and attempted to edit using an old account JFBreen. The old account was blocked as a sockpuppet. Although I had never intended to engage in sock puppetry from the start, I set up AmirahBreen before I was ever aware of the rules on sock puppetry, and both accounts were own name.
- After both these accounts were blocked I began to set up sock puppet accounts. All of which were blocked almost immediately. The reason the last sockpuppet account I attempted to use was identified was due to the fact I have always used the same Amazon Fire computer (as it says on the Sockpuppet Investigation same user agents were used). I did not consider it worth the purchase of a new computer to defend work I had never been paid for anyway and even the small amount of paid work I had done was hardly enough to pay for a new laptop, so at this point I did not persist further in attempting to create sockpuppet accounts. Although the edits I made through the sockpuppet accounts were good faith in principal I realise now that it was disruptive to be creating accounts to edit while my main account was blocked and have long since stopped doing this.
- 2. If I am unblocked any future edits I make will be useful contributions to the encyclopedia following the Wikipedia rules and guidelines to the best of my knowledge. I do not intend to edit on any subjects I was previously paid to edit. I am still interested in editing on subjects I was never paid to edit where there is no conflict of interest.
- 3. If unblocked I will edit only from my main account, I will not create sockpuppet accounts. I am not at this point in time intending to do paid editing again, but if I do so in the future I will follow Wikipedia guidelines and rules in declaring it and in any work I do.
- 4. The accounts I have used to edit Wikipedia in the last two years are
- AmirahBreen
- JFBreen
- Osy2nb
- NotSoNewToo
- AfricaThrive
- SeekingtheGold
- QueenofAmirah
- CaptureCode
- JCH293
- 5. I am not aware that I made any edits at all while not logged in.
- I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
- I have been compensated for the following edits through my UpWork Account, there are no other affiliations or conflicts of interest to declare.
- ALM Translators - Draft: Arnaud Marolleau
- AVA Inclusivity - Non-fungible token
- DCTB - Draft: Hyphened Nation
- Mark Jacobson - Zade Dirani
- Online Gravity - Draft: Online Gravity
- Qatalog - Qatalog
- Rhys Woodfield - Rhys Williams
- S.U.M. - Cyrius Ahanchin
- Search Engine Optimist - I cannot identify any Wikipedia edits I did for this customer, I received a payment of $30 for SEO work
- I do not intend to edit these topics in the future. I have no plans to do any further paid editing as the payments I received were hardly worth the time spent. If I did agree to do paid edits on any subject in the future I would follow the disclosure requirements. Amirah talk 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=:The Arbitration Committe has advised me to appeal to the community for the socking and undisclosed paid editing with an appeal on my talk page, where an administrator will be able to review it and potentially take further action. :1. The issue my account AmirahBreen I was initially blocked for was paid editing. I have listed all the paid editing below. :After being blocked for paid editing I found that much of my unpaid work (the vast majority of work I had done on Wikipedia was unpaid) was being deleted. I found this upsetting and attempted to edit using an old account JFBreen. The old account was blocked as a sockpuppet. Although I had never intended to engage in sock puppetry from the start, I set up AmirahBreen before I was ever aware of the rules on sock puppetry, and both accounts were own name. :After both these accounts were blocked I began to set up sock puppet accounts. All of which were blocked almost immediately. The reason the last sockpuppet account I attempted to use was identified was due to the fact I have always used the same Amazon Fire computer (as it says on the Sockpuppet Investigation same user agents were used). I did not consider it worth the purchase of a new computer to defend work I had never been paid for anyway and even the small amount of paid work I had done was hardly enough to pay for a new laptop, so at this point I did not persist further in attempting to create sockpuppet accounts. Although the edits I made through the sockpuppet accounts were good faith in principal I realise now that it was disruptive to be creating accounts to edit while my main account was blocked and have long since stopped doing this. :2. If I am unblocked any future edits I make will be useful contributions to the encyclopedia following the Wikipedia rules and guidelines to the best of my knowledge. I do not intend to edit on any subjects I was previously paid to edit. I am still interested in editing on subjects I was never paid to edit where there is no conflict of interest. :3. If unblocked I will edit only from my main account, I will not create sockpuppet accounts. I am not at this point in time intending to do paid editing again, but if I do so in the future I will follow Wikipedia guidelines and rules in declaring it and in any work I do. :4. The accounts I have used to edit Wikipedia in the last two years are :AmirahBreen :JFBreen :Osy2nb :NotSoNewToo :AfricaThrive :SeekingtheGold :QueenofAmirah :CaptureCode :JCH293 :5. I am not aware that I made any edits at all while not logged in. :I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. :I have been compensated for the following edits through my UpWork Account, there are no other affiliations or conflicts of interest to declare. :ALM Translators - Draft: Arnaud Marolleau :AVA Inclusivity - Non-fungible token :DCTB - Draft: Hyphened Nation :Mark Jacobson - Zade Dirani :Online Gravity - Draft: Online Gravity :Qatalog - Qatalog :Rhys Woodfield - Rhys Williams :S.U.M. - Cyrius Ahanchin :Search Engine Optimist - I cannot identify any Wikipedia edits I did for this customer, I received a payment of $30 for SEO work :I do not intend to edit these topics in the future. I have no plans to do any further paid editing as the payments I received were hardly worth the time spent. If I did agree to do paid edits on any subject in the future I would follow the disclosure requirements. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC) [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 17:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=:The Arbitration Committe has advised me to appeal to the community for the socking and undisclosed paid editing with an appeal on my talk page, where an administrator will be able to review it and potentially take further action. :1. The issue my account AmirahBreen I was initially blocked for was paid editing. I have listed all the paid editing below. :After being blocked for paid editing I found that much of my unpaid work (the vast majority of work I had done on Wikipedia was unpaid) was being deleted. I found this upsetting and attempted to edit using an old account JFBreen. The old account was blocked as a sockpuppet. Although I had never intended to engage in sock puppetry from the start, I set up AmirahBreen before I was ever aware of the rules on sock puppetry, and both accounts were own name. :After both these accounts were blocked I began to set up sock puppet accounts. All of which were blocked almost immediately. The reason the last sockpuppet account I attempted to use was identified was due to the fact I have always used the same Amazon Fire computer (as it says on the Sockpuppet Investigation same user agents were used). I did not consider it worth the purchase of a new computer to defend work I had never been paid for anyway and even the small amount of paid work I had done was hardly enough to pay for a new laptop, so at this point I did not persist further in attempting to create sockpuppet accounts. Although the edits I made through the sockpuppet accounts were good faith in principal I realise now that it was disruptive to be creating accounts to edit while my main account was blocked and have long since stopped doing this. :2. If I am unblocked any future edits I make will be useful contributions to the encyclopedia following the Wikipedia rules and guidelines to the best of my knowledge. I do not intend to edit on any subjects I was previously paid to edit. I am still interested in editing on subjects I was never paid to edit where there is no conflict of interest. :3. If unblocked I will edit only from my main account, I will not create sockpuppet accounts. I am not at this point in time intending to do paid editing again, but if I do so in the future I will follow Wikipedia guidelines and rules in declaring it and in any work I do. :4. The accounts I have used to edit Wikipedia in the last two years are :AmirahBreen :JFBreen :Osy2nb :NotSoNewToo :AfricaThrive :SeekingtheGold :QueenofAmirah :CaptureCode :JCH293 :5. I am not aware that I made any edits at all while not logged in. :I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. :I have been compensated for the following edits through my UpWork Account, there are no other affiliations or conflicts of interest to declare. :ALM Translators - Draft: Arnaud Marolleau :AVA Inclusivity - Non-fungible token :DCTB - Draft: Hyphened Nation :Mark Jacobson - Zade Dirani :Online Gravity - Draft: Online Gravity :Qatalog - Qatalog :Rhys Woodfield - Rhys Williams :S.U.M. - Cyrius Ahanchin :Search Engine Optimist - I cannot identify any Wikipedia edits I did for this customer, I received a payment of $30 for SEO work :I do not intend to edit these topics in the future. I have no plans to do any further paid editing as the payments I received were hardly worth the time spent. If I did agree to do paid edits on any subject in the future I would follow the disclosure requirements. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC) [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 17:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=:The Arbitration Committe has advised me to appeal to the community for the socking and undisclosed paid editing with an appeal on my talk page, where an administrator will be able to review it and potentially take further action. :1. The issue my account AmirahBreen I was initially blocked for was paid editing. I have listed all the paid editing below. :After being blocked for paid editing I found that much of my unpaid work (the vast majority of work I had done on Wikipedia was unpaid) was being deleted. I found this upsetting and attempted to edit using an old account JFBreen. The old account was blocked as a sockpuppet. Although I had never intended to engage in sock puppetry from the start, I set up AmirahBreen before I was ever aware of the rules on sock puppetry, and both accounts were own name. :After both these accounts were blocked I began to set up sock puppet accounts. All of which were blocked almost immediately. The reason the last sockpuppet account I attempted to use was identified was due to the fact I have always used the same Amazon Fire computer (as it says on the Sockpuppet Investigation same user agents were used). I did not consider it worth the purchase of a new computer to defend work I had never been paid for anyway and even the small amount of paid work I had done was hardly enough to pay for a new laptop, so at this point I did not persist further in attempting to create sockpuppet accounts. Although the edits I made through the sockpuppet accounts were good faith in principal I realise now that it was disruptive to be creating accounts to edit while my main account was blocked and have long since stopped doing this. :2. If I am unblocked any future edits I make will be useful contributions to the encyclopedia following the Wikipedia rules and guidelines to the best of my knowledge. I do not intend to edit on any subjects I was previously paid to edit. I am still interested in editing on subjects I was never paid to edit where there is no conflict of interest. :3. If unblocked I will edit only from my main account, I will not create sockpuppet accounts. I am not at this point in time intending to do paid editing again, but if I do so in the future I will follow Wikipedia guidelines and rules in declaring it and in any work I do. :4. The accounts I have used to edit Wikipedia in the last two years are :AmirahBreen :JFBreen :Osy2nb :NotSoNewToo :AfricaThrive :SeekingtheGold :QueenofAmirah :CaptureCode :JCH293 :5. I am not aware that I made any edits at all while not logged in. :I have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements. :I have been compensated for the following edits through my UpWork Account, there are no other affiliations or conflicts of interest to declare. :ALM Translators - Draft: Arnaud Marolleau :AVA Inclusivity - Non-fungible token :DCTB - Draft: Hyphened Nation :Mark Jacobson - Zade Dirani :Online Gravity - Draft: Online Gravity :Qatalog - Qatalog :Rhys Woodfield - Rhys Williams :S.U.M. - Cyrius Ahanchin :Search Engine Optimist - I cannot identify any Wikipedia edits I did for this customer, I received a payment of $30 for SEO work :I do not intend to edit these topics in the future. I have no plans to do any further paid editing as the payments I received were hardly worth the time spent. If I did agree to do paid edits on any subject in the future I would follow the disclosure requirements. [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 16:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC) [[User:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkblue">Amirah</span>]] [[User talk:AmirahBreen|<span style="color: darkgreen">talk</span>]] 17:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- I'm pretty impressed with this request. GeneralNotability, what are your thoughts? SQLQuery Me! 22:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
- SQL, since I was involved in the arbcom side of this, I think it's better if I don't opine. You are free to act on this as you think appropriate. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Fair enough, thanks for getting back to me. I'll wait for more opinions. SQLQuery Me! 00:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- SQL, since I was involved in the arbcom side of this, I think it's better if I don't opine. You are free to act on this as you think appropriate. GeneralNotability (talk) 00:07, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
I have a question. Regarding the Talk:Sharif_Sheikh_Ahmed/Archive_1#WP:COI? discussion, is it still your position that you had no WP:COI on that article? I'm not asking about WP:PAID here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- There's also the issues brought up here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1065#WP:NPOV, WP:OWN, and copyright violations at Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, this is still my position, and this issue has also no connection with the reasons I have been given for being blocked, which are paid editing and sock puppetry. This is why I did not mention them in my appeal. Amirah talk 12:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- ScottishFinnishRadish, this was a content dispute and in no way was it connected to the issues of paid editing or sock puppetry Amirah talk 23:28, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, this is still my position, and this issue has also no connection with the reasons I have been given for being blocked, which are paid editing and sock puppetry. This is why I did not mention them in my appeal. Amirah talk 12:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
- If unblocked, what kind of edits (if any) would you make, to what kind of articles/topics? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 06:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
- If unblocked I will not repeat the behaviour I was blocked for in any future editing, neither do I intend to edit any articles which I was previously paid to edit. I will make constructive edits following Wikipedia guidelines to the best of my ability, these may be on any article/topic where there is no COI. Amirah talk 23:41, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
I am concerned that if this user is unblocked without addressing the behaviour at the Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed article, this user may repeat behaviour that is inappropriate that may lead to another block. AmirahBreen, what could you have done differently in that article and during the discussions in order to create a more collegial discussion or resolve disputes among editors? Z1720 (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comment @Z1720:, I do appreciate your concerns over this article, however I am following the guidance on Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks here, which warns me to keep my request to the point and address the reasons I was blocked as I have done above. As this article has no connection to the reasons I was blocked, I feel that addressing this here would be inappropriate and may make my appeal too wordy and complex for the admins who are kindly reviewing my block.
- WP:NOTTHEM says that 'Disagreements with others should be addressed through dispute resolution after you are unblocked, but your unblock request is not the place for this'. Amirah talk 23:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is certainly part of the reason for a continuing block, as you edited the article with a sock to continue skewing the POV. [2] ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for drawing this to my attention.
- The reason I was initially blocked was for paid editing, not sock puppetry. The paid editing was not connected in any way to the article concerned. The only reason for sock puppetry as listed under Wikipedia:ILLEGIT was block evasion. I started using socks as a reaction to being blocked, but decided not to continue using them as it is against Wikipedia guidelines. I have not used sock puppet accounts since the last investigation which was in Feb 2022. I have no intention of using sock puppet accounts in the future whether I am unblocked or not.
- I accept that I used a sock to edit the article, but not that I used a sock in order to deliberately skew the POV. This is evidenced by the fact that I did not use sock puppet accounts until after I was blocked. If you wish to discuss my POV and intention you are welcome to do so following dispute resolution guidelines if I'm unblocked. Amirah talk 01:43, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- The answers above are not sufficient for me to recommend an unblock. While the block was for undisclosed paid editing and socking, other behaviour needs to be addressed, acknowledged, and corrected before it can be lifted. Otherwise, this behaviour will lead to more disputes, time taken away from improving Wikipedia, and possibly another block for AmirahBreen. Furthermore, citing WP:GAB as to why they are not discussing this issue is dodging the question and feels like Wikilawyering. The purpose of GAB's recommendation for staying on task is to prevent unblock requests from being too long; considering that AmirahBreen was directly asked about the Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed article, I do not see how GAB (an essay, and not a guideline or policy) prevents them from answering the question. I hope AmirahBreen changes their mind and chooses to address their conduct in the article below. Talking about their "POV and intention" after they are unblocked is too late. Z1720 (talk) 02:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- I understand what you are saying about GAB not being a guideline or policy, and will attempt to answer your concerns as succintly as possible. Other than the behaviour for which I was blocked, I have always done my best to edit Wikipedia to the best of my ability following guidelines and policy to the best of my knowledge. As far as the article is concerned I have been accused in previous discussions of negative POV and have always maintained that I considered my edits a fair reflection of reliable published sources and still do. Since I was blocked editors have had ample opportunity to edit the article without any input from me at all. As the article now stands there are only two edits which I would make if I were unblocked at this point in time. That is the internal link to Disappearance of Ikran Tahlil Farah which was broken when the article was renamed and the red link was removed. I would re-instate this link as I consider it a valid edit to the article. Whether this reflects positively or negatively on the subject of the bio, I would consider it a valid edit either way. I would also consider it relevant to add under the section Support for Ethiopia's military in Tigray, that General Tahalil was reported as saying that most of the 5,000 soldiers in Eritrea had been repatriated and that the rest would also be returning to Somalia soon. [3] and since the training program is also mentioned in the article about Ikran, I would think that it should also be mentioned there too.
- The answers above are not sufficient for me to recommend an unblock. While the block was for undisclosed paid editing and socking, other behaviour needs to be addressed, acknowledged, and corrected before it can be lifted. Otherwise, this behaviour will lead to more disputes, time taken away from improving Wikipedia, and possibly another block for AmirahBreen. Furthermore, citing WP:GAB as to why they are not discussing this issue is dodging the question and feels like Wikilawyering. The purpose of GAB's recommendation for staying on task is to prevent unblock requests from being too long; considering that AmirahBreen was directly asked about the Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed article, I do not see how GAB (an essay, and not a guideline or policy) prevents them from answering the question. I hope AmirahBreen changes their mind and chooses to address their conduct in the article below. Talking about their "POV and intention" after they are unblocked is too late. Z1720 (talk) 02:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- It is certainly part of the reason for a continuing block, as you edited the article with a sock to continue skewing the POV. [2] ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
- As with many bios the article on Mohamed Abdullahi Mohamed contains information which reflects positively/negatively on the subject as well as information which reflects neither positively nor negatively. Much of the information in this article which may reflect positively on the subject was added by myself. For example, the Awards and honours section and the link to his thesis in External links. I still maintain that my POV is neutral on the subject and my intentions are honestly to improve Wikipedia as an encylopedia. In order to improve communications I would ask that other editors assume good faith and I am willing to do so myself. Amirah talk 03:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)