Jump to content

Talk:Walnut: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: banner shell (Rater)
→‎Drupe or Nut: new section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 32: Line 32:


Surely it is meant to be a reference, or is it something else? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|'''Q'''wertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Qwertyxp2000|contribs]]) 03:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Surely it is meant to be a reference, or is it something else? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|'''Q'''wertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Qwertyxp2000|contribs]]) 03:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

== Drupe or Nut ==

The article seems to be confused about whether the walnut is a drupe or a true botanical nut [[Special:Contributions/173.226.237.130|173.226.237.130]] ([[User talk:173.226.237.130|talk]]) 00:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:29, 25 February 2023

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EmmerFlynnt. Peer reviewers: Ziqing1e.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over inconclusive history

This and several other edits today by Aziz.N1987 are unconstructive edit warring, now exceeding WP:3RR. Four editors have reverted the Aziz history edit, based on this source, which is inconclusive at best, leads to speculation, and is not a WP:SCIRS review. The edits have not improved the History and cultivation section, but rather made it vague with disrupted style and poorly written grammar. Further, the Aziz edits are unformatted and break WP:MOS, for which the editor has been warned. Best if this editor pauses with editing, discusses changes here, and stops the persistent edit warring. Zefr (talk) 18:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Walnut reference?

I found this section peculiar:

Pairs of walnuts are sometimes sold in their green husks for a form of gambling known as ''du qing pi''.[https://www.academia.edu/25307556/Asian_Anthropology_Nuts_Beijing_folk_art_connoisseurship_in_the_age_of_marketization]

Surely it is meant to be a reference, or is it something else? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 03:08, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Drupe or Nut

The article seems to be confused about whether the walnut is a drupe or a true botanical nut 173.226.237.130 (talk) 00:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]