User talk:Petepetey: Difference between revisions
Notification: Your Articles for Creation submission has been declined (AFCH 0.9.1) |
|||
Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
[[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 22:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline--> |
[[User:Hoary|Hoary]] ([[User talk:Hoary|talk]]) 22:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline--> |
||
:Hey Hoary - |
|||
:Thanks for your quick response on this. I understand what you are saying, but I am looking at the 23 people who are listed on wikipedia as brand consultants. 19 are men. Of the 19, I argue that several of them have fewer citations of distinction than I posted here for Birkenbeuel. |
|||
:See: Andy Stefanovich (Press releases, a simple bio posted on Fast Company are used), Simon Mainwaring (mainly links to his own website), and John Gerzema (listed as primary author in most references). |
|||
:Also, it's important to note that only the female branding consultants have questions flagged on their profiles despite the male profiles being arguably as weak or weaker. |
|||
:Given the paltry number of women leaders featured on wikipedia (especially Black women leaders), the extensive number of references, and that this entry meets or surpasses the threshold of several of the male branding consultants who have bios posted - would you please reconsider? |
|||
:Kindly, |
|||
:Petepetey [[User:Petepetey|Petepetey]] ([[User talk:Petepetey#top|talk]]) 17:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:50, 25 May 2023
Welcome!
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
![]() |
Hello! Petepetey,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 23:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
|
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I am trying to figure out how I can introduce this photo file:hughes and gwendolyn brooks.jpg into the commons so then it can be used in this article?? I have no idea how to do that. Thanks. here is link to photo that has been approved for public domain but never moved there: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hughes_and_Gwendolyn_Brooks.jpg#file
thank you!
- You can always still use the image in Wikipedia articles; it doesn't have to go to Commons for that. There is a huge backlog of files to be moved to the Commons right now, so I wouldn't worry about this one. Hope this helped, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 02:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
thank you for the quick response! I have tried several times to tag the photo and use it anyway. Can you tell me how how i do that? I have tried the gallery and the file upload. ??
- I wrote this essay to answer that exact question - hopefully it will help you out, but let me know if you get stuck. Yunshui 雲水 12:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
Belated thank you! that was super helpful. do you have a link to/ trick up your sleeve for editing references? thanks a million.
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Jernifenchore (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
- You might be looking for WP:Referencing for beginners. I hope this helps. — kikichugirl oh hello! 01:50, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Film director
- added a link pointing to Hounddog
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Petepetey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Petepetey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Petepetey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Exploratory product development for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Exploratory product development is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploratory product development until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 22:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Your submission at Articles for creation: Exploratory Product Development (November 20)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exploratory Product Development and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Exploratory Product Development, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Exploratory Product Development, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
Hello. Your recent edit to List of Stanford Law School alumni appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you. You're right. I created a "Robin Feldman" entry here but can't figure out why it's not showing up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Robin_Feldman. What have I done wrong? Thank you. Petepetey (talk) 18:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Exploratory Product Development has a new comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Your draft article, Draft:Exploratory Product Development
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/1d/Information_icon4.svg/48px-Information_icon4.svg.png)
Hello, Petepetey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exploratory Product Development".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: JinJa Birkenbeuel (May 23)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JinJa Birkenbeuel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hey Hoary -
- Thanks for your quick response on this. I understand what you are saying, but I am looking at the 23 people who are listed on wikipedia as brand consultants. 19 are men. Of the 19, I argue that several of them have fewer citations of distinction than I posted here for Birkenbeuel.
- See: Andy Stefanovich (Press releases, a simple bio posted on Fast Company are used), Simon Mainwaring (mainly links to his own website), and John Gerzema (listed as primary author in most references).
- Also, it's important to note that only the female branding consultants have questions flagged on their profiles despite the male profiles being arguably as weak or weaker.
- Given the paltry number of women leaders featured on wikipedia (especially Black women leaders), the extensive number of references, and that this entry meets or surpasses the threshold of several of the male branding consultants who have bios posted - would you please reconsider?
- Kindly,
- Petepetey Petepetey (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2023 (UTC)