Jump to content

Decentralized autonomous organization: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
TomJBar (talk | contribs)
8 edits
Improvements made based on the addition of two academic references. These pertain principally to the governance section.
Line 4: Line 4:
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=March 2021}}
{{Use Oxford spelling|date=March 2021}}
{{Government by algorithm}}
{{Government by algorithm}}
A '''decentralized autonomous organization''' ('''DAO'''), sometimes called a '''decentralized autonomous corporation''' ('''DAC'''),{{efn|Depending on [[Dialects of English|English dialect]], it may also be spelled ''decentralised autonomous organisation''. The terms ''decentralized autonomous company'', ''distributed autonomous organization'', etc., have also been used.}}<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Hassan |first1=Samer |last2=Filippi |first2=Primavera De |date=2021-04-20 |title=Decentralized Autonomous Organization |url=https://policyreview.info/glossary/DAO |journal=Internet Policy Review |volume=10 |issue=2 |doi=10.14763/2021.2.1556 |s2cid=235559086 |issn=2197-6775}}</ref> is an [[organization]] managed in whole or in part by decentralized computer program, with voting and finances handled through a [[blockchain]].<ref name=Vigna20150127 /><ref name=Hodson20131120 /><ref name=Economist20160521 /> In general terms, DAOs are member-owned communities without centralized leadership.<ref>{{cite book |last=Prusty |first=Narayan |date=27 April 2017 |title=Building Blockchain Projects |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=80EwDwAAQBAJ |location=Birmingham, UK |publisher=Packt |page=9 |isbn=9781787125339}}</ref><ref>[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3082055 The Decentralized Autonomous Organization and Governance Issues] ''Regulation of Financial Institutions Journal'': Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 5 December 2017.</ref> The precise legal status of this type of business organization is unclear.<ref name=Popper20160521 />
A '''decentralized autonomous organization''' ('''DAO'''), sometimes called a '''decentralized autonomous corporation''' ('''DAC'''),{{efn|Depending on [[Dialects of English|English dialect]], it may also be spelled ''decentralised autonomous organisation''. The terms ''decentralized autonomous company'', ''distributed autonomous organization'', etc., have also been used.}}<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last1=Hassan |first1=Samer |last2=Filippi |first2=Primavera De |date=2021-04-20 |title=Decentralized Autonomous Organization |url=https://policyreview.info/glossary/DAO |journal=Internet Policy Review |volume=10 |issue=2 |doi=10.14763/2021.2.1556 |s2cid=235559086 |issn=2197-6775}}</ref> is an [[organization]] managed in whole or in part by decentralized computer program, with voting and finances handled through a [[blockchain]].<ref name=Vigna20150127 /><ref name=Hodson20131120 /><ref name=Economist20160521 /> In general terms, DAOs are member-owned communities without centralized leadership.<ref>{{cite book |last=Prusty |first=Narayan |date=27 April 2017 |title=Building Blockchain Projects |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=80EwDwAAQBAJ |location=Birmingham, UK |publisher=Packt |page=9 |isbn=9781787125339}}</ref><ref>[https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3082055 The Decentralized Autonomous Organization and Governance Issues] ''Regulation of Financial Institutions Journal'': Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 5 December 2017.</ref> The precise legal status of this type of business organization is unclear.<ref name=Popper20160521 /><ref>{{Cite journal |last=Barbereau |first=Tom |last2=Bodó |first2=Balázs |date=2023-07-01 |title=Beyond financial regulation of crypto-asset wallet software: In search of secondary liability |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364923000390 |journal=Computer Law & Security Review |language=en |volume=49 |pages=105829 |doi=10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105829 |issn=0267-3649}}</ref>


A well-known example, intended for venture capital funding, was [[The DAO (organization)|The DAO]], which amassed 3.6 million ether (ETH)—[[Ethereum]]'s mining reward—then worth more than US$70 million in May 2016, and was hacked and drained of {{USD|50 million}}<!-- Approximate US dollar value of the drained Ether --> in [[cryptocurrency]] weeks later.<ref>{{cite web |title=Digital currency Ethereum is cratering amid claims of a $50 million hack |url= http://uk.businessinsider.com/dao-hacked-ethereum-crashing-in-value-tens-of-millions-allegedly-stolen-2016-6 |first=Rob|last=Price |date=17 June 2016 |access-date=17 June 2016 |work=Business Insider}}</ref> The hack was reversed in the following weeks, and the money restored, via a [[hard fork]] of the [[Ethereum]] blockchain. Most Ethereum miners and clients switched to the new fork while the original chain became [[Ethereum Classic]].
A well-known example, intended for venture capital funding, was [[The DAO (organization)|The DAO]], which amassed 3.6 million ether (ETH)—[[Ethereum]]'s mining reward—then worth more than US$70 million in May 2016, and was hacked and drained of {{USD|50 million}}<!-- Approximate US dollar value of the drained Ether --> in [[cryptocurrency]] weeks later.<ref>{{cite web |title=Digital currency Ethereum is cratering amid claims of a $50 million hack |url= http://uk.businessinsider.com/dao-hacked-ethereum-crashing-in-value-tens-of-millions-allegedly-stolen-2016-6 |first=Rob|last=Price |date=17 June 2016 |access-date=17 June 2016 |work=Business Insider}}</ref> The hack was reversed in the following weeks, and the money restored, via a [[hard fork]] of the [[Ethereum]] blockchain. Most Ethereum miners and clients switched to the new fork while the original chain became [[Ethereum Classic]].

The governance of DAOs is subject to controversy. As these typically allocate and distribute tokens that grant voting rights, their accumulation may lead to concentration of power.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal |last=Barbereau |first=Tom |last2=Smethurst |first2=Reilly |last3=Papageorgiou |first3=Orestis |last4=Sedlmeir |first4=Johannes |last5=Fridgen |first5=Gilbert |date=2023-05 |title=Decentralised Finance’s timocratic governance: The distribution and exercise of tokenised voting rights |url=https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160791X23000568 |journal=Technology in Society |language=en |volume=73 |pages=102251 |doi=10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102251}}</ref>


== Background ==
== Background ==
Line 17: Line 19:


== Governance ==
== Governance ==
DAO governance is coordinated using tokens or NFTs that grant voting powers. Admission to a DAO is limited to people who have a confirmed ownership of these governance tokens in a [[cryptocurrency wallet]], and membership may be exchanged. Governance is conducted through a series of proposals that members vote on through the blockchain,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Zhao |first1=Xi |last2=Ai |first2=Peilin |last3=Lai |first3=Fujun |last4=Luo |first4=Xin (Robert) |last5=Benitez |first5=Jose |date=September 2022 |title=Task management in decentralized autonomous organization |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1179 |journal=Journal of Operations Management |language=en |volume=68 |issue=6–7 |pages=649–674 |doi=10.1002/joom.1179 |s2cid=248309790 |issn=0272-6963}}</ref> and the possession of more governance tokens often translates to greater voting power. Contributions from members towards the organizational goals of a DAO can sometimes be tracked and internally compensated. Inactive holders of governance tokens can be a major obstacle for DAO governance,<ref name="Economist20160521" /> which has led to implementations allowing voting power to be delegated to other parties.
DAO governance is coordinated using tokens or NFTs that grant voting powers. Admission to a DAO is limited to people who have a confirmed ownership of these governance tokens in a [[cryptocurrency wallet]], and membership may be exchanged. Governance is conducted through a series of proposals that members vote on through the blockchain,<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Zhao |first1=Xi |last2=Ai |first2=Peilin |last3=Lai |first3=Fujun |last4=Luo |first4=Xin (Robert) |last5=Benitez |first5=Jose |date=September 2022 |title=Task management in decentralized autonomous organization |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joom.1179 |journal=Journal of Operations Management |language=en |volume=68 |issue=6–7 |pages=649–674 |doi=10.1002/joom.1179 |s2cid=248309790 |issn=0272-6963}}</ref> and the possession of more governance tokens often translates to greater voting power.<ref name=":1" /> Contributions from members towards the organizational goals of a DAO can sometimes be tracked and internally compensated. Inactive holders of governance tokens can be a major obstacle for DAO governance,<ref name="Economist20160521" /> which has led to implementations allowing voting power to be delegated to other parties.


== Issues ==
== Issues ==
===Social===
===Social===
Inactive or non-voting shareholders in DAOs often disrupt the organization's possible functionality.<ref name=Economist20160521 />
Tokens that grant voting powers are often not used to vote.<ref name=":1" /> Inactive or non-voting shareholders in DAOs often disrupt the organization's possible functionality.<ref name=Economist20160521 />

Another risk is the concentration of power in the case that individuals accumulate large amounts of tokens that grant voting power. Concentration of these tokens defeats the ambitions to distribute governance power. In a study of [[Decentralized finance|Decentralised Finance]] DAOs, the distribution of tokens was shown to be highly concentrated among a small population of holders.<ref name=":1" />


=== Legal status, liability, and regulation ===
=== Legal status, liability, and regulation ===
Line 98: Line 102:


== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Decentralized finance|Decentralized Finance]]
* [[Decentralized application]]
* [[Decentralized application]]
* [[Decentralized computing]]
* [[Decentralized computing]]

Revision as of 07:23, 26 June 2023

This article is about a type of organization. For the former organization that followed this approach, see The DAO (organization).

Part of a series on
Algocracy
Examples

A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), sometimes called a decentralized autonomous corporation (DAC),[a][1] is an organization managed in whole or in part by decentralized computer program, with voting and finances handled through a blockchain.[2][3][4] In general terms, DAOs are member-owned communities without centralized leadership.[5][6] The precise legal status of this type of business organization is unclear.[7][8]

A well-known example, intended for venture capital funding, was The DAO, which amassed 3.6 million ether (ETH)—Ethereum's mining reward—then worth more than US$70 million in May 2016, and was hacked and drained of US$50 million in cryptocurrency weeks later.[9] The hack was reversed in the following weeks, and the money restored, via a hard fork of the Ethereum blockchain. Most Ethereum miners and clients switched to the new fork while the original chain became Ethereum Classic.

The governance of DAOs is subject to controversy. As these typically allocate and distribute tokens that grant voting rights, their accumulation may lead to concentration of power.[10]

Background

Although the term may be traced back to the 1990s, it was not until 2013 that it became more widely adopted.[1] Although some argue that Bitcoin was the first DAO, the term is only understood today as organizations deployed as smart contracts on top of an existing blockchain network.[1]

Decentralized autonomous organizations are typified by the use of blockchain technology to provide a secure digital ledger to track digital interactions across the internet, hardened against forgery by trusted timestamping and dissemination of a distributed database.[2][3][11] This approach eliminates the need to involve a mutually acceptable trusted third party in any decentralized digital interaction or cryptocurrency transaction.[3] The costs of a blockchain-enabled transaction and of the associated data reporting may be substantially offset by the elimination of both the trusted third party and of the need for repetitive recording of contract exchanges in different records. For example, the blockchain data could, in principle and if regulatory structures permit it, replace public documents such as deeds and titles.[2]: 42 [3] In theory, a blockchain approach allows multiple cloud computing users to enter a loosely coupled peer-to-peer smart contract collaboration.[2]: 42 [12]

Vitalik Buterin proposed that after a DAO is launched, it might be organized to run without human managerial interactivity, provided the smart contracts are supported by a Turing-complete platform. Ethereum, built on a blockchain and launched in 2015, has been described as meeting that Turing threshold, thus enabling such DAOs.[2][13][14] Decentralized autonomous organizations aim to be open platforms through which individuals control their identities and their personal data.[15]

Governance

DAO governance is coordinated using tokens or NFTs that grant voting powers. Admission to a DAO is limited to people who have a confirmed ownership of these governance tokens in a cryptocurrency wallet, and membership may be exchanged. Governance is conducted through a series of proposals that members vote on through the blockchain,[16] and the possession of more governance tokens often translates to greater voting power.[10] Contributions from members towards the organizational goals of a DAO can sometimes be tracked and internally compensated. Inactive holders of governance tokens can be a major obstacle for DAO governance,[4] which has led to implementations allowing voting power to be delegated to other parties.

Issues

Social

Tokens that grant voting powers are often not used to vote.[10] Inactive or non-voting shareholders in DAOs often disrupt the organization's possible functionality.[4]

Another risk is the concentration of power in the case that individuals accumulate large amounts of tokens that grant voting power. Concentration of these tokens defeats the ambitions to distribute governance power. In a study of Decentralised Finance DAOs, the distribution of tokens was shown to be highly concentrated among a small population of holders.[10]

The precise legal status of this type of business organization is generally unclear,[11] and may vary by jurisdiction. On July 1, 2021, Wyoming became the first US state to recognize DAOs as a legal entity.[17] American CryptoFed DAO became the first business entity so recognized.[18] Some previous approaches to blockchain based companies have been regarded by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as illegal offers of unregistered securities.[7][19] Although often of uncertain legal standing, a DAO may functionally be a corporation without legal status as a corporation: a general partnership.[20] Known participants, or those at the interface between a DAO and regulated financial systems, may be targets of regulatory enforcement or civil actions if they are out of compliance with the law.[20]

In June 2022, the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz published an "Entity selection framework" describing organizational alternatives for DAOs with substantial presence in the United States.[21]

Security

A DAO's code is difficult to alter once the system is up and running, including bug fixes that would be otherwise trivial in centralized code. Corrections to a DAO require writing new code and agreement to migrate all the funds. Although the code is visible to all, it is hard to repair, thus leaving known security holes open to exploitation unless a moratorium is called to enable bug fixing.[22]

In 2016, a specific DAO, "The DAO", set a record for the largest crowdfunding campaign to date.[23][24] Researchers pointed out multiple problems with The DAO's code. The DAO's operational procedure allowed investors to withdraw at will any money that had not yet been committed to a project; the funds could thus deplete quickly.[4] Although safeguards aimed to prevent gaming shareholders' votes to win investments,[7] there were a "number of security vulnerabilities".[25] These enabled an attempted large withdrawal of funds from The DAO to be initiated in mid-June 2016.[26][27] On July 20, 2016, the Ethereum blockchain was forked to bail out the original contract.

DAOs can be subject to coups or hostile takeovers that upend its voting structures especially if the voting power is based upon the number of tokens one owns. An example of this occurred in 2022, when one individual collected enough tokens to give themselves voting control over Build Finance DAO, which they then used to drain the DAO of all its money.[28]

List of notable DAOs

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by adding missing items with reliable sources.
Name Token Use cases Network Launch Status
The DAO DAO Venture capital Ethereum April 2016 Defunct late 2016 due to hack[29]
ConstitutionDAO PEOPLE Purchasing an original copy of the Constitution of the United States Ethereum November 2021[30] Defunct[31]
PleasrDAO PEEPS A group of art collectors who own the sole copy of the Wu Tang Clan album Once Upon a Time in Shaolin[32] Ethereum April 2021 Operational
FreeRossDAO[33] FREE Clemency for Ross Ulbricht, criminal justice reform advocacy organization Ethereum December 2021[34] Operational[citation needed]
AssangeDAO JUSTICE[35] Purchased Clock, an NFT artwork by Pak, to fund legal defense of WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange Ethereum February 2022[36] Operational
MakerDAO[37] MKR Dai (cryptocurrency) stablecoin maintainer and regulator, lender Ethereum December 2017 Operational
Uniswap UNI Decentralized exchange (DEX), Automated Market Making (AMM) Ethereum & Celo November 2018 Operational[38]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Depending on English dialect, it may also be spelled decentralised autonomous organisation. The terms decentralized autonomous company, distributed autonomous organization, etc., have also been used.

References

  1. ^ a b c Hassan, Samer; Filippi, Primavera De (20 April 2021). "Decentralized Autonomous Organization". Internet Policy Review. 10 (2). doi:10.14763/2021.2.1556. ISSN 2197-6775. S2CID 235559086.
  2. ^ a b c d e Vigna, P.; Casey, M. J. (27 January 2015). The Age of Cryptocurrency: How Bitcoin and the Blockchain Are Challenging the Global Economic Order. St. Martin's Press. ISBN 9781250065636.
  3. ^ a b c d Hodson, H. (20 November 2013). "Bitcoin moves beyond mere money". New Scientist.
  4. ^ a b c d "The DAO of accrue: A new, automated investment fund has attracted stacks of digital money". The Economist. 21 May 2016.
  5. ^ Prusty, Narayan (27 April 2017). Building Blockchain Projects. Birmingham, UK: Packt. p. 9. ISBN 9781787125339.
  6. ^ The Decentralized Autonomous Organization and Governance Issues Regulation of Financial Institutions Journal: Social Science Research Network (SSRN). 5 December 2017.
  7. ^ a b c Popper, N. (21 May 2016). "A Venture Fund with Plenty of Virtual Capital, but No Capitalist". New York Times.
  8. ^ Barbereau, Tom; Bodó, Balázs (1 July 2023). "Beyond financial regulation of crypto-asset wallet software: In search of secondary liability". Computer Law & Security Review. 49: 105829. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105829. ISSN 0267-3649.
  9. ^ Price, Rob (17 June 2016). "Digital currency Ethereum is cratering amid claims of a $50 million hack". Business Insider. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  10. ^ a b c d Barbereau, Tom; Smethurst, Reilly; Papageorgiou, Orestis; Sedlmeir, Johannes; Fridgen, Gilbert (2023-05). "Decentralised Finance's timocratic governance: The distribution and exercise of tokenised voting rights". Technology in Society. 73: 102251. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102251. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  11. ^ a b Wright, A; De Filippi, P. (10 March 2015). "Decentralized Blockchain Technology and the Rise of Lex Cryptographia". SSRN 2580664.
  12. ^ Norta, A. (18 August 2015). "Creation of Smart-Contracting Collaborations for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations". Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing. Vol. 229. pp. 3–17.
  13. ^ Pangburn, D. J. (19 June 2015). "The Humans Who Dream of Companies That Won't Need Us". FastCompany.
  14. ^ Evans, J. (1 August 2015). "Vapor No More: Ethereum Has Launched". TechCrunch.
  15. ^ Deegan, P. (2014). "Chapter 14—The Relational Matrix: The Free and Emergent Organizations of Digital Groups and Identities". In Clippinger, J. H.; Bollier, D. (eds.). From Bitcoin to Burning Man and Beyond: The Quest for Identity and Autonomy in a Digital Society. Amherst, Massachusetts. pp. 160–176]. ISBN 978-1-937146-58-0. creating an operational and autonomous Trust Framework [that can i]ntegrate with a secure discovery service in the form of a Decentralized Autonomous Organization ...{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  16. ^ Zhao, Xi; Ai, Peilin; Lai, Fujun; Luo, Xin (Robert); Benitez, Jose (September 2022). "Task management in decentralized autonomous organization". Journal of Operations Management. 68 (6–7): 649–674. doi:10.1002/joom.1179. ISSN 0272-6963. S2CID 248309790.
  17. ^ "Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Find a Home in Wyoming". JD Supra. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
  18. ^ "Wyoming becomes first US state to legally recognise DAO". finance.yahoo.com. Retrieved 9 July 2021.
  19. ^ "SEC Charges Bitcoin Entrepreneur With Offering Unregistered Securities". US Securities and Exchange Commission. 3 June 2014.
  20. ^ a b Levine, M. (17 May 2016). "Blockchain Company Wants to Reinvent Companies". Bloomberg View: Wall Street. Bloomberg News.
  21. ^ "A Legal Framework for Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Part II: Entity Selection Framework" (PDF). Retrieved 13 June 2022.
  22. ^ Peck, M. (28 May 2016). "Ethereum's $150-million Blockchain-powered Fund Opens Just as Researchers Call For a Halt". IEEE Spectrum. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  23. ^ Vigna, P. (16 May 2016). "Chiefless Company Rakes in More Than $100 Million". Wall Street Journal.
  24. ^ Waters, R. (17 May 2016). "Automated company raises equivalent of $120M in digital currency". Financial Times.
  25. ^ Popper, N. (27 May 2016). "Paper Points Up Flaws in Venture Fund Based on Virtual Money". The New York Times.
  26. ^ Popper, N. (17 June 2016). "Hacker May Have Taken $50 Million From Cybercurrency Project". New York Times.
  27. ^ Price, R. (17 June 2016). "Digital currency Ethereum is cratering amid claims of a $50 million hack". Business Insider. Retrieved 17 June 2016.
  28. ^ "Democratic DAO Suffers Coup, New Leader Steals Everything - VICE". www.vice.com. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
  29. ^ Finley, Klint (18 June 2016). "Someone Just Stole $50 Million from the Biggest Crowdfunded Project Ever (Humans Can't Be Trusted)". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 16 November 2019.
  30. ^ Roose, Kevin (17 November 2021). "They Love Crypto. They're Trying to Buy the Constitution". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
  31. ^ Fox, Matthew (19 January 2022). "Tokens of the defunct DAO that failed to buy a copy of the constitution are worth $300 million even after disbanding". news.yahoo.com. Retrieved 28 January 2022.
  32. ^ Leight, Elias (20 October 2021). "Revealed: The Crypto Fans Who Secretly Paid $4 Million for Pharma Bro's Wu-Tang Album". Rolling Stone. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
  33. ^ Collier, Kevin. "NFT of Silk Road founder's art sells for more than $6 million". www.nbcnews.com. NBC News. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  34. ^ Mak, Aaron (25 January 2022). "Ross Ulbricht Went to Jail for Letting People Buy Drugs With Bitcoin. Can These Crypto Obsessives Get Him Out?". slate.com. Slate. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  35. ^ "Justice Token". AssangeDAO. Retrieved 14 April 2022.
  36. ^ "'Cypherpunks have rallied to Assange': NFT auction raises $52m for WikiLeaks founder". The Guardian. Reuters. 9 February 2022.
  37. ^ Ehrlich, Steven. "How Crypto's Original Bubble Boy Rode Ethereum And Is Now Pulling The Strings Of The DeFi Boom". Forbes. Retrieved 20 July 2022.
  38. ^ "OpenOrgs.info". openorgs.info. Retrieved 15 January 2022.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Decentralized_autonomous_organization&oldid=1161980687"