Talk:One America News Network: Difference between revisions
Slatersteven (talk | contribs) |
→It’s not far-right: Reply |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:::This is a propaganda article with corroborating opinions, not a true and factual piece. [[Special:Contributions/2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374|2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374]] ([[User talk:2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374|talk]]) 12:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC) |
:::This is a propaganda article with corroborating opinions, not a true and factual piece. [[Special:Contributions/2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374|2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374]] ([[User talk:2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374|talk]]) 12:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
::::But based upon facts, the IP said so. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 12:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC) |
::::But based upon facts, the IP said so. [[User:Slatersteven|Slatersteven]] ([[User talk:Slatersteven|talk]]) 12:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC) |
||
:::::If your definition of "fact" is "propaganda", then yes, it is based upon "facts". [[Special:Contributions/2600:4040:445D:C200:924C:A8DF:576C:FAF7|2600:4040:445D:C200:924C:A8DF:576C:FAF7]] ([[User talk:2600:4040:445D:C200:924C:A8DF:576C:FAF7|talk]]) 13:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC) |
|||
== Minor revision to the lead sentence. == |
== Minor revision to the lead sentence. == |
Revision as of 13:17, 22 July 2023
Before requesting any edits to this protected article, please familiarise yourself with reliable sourcing requirements. Before posting an edit request on this talk page, please read the reliable sourcing and original research policies. These policies require that information in Wikipedia articles be supported by citations from reliable independent sources, and disallow your personal views, observations, interpretations, analyses, or anecdotes from being used. Only content verified by subject experts and other reliable sources may be included, and uncited material may be removed without notice. If your complaint is about an assertion made in the article, check first to see if your proposed change is supported by reliable sources. If it is not, it is highly unlikely that your request will be granted. Checking the archives for previous discussions may provide more information. Requests which do not provide citations from reliable sources, or rely on unreliable sources, may be subject to closure without any other response. |
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One America News Network article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
It’s not far-right
It’s not far-right. 2600:1005:B11E:F984:5C0B:BC7E:7AC7:E5C0 (talk) 22:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- See the FAQ at the top of this page, as stated in a big box when you posted labeled: "Please read this before posting an edit request for this protected article". O3000, Ret. (talk) 22:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Too much bias in this article. You're writing an encyclopedia entry not a fact supported opinion piece. 2600:1700:2191:7E3F:4CEC:4B29:8B6A:B0A5 (talk) 19:48, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
- What? Slatersteven (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
- This is a propaganda article with corroborating opinions, not a true and factual piece. 2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374 (talk) 12:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- But based upon facts, the IP said so. Slatersteven (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- If your definition of "fact" is "propaganda", then yes, it is based upon "facts". 2600:4040:445D:C200:924C:A8DF:576C:FAF7 (talk) 13:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- But based upon facts, the IP said so. Slatersteven (talk) 12:56, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is a propaganda article with corroborating opinions, not a true and factual piece. 2600:4040:445D:C200:9852:55AA:BC87:3374 (talk) 12:52, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- What? Slatersteven (talk) 09:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Minor revision to the lead sentence.
Hello, I noticed that the first sentence in the lead describes the network as "pro-Trump."
While I do understand that this description is supported by sources, as it is a news network that covers a variety of topics, it seems overly simplistic to label the network primarily based on its support for one individual. The article's Content section suggests that the network covers a variety of topics beyond politics, including entertainment, crime, and international events.
With this in mind, I suggest the lead be revised to provide a more nuanced and accurate description of the network's coverage (it's general far right influence was already stated prior), For example:
'One America News Network (OANN), also known as One America News (OAN), is a far-right cable news channel founded by Robert Herring Sr. and owned by Herring Networks, Inc., that launched on July 4, 2013.'
Perhaps the reference to its support for Trump could be placed further down in the lead or to omit it entirely, since the fourth paragraph already provides a detailed summary of this aspect of the network in the lead. Thanks. DS_X1 (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
- We dont, we also point out how they are far-right, which covers much of the rest of their content. Slatersteven (talk) 13:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
news neutrality
What is "a conspiracy therory"? Opinions not liked, or misinformation like what adam schiff claimed about reliable sources connecting Donald Trump to rusiian election interefernce? 2600:4040:7C47:F000:819A:C15:59B7:D673 (talk) 19:47, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- See Conspiracy theory. Adam Schiff is a living person. Please do not make accusations against living people without reliable sources. WP:BLP O3000, Ret. (talk) 19:54, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
This article is highly subjective. It demonstrates significant bias based on biased sources. Although a source may be “independent” that doesn’t mean it’s reliable. Instead of “far right” the description should be “conservative leaning”. This networks should receive the same treatment as CNN, MSNBC, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BiffStudley1072 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- No, but being RS does, if you do not think any of these sources are reliable take it to wp:rsn. Slatersteven (talk) 15:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Conservatism articles
- Mid-importance Conservatism articles
- WikiProject Conservatism articles
- C-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- C-Class Television stations articles
- Low-importance Television stations articles
- Television stations task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American television articles
- Low-importance American television articles
- American television task force articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Low-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Talk pages of subject pages with paid contributions
- Wikipedia requested photographs